Cisco WAN :: WS-SUP720-3B - 2 Full BGP Table - Maximum Routing Table?
Jan 16, 2013
In datasheet of WS-SUP720-3B - link- was said that are only supported around 256K routes (fib?rib?).With this value I can't get 2 full bgp - that is around 850K ..
The supervisor is that control this or just memory ? I said this because I have a 7204-npe-g1 whith 2 fullrouting and 1G of and he are ok..
I have a question about filtering incoming bgp route updates from an internet provider. This provider sends the full internet routing table and default route and on an incoming prefix-filter on the customer switch (C6509-sup720) the default route is only accepted.What happens on the 6509 switch when the BGP peer flaps?Does it need to process all the internet routing updates, and if yes probably it cannot handle all these updates?What happens with the CEF table, will the switch install the routes first?
My comany is planning get full bgp table from our providers we have mutliple egress providers in order to load balance we are looking for a full table from all of them what would be minumu requiremts we have all edges as 6500 with sup 720 ,is there any memory requrements that need to be upgraded ??
I've inherited a project building an internet connectivity solution for a large corporate. It has its own AS and its own PI space. They are putting in 100Mbit connections from 5 different Tier1's , taking full internet routing from each. Cisco ASR1002's have already been specified and purchased for the job. I'm not familiar with the ASR platform at all - is it up to the job with full routing tables? multiple instances of full tables ? (not likely to put all 5 into one box!)
I'm looking for a Cisco device to run a full BGP table with a 60Mb link. And one of the main restrictions is that my traffic is almost 100% real-time (voip). So the average packet size is small. Today we own a Cisco 7204 NPE400 with 512Mb RAM. I think even though I upgrade it to a G2, due to the small average packet size, the router will be near to its limit. Maybe a Cisco 7300 NSE-150? Or should I think about a switch?
I have recently installed a Cisco 2911 ISR G2 with the default 512 Mb DRAM intending to eBGP peer. I ordered the 2GB upgrade RAM however due to time constraints on backordered parts, I fired up this router and eBGP peered without it. The Peer advertised the whole route table with 400,000+ routes. The BGP session came up then the router crashed due to not enough memory. The router disabled IP CEF due to insufficient memory. I disabled IP CEF permanently and have been running the router in this condition for 3-weeks with a stable eBGP session. This resulted in no CEF, 25% CPU during light traffic, 89% memory, and 50% CPU when traffic is around 30 Mbps through the router.
I am experiencing a hit to the throughput resulting in a lost packet and practically a brief traffic stall roughly every minute. This hit is so quick that it does not always result in packet loss and IP traffic sessions are not reset. I do see this on my live bandwidth graphs that the traffic takes a dive every so often, roughly 1-minute.
I initially thought this problem could be L2 to the upstream eBGP peer but all interfaces are clear of errors. I also thought this could be the BGP session going down, however, It is always up. I thought this could be duplex mismatch on L2, however its solid and no logs on either end. Funny thing is pinging thr router from both the LAN side and the WAN side results in the same packet lost every minute or so.
Even though the CPU and memory always stays the same at under 20-50% CPU and less than 89% memory, do you think this could be the BGP Scanner walking the routing table every minute?
We have a BGP / OSPF configuration as shown in the topology picture. When the connection towards Internet is taken down, we expect the traffic to be forwarded toward WAN 2 (preferred) or WAN 1. The problem is that the BGP learned routes disappears when the Internet connection is taken down. The IP routing table on R2 only shows internal networks and the networks between R2 and WAN 1 and 2. No routes to internet is shown. We run "show ip bgp neighbors <ip-to-wan-1-router> received-routes" it contain internet routes. And when we run "show ip bgp neighbors <ip-to-wan-1-router> routes" it contains no routes at all.
I am currently using 2 routers. One is a 2wire router with stock firmware it is connecting to the internet and can't be altered all too much, it also has a PC connected to it. The other is a WRT54GL with Tomato on it with pretty much EVERY other PC and device connected to it, it is also connected to the 2wire and DMZ'd through it.What I want to do is somehow allow everything on the Tomato router to have access to the 2wire router's PC. (For media access or printers or whatever on Windows 7)
What are the rough figures that a NPE-G2 is able to hold for the BGP routing table?
378475 network entries using 51472600 bytes of memory 378482 path entries using 21194992 bytes of memory 63008/63003 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 8065024 bytes of memory BGP using 82975730 total bytes of memory
Are these 3 memories different memory allocated or are they are a sub-set of each other? If a NPE-G2 has 1GB RAM, does it mean that the routing table limit is depending on the RAM availability?
On the 6509, with normal 67xx cards installed, where is all the mac table held, is it held on the card itself or on the supervisor? And if I use dcef cards, I gather the MSFC copies the mac table to the DFC ?
We have two Cisco 3560E layer 3 switches at the core of our network. The switches are configured as an HSRP pair and the clients on our network point to the HSRP address as their default gateway. So if CORE-A dies, then CORE-B will pick up the address and the default route for the clients will continue to be available.We also need to specify a few static routes on the core switch to allow us to get to specific networks. Is there a way to do this so that the routes failover in the same way that the default gateway does?
I have a problem on a router of mine, a Quidway R 1760.The problem occurs as follows. On Friday I rebooted the device and the ARP table looked right, in other words there were only a hand fully of lines that looked like this.
[code]...
I have two requests/questions.how can I prevent it.to a software manual for a Quidway R 1760 or simlar? I need to access the routers OS but have no password for it and cannot find any commands on the internet.
I need to remove (or change) the default entry in the routing table for Windows XP, which routes packets with a destination equal to the adapter's address to localhost. The reason for this is I want the PC to be able to send packets to a device (with IP address A) connected to one adapter on the PC with IP address B, even though a second adapter on the PC has IP address A.
I tried the "Advanced Routing" Feature over the RV-042 V3 Dual WAN VPN Router , And the New IP Subnet i added ( 10.0.7.0 ) in the Static Routing Table does NOT Appear in the Routing Table of the Router. Please review the attached Print Screen for both the Static Routing Entry Configuration & the Routing Table of the RV-042 Router.
I started using RIPv2 on Packet Tracer. I got two subnets to connect with two routers. After I completed that, I decided to add a third router. How to setup the Routing Table for atleast R3 ?
I am using Cisco 2911 & IOS version is 15.1. My problem is that after some days (e.g. 15-20 days), the routing table suddenly stops updating & then I have to enter the default route again to make it up. I am using Track 1 to track default route here. After primary link goes down, the Track is also going down but after coming the primary link up, the track is not coming up. So, I have to add the default route again to make it up.
We have small which I'm looking to implement and have built this on GNS3.
We have:
Router A in site 1 Router B in site 2 Router C in site 3
Router A and B are connection via a point to point 100M link and from Router C we have a 2 point to point one of which is 5Mpbs and going to Router A and Router B.
For Router C to reach Router A network it will go via Router B and these are 100M connection. When the link between Router A and B goes down. Router C should update and start using the 5m route.
For some reson, the routes are not updating. I have to do 'clea ip eigrp ne' for the routes to update and if I reload the routers all works well, it seems the problem is intermittent.
I am attempting to filter a specific host(s) from my OSPF routiing table on a ASA 5550 (ABR) using LSA prefix lists. However, when I look at the other routers in that area, I notice that ALL LSA type-3's are being removed (10 hosts are now missing from the routing table). I have verified the filter is working on the ABR, but I can't figure why ALL hosts/routes that were coming into the area are now being filtered instead of the specific one that I want to filter out.
Here is the config on the ABR:
prefix-list pdm_pl_000 seq 10 permit 206.253.180.137/32 ! ! router ospf 1 network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 area 0 network 10.150.10.0 255.255.255.0 area 10 network 10.150.252.0 255.255.255.224 area 10
[code]....
The 206.253.180.137 host is actually coming from Area '3'. Am I doing something that is removing all type-3 LSA's?
I know its probably got something to do with EIGRP no auto-summary, I was wondering if I could get some input as to why a route would change from being variably subnetted, which is usually the case until no auto-summary is deployed. Or am I totally lost? I attached a screen shot for a closer observation.
My 2821 router has an arp table with the wrong ip to Mac mappings. The impact is that I can reach any host in the 10.1.1.1 subnet. I can reach hosts in the 192.168.35.0 just fine. [code] It is as if the 192.168.35.1 device is answering all arp requests as a proxy arp or something. Clear arp-cache nor clear ip arp on my 2821 have any affect.
we have 6500 cisco switch as a backbone switch in universty. When ı want to look mac addres table , it does no show all mac address.ı mean if ı type ;show mac address-table there are not all mac address.
we have a 3750 and use dhcp services on the switch. every so often we run out of ip's even though we have much less users than the size of the allocated dhcp pool. I've noticed that the dhcp bind table is full but a ping-sweep only shows very few ip's being assinged and used. It looks like the IP addresses are not being released from the table even though I have decreased the lease time to 8 hours.