I started using RIPv2 on Packet Tracer. I got two subnets to connect with two routers. After I completed that, I decided to add a third router. How to setup the Routing Table for atleast R3 ?
View 5 Repliessuppose i have one switch and many RIPv2 routers connected to it.ripv2 destination address is 224.0.0.9 that is mapped to 0100:5e00:0009 normally the switch will send this frame to all ethernet ports
is there a way to take benefit from the multicast address so that the frame will be sent only to the RIP routers.i know it is possible to map staticlly the mac address to some ports but is there any dynamic solution also?
I am having a problem reaching a soho linksys e1000 router through a second hop cisco 2900 router.Here is a brief topology of the network: I am using OSPF area 100 for all networks except for
192.168.2.0 on R1 to E1000 which is RIPv2
R1 directly connects to R2 with a point-to-point serial on network 192.168.12.0 /30 with ip 192.168.1.13
R1 directly connects to a a switchport using network 192.168.2.0 /24 with ip 192.168.1.75
R3 directly connects to a switchport using network 192.168.1.128.0 /25 with ip 192.168.1.129
R3 directly connects to a different cisco router using ethernet on network 192.168.1.0 with ip 192.168.1.1
E1000 directly connects to a switchport using network 192.168.2.0 /24 with ip 192.168.2.1
The switch has a vlan ip on 192.168.1.128 /25?I can ping from R1 to E1000?I can ping from R3 to R1 192.168.2.75? I can't ping from R3 to E1000 192.168.2.1?show ip route on R2 indicates that network 192.168.2.0 is reachable via the serial connection on 192.168.1.12?I have redistributed rip to ospf area 100 and OSPF to RIP on R1?I am wondering why R1 can reach E1000 on network 192.168.2.0, and why R3 can reach R1s 192.168.2.0 newtork, but R3 can't reach the E1000.There is an R2 router than can reach R1 and also cannot reach E1000, but I assume it's for the same reasons R3 can't, so I've omitted the remainder of that topology for this question.
I tried the "Advanced Routing" Feature over the RV-042 V3 Dual WAN VPN Router , And the New IP Subnet i added ( 10.0.7.0 ) in the Static Routing Table does NOT Appear in the Routing Table of the Router. Please review the attached Print Screen for both the Static Routing Entry Configuration & the Routing Table of the RV-042 Router.
View 0 Replies View RelatedWe have two Cisco 3560E layer 3 switches at the core of our network. The switches are configured as an HSRP pair and the clients on our network point to the HSRP address as their default gateway. So if CORE-A dies, then CORE-B will pick up the address and the default route for the clients will continue to be available.We also need to specify a few static routes on the core switch to allow us to get to specific networks. Is there a way to do this so that the routes failover in the same way that the default gateway does?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am using Cisco 2911 & IOS version is 15.1. My problem is that after some days (e.g. 15-20 days), the routing table suddenly stops updating & then I have to enter the default route again to make it up. I am using Track 1 to track default route here. After primary link goes down, the Track is also going down but after coming the primary link up, the track is not coming up. So, I have to add the default route again to make it up.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have small which I'm looking to implement and have built this on GNS3.
We have:
Router A in site 1
Router B in site 2
Router C in site 3
Router A and B are connection via a point to point 100M link and from Router C we have a 2 point to point one of which is 5Mpbs and going to Router A and Router B.
For Router C to reach Router A network it will go via Router B and these are 100M connection. When the link between Router A and B goes down. Router C should update and start using the 5m route.
For some reson, the routes are not updating. I have to do 'clea ip eigrp ne' for the routes to update and if I reload the routers all works well, it seems the problem is intermittent.
I am attempting to filter a specific host(s) from my OSPF routiing table on a ASA 5550 (ABR) using LSA prefix lists. However, when I look at the other routers in that area, I notice that ALL LSA type-3's are being removed (10 hosts are now missing from the routing table). I have verified the filter is working on the ABR, but I can't figure why ALL hosts/routes that were coming into the area are now being filtered instead of the specific one that I want to filter out.
Here is the config on the ABR:
prefix-list pdm_pl_000 seq 10 permit 206.253.180.137/32
!
!
router ospf 1
network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
network 10.150.10.0 255.255.255.0 area 10
network 10.150.252.0 255.255.255.224 area 10
[code]....
The 206.253.180.137 host is actually coming from Area '3'. Am I doing something that is removing all type-3 LSA's?
I am currently using 2 routers. One is a 2wire router with stock firmware it is connecting to the internet and can't be altered all too much, it also has a PC connected to it. The other is a WRT54GL with Tomato on it with pretty much EVERY other PC and device connected to it, it is also connected to the 2wire and DMZ'd through it.What I want to do is somehow allow everything on the Tomato router to have access to the 2wire router's PC. (For media access or printers or whatever on Windows 7)
View 13 Replies View RelatedIn datasheet of WS-SUP720-3B - link- was said that are only supported around 256K routes (fib?rib?).With this value I can't get 2 full bgp - that is around 850K ..
The supervisor is that control this or just memory ? I said this because I have a 7204-npe-g1 whith 2 fullrouting and 1G of and he are ok..
I have a problem connecting SRP541W to my ISP (L2TP). Connection is established, but default routing table is wrong: instead of gateway I see Server IP: [code]
In similar situations other users of my ISP with Cisco routers (IOS) solved this problem by adding command no peer neighbor-route but i can't do it through the WEBgui...
I've been playing around with the Cisco RV180s for a while now and have come across a problem with the subnet calculation in the static routes and routing table. Essentially, if I configure up a static route for a /16 it's entered in the routing table as a /13. If I add a /24 it's entered in the routing table as a /16. I haven't tested every subnet size and combinations but this looks like a fairly fundamental maths bug.
As a side note, I notice that the 1.0.1.9 release notes state the removal of SSH Server, however, I can not find any reference to it's existance prior to 1.0.1.9, did/does it exist in 1.0.0.30 and if so where? .
Screenshots are below and an extract from the configuration file for reference.
From the config file:
route = {}
route[1] = {}
route[1]["active"] = "1"
route[1]["dstIpAddr"] = "8.8.0.0"
route[1]["gwIpAddr"] = "192.168.1.250(code)
On the 6509, with normal 67xx cards installed, where is all the mac table held, is it held on the card itself or on the supervisor? And if I use dcef cards, I gather the MSFC copies the mac table to the DFC ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco 1812, Version 12.3(8)YI1..What does "none" mean ?Most of mac adressess in cam has specified interface, but several has none.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI am in need to have the arp table cleared every 5 seconds or so on a 2800 router. I was wondering how I might be able to accomplish this.
View 4 Replies View RelatedMy 2821 router has an arp table with the wrong ip to Mac mappings. The impact is that I can reach any host in the 10.1.1.1 subnet. I can reach hosts in the 192.168.35.0 just fine. [code] It is as if the 192.168.35.1 device is answering all arp requests as a proxy arp or something. Clear arp-cache nor clear ip arp on my 2821 have any affect.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe have 6500 cisco switch as a backbone switch in universty. When ı want to look mac addres table , it does no show all mac address.ı mean if ı type ;show mac address-table there are not all mac address.
View 3 Replies View Relatedwe have a 3750 and use dhcp services on the switch. every so often we run out of ip's even though we have much less users than the size of the allocated dhcp pool. I've noticed that the dhcp bind table is full but a ping-sweep only shows very few ip's being assinged and used. It looks like the IP addresses are not being released from the table even though I have decreased the lease time to 8 hours.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have one VLAN on a 3750 where I do not see any MAC addresses even though it is in use. This is an unrouted VLAN between a WLC on a port- channel /LAG and an access port to an ASA for guest traffic. When I do a show MAC add I get nothing for VLAN 60 (guest DMZ) but all other VLANs seem to be OK. Spanning tree is not showing TC counters incrementing either.
I also was told when put a port on this VLAN the laptop did not get a DHCP address form the ASA, but the wireless guest clients are working fine. I can see the DHCP leases and ARP entries in the ASA and the ASA ARP in the WLC so some traffic is passing fine. I'm not onsite right now so troubleshooting is all remote which limits some options.
I have 3750E swiches with IOS v. 12.2(55)SE3. Couple servers connect to ths switch, after ping of IP this servers I can see mac addresses in mac address table.
For instance:
sw1#show mac address-table vlan 20
Mac Address Table
-------------------------------------------
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports(code)
---- ----------- -------- -----
When ip generate traffic to this server this mac address appear in table again on shot time (less than 10 seconds).
We got a layer3 switched network, with one vlan for every switch, routed by a cat4006. [code] So can we put some ports on different switches in, let`s say vlan 50, with different ips? For example, Port 0/3 on Switch 1 and 0/8 on Switch 2, but keeping the ip of the "old" vlan? Or is it necessary to configure a specified vlan interface with ip-adress for every vlan if i want to route it?
View 4 Replies View RelatedA Network Lab (governmental) did not let our cisco 2960s switches to be imported to the country and said "according to my lab tests, the maximum mac that your switch can learn is about 500 but as cisco says it should be about 8000"
they did not give me their software but i like to test it myself
Is there a software which generates thousands of MAC and inject them into switch to test the real amount shown in show mac count ?
I have the switch ============>>>>>
sw2960g============server linux
As u see above , the inetrface Gi0/6 , Gi0/7 are connected directly to linux server by two redundent links .
I mean that Gi0/6 is connected to interface0 in linux server
and Gi0/7 is connect to interface interface1 in linux server
Gi0/6===>vlan 1
Gi0/7===>vlan 2
each interface of linux server has a different ip and different gateway .
Now from switch, I make ping to interface 0 of linux server and i have a reply , every thing is ok but when i type the command :
#sh mac address-table | i Gi0/6
There is no Mac addresses and seems no Mac address relative to Gi0/6, I mean that doesn't it mandatorty to learn the mac address of linux server and write in mac table relative beside interface Gi0/6 ? How I could ping the server but no mac beside Gi0/6 ?
we have cisco WS-C6509-V-E with IOS version 12.2(33)SXI4; s3223_rp_IPSERVICESK9_WAN_M) running on a switch. I am trying to configure the command "mac-address-table synchronize" under global config mode. But when I enter the command Cisco(config)#mac-address-table ?It doesn't show the synchronize option?
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe issue is occuring on our local LAN where my ARP requests are being modified after a period of time by the router for one host. I'm finding that the host will work fine with the correct MAC IP pairing for a period of time and then about 15-30 minutes later, the arp table is changing so the associated mac/IP address is now the mac address of the router interface.
The FastEthernet 0/1 port has no ip proxy-arp enabled and is set with ip nat inside.This only started happening after restarting the router, however the running config was saved as the startup config prior to the restart.I've tried hard-coding the entry with the command arp 10.15.4.190 c82a.1459.0579 ARPA however that is not working as expected.
The device is an 1841 ISR with the advanced IP Services bundle loaded. Is there some way that the router is viewing my host (provides DNS, Directory Services) as a intrustion attempt and somehow rejecting the packets?
I am looking for a way to create different routing policies for vlans on a 3750 table.
My set up is
Clients----------- 3750 -------------- ASA ---------------Servers
|
|
|
Internet Routers
What i am trying to do is on the 3750 to route private networks to my ASA on different subintefaces and all internet to my internet routers . Each VLAN has a different GW for the internet. On some case i have the ASA as a default gateway. ASA default default route is 3750 where i need the internet traffic to be spllited on the proper Boarder router.
We want to configure the "mac-address-table synchronize" command on our 6500 series switches to ensure that the CAM tables on our DFCs are in synch with the PFC on the supervisor modules. url...it is recommended that we disable the routed MAC purging with the mac-address-table aging-time 0 routed-mac global configuration command. What is a routed mac entry? Are there any issues with running that mac aging-time command?
We also plan to run this command "mac-address-table aging-time 14400" to keep our ARP and CAM tables on the same aging time to reduce unicast flooding on our network. Can we run this command with the "routed-mac" command above?
My Catalayst 4507 is reaching up to 82% CPU utilization and I noticed that K2L2 Address Table R is causing the high CPU.
C4507#sh processes cpu | in HiPri|LoPri|CPU utilizationCPU utilization for five seconds: 82%/1%; one minute: 86%; five minutes: 87% 54 350533923 329104616 1065 13.27% 13.84% 13.86% 0 Cat4k Mgmt HiPri 55 1771768520 274992685 6442 59.91% 64.55% 66.04% 0 Cat4k Mgmt LoPri
C4507#sh platform health | in K2L2|%CPuK2L2 Address Table R 2.00 66.35 12 5 100 500 91 82 58 27272:55K2L2 New Static Addr 2.00 0.00 10 0 100 500 0 0 0 0:00K2L2 New Multicast A 2.00 0.00 10 5 100 500 0 0 0 0:18K2L2 Dynamic Address 2.00 0.00 10 5 100 500 0 0 0 0:16K2L2 Vlan Table Revi 2.00 0.00 12 8 100 500 0 0 0 1:22
We are getting log messages like
%EARL-DFC4-4-NF_USAGE: Current Netflow Table Utilization is 95%
%EARL-DFC4-4-NF_USAGE: Current Netflow Table Utilization is 99%
What this messages really means and how to get rid of these messages. We are using IOS version 12.2(33)SXJ in Catalyst 6500.
I've configured ip dhcp snooping on several vlans I want to monitor and the binding table doesn't seem to be building.eature DHCP is on, global ip dhcp snooping is enabled, VLAN snooping is enabled on the vlan's I want to monitor and my trusted interfaces are also configured. Alas no binding entries in the table! 7K is running 4.2(6).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have run into a very strange problem while doing pre-deployment vPC/STP testing in the lab with a pair of Nexus 7000s.
The basic configuration is as follows:
2x Nexus 7000 VDCs (ver 6.0(4)) are configured as vPC peers and connected with a vPC peer-link (redundant on different 10G blades) and a vPC peer-keepalive link. The switches also act as HSRP and EIGRP routers. The N7K-A switch is nominally configured as STP root and HSRP prime for all VLANs, N7K-B switch is STP backup root and HSRP secondary. STP version is PV-RSTP+. As it stands now STP root and vPC prime are on different switches, STP root is on N7K-A and vPC prime is on N7K-B.
3x Layer-2 access switches (3750-1, 3750-2, 3560-1) are configured as access switches and connected to the Nexus 7Ks with a 1G uplinks in V-pattern.
3750-1 and 3560-1 are configured for vPC as Port-Channel10 and Port-Channel12 respectively. 3750-2 is configured for STP. Vlan 35 is shared between all three switches and is enabled on the vPC peer-link (overlapping vPC and STP domains). The downlink port to the STP-only 3750-2 on N7Ks is configured as "vpc orphan suspend".
Everything seems to work fine and pings on VLAN 35 between access switches (that have mgmt interfaces in VLAN35) recover rapidly after failures. However, if I break the vpc peer-link the ping between the two vPC switches 3750-1 and 3560-1 stops. Moreover, this appears to be sporadic in nature with some vpc peer-link failure attempts recreating the problem and some not. Sometimes the problem manifests itself when the peer-link is brought back up rather than taken down.
After doing a bit of troubleshooting, I have isolated the problem to MAC address blackholing. Basically when the peer link is taken down, MAC Address table on the vPC primary switch, N7K-B, (I believe during vPC convergence) forces the traffic destined from 3750-1 to 3560-1 through the STP only switch 3750-2, which apparently goes through the RSTP convergence and enables its alternate link to N7K-B before vPC has finished its convergence. After vPC convergence is finished the path through the STP-only access layer switch 3750-2 no longer exists, as vPC will take down all vPC ports and suspend orphan ports on the vPC secondary switch (N7K-A). However the MAC Address table on N7K-B still points through the 3750-2 access layer switch instead of directly through Port-Channel 12 on N7K-B and thus creates a traffic blackhole. Issuing a ping or bouncing SVI interfaces on N7K-B fixes the problem.
I am little confused about the location of FIB table and adjacency table in both cisco 6500 series and fixed ports switches .In case of 6500 series switches
"Central CEF mode:The CEF FIB and adjacency tables reside on the route processor,and the route processor performs the express forwarding. Use this CEF mode when line cards are not available for CEF switching, or when features are not compatible with distributed CEF."
If line cards do no support CEF, then FIB and adjacency tables are built and are located on route processor( control plane ). Data plane operations are implemented in software and route processor performs those operations.
Some Cisco switches actually use different hardware to control the different planes. For example, the Cisco Catalyst 6500 is a modular switch that uses the Multilayer Switch.Feature Card (MSFC) for control-plane operations, and the supervisor Policy Feature Card (PFC) for the data-plane operations.
Supervisor module has has MSFC and PFC. MSFC implements control plane operation where as PFC implements data plane operation.But the first paragraph says in Central cef mode, both data plane and control plane operations are implemented by route processor. [code]
Do these switches implement the Central mode cef in same way as mentioned above. i.e
"Central CEF mode:The CEF FIB and adjacency tables reside on the route processor and the route processor performs the express forwarding. Use this CEF mode whenline cards are not available for CEF switching, or when features are not compatible with distributed CEF."Or fixed ports switches such as 3750 implement data plane operation in hardware where FIB tabe and adjacency table are maintained on Data plane.
i'm trying to create a VPN IPSEC link between 2 offices. The VPN link is created, and i can communicate but only one way. Clients in Office B seems to have routing problem.
Details :
Office A :
- SRP527W router.
- Client Network : 192.168.0.0 / 24
[Code].....