My CAT 4510 switch is showing 99.9% CPU usage almost through out the day. After some analysis i saw that the “Cat4k Mgmt LoPri” process is having 86% CPU utilization. This process is a package that is including multiple process.
2. Within this package, two processes have been identified which are causing this shock which are “K5L3Unicast Adj Tabl” and “K5 L2 Hardware Addre” .
3. This indicates that some heavy activity is going on CEF adjacency table and RP MAC Address Table. My current IOS version is 12.2(53)SG and i want to upgarde this to 12.2(53)SG1.
C Can any one tell me if this will solve the issue and how clean is the 12.2(53)SG1 of bugs.
This switch is currently the gateway of my network configured for GLBP with another CAT 4507 switch. This switch is normal and showing only 37% CPU usage.
My CAT 4510 switch is showing 99.9% CPU usage almost through out the day. After some analysis i saw that the “Cat4k Mgmt LoPri” process is having 86% CPU utilization. This process is a package that is including multiple process.
Within this package, two processes have been identified which are causing this shock which are “K5L3Unicast Adj Tabl” and “K5 L2 Hardware Addre” .
This indicates that some heavy activity is going on CEF adjacency table and RP MAC Address Table. My current IOS version is 12.2(53)SG
however recently when i check my internet usage log on my wireless company (Rogers) the usage is totally off from what my bandwidth tracker shows me. So i decide to turn off my wifi and see what happens, there has always been this weird wifi connection appearing whenever my wifi appears, then afterwards when i turn off my wifi the suspicious wifi connections disappear. is this possible that someone is using our wifi? i might just be overreacting but it has brought me to concern that if the usage continues my family will have to end up paying over $30 for extra internet use. it is very frustrating me because when i check my DHCP client table it only shows 3 connection, ethernet - my desktop which is not turned on, 2 wireless connection - my laptop and my sister's laptop.
my computer is a dell dimension 1100, with a Linksys WMP54G wifi card, running vista home basic.In the wifi thing in the notification area, it shows two wireless networks, One is my normal SSID (Lower Net), and one is "Unidentified network". They are both on one wireless connection (Wireless Network Connection 3). When i try to go on the internet, it says i'm not connected. i tried disconnecting from the unidentified network, but that disconnects me from lower net too.
I have cisco 4510 core switch in my network now we are planning to connect SWAN to the core switch,swan admin given one ip 10.10.1.128/24 .now i have to configure core switch.For swan what type of configuration is required. i will create separate vlan and it has to route through my firewall.
I have a 4510 with sup7e and I would like to deploy netflow on this switch. The network will contain the 4510 switch where there will be 4 blades installed, each blade contains a separate Zone (vlan) . These 4 zones will then trunk upto a firewall via ten gig link over sub-interfaces. There will be an ip address assigned to each vlan on the 4500 switch but there can not be routing enabled between the vlans on the switch.
I am having issues working on my QOS between 4510 and 3550 switch connecting on layer 3 through a service provider. I have class maps and policy map setup on both sides and then policy map attached to interfaces however i dont see any traffic matching in policy map on 3550 switch, i do see some traffic matching on 4510 but the speed with which its increasing has my doubts about it. When i make voip calls ( VOIP switches are sitting behind 3550 and are mainly 3550 pwr 24 port switches with phone ports configured for auto qos voip cisco-phone and trusting cos) i rarely see the RTP matching in class under policy map.
I am currently running 12.2 (53) and am looking to move up to the 15+ train. Are there any pre-reqs prior to the upgrade that any one is aware of?Unfortunately I have no "lab environment" to test it in. I have production switches with minimal impact to the campus and if done late night I could have it restored back before open of business the following morning. My FW is up to the latest version and I have found nothing in the release notes specifically stating that there would require any stepped upgrades up to v15 and higher.
I am experiencing an issue with end host being discovered on a cisco 4510. Anything connected to modules 9 or 10 are not discovered in User Tracking. The switch is running: Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 03.02.01.SG RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4).
We have an issue where switches are failing weekly in a switch closet. In the past month we have gone through several 3750G switches and a couple 4510s. The power supplies have eventually made a popping noise and had to be replaced. on the 4510s we've tried two chassis and gone through several power supplies.The switches have been behind UPS systems so should be receiving conditioned power.Could load from the PoE devices really be causing this? I wouldn't think it's power since they are behind a UPS.
This has been happening repeatedly time to time! we just replace the part! But now it has come to trouble us again.It happening only in one module like 6 to 10 ports wont work.
we run IOS cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.02.00.SG.150-2.SG.bin will there be any bug in it?
I have two servers on one subnet that each need to replicate to a single server on another subnet. They also need to replicate to each other. This replication is unidirectional so I will refer to the 2 server subnet as the source subnet and the single server subnet as the destination subnet. In order to keep this replication running without killing the MPLS links on either end, we are trying to use a policy-map that limits bandwidth from the source subnet.The Problem:We have created a policy that polices traffic during specific times of day and limits the bandwidth as prescribed, however, bandwidth is also being limited between the 2 servers on the source subnet which is not needed or desired.Class 512K set dscp ef police 1024000 bps 1024000 byte conform-action transmit exceed-action dropClass Map match-any 512K (id 4) Match access-group name DAGExtended IP access list DAG 10 permit ip host 10.20.0.3 host 10.20.0.10 time-range DAG-REP (active) (22793 matches) 20 permit ip host 10.20.0.4 host 10.20.0.10 time-range DAG-REP (active) (14156 matches)The service policy is applied on the input side of the 2 interfaces on which our devices are connected.As you can see, the access list identifies the interesting traffic as traffic from two specific hosts to one specific host. The problem we are having is that bandwidth is also being throttled between the two source hosts even though it is not defined to do so.What can I do to limit traffic from the two source devices to the single destination device without limiting bandwidth between the two source devices?
We have multiple switches(Cisco 4510, 4507R, 3560's) within our network. I've been looking over the port settings between them and noticed that not all ports that are connected directly from switch to switch are trunked the same. Some are desirable on one switch and forced truck on the other switch.
I'm part way through trying to set a Catalyst 4510R to factory defaults, One thing I'm stumped on is how do i remove the Customer Disclaimer eg what commands do i need to remove this and any other customer text within the switch, below is copy of text from the switch with customers details omitted.
I am using Cisco 4510 Switch with Default LAN Base image. Now I have purchased 10G Upgrade license. The part number for Upgrade license is WS-C4500-10G-LIC. I have received a CD from Cisco (named as 'Includes License and Warranty'). Any License upgradation is required for this license? Or this is only a paper License.
I could not find out any .lic file on the CD. Also there is no paper with PAK.
I just upgraded all of our switches on campus to Version 15.0(2)SG4 after about a month of testing. On two switches so far, we are seeing that clients can not connect, and the switch isnt detecting a link. I dont see anything out of the ordinary in int status, port-security, or errors on the interface. Plugging in a different computer does nothing. Only thing that works, is a shut, no shut of the interface. After that, its connected.
I have a Catalyst 4510 that is running IOS version 15.X that has a bug and Cisco recommends upgrading the IOS. Are there additional steps required to perform an IOS upgrade due to licencing Cisco put in place?
At our site we have a 4510 core switch and 3750x switches in our IDFs. The 3750 switches are connected to the core via DOT1Q trunks in a server client setup. We are putting in an Informacast/Berbee server witch will send pages and text to the cisco phones. We also have 1 3750 switch connecting to the core via a layer 3 port channel. If we put the Informacast server on the phones vlan would I just need to enable ip pim sparse-dense mode on that vlan only and enable multicast routing, ip multicast routing?
I am planning to enable MAC address filtering (one port on 4510 & another 3560). I want to allow only that MAC address to communicate via that port with the rest of the network and internet.
4510 has PC connected and 3560 had polycom connected. [code]
I got a 6509 version 12.1(22)E2 that I am replacing with a 4510E version 3.40SG with Supervisor Engine 7-E. The 6509 is configured with 20 channel-group for dual fiver connection to ten 3550 switches with trunking enabled with isl encapsulation. The 6509 is the VTP server to each of the 3550 switch clients. There are 40 Microsoft Servers attached ot the Gig RJ45 port modules.
I have attached the 4510 to the 6509 with dual fiber connection configured as a channel group with trunking enabled. I am configuring the 4510 the same as the 6509 except I have to use trunking with dot1q encapsulation because isl is not supported on the 4510. I no longer want to use VTP with the 4510 and have set the it as transparent mode. Each of the 3550 switches are changed from isl trunking encapsulation to dot1q and VTP mode is changed to transparent when they are moved from the 6509 to the 4510.
I want to move the switches over a few at a time and not all at once. The first 4 switches attached with no problems and ran with no problems for the user access to the servers still on the 6509 for a week. Then I found out DHCP was not working for the devices attached to the switches on the 4510. I moved one of our domain controllers form the 6509 to the 4510 to fix the DHVP problem. I have now added 2 more switches with users that use an application on a server still on the 6509 and they are getting disconnect errors after logging into it and using it. Other applications on different server also on the 6509 are having no problems. I moved the switches back to the 6509 to get the users up during business hours. I now plan on moving the server for the application that was failing to the 4510 in hopes that it will fix the problem.
Is there something I can do to speed up the connection between the 6509 and the 4510 so I can continue this transition without having to move the servers to the 4510 as I move the users?
My internet link is connected on Internet Router & below downwards Cisco ASA 5520 is connected.ASA is connected with core switch cisco 4510 on downwards. our web based mail [URL] is hosted outside.
Lets suppose ISP pool is 4.4.4.0/28.suppose owa server is Static natted on ASA with 4.4.4.4. my machine traffic is going to internet with same ISP with PAT on Cisco ASA & internet is working on my machine. if i want to access {URL} or ip base for mail access, its not working & also it is not pinging. i suppose to ASA is blocking for returning traffic.
is there any way to traffic will go via same Firewall & comeback on same firewall port?
We are facing issue related to STP.I am getting MAC FLAP error on Cisco 4510 switch. The effect on network is intermittent Pkt drops in the network. When I checked the specific Ip address I am getting the same with two different. [code] Vlan is created on CORE switch and assign priority 0 than CORE switch should be the Root. but instead Root port is becoming the port where server is connected. Server at last connected to CORE switch via HP switch via other Vlan to CORE switch and creating a loop as shown in Diag. [code] The Priority of Vlan 102 is changed and Root port has been changed due to that. The Bridge ID is the same as CORE switch.
I am planning on deploying a 2960 switch and will need to uplink it to a 4510 switch. There are 2 TenGig Ports available and I was thinking of uplinking one of them to the 1Gb SFP port on the 2960. Would this work?
I have a 4500 Catalysts switched (4510 R ) that require the configuration to wiped back to factory default setting, How would i go about clearing the configuration on each module board
The chassis consists of
2 x Supervisor engines v WS-X4516 with Flash cards 4 x WS x84448 GB RJ45 48 port switches 1 x WS x4306 GB Switch Module
I also have a Catalyst 6500 that requires each module within the chassis to we wiped back to factory defaults
1 x Supervisor engine WS X 6k SUP 2- 2GE 1 x WS X6416 G-Bic 16 port GB Ethernet 4 X WS X 6148 CE-TX Base T GE 10/100/1000 1 x WS X6348 48 Port Inline Power Capable
And i have a Catalyst WS - C 6513 with the following Module card that need the configuration wiped to Factory defaults as well
I am looking to find a command or counter to tell me if a cisco switch port on a 4510 was ever up and passed traffic. I want to shutdown all unused switchports on our access switches. But before I do that I need to make sure device is just not off or the person is away on vacation. If I do sh int interface, is there a counter I can reference.
We have an existing network with a Catalyst 4510 core switch and departmental 3560 switches connected via fiber. Due to company restructure we can no longer afford to buy new 3560's when anything goes wrong so this week I purchased an SG200-26 which I'm trying to get onto the network.
This is a legacy network which I didn't setup so my Cisco skills are somewhat limited (another reason for the SG200's hopefully), anyway have been looking at the configs on the existing switches and trying to match settings in the SG200 setup however not getting anywhere! I have the config from the dead switch so I can show what needs to be achieved, any experience in downgrading environment in a similar way?
I have configured Span port on our 4510. We have an application 5view server to monitor trafic connected to G9/17 Since we have changed the network connection from physical Giga port and add a Port-channel instead, we don't see any more trafic from the new Port-channel to G9/17
We are getting below errors on our Cisco 4500 Switche PS after Power Down activity.
Switch1
------------------ show power detail ------------------
Power Fan Inline Supply Model No Type Status Sensor Status ------ ---------------- --------- ----------- ------- ------- PS1 PWR-C45-4200ACV AC 4200W good good good PS1-1 off PS1-2 220V good PS2 PWR-C45-4200ACV AC 4200W err-disable good good PS2-1 220V good PS2-2 220V good
*** Power Supplies of different type have been detected***
00:01:02: %C4K_CHASSIS-3-MIXINPOWERDETECTED: Power supplies in the chassis are of different types (AC/DC) or wattage(code)
I'm having some trouble with a 4510 Switch Line Card. I need some recomendations for troubleshooting it.We have some PoE phones connected to the card number 3. When those phones were restarted, they did not go up again. In order to discard wiring issues, we connected the phone directly to the card 3, and the phone did not go up. If the phone is connected to a different card, it goes up correctly.
Additionally, to restore the service, these phones were migrated to other cards, but when we disconnect the equipment, ports in line card 3 remain in an up / up state (and nothing is connected to those ports!!), and only reflect the actual state after restarting the port.What steps could I do in order to troubleshoot this issue?. What should I look for, or how do I discriminate the problem? Might it be a hardware issue, a PoE issue?
