I am pretty far out of my comfort zone here but these VS-S720-10G-3C cards were purchased to upgrade our 7609/7606 routers, the spec sheet says they are compatable but I can't find an IOS that "likes" them. I had no problem finding an IOS and using the vss cards in our 6506...
[URL]
I'm planning to implement a VSS system with two 6509 and VS-S720-10G supervisor engines. In technical specifications is said that this card can support up to 1024 VRFs. Is this limit the same when working in VSS?
View 6 Replies View Relatedwe purchase only Cisco Supervisor Engine VS-S720-10G and use it in our old C6509-E chassis.Now the supervisor engine was dead,(means not working and no LED's are ON). How can i claim the RMA from cisco?
We purchase from one of our partner. We send it to them,they are not able to find the Serial number from the Supervisor Engine module (Because lot of serial numbers are on the board). Also the customer through the catoon.
Now how we can know which is exact serial number of sup? How to get RMA from the Cisco on which serial number?
We are upgrading two standalone 6509E chassis to a VSS system with new VS-S720-10G-3C cards. The 6509's have WS-X6748-GE-TX card with DFC3B daughter cards (see below). The compatablity matrix (see below) states that 67xx cards are supported but it goes on to state DFC3C or DFC3CXL cards are needed. So does this mean that the existing WS-X6748-GE-TX cards have to be upgraded or will they be supported?
Core #1Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL 2 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE SAD 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B SAL 6 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot) WS-SUP720-3B SAL 7 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL 8 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL
[code]....
I got a new VS-S720-10G it had 122-33.SXH8b on there. I had to downgrade it to 12.2.33.SXI1 to match our other switches. I installed the file I use in all the other switches, s72033-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI1.bin but the Sup is now is only booting up only to ROMMON mode.
Initializing ATA monitor library...
Self extracting the image... [OK]
Self decompressing the image : #################################################
################################################################################
################################################################ [OK]
%SYSTEM-1-INITFAIL: Network boot is not supported.
System Bootstrap, Version 8.5(4)
Copyright (c) 1994-2009 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Cat6k-Sup720/SP processor with 1048576 Kbytes of main memory
[code]....
How do I get the older version of IOS to load up?
I am about to replace the supervisor engine in our pair of distribution switches in our data center. We currently have a FWSM module installed in each of my distribution switches running 3.1(20) code. The old sup720 are running 8.6(4) and the mfsc are running 12.2(17d)SXB11a. I am wondering about the compatibility of running the FWSM with the same code after installing the new VS-S720 modules. I do not plan on configuring virtual switch yet and did plan on upgrading the FWSM to 4 code train but just not immediately. Will I be able to run my FWSM using the current 3.1(20) code after I install my new VS-S720 running in native mode?
If I have to upgrade the FWSM then I need to know if I have to upgrade the module in each distribution switch at the same time? Furthermore I do not believe that the FWSM 4 code is supported in hybrid mode, which means that I will have to convert to native before upgrading to FWSM 4 before I install the VS-S720 in one of my distribution switches. Currently the FWSM modules are in active/standby mode in different chassis.
I had planned to install the VS-S720 module in one of my distribution switch and do the other installation a week later. I would rather not have to convert to native and upgrade the FWSM modules in both distribution switches during the first switch upgrade.
cnDS02> (enable) sh mod
Mod Slot Ports Module-Type Model Sub Status
--- ---- ----- ------------------------- ------------------- --- --------
1 1 16 1000BaseX Ethernet WS-X6516A-GBIC no ok
2 .... Please refer to Detail Note. cnDS02> (enable) sh mod
[code]....
We have 7 interfaces with rj45 connections.. all around 100Mbit per connection .. most likely in the future we will need a couple more interfaces.. i was thinking it would be better to take a WS-X6516-GE-TX card then a FE card as for example a WS-X6148-RJ-45 .Now we want to implement a 7606 with a SUP720-3BXL with 1GB dram for the RP(MSFC3)... so enough memory to support the 2x a FULL BGP table to two peers.
Q : Does the SUP720-3BXL work well with two peers sending the FULL BGP table ?
Q : And does that also work with a WS-X6516-GE-TX connected to the two peers sending the FULL BGP table ? .. or is it better to take a 6724 linecard with a DFC3-BXL so that the 6724 will lookup routes locally instead a 6516 will have the S720- perform the routing ? I know that adding the DFC's increases the bandwidth of the chassis significantly (40gbps per slot most 6700 linecards ,and 20gbps for the 6724 which is 1:2 oversubscribed )
Q: Or is it better to connect the two peers to the two SFP interfaces on the SUP720 , and connect the small routers and customer networks to the 6516 linecard?
I need those two stencils.I have checked here [URL] but:
- the one for the C6509-E is not there
- the one for the supervisor does not work properly (misaligned anchor points).
I'm trying to configure a egress netflow in a 6500 (VSS) with VS-S720-10G supervisor. I foud some old posts and understood that netflow wasn't supported on 6500 but i found a new document and it seems that netflow is supported in Supervisor Engine 2T:[URL] Does the netflow still not supported in VS-S720-10G? It's weird because the command is supported:
#sh run int vlan 4
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 353 bytes
!
interface Vlan4
ip address X.X.X.X 255.255.0.0
[cod]....
What key sequence to go into ROMMON mode from the console port for VSS system with 2 VS-S720-10G?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have catalyst 6500s with two VS-S720-10Gs, one is in Active and one is in Hot state. Both Sup cards have two 10G uplink ports. How does the traffic forwarding works in this case on the uplink ports? Do these uplink ports actively forward traffic or it is only the uplinks ports on Active that forward traffic? I see CDP neighbors on both Active and Hot SUPs uplinks ports - it indicates that packets are flowing on both cards.
I want all uplink ports on both SUPs to actively forward traffic. Does it work? What is the config for this?
i have a query ,we are planning to upgrade the Sup Engine from WS-SUP720-3B 2 ports Supervisor Engine 720 to
RSP720-3CXL-GE=
Cisco 7600 Route Switch Processor 720Gbps fabric,PFC3CXL, GE
Can we use the same old IOS from Sup720 to the New RSP720 without purchasing it ?
Show Version-- Cisco Router 7609
Cisco IOS Software, c7600s72033_rp Software (c7600s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRB3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)S4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
System returned to ROM by power cycle at 08:36:39 PDT Fri Mar 30 2007 (SP by power on)
System restarted at 10:04:20 GMT Fri Nov 25 2011
System image file is "bootdisk:c7600s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRB3.bin"
Last reload type: Normal Reload
[code]....
what is use of haiving SPA and SIP in router hardware ? what if we dont have them in router ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need to know if upgrading Cisco IOS on 7600 series router is possible. From 12.2(18)SXF --> 12.2(33)SRC, i need this because SRC supports Lawfull Intercept.
specification of router is 7606
slot 1 - WS-X6708-10GE
slot 1/0 - WS-F6700-DFC3C
slot 4 - WS-X6408A-GBIC
slot 6 - WS-SUP720-3B
slot 6/0 - WS-F6K-PFC3B
slot 6/1 - WS-SUP720
The 7600 platform support x.25 and XOT features. In ios versión S764AEK9-15103SCisco 7600-RSP720 IOS ADVANCED ENTERPRISE SERVICES SSH The feature navigator display that support this features, but i'dont see these on the other newer ios version. If posible use 7600 for x.25 / xot or maybe will used de 3900 platform?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIf I have SIP-200 and I need to configure a feature , for eg - PPP on SIP-200 , is it something possible ? If Yes how I can do that in IOS ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedToday i want to ask is cisco 7600 support ip next-hop recusrive x.x.x.x (PBR feature).
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhy below simple PBR is not implemented in H/W knowing the Copp is not configured
NPE-1#sh ver | i image
System image file is "bootdisk:c7600rsp72043-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRE0a"
NPE-1#sh run int GigabitEthernet1/1
interface GigabitEthernet1/1
ip address 11.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
ip pim sparse-mode
[code]...
I am trying to establish a BGP session between a Cisco 7600 and Juniper MX960, but this always stucks in OpenConfirm state.
access-4#show ip bgp v v VRF1 neighbors 166.63.168.197BGP neighbor is 166.63.168.197, vrf VRF1, remote AS 5555, local AS 65533, external link BGP version 4, remote router ID 195.2.1.21 BGP state = OpenConfirm Last read 00:02:27, last write 00:02:27, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Message statistics: InQ depth is 0 OutQ depth is 0 Sent Rcvd Opens: 4 4 Notifications: 2 1 Updates: 0 0 Keepalives: 4
May 12 13:58:07.531 bst: TCP src=54912, dst=179, seq=1766275951, ack=1681278050, win=17520 ACK PSHMay 12 13:58:07.535 bst: IP: tableid=2, s=166.63.168.198 (local), d=166.63.168.197 (Vlan20), routed via FIBMay 12 13:58:53.883 bst: IP: tableid=2, s=166.63.168.198 (local), d=166.63.168.197 (Vlan20), routed via FIBMay 12 13:58:59.359 bst: IP: s=166.63.168.197 (Vlan20), d=166.63.168.198, len 61, rcvd 2May 12 13:58:59.359 bst: TCP src=54912, dst=179, seq=1766276010, ack=1681278050, win=17520 ACK PSH FINMay 12 13:58:59.359 bst: IP: tableid=2, s=166.63.168.198 (local), d=166.63.168.197 (Vlan20), routed via FIBMay 12 13:58:59.359 bst: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 166.63.168.197 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes
ICMP works fine. It is same on JUniper end. Sending keepalives but cannot receive
###interface configinterface Vlan20 ip vrf forwarding VRF1 ip address 166.63.168.198 255.255.255.252 no ip redirects no ip proxy-arp load-interval 30end
###bgp config
neighbor 166.63.168.197 remote-as 5555 neighbor 166.63.168.197 local-as 65533 neighbor 166.63.168.197 ebgp-multihop 5 neighbor 166.63.168.197 update-source Vlan20 neighbor 166.63.168.197 activate neighbor 166.63.168.197 soft-reconfiguration inbound
what is the use SPA and SIP...in router hardware ? What if we do not have them ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a strange QoS problem with one Cisco7600 (sup7203BXL, IOS 12.2(33)SRE6).
This is layer 2 traffic,and all ports are L2 dot1q trunks:
1) Packet comes with DSCP 46 on Gigabit port (WS6728-SFP) with "mls qos trust dscp" configured. It goes out the port of the same card/slot with DSCP 0.
2) packet comes with DSCP 46 on different Gigabit port on the same card/slot with "mls qos trust dscp" and also "mls qos vlan-based" configured. It qoes out out the port with DSCP 46.
Why the switch behave differently if "mls qos vlan-based" is configured on port (or to say it works correct since it doesn't override DSCP)?
I have global command "mls qos rewrite ip dscp" since this 7600 is also MPLS PE router and I found in documentation that "mls qos rewite ip dscp" is mandatory for QoS on MPLS (EXP bits). So I can't turn off "rewrite ip dscp". Again the problem that I presents is L2 problem not MPLS (MPLS is used for different traffic).
Also mls qos mappings are ok COS to DSCp are 5 to 46 and vice versa.
Furthermore, as far as I know if I have configured "mls qos trust dscp" on Gigabit ethernet port, switch (7600) should work in this order:
- make internal DSCP from packet DSCP
- since I don't have configured DSCP mutation DSCP should stay the same (46)
- using map DSCP - COS ( 46 -5 ) switch will choose queue on outgoing interface in regards to mapped COS
I'm looking for iformation if CFM Local Maintenance End Point configured on Cisco 7606 router is able to respond to the Y.1731 Performance Monitoring (DMM/DMR ).I know I can use IP SLA to configure Y.1731 PM measurements, but I just need a reflector that will answer for incoming DMM messages with DMRs.
View 0 Replies View RelatedYou can configure EoMPLS on a port of the WS-X6724SFP card found in a Cisco 7600 with Supervisor 720.
View 1 Replies View Relatedif the 7600-SIP-200 supported in VSS mode or not ?
I have configured to Cisco Catalyst 6513 as VSS, both of them have the 7600-SIP-200 module, before converting them to VSS I was able to work with the 7600-SIP-200 module, but after I did convert them to VSS, both modules didn't work.
here is the show module output, after VSS conversion:
VSS1#show module Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 0 4-subslot SPA Interface Processor-200 7600-SIP-200 JAE14500GMT 7 5 Supervisor Engine 720 10GE
[Code].....
Need to clarify this log message:
*Oct 23 06:20:07 UTC: %FPD_MGMT-3-INCOMP_IMG_VER: Incompatible ROMMON (FPD ID=5) image version detected for 7600-SIP-200 card in slot Detected version = 1.3, minimum required version = 1.4. Current HW version = 2.303.
I would like more information of performance to 7600 router with the SP-720, how many sessions full bgp routing it supports? I have 4 links 1 GB and a throughput of 900 MB.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have cisco 7600 core router in ISP , i want to put the bandwidth limit on it for outgoing traffic (for internet) on a subnet because i am using Bluecoat and i want to test my bluecoat.On this subnet i have no limit for bluecoat but after the bluecoat i want to limit it. On 7600 cisco router i have not rate limit command so how it can be possible for a perticular subnet ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 7606 running c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRD2.bin with SIP-400 card that has suddenly stopped working, on checking the logs i see the following:
%ONLINE-SP-6-TIMER: Module 3, Proc. 0. Failed to bring online because of timer event
%C7600_PWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 3 set off (Module Failed SCP dnld)
I have tried reseating and even moving it to a different slot but no luck.
%ONLINE-SP-6-TIMER: Module 4, Proc. 0. Failed to bring online because of timer event
%C7600_PWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 4 set off (Module Failed SCP dnld)
sh module
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
1 20 ESM20G 7600-ES20-GE3C JAE1237UT90
2 4 7600 ES+ 7600-ES+4TG3CXL JAE13157HIW
3 0 4-subslot SPA Interface Processor-400 7600-SIP-400 JAE13219CZH
5 2 Route Switch Processor 720 (Active) RSP720-3C-GE JAE1151819I
6 2 Route Switch Processor 720 (Hot) RSP720-3C-GE JAE11495POH
[code].....
im having lms 4.2.2 and monitoring a cisco 7600 router interface ten gigabit ethernet x/x under dfm. When ever the interface is down due to any media issue i am not getting any alerts in dfm., the interface used to go down for more than 10 minutes. I am able to do an snmpwalk to this interface when the interface was down and getting the value as 2(for down). I am getting other information and configuration mode alerts in dfm for this device.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI posted also under Service Providers for my problem with MPLS/VPN. I just noticed I have the same issue with plain IPV4 BGP. [URL] I have two 7600 running on SRC3 and SRD6. Both acting as RRs.
I noticed that RR1 is reflecting the route to this other 7600 iBGP peer but not installing/importing the route. Other iBGP speakers are able to install and import the route. Is there any issue with 7600 SRC/SRD IOS for Route-reflection?
iBGP policy is similar to all but only the 7600 is unable to install the route. Other 7200 ibgp peers are successful.
Router with 2 RSP RSP720-3C-GE & Image: c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE2.bin We are getting the message as
------------------ show version ------------------
Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: [URL]
[Code]....
Show log is attached & we are getting %DHCPD-4-DECLINE_CONFLICT: messages constantly.
I'm trying to find a single device that can both handle Q-in-Q VLAN trunk termination and also TDM cross connects between DS0's on a multi-channel T1 card and DS0's on a multi-channel DS-3 card. I'm looking at a Cisco 7606-S with SUP720's. If I install a 7600-SIP-200 or 7600-SIP-400 with both a SPA-2XCT3/DS0 (channelized T3 card) and a SPA-8XCHT1/E1 (channelized T1 card) will I be able to TDM cross connect the DS0's between the cards? Is there a limit on the number of TDM cross connects? Also, I noticed the CMM cards are EOL. Ideally we'd like to terminate PRI's into the 7606 and run H.323. We'd like to pass voice calls to CUCM and TDM switch FAX calls (via H.323 dial-peer) to a given CAS DS0 on the SPA-2XCT3/DS0. Is this doable with any of the current cards? If not, then we'll stick to the configuration in the first paragraph and only have the 7606 handle the TDM cross connects.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am looking for the best QoS method for a 7600 series router. We have a 7604 edge router that has remote branch connections to it via GRE tunnels. unfortunately I cannot shape on these GRE tunnels neither can I use bandwidth or priority statements.
View 1 Replies View Related