Cisco WAN :: Dhcp No Internet On 3560?
Jun 10, 2011have a problem with my 3560 Series PC gets a dhcp of the switches but not on the Internet?
View 1 Replieshave a problem with my 3560 Series PC gets a dhcp of the switches but not on the Internet?
View 1 RepliesWe have the configuration below set up in a 3560 switch (addresses and names modified for privacy). We are running out of dynamic IP’s in the current pool (6.35.159.0 – 6.35.159.255). We have a new set of IP’s that we can use (6.44.56.0 – 6.44.57.255 – an additional 512 addresses). Although I can figure out the commands to add a new dhcp pool, secondary subnet, etc., I’ve never done this before so I’m not sure of everything I need to do. The end result I need is that the 3560 needs to be able to hand out IP addresses from the current and new pool to anything connecting to vlan 300 – our datanet where computers access the Internet. What I need to do as far as modifying the vlan, adding the secondary subnet, defining helper IP’s, gateways, whatever, so that computers connecting via vlan 300 have Internet access via either of the pools? I have been told that all I need to do is create the pool, but not sure if that is correct...
[code]....
i have a adsl modem that is sending dhcp reqeust and i want to use that on my cisco switchs 3560 48 ports.i want to use the interface port 0/48 as a WAN connection and i want to use the other interfaceports for DCHP pool.i have an d-link (dir655) router at home and i want to have the same situation on my cisco switch my WAN interface get from a DHCP reqeust an ip adress from the provider like 10.10.123.44 (for the cisco switch would this interface port gig 0/48)then i want to configere my LAN as a DHCP pool like 192.168.0.1 (for the cisco switch would this interface port gig 0/1 - 47 .
View 3 Replies View RelatedWould like to impliment VLAN's on Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(25)SEB4...But I need a DHCP Realy to my Windows Based DHCP Server. How do I enable DHCP Relay on the 3560?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have attempted to implement DHCP snooping and have been having some strange issues. I have 5 3560s taht I use for my edge and when I attempt to implement on all five, the VLAN that houses my voice data appears to no longer be able to recieve DHCP lease renewals so after the 24 expiration all of my phones lose their configs. Once I roll back the changes the voice VLAN comes back. The other VLANs seem to function correctly as theya re able to renew their DHCP addresses.
The 3560s tie into each other using GIG Ports 1 & 2 and the top and bottom switches tie into our core switch, a 4507. The config that I use is below, failry simple and straightforward.
4 of the 5 switches feed our general office vlans for voice and data however the 5th switch is there for expansion and not in use. As such I have left the config changes in place on it and have tied myself and a colleague into it and have been operating fine for over a week now. So the config that I use seems sound in theory and should work on the other 4 switches with no issue.
I have made a topology by using one 3560 switch and 2 2950 switches. I have also made 2 vlans name Clients and other Servers and vlan 1 is for anagement purposes. The left 2950 switch is for clients and the right is for servers. Clients is vlan 2 and servers is vlan3 . Now what i want is that my dhcp is should assign ips to clients in vlans 2 provided that servers are in vlan 3. I am also using a border router and i have introduced a default route on the 3560 to the border router.
Now when i assign static ips to my clients pc and server dhcp then i can ping between vlans but when i try to assign ip through dhcp then it wont work. Also the default route on the switch to the border router doesnt seem to work. I can ping only the border router when i put a default route on the border router instead of the 3560 switch.
I have a cisco 3560 24PS and its connected to two ADSL broard band routers.one is a personal broadband line using a Billion ADSL broadband router, and the other is a business broardband line using BT's 2wire broadband line.on the Billion routers i have various things attached like a NAS and a printers, both wired connections. then i have laptops and phones that connect over wifi, so its configured to act as a DHCP server
the only thing conncted to my 2wire router is my company's laptop (wired or wifi depending on where i'm working from), so again i have it working as a dhcp server.The switch is configured with multiple vlans, with dhcp scopes assigned for each vlan.I have a static route pointing all traffic to my Billion ADSL for internet connectivity.
The problem i'm having is that when i turn on the cisco switch, all wifi conected devices loose their conection. only 2 things get it working again, a reboot of the router, or disabling then enabling the DHCP service on the router.upon further analysis i was able to find out that the devices were not able to pick up an address from the router. again i looked deeper into this and i can see the following on logs of my router: [code]
so it seems that the router tuns off its DHCP capabilities because it detects that my Cisco switch is running DHCP services. I need to figure out how to keep the billion routers DHCP running when ever the switch is turned on.is there a way of filtering out any DHCP chat from the switch to the router?
I am trying to understand the basics of DHCP snooping. I have a just a 3560 switch and a laptop ( to get a DHCP address) and my DSL router which has a DHCP server running. On the switch I have enabled "IP DHCP Snooping" and "IP DHCP Snooping VLAN 1" plugged the laptop and DSL router in and the laptop gets and IP address, should it?
I thought all ports were untrusted by default so the DHCP server should be blocked at offering IP addresses? If I wanted the DHCP server to be allowed to offer IP's I thought I should need to trust the port.
I'll start out with the fact I work mostly with Wi-Fi and not a lot in the security realm... If I plug my workstation into the 3560, my wired client adapter can get an IP address. But the WLAN adapter will not when associated to WLAN.Usually this is not a problem since you may only have two access points on the controller and a dozen or so hosts. In my case, however, I want to put a few of the ports on the 3560 into the same VLAN as the WLAN on the 2106 so I can give them the same guest access as the WLAN. The hosts plugged into the 3560 get an IP address without issue from the ASA. When I disable dhcp proxy, the WLAN clients get an IP address, but then the APs cannot get an IP address from the internal DHCP server on the WLAN controller, and cease to function when rebooted since they cannot get to the controller without an IP address.
Any way to configure the ASA to accept the modified DHCP packets from the WLAN controller? It appears to me that the ASA is not able to accept DHCP relayed packets.
I have two WAP4410N plugged into my Catylist 3560 switches.One of these switches is my Default Gateway for the LAN.The only way I can get a device to connect to the WAP4410N is by assigning it a static IP. Then it works perfectly.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI want to implement port-based and MAC-based in these two switches: 2960 & 3560 (both of them have this IOS version: 12.2(55)SE1). And I haven't found a way to implement both of them at the same time. This is what I got:
ip dhcp use subscriber-id client-id
ip dhcp subscriber-id interface-name
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.2
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.0.251 192.168.0.255
[code]....
With this configuration I can use port-based, but not MAC based. If I remove the first two lines and change the last line for this one:
address 192.168.0.7 client-id 0112.ae1d.af58.60
Then, the computer with that MAC address got the correct IP, but then the port-based doesn't work. Also, I got this line in the interface what I want to use MAC-based:
ip dhcp server use subscriber-id client-id
can you enable dhcp service on a 3560 switch.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm attempting to configure a Catalyst 3560-X Switch to act as a DHCP Server. There is documentation that supports this feature. Below is my config procedure however after the completed procedue no IPs are handed out to clients. [code]
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe have a 3560 switch configured with EIGRP with dhcp. We have a user that we cannot ping, however the interface show up / up and no errors on interface. the ip address is 10.2.0.199 - however we have dhcp configured to exclude the range from dhcp ip dhcp excluded-address 10.22.0.1 10.22.0.200 how can this work station get a dhcp address if we have that ip range excluded from the dhcp pool?
The user is off a different switch that is a uplink to this distribution switch. Traceroutes shows that the problem is with the distribution switch.
i am not sure if this is something with my DHCP setup or not, but it certainly seems to be the culprit. I am running a 3560G and using it as DHCP and to do V LAN routing (Geiger protocol). I have 10 pools configured with a few static addresses per pool. Now to get down to the problem. I have a computer (and this problem seems to be a gremlin as it changes what computer is affected quite often) that will connect, get its IP, immediately disconnect, then send out a DHCP req again. The computer has a static assignment in the pool, and for the brief second that it connects, it gets the right address. If i move the computer to another v lan, all works right. If i delete the static entry it will get an address in the right v lan no problem. The command i have been using to add static entries is:
address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx client-id 01xx.xxxx.xxxx.xx
That seems to have been working on all my static routes except for a bank of computers in vlan3. I have went as far as to delete the pool and recreate it, heck i even recreated the v lan and i am still having issues. Below are some snippets of the running config for review.
The DHCP Pool for the affected LAN:
ip dhcp pool Dev3
network 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0
boot file bootx86wdsnbp.com
next-server 192.168.1.78
dns- server 192.168.1.8 192.168.1.78
[Code] .....
My Network Layout is as, Firewall (with Routing)------>Cisco 3560 Switch (L3)------> connected 8 Cisco 2960 switch (L2)----> all users I have configured 20 VLAN's on cisco 3560 switch with Dynamic Pool and Static, Means, 5 Vlan's are Dynamic and remaining are Static Our Company process provides only internet access to existing clients computers. Problem is that, I configured Static VLAN 5 for one of our Client in their seperate room, mean to say, i activated all ports of their room with Static VLAN 5. one day they configured own DHCP server on Windows 2003 Server with same subnet (Same as VLAN5) in their room without any information and now their all computer/ Laptop acquiring ip address Dynamically.
If i have configured Static vlan on that port's then how it is get Dynamic ip from same port's.How to restrict to permit another DHCP server/Service in our premises. I Do not want to give administrative control to Clients to do such kind of thing with LAN.
How to configure cisco 3560 to force the client only can get ip by dhcp-relay server ?
The company i am working in has 5 vlans which have been set an lay-3 switch(3560), uses the dhcp-relay server .(in svi configuration: ip helper-address X.X.X.X) well , that works ok~
Now , I got my problem: I need to force the client only can get ip by dhcp-relay server, that means if anyone set static IP manunally , he can't really access to anywhere (to provent anyone set static IP with malignancy )
I know if a h3c router , how to set this configuration n svi configuration : dhcp relay security address-check enable )
the how to configure on a cisco 3560 ?
My actual Scenario
1 x 4500 and 1 x 3560?They are gateways of 8 Vlans?They are doing HSRP in each of those Vlans?The 4500 is the Active?There is a DHCP Pool for each of those Vlans on both gateways using "ip dhcp excluded-address" I ensured that the range of provided ips by each DHCP server will not be overlapped Obs.: Reducing the lease time, I ended with the calls bringing related problems.
OK, every thing is blue, every thing is fine.But the network diagram is realy complex(41 switchs, 89 uplinks), and depending of how is the network flow, one or other server answer first or latter.
For many reasons I would like that the secondary DHCP server would answer only if the primary DHCP server goes down.To me, the bigger reason is that DHCP database would be only in one DHCP server.But there is other reasons.
I passed by many frustrated solutions:Try to force a delay on the answer on one of the servers. - Impossible.Try to disable DHCP server, and, using EEM, enable it only if router became active in HSRP. - I couldn't do It.
What I'm thinking now is use the HSRP resource to resolve it.On both routers I would put a "ip helper-address" pointing to an Virtual_HSRP_IP.And depending on which router is the active, him will answer the request.
My first doubt is:Would it work?The second doubt is:Could I use the same Virtual_HSRP_IP that exists on that Vlan(see example 1),or I would need to point it to a Virtual_HSRP_IP in a different Vlan(see example 2)?
Example 1
-----------------------------------
| 4500 |
-----------------------------------
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.10.0.2 255.255.0.0
ip helper-address 10.10.0.1
standby 1 ip 10.10.0.1
[code]....
I recently ran into some problems concerning the use of a Cisco layer 3 switch (3560) as an Internet edge device to perform a simple static route between the customers network and the ISP POP router. Although this device can perform the routing at the edge for Internet traffic, I am concerned that this device has limitations when it comes to functions such as traffic shaping to the subscribed bandwidth of the Metro Ethernet access to the Internet. Since the 3560 could not conform to the 20 Mbps of subscribed bandwidth, any traffic beyond 20 Mbps was dropped causing performance issues with applications that use TCP. I am trying to find design documents or white papers that would either support or not support using a layer 3 switch as an Internet perimeter device instead of a router. I would like to know if Cisco has a specific perspective on this subject and whether or not they would ever recommend actually using a layer 3 switch model that is a 37XX or below?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 5 SVIs configured for VLAN Interfaces 121-125 for my vSphere environment.
All VMs can ping IPs on all the VLANs (VMs on VLAN 124 can ping VMs on VLAN121)
All VMs, except those on VLAN 124, can access the Internet or even ping my router IP.
If I change one of the VLAN 124 VMs to use a different VLAN, and update the addressing appropriately, it can access the Internet.
The problem is exhibited with Windows and Linux VMs. So, I believe something in my switch setup is the problem with VLAN 124 in particular.
If i do a show vlan brief, VLAN 124 is listed.
If I do a show ip int brief, VLAN 124 is listed as upup. I also tried to shut o shut the VLAN 124 interface.
Only one specific VLAN has connectivity problems?
My topology is Catalyst 3560 to home router to Internet.
Here is my IOS image: c3560-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE6.bin
Here is my show run output:
3560_02#sh run
Building configuration...
[Code].....
At one of my field offices I want to redirect internet traffic down a separate DSL connection instead of having it ride the T1 back to the main office then going out. At this office I have a 2600 router, 3560 switch, with a Fortigate firewall in between DSL connection and LAN, Fa0/0 on router and firewall are both plugged in to switch. I have seen posts that mention PBR or static routes which is the reccomended method for dealing with this?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have configured vlans in 3560G switch but vlans notable to accessing Internet
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have been reading for awhile now on all the Cisco forums on the 3560 and shaping egress traffic but I wanted to verify my thoughts on this. I have 3560 that connects to the ISP that is policing at 10Megs, I want to shape my egress traffic going to the ISP, I do not want to provided QOS to any specific traffic type but only shape all traffic outbound. Will my config below shape "all" egress traffic going to the ISP on the 3560, on a port that is physically connect at 100Meg Full duplex?
int gi0/1
srr-queue bandwidth shape 40 40 40 40
I gathered these numbers using the formula of 100* 1/weight, which would equal 2.5 and if each queue has 2.5 meg that would = 10Meg. However another concern is that I don't think I have the full 100Meg on the interface to use (correct?)
i have a strange issue with an HSRP Setup. I have two (S1+S2) 3560 as Core/Distribution Layer. Inter-vlan routing are enabled on both Switches. S1 and S2 are connected with an ether channel over four fibre ports. S3 -S5 are the (L2) access layer.
Gi0/1 on S1 and S2 are L3 ports, connect to a Linux Firewall.
HSRP is enabled, S1 is the active router and the STP root bridge.
But, my monitoring via cacti show me, that the Gi0/1 on S2 is active, too! But it should not be active? Only if S1 fails, should S2 the active switch.A client from the access ports on S3 - 5 gets traffic from the Internet via Gi0/1 from S2. Gi0/1 on S1 is active too, but will send mostly traffic to the Internet. Why is S2 active and why route it traffic from the Internet to the client?
I am trying to sort out an IP problem on my mates PC. I have setup a Linksys wireless router on his home broadband and it works fine with my laptop and gives me a DHCP address. When I try to connect his home PC either with a wireless dongle or ethernet connect it gets a Public IP address through the router and not one of the DHCP addresses. Even if you give it a static IP address and setup the router to accept it when you turn the PC on it still gets this public IP address. It is associating with the wireless router but only gives a local connection. I have done the ipconfig and it just renews the public IP address to a different one
View 3 Replies View Relatedsetting up an ASA 5505 to be used as a firewall between a BT internet router(BTNet service) and a Cisco 3560 Lan switch. BT have presented me with a cisco 3800 series router with the following details:
Network Address Network Mask BTnet NTE Router LAN Address
There are 2 Gigethernet ports on the back of the router port Ge0/0 is connected to the BT NTE and the status light is flashing green. Int ge0/1 is connected into port int e0/1 of the ASA but i am unable to get any connection.
I need another set of eyes on my config. I am trying to set up my router for a basic connection for the time being. I set my gig 0/0 port to dhcp I see traffic being sent and recieved but I can not ping 8.8.8.8. I am connected to a basic comcast modem from 0/0 I have also tried setting gig 0/0 to 100 full. I do have IP routing enabled. I believe I have my acl's configured correctly. I am wondering at this point if I need a static block of IP's from comcast.
hostname vpn-router-2901
username ****** password *****
enable secret *****
[Code].....
I found a tricky task for our ASA 5505 firewall. I am not able to go internet when using DHCP but I can access by using fixed IP address in client PC.Same IP, Same Mask, Same DNS, Same Gateway. All the same but no hope. Any configuration i missed in firewall?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have successfully configured my DHCP server because I can ping it from the clients PC and my clients PC automatically grabs IP from my DHCP. How my clients can have access to internet. Here is my hardware setup: 1. I connect clients PC and one DHCP server in one unmanaged switch2. I have my Bell DSL Modem but not connected yet to one of these machines. I do not know how I can configure it yet to work with my machines.The IP I assigned started at 10.10.200.10 to 10.10.200.90How do I connect the DSL and configure so that it may give everyone access to internet?
View 1 Replies View RelatedInternet Connection Sharing. On one of my pc's with Win 7 I try to use ICS and it does not work. I have tried forcing the ip address on the LAN connection on the host computer (192.168.0.1 or something) and it will not assign an IP address to any device hooked up to it.On my macbook running Win 7 and all the settings the same, all of the same devices work fine. I tried using a cross-over cable and switch (not at the same time) with no luck. Not using any firewall and I've tried for days.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Linksys e3200 which was working great until about a week ago. Now any device that connects via DHCP does not have access to the internet, though devices set up with a static IP outside the DHCP range still have full access.The devices connecting via DHCP still have full network access, just not internet access.I tried most of the obvious fixes (reboot, changing the range and lease time for the DHCP) but have at best received a temporary fix.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI can ping [URL], from the router but not from a client attached to the router dhcp interface(10.1.3.1). When I turn on ip routing I cannot ping at all. Here is the config I have now that can ping the internet from the router.
sh runBuilding configuration... Current configuration : 1191 bytes!! No configuration change since last restart!version 12.3no service timestamps debug uptimeservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname
[code]....
I have some DHCP trouble since I subnetted my network with a 2921. My clinets are in 172.16.2.0/23 and DHCP servers are in 172.16.5.0/24.Sometimes, randomly I guess, I get NACK from my DHCP server, and if I look into DHCP logs I got something like this:
15,11/09/12,09:52:27,NACK,172.16.3.172,switchE51D12.host.com,A0CF5BE51D12,,0,6,,,,,,,,
15,11/09/12,09:52:28,NACK,172.16.3.172,switchE51D12.host.com,A0CF5BE51D12,,0,6,,,,,,,,
15,11/09/12,09:52:29,NACK,172.16.3.172,switchE51D12.host.com,A0CF5BE51D12,,0,6,,,,,,,,
[code]....