I would like to be able to allow a specific client to only associate at 6mbit/s -is this possible using the wlc controller 5508? Another option would be to limit a whole w lan ssid to 6mbit/s but i can't find a way to do that either.
Other w lan ssid's on the same access points/controller need full data rates, so i guess i can't use the RF-profiling for this.
Is it possible to enable an absolute value rate limit using QOS on a HP ProCurve 5406 switch for a particular IP range on a specific port? Is there a way to configure our HP 5406 with an absolute rate limit on "WAN" port for that server's IP range? I would like to limit it to only being capable of sending 1Mbps worth of traffic over the head end at once.Everything in the documentation points towards priority queues, which as far as I can tell, isn't really what I want.Baring accomplishing this goal using rate limiting is there a better way to prevent our services from accidentally saturating this connection?i thimkong about somthing like that:
class ipv4 rate-limit-port-A1
match ip 10.136.0.0/16 any
exit
policy qos port-a1-ratelimit
class servers-to-be-slowed action rate-limit kbps 1000
exit
interface A1 service-policy port-a1-ratelimit inI'm not sure about this.
I want to limit data consumed by one of my devices; how can I do that. I have set up wireless network using Belkin AC 1200 DB.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've spent parts of the past five days buying and exchanging several WAP4410N units because I was not able to achieve anything close to a 300Mbps data rate. I also tried various wireless-n network cards which were known to be configured correctly for 300Mbps speeds with no luck.
The highest speed I was able to achieve was 130Mbps, which is an indication that channel bonding is not in effect.
Then I came across another post in the forums:
WAP4410N does not exceed 130Mbps in N mode at close range.
where the OP mentions recently upgrading to firmware 2.0.4.2, though not treating that as the cause of his problems.
On a lark, I tried downgrading to both firmware 2.0.2.1 and firmware 2.0.3.3, and to my surprise, I was able to achieve the full 300Mbps data rate with both firmware versions.
When I reverted back to 2.0.4.2, I was not able to achieve the full 300Mbps data rate.
So, right now, I downgraded to firmware 2.0.3.3 so I can get the higher data rate, though there are other quirks to deal with.
Furthermore, when I do a web search of reviews, I can see that the inability to achieve the 300Mbps data rate is a huge source of complaints.
Does the data rate to N connected clients go down to G rate if there is even a single G client connected?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have been deploying 3502 APs remotely to locations with full T1s that backhaul to where I sit at HQ. Both the foreign and anchor controller are here at my location.
I am seeking to rate limit per user the bandwidth each client will get on the guest internet ssid. As you know this traffic is encapsulated in capwap between the AP and the controller so I cant use a standard ACL on the switch or router.
We are trying to keep the guest internet access usage in check on the T1 at any given site so the other ssid's & local lan traffic is not overly competing for the bandwidth.
I found the place to edit the default profiles in the controller but the documentation really isnt clear on best practices.
So I put it to you my fellow wireless engineers to suggest how you are implementing bandwidth management on your wireless guest internet.
Oh and here is my hardware & software levels.
5508wlc - forgeign
4402wlc - anchor
Software Version7.0.230.0
I have just bought an E3000 router when my old router died last week. I am having two problems:
1. The data rate slows down after a period of time (long message trail elsewhere)
2. I cannot see everything on the network.
I have several Win 7 computers, two win xp computers, three NAS devices (linux based), and a printer sitting on the network, along with two switches to cope with all the traffic (not to mention iPods, iphones etc.)With my old router, I couold see everything plugged into the network from my main Win 7 computer. (note: the win 7 network map does not always work, but the windows explorer window of the network always showed everything).With the E3000 router, I can only see 1 or 2 of the devices on the network. If I reboot the router, then sometimes all of the devices appear on the windows explorer window (sometimes not)I am running a workgroup (not a domain) and i am not using win 7's homegroup because that will not work with the non-win 7 devices.Is there a setting that will see all of the devices in Win 7 (either on the router or on the computers). I suspect it is a router issue as it worked with my old Zyxel router.
I am not able to disable rate limit comand from Cisco 3700 series router. I have tried with no rate limit command in the interface .Command is taking but still the rate limit comman in the interface.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a stack of Cisco 3750v2 switches with 8 VLANs (one per customer) and 8 SVI's (again, one per customer). I am trying to apply rate limiting to the SVI's of each vlan for both input and output traffic. This is my SVI configuration for one such VLAN (I have substituted the real IPs for prviate IPs for the purposes of this example) -
interface Vlan30
description ****CUST-C-VL30-SUBRATE-CAR-10M****
ip address 192.168.30.250 255.255.255.0
[Code]...
Based on this and the speed tests I am performing from within the VLAN i am receiving the full bandwidth and not what should be assigned based on the rate limiting. Have I missed anything as far as the configuration goes?
I'm trying to limit one of my inside hosts, since it's been a little of a hog. I have 3Mb available from my ISP via 2x T1. I'm testing this on a computer in a lab:
PC 10.10.10.10------Cisco2960-------- 10.10.10.1 Inside - ASA - Outside 208.66.x.1------------------------208.66.x.2-Cisco 2811-2xT1
Here's what I've tried so far, please see text in red:
***global (outside) 1 208.66.x.115
***nat (inside) 0 access-list No-Nat
***nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
[Code].....
It didn't work... I was able to max the bandwidth again. I also tried to apply service-policy to inside int, which didn't make a difference.
I run streaming multicast video cameras on my network. I stumbled upon the command ip multicast rate-limit. When I configured a test setup in my lab (multicast camera source and a few routers) and tried the command it simply did not work. Moreover, when I went to use the command on a 3900 router in my lab, it was not there.
I take it this command has been deprecated?
Within the Internet Access Policy section of the browser based utility, is it possible to limit access for a specific device (PC) to LAN only (not allow any traffic to external internet)? I see that you can block internet access for a specific machine, however I didn't know if this was inclusive of LAN as well.If not, is there another way to achieve this via the E3000 or should I be looking for a solution on the specific PC itself?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am looking for the command of rate-limit on a sub-interface in cisco asr 1013.
Cisco IOS Software,
IOS-XE Software (X86_64_LINUX_IOSD-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M),
Version 15.2(2)S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
IOS XE Version: 03.06.00.S
If it is possible in Cisco asr 1013. If yes then what are the commands.
1841 - IPBASE 12.4.7d
We provide internet access for a number of clients sitting on our WAN, at present they have un-restricted access to the full bandwidth of our 1Gb internet pipe. As they are only paying for a proportion of that we want to set a Mbps limit on the clients, and idealy the device should be transparent between our router and the clients.
I have been trying to set up rate limits on a bridge on our 1841.
#
bridge 1 protocol ieee
bridge 1 route ip
bridge 1 bridge ip
[Code].....
I have tried many combinations but can't get this to limit the traffic, the client still draws as much as they can.
Does rate limit work on bridged interfaces? or am I going to have to try it routed instead?
Worried about denial-of-service attacks. They have 11 vm's that share a connection and want to set it up so that there is a maximum amount of traffic allowed to hit each vm, so if there is a DDoS attack it will only affect that one VM instead of all the VM's on the same connection.
What is the best way to go about this from the ASA? This is behind a 5515 with asa code version 8.6. Is there a way to rate-limit by ip address?
Setup:
Cisco 886VA-K9
Cisco IOS Software, C880 Software (C880DATA-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(4)M3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
This router has two VLAN's on one Ehternet interface
VLAN1: data
VLAN2: voice
The WAN connection is a regular DSL line with PPP.
Modem FW Version: 120306_1254-4.02L.03.B2pvC035j.d23j
Modem PHY Version: B2pvC035j.d23j
Output of show interface brief:
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
ATM0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
BRI0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
BRI0:1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
[code]....
We all know you can't manage data traffic on the internet since your not in control of both sides of the link. So only queuing would not be a good practice IMHO. I was thinking on just rate-limit or police data-traffic so Voice always has bandwidth available when needed. I've did tried to rate-limit on the ATM0 interface, but no luck. Voice was still very bad.
My question is: where to rate-limit the data traffic? On the VLAN interface, the ATM interface, DIALER interface?
I apologize in advance if this is a novice inquiry, but our company just switched from Point-to-Point T1's to Metro Ethernet.
On one point-to-point, from our main office to one of our high profile locations, we had two bonded T1's. Now this site has a 3 Mbps Metro-E link, but it's being over-saturated. I don't know what type of QOS implementation our T1 provider had, but it prevented flooding. Now, I'm getting horrendous latency as the office peak hours approach since there is no QOS on the mesh by our Metro-E providers.
Ultimately, my question is: what's the best way to set a Fast Ethernet port on a Cisco 1800 series router to limit all bandwidth to 3 Mbps? At the moment, I don't have a preference in which traffic takes priority. I tried the rate-limit command, along with a speed calculator I found online, but that slowed the network down immensely.
I configured rate limit on cisco 2960 switch sexuss fully, but i could not configure in cisco 2950 (verson 12.1 (22).To confiure the same on 2950
View 4 Replies View RelatedACE A2(3.4). Is it possible to set a rate-limit connections per sec from any source IP. For example, if a client is trying to GET a web page 10 time per sec I will send a reset or drop that connection.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to rate limit a 3560 inbound and outbound using different QoS methods. I've read about vlan class maps/policy maps, using the rate limit command on the physical interface, using the srr-queue bandwidth command(it's a gig switch so not sure that would work) and marking all packets and then applying QoS. I'm just learning QoS so trying to figure all of this out and find the best way to do things.
Also, I was told to do this because it's not advisable to have a connection to your ISP that is not 10mb or 100mb on a switch, since they are not divisible by 10 and it can cause issues?
I have a Cisco SG300 small business switch and 541 APs. There are 2 VLANs in our network. One must be limited by bandwidth. How to configure vlan rate-limiting on SG300? And describe CIR & CBS.
View 1 Replies View RelatedBuy a router RV120W, and one of the reasons is limit of bandwidth (QoS). I set up a profile of 1-256 kbps limit, and apply it to the only VLAN that is configured, but does not work and can navigate using the full bandwidth of the internet connection. My firmware version is 1.0.2.6
View 8 Replies View RelatedI am using Cisco 3560 as distrubution switch and want to limit port 445 traffic on 1 MB and applied rate limit statment on Gi0/1 port but switch unable to limit said traffic.rate-limit output access-group 120 1024000 128000 128000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop.
View 25 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to determine whether Cisco has any equivalent (in any platform) to some of the existing firewall rules within our iptables infrastructure. [code] What this does, is allow port forwards on port 3389/rdp. However, if a single IP opens too many connections within a timeframe, it starts dropping new ones.This is a critical requirements for certain security scenarios, such as preventing RDP brute forcing. A similar principle can be applied to 22/ssh.I've had a look around, rate limiting searches generally land me on QoS based discussions. I've seen people ask similar questions and get referred to CBAC. Whilst I can see similarly worded functions there such as limiting "half open" connections, I don't see anything there that limits the actual number of connection attempts you can make.
View 1 Replies View RelatedTo rate limit the 2960 switch port to 1 MB.I have made the specified chnages , how ever still it is reaching more tha 1 MB
Hard coded the bandwidth of port to 10 MB and have applied the specified command srr-queue bandwidth limit 10.
I am having an issue with VoiP phones giving me an insufficient bandwidth message. I have three remote locations connected to our main building using 2 Mb point to point ethernet solutions through TWC. Each remote location has a Cisco WS-C3560-24PS running IOS C3560-IPBASE-M, version 12.2(25) and have the cable modems plugged into port 1 on them. The remote buildings are labeled 192.168.101.xxx, 192.168.102.xxx, and 192.168.103.xxx. There are 14-16 VoiP phones in each remote building. The main building being in the subnet of 192.168.100.xxx. I have the 3560s connecting to a single port on a 2801 in the main building, all using the subnet of 192.168.253.xxx The phone server sits in our network at 192.168.100.203. I have created the ACLs, class maps, and policy maps on all of the equipment.
For the remote buildings I have the following:
ACL
===========
Extended IP access list VOIP
permit tcp any host 192.168.100.203 dscp ef
permit tcp any host 192.168.100.203 eq 5566
[Code]....
I have put a hub in to capture traffic via Wireshark to see if DSCP flags are being appropriately marked and I do see that all VoiP packets are getting marked with as EF. However, I have been receiving phone calls from people in the remote buildings stating that their phones will cut out, flash Insufficient Bandwidth on the LCD displays and then the call will cut back in. I am wondering if the 2801 is not applying QoS with the rate-limits in mind since it is set to 100 Mb, or is it an issue with trying to take 3 remote locations and bring them down into 1 port on the 2801?
How is it i can implement the command 'ip multicast rate-limit out group-list <access-list>' but i get the error "ip multicast rate-limit" command is not supported on 6509?
Is it an IOS limitation or a limitation of the switch series and subsequently can't be used at all?
How (and is) it possible to rate limit pps on an interface (physical/logical), on a 6509-E?The porpuse is to protect from attacks which lead to very high pps, bypassing traffic rate-limits, and effecting the device's performance
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a customer that have trouble with the update of the position of a client. Even if the clients walks across the whole building, the client will stay at the same place for several minutes. Is there any way to tune the refresh rate? When I push the load button in the map, the clients position will refresh, or it did when I was on the site, now they just test with an application.
The setup:
WiSM 7.0.220
WCS 7.0.220
MSE 7.0.220
They use the API for MSE to get the location information to the external application, and that will show the information on a cisco 7925 IP phone.know a way to increasing the refresh rate?
i have configured some 1142n's, everything works in terms of .n but the reported client connection on the AP does match the published MCS definitions.eg so what does "Current Rate (Mb/sec) m6-4" actually mean in terms of MCS connection
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to limit the bandwidth on certain ports to 3Mbps and others 1Mbps for a project, however when I do a bandwidth test from a website the speed on the router doesn't seem to change it's as if the changes over telnet aren't actually affecting the swtich's qos settings. I have verified that the policy is attached to the interface and the settings are correct as well.
Router
Telnet address: 10.xxx.xx.xx
Password:
[Code].....
I have something I assumed but I am not sure if this wrong or not. I assume that every say 1 meter, I can send say 1 bits, so if I have 10 meters of link length, I can send 10 bits of data on that link. Do you have any argument to strongly support this assumption, preferrably a reference.
View 13 Replies View RelatedWhich network provides the highest data transfer rate?
View 1 Replies View Related