how can i connect two offices in the same town.these two offices are separated by two kilometres.each office has ten rooms.how can i provide a secure intranet between the two offices ,what media can be used and hardware to provide a secure intranet via the two offices.
View 2 RepliesI have my PC in my office with two lans,, one, the internal lan of my company with a static ip address, the other one a broadband line for connecting to internet.. If i switch on both the lans at the same time, i am able to use the broadband lan and the internal lan stops functioning,, to make it work i need to disable the lan with broadband line.. i even tried bridging the lans but that again stopped my internal lan. way to connect both the lans at the same time so that both the networks work simultaneously... and if there is any other option to function two lans on a single PC at the same time.
View 19 Replies View RelatedI need to connect 4-6 laptops in a mesh network topology. What equipment do I need (switches, hubs cable etc..) and how should I create the connection?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to connect to LANs from one Computer Answer of : How to connect to two different LANs from one Computer with two LAN Cards :with 16 Port Switch in My Computer lab.
View 1 Replies View RelatedSupposing we have 2 LANs of 5 pcs in different buildings is there any special way to connect them using fibre optics?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to connect two LANs together with hardware VPN, for some file sharing. I was thinking to use a Linksys router and a dedicated ADSL line at each site, in order to setup the VPN. There is also an extra ADSL connection at each site for user internet access. how am I going to separate the two, without having to install two network cards on each user PC?If I set the user's gateway to the VPN or the internet router, how can I use the other?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have two locations in the same city and I want to connect them together so I can share files and printers. Each of the LANs has a router and is a simple workgroup. LAN A uses 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0; LAN B is 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0. What is the best way to connect these two networks together so I can share printers on both sides? Should I replace the network routers, they are older and definitely could use an upgrade
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm given an ASA 5505 to configure for remote access vpn. I can establish vpn connection to the ASA 5505 but can't access any of the internal vlan/subnets. I configured three of the ASA ports for connection into each of the internal subnets/vlan via a switch.Given below is my full configuration.
ASA5505# sh run: Saved:ASA Version 8.3(1)!enable password bLjadbVl0mgRQWih encryptedpasswd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encryptednames!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0!interface Vlan2nameif
[Code].....
LAN L1, with IP addresses 192.168.10.x, for Company C1
LAN L2, with IP addresses 192.168.11.x, for Company C2
I have networks separated: different racks (but very closer fisically: a wire can be thrown), different gateways (to DSL), but both LAN's must connect with each other. I have acquired two RV042, one for each company to create VPN's (permitting telejob).
We live in a large ranch styled house. Conversely, we installed two broadband connection at opposite ends of the home. One cable and one DSL. Reason: Kids share DSL and Parents have the cable all to themselves. We are currently wanting to setup a media server where both networks would have access to a database of media files. It would be in the middle of the house and each network would connect to it wirelesslyI guess first off, is this possible
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have problem with LMS 4.0 when i connect the topology from client PC. On client PC (Install windows 7), I had some check:
- Telnet LMS 42342 ------ OK
- Add host in Program files/system32/drivers/etc: 10.10.10.14 LMS
i create a network topology ( i attached picture) and i don't know what exactly IP addresses should be assigned to routers and switches + there should be five VLAN's created and just one vlan (vlan 2) must see others vlans (for management purposes) and others vlans should not see each other. So i need that: 1) What IP addresses should be on routers and switches 2) How to create a 5 vlans, that they should not see each other, but one should see all, for example where i have to put "tagged" ports where "untagged" or "not member" ports etc.
View 1 Replies View Relatedi create a network topology ( i attached picture) and i don't know what exactly IP addresses should be assigned to routers and switches + there should be five VLAN's created and just one vlan (vlan 2) must see others vlans (for management purposes) and others vlans should not see each other. So i need that: 1) What IP addresses should be on routers and switches 2) How to create a 5 vlans, that they should not see each other, but one should see all, for example where i have to put "tagged" ports where "untagged" or "not member" ports etc.
View 4 Replies View RelatedUsing Topology I can show device view from all my managed VTP domains. I don't understand why all links are "not in network"!?
View 3 Replies View RelatedAfter some time LMS stops to refresh network topology (not changing colors for devices which lost/found). However, if I restart topology services devices are refreshed.
Checked the processes. Everything is fine but there is a process named "1018". But I did not found any job with this number.
As we know when multiple PCs share same link"line" they will need multiple access protocol like CSMA/CD to protected from collision,,share link like "bus topology" need multiple access protocol "CSMA/CD" but in star topology"switch not hub" PC0 connect to port0 ,,PC1 connect to port1 PCn connect to portn then every PC connect to separate port ,, and the switch mange the network"by using MAC" then why we need to used CSMA/CD in star topology"switch"???
View 9 Replies View RelatedWe currently support a third party VOIP software. Recently we have had issues with our T38 faxing to our SIP Trunk provider because our FW (sonicwall) doesn't support Nating the connection address within the SDP packet of the T.38 reinvite. This has caused us to look at alternate solutions. I have been in discussion with CISCO sales engineers and can't get a straight answer on which one of their products support this(RFC 3362, T.38 protocol used by our VOIP server)We were looking at replacing our sonicwall with an ASA but it seems it doesn't support RFC 3362 either . However, the sales engineer thinks that their regular routers will. So If I purchase a cisco router, i.e 8xx or 2621XM the question is where do I put it in my current topograpy. Currently we our at a Datacenter and our drop into our cabinet comes right into the Sonicwall and we have all NAT handled there, routing to different LAN ports on the Sonicwall. On LAN side all we have are standard switches supporting all of our Servers.
If I buy a Cisco router to handle my NAT issue for faxing.Do I put it on the WAN or LAN side of my FW?Do I setup the router to handle all of my NATing or just the NATing of my VOIP server that is having issues with the T.38? Would I need a Sonicwall FW if I purchased a CISCO 891?
I have a problem where clients cannot roam between Cisco 1231g-e-k9 and recently installed cisco 1242g-e-k9 access points.. On looking at the CDP option on the 1231 and 1242 access points they are all aware of each other. However if I use the Network View option I see a different picture. All the 1231 access points can see each other but not see the 1242's. Network View on the1242 shows all the 1231's but none of the 1242's. The 1231 are running ver. 12.3(8)JEB and the 1242's are running ver. 12.4(21a)JA1.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am a beginner, and my customer complaining about the internet connection performance which is very slow, the network description is given below:
Description:
The building has four floors and each floor has one mount rack which contains one 26 port switch + 16 port switch. and each floor has 32 pc as well.
- 4, Cisco SR2024 un managed switches.
- 4, Cisco SR2016 un managed switches.
- 1, Cisco access point for internet connection.
- 1, Active directory server.
- 1, Mail Server.
- Internet ADSL connection, 1 MB speed.
This is the current topology.
*Note:The links and cable type "100BASE-TX under Cat 5" among all switches.
*Note:Whenever I connect to the main router "Access point" the internet becomes very fast.
I have two complete and separate "networks", each with their own internet connections. One is for home use, one is for business use.
(1) Home network has a D-Link cable-modem/router to the ISP. Variable public IP address. NAT'd.This router is configured "as provided" by the ISP (except for a few port-forwards). DHCP serving is enabled, etc. If possible, I do not wish to change any major router settings.LAN IP Range: 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
(2) Business network has a 2-Wire ADSL-modem/router to a different ISP. Static public IP address. NAT'd.DHCP serving is handled by a Windows 2003 Server. I am happy to change any router and server settings.LAN IP Range:192.168.254.0/255.255. 255.0
I have a network printer. It is currently connected to the Home Network (1) and has a static IP address 192.168.0.8, but I wish it to be accessible by PC's on both networks.My first thought is to simply connect both routers LAN-side via an ethernet cable. However, I can't find a way to add a LAN-LAN static route on the Business Network router (it only has options for WAN-LAN static routes). Do I really need to internetwork the routers via the internet?!?
I have 2 LANs in my own PC & 2 Routers (TP-Link WR941N each) with 2 internet accounts (512Kbps each) connected to the same ISP signal & company using NanoStation 5 from ubnt.As u know the connections work separately by default!! (I use Windows 7 64bit)Can I merge them to get double speed (download/upload simultaneously) using reg edit or special software or method?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to connect my laptop that has a single wired network port to 2 different lans...currently I unplug the wire from wall port A and plug it into wall port B and back and forth. Is there something like a KVM switch, that can have wires from wall port A and B go in to with a single wire going out to the laptop's network card? Then I could just toggle a switch (push a button) to connect back and forth between the lan connected through wall port A and wall port B. Does such a device exist or would it make better sense to add another network card via USB and have both wall ports wired to the laptop all the time and use software to switch between each card?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to get the Cisco 1921 to route between 2 LANs. I can ping from the router itself, but cannot ping across either, is there something I am doing wrong here:
version 15.1
!
no aaa new-model
!
no ipv6 cef
ip source-route
ip cef
[code]....
My VDSL subscription will include both Internet, and TV. The supplied router then makes them available via two separate ports with different address ranges. LAN cables then connect to the computers and TV decoder from these ports.In the house there is a single Ethernet cable already running through the walls from the basement to the lounge on the ground floor. I want to consolidate both the Internet and TV data onto this cable and then split it apart again at the other side to go to a TV decoder and a wifi router.I don't want the VDSL router to be in the lounge as I will also have a TV decoder and Internet connection in the basement.I am renting the property so I can't run new cables through the walls etc.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have two complete networks in my office. I want to access my printer from both the networks. Condition: With the Firewall I can't access computer of one network from another how can I access the printer from both the LANs. I am not allowed to play with Firewall.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 2 LANs in my own PC & 2 Routers (TP-Link WR941N each) with 2 internet accounts (512Kbps each) connected to the same ISP signal & company using NanoStation 5 from ubnt. As u know the connections work separately by default!! (I use Windows 7 64bit) Can I merge them to get double speed (download/upload simultaneously) using reg edit or special software or method?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have two LANs 192.168.0.* and 192.168.1.* (main)
I'd like to facilitate port forwarding on the sub-LAN - is there a way to configure the device to do so? The "main" LANs fowarding works just fine, however I have specific ports that need to go to the sub-LAN.
I have a spare 2621 sitting on my desk and i would like to run a little experiment. i had two LAN segments that are seperated right now, but would like to stick this router between them and route traffic between them?
Current configuration : 1221 bytes
!
version 12.2
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption(code)
connecting to separate private lans:
A) 192.168.1.x
B) 192.168.0.x
A is behind a Watchguard XTM25 11.5.3
B is behind a CISCO SA520W
Both have static public facing IP's.
B only has a IP based PBX system attached to it over a SIP ALG. (originally it was hooked up to the watchguard but they didn't play nice, but works great with the Cisco. Problem is the Cisco don't have all the features of the Watchguard)
A has all my users workstations attached. The issue is that computers on A need to talk to server on B for a desktop application to work. Since they are on separate subnets, it isn't working. The app itself still doesn't work by port forward/sNats, etc.
A & B are right next to each other, so cabling between them is not an issue.
Currently, I have a cable between the watchguard and the Cisco. The watchguard end is configured with a static private ip on the subnet A (the cisco side), and plugged into the lan on the cisco side. I have a policies to let all traffic flow freeley, and from the logs on the Watchguard, all A subnet traffic is correctly going to the Cisco via said cable.
But, nothing is coming back from the Cisco. So my question is, how can I get the Cisco to play nice with the other subnet and send traffic back to the B subnet?
I have a Cisco 2600 with IOS 12.3. I need a very basic configuration to allow traffic between two LANs. To test this I cleared the router config to the factory default state and configured my network addresses on the interfaces.
When I connected a PC to each interface I found they could ping each other, I was expecting to have to write ACLs to permit the traffic into the interfaces, thinking that the default behaviour of the router would be to deny access. default bahaviour without any ACLs or other routing configurations?
My config, such as it is, is as follows:
Current configuration : 770 bytes
version 12.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
[code]....
I've created the VLAN on the Database but it tells me that there are no VLANs configured when i issue the command. Both VLAN 110 and 111 status are down, down.. Below is my config:
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 15817 bytes!upgrade fpd autoversion 12.2service timestamps debug uptimeservice timestamps log uptimeno service password-encryptionservice counters max age 10!hostname Router!!no aaa new-modelip subnet-zero!!!ipv6 mfib hardware-switching replication-mode ingressvtp domain Marinersvtp mode transparentmls ip multicast flow-stat-timer 9no mls flow ipno mls flow ipv6no mls acl tcam share-globalmls cef error action freezeno scripting tcl initno scripting tcl encdir!!! !!!!!!!redundancymode ssomain-cpu auto-sync running-configspanning-tree mode pvstno spanning-tree optimize bpdu transmissiondiagnostic cns publish cisco.cns.device.diag_resultsdiagnostic cns subscribe cisco.cns.device.diag_commands!vlan internal allocation policy ascendingvlan access-log ratelimit 2000!vlan 110name Data!vlan 111name Voice!vlan 112name Video!------------Output
[code]....
I just got the E3200 and it's a pretty good router. Configured it to have 1 SSID as the 5Ghz SSID and the other as the 2.4 Ghz SSID. Since there are 2 SSIDs broadcasted, I was expecting machines connected to each distinct SSID to not be able to see each other, ie expecting the 5Ghz SSID to be a private LAN1 and the 2.4 Ghz SSID to be LAN2? It turns out machines on either SSID can see each other, so it looks like it on 1 big LAN even though there are 2 SSIDs.Doesn't a SSID map to a unique LAN even though they are in the same router?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe want to use a Cisco 861 Ethernet router to link our LAN's data and voice segments together (each on separate switches). Our switches are not Layer3 so routing over them is not an option. We only use the default VLAN1 on both switches.There is a data segment 192.168.1.0/24 and a voice segment 192.168.150.0/24, each with it's own internet/WAN access (internet for the data lan and SIP provider for the voice lan).
Diagram:
internet-~--router_192.168.1.1------192.168.1.0/24_data_lan--------192.168.1.254_cisco861_192.168.150.254-----192.168.150.0/24_voice------192.168.150.1_router--~-sip_provider
This is want i want to achieve:
- Link the data and voice switches using the 861
- I want to make the Cisco 861 the default gw on both segments, but they should only route traffic destined for the other segment to each other and route all other traffic to their segment's designated internet connection. I don't want the Cisco to do any NATting and there's no need for firewalling either.