I have 2 LANs in my own PC & 2 Routers (TP-Link WR941N each) with 2 internet accounts (512Kbps each) connected to the same ISP signal & company using NanoStation 5 from ubnt.As u know the connections work separately by default!! (I use Windows 7 64bit)Can I merge them to get double speed (download/upload simultaneously) using reg edit or special software or method?
I have 2 LANs in my own PC & 2 Routers (TP-Link WR941N each) with 2 internet accounts (512Kbps each) connected to the same ISP signal & company using NanoStation 5 from ubnt. As u know the connections work separately by default!! (I use Windows 7 64bit) Can I merge them to get double speed (download/upload simultaneously) using reg edit or special software or method?
What I want to do is combine a sad 1.5M DSL connection and a long range WiFi signal into a single connection for a rural area home.I am looking for any effective solution (including boosting WiFi output signal beyond FFC suggested values). The WiFi long range antenna (DISH + gutted LNB) receives a full bar 40+ Mbps signal from 11 miles away. DSL is standard 1.5M over DSL Modem.
I have a small call center and we are struggling with adequate dsl bandwidth for our voip. The providers cannot give us more upload bandwidth. Any way to combine the bandwidth of two or more lines so that the server/switch sees increased bandwidth for upload?
i bought me a router so that me and a few other friends could play to star craft 2, but i would like to know that if i could play an LAN with NO internet on it?
I have inherited a Cisco VPN 3005 and need to configure an interesting scenario:
2 LAN-2-LAN tunnels: 1 required an outside IP and has an existing static NAT of 192.168.1.1 -> 12.2.1.1 for 0.0.0.0 as the destination.I now have a need to created a new NAT for 192.168.1.1 to translate to 10.99.1.1 for destination of 13.3.1.1, 14.3.1.1 and 15.3.1.1.
Is it possible to have the above scenario, or even NAT 12.2.1.1 from the first NAT back to 10.99.1.1??
I'm going to combine 2 512 kbps ADSL line in my PC. i know that it would be much better to get a 1 MB ADSL connection...but the problem is where i live now there is not better speed than this! Well i have a PC with 2 LANs - 2 phone lines - 2 ADSL modems - as far as i learned from Google , by no means it is possible to combine them to have 1 MB data rate but it is possible for example IDM would works with one 512 and another program with another 512..!! And load balancing is the only solution for this which it needs a special routers ! it is somehow difficult for me to provide one ..!! so my question is :
1- Is there any other solution for combining this 2 lines?! I heard something about teaming. 2- Is it possible to use load balancing by software? 3- How about the efficiency and ping time?
My apartment complex limits each connection to 200KBps but each connection has the same IP so I thought there has to be an easy way to combine the connections. Is there a way to connect the wired network i'm connected to with the wireless one?
I have two RFC1918 domains I wish to connect, can I use double NAT with PAT so that each domain is represented as one single ip address with each session a port of that address-
The link is a private point to point link with a /32 mask so could I use this as the PAT address ?
Facing a problem of double multicast on one of our cisco 3750 switch. On checking with sniffer it was found that out of double packet’s one packet is having source mac-address of vlan and another packet is having a source mac-address of switch base mac-address.
setting up a simple internet plan for a place, but a LAN center needs crazy fast internet, faster than most large enterprise class offices that take up an entire floor or two. Otherwise there is too much lag in games like first person shooters. We are expecting to have 60 computers, plus people bringing their own gaming rigs from home and laptops as well, xbox, ps3 and other consoles, all accessing the internet at the same time to varying degrees, with no room for lag. There is a LAN center in california that has 200 or more computers and they pay for 9 t3 lines, which is thousands and thousands of dollars per month. Plus the initial equipment to set that up from what I can find on cdw is many thousands of dollars also. Something like 10,000 for a router with 4 expansion bays, and 4000-6000 dollars for a t3 expansion card, bringing the total to around 22-28,000 for equipment to do just 4 t3's. Plus the monthly cost. Since we don't need all of the traffic to be secured like a high end business class line like a t3, I was considering what it would be like, and how one would set up, having multiple cable internet lines coming in. They make cable wic cards for cisco routers. 4, 50meg cable lines would give us 200 down and 40 up but I don't know how to make that work without having multiple public ip's. I was thinking that if I did have multiple public ip's on the network I could just divide the computers up so that they are in groups, using all of the public ip addresses for gateways, so that the load is split pretty evenly, but still, there should be a more seamless way to do this, I just don't know what it is. At the rate for business cable internet, 4 lines would probably only cost around 700 dollars a month, which is much better than probably 5 grand a month for several t3 lines.
I just installed a new RV016, and have it up and running currently using just one WAN (cable) on the Internet2 port. Just FYI I do plan to have a second WAN on Internet1 (DSL) once I get this next step working and want that to be the dafault provider, hence the use of Internet2 for this first connection.I already have a WRVS4400N installed that has a whole network on it that will be independant to the new the network and am trying to connect the WRVS4400N to my RV016. It is currently plugged into port 8 of the RV016 and the port is currently set to VLAN2.I know just enough to be a danger to myself here. :-) The RV016 is using the default IP of 192.168.1.1 while the WRVS4400N uses 192.168.10.1.I do know that "Typically, a Cisco RV0xx Series router is used as an access router, with a single LAN subnet. By default, the firewall is pre-configured to deny LAN access if the source IP address is on a different subnet than the router’s LAN IP address. However, you can enable multiple subnets to allow this router to work as an edge device that provides Internet connectivity to different subnets in your LAN."Hence I have added added the 192.168.10.1 subnet with mask 255.255.255.0 (to the RV016) and have tried switching the WRVS4400N from Gateway mode to Router mode. The RV016 can see it but nothing on the WRVS4400N network has any internet access, while computers on RV016 do. I assume this is because of the firewall blocking the traffic.
I'm trying to combine dynamic and static NAT on a SR520. My dynamic NAT is specified with:ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.7.255 In addition to this I want to perform static NAT for a couple of selected internal hosts. I can do this:ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 10.85.10.2 which works fine but means that the source address 192.168.1.5 is translated to 10.85.10.2 for all destination IPs. What I want is for the above static translation only to occur for a particular destination subnet.To accomplish this I have tried:
ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 10.85.10.2 route-map toOtherSite route-map toOtherSite permit 10 match ip address 150 access-list 150 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
But this does not appear to work. Instead it seems to render the host 192.168.1.5 unable to progress through the NAT, whether the destination subnet is 192.168.10.0/24 or not, and I can't work out what I'm doing wrong.
I have cisco 1841 router and two types of ISP line (Different provider):
1. Lease line = 2 mbps ( it is terminated over cisco 1841 router); For internet-access purpose 2. DSL = 1 mbps; For internet-access purpose
Our cisco 1841 router have only two fastethernet port, first for WAN Port where 2 mbps lease line terminated , second for LAN which is connected to Cisco switch and 1 mbps adsl line running seperatly which is not part of cisco 1841 router. i am planning to buy HWIC card for extra wan port on existing router where i will terminate 1 mbps adsl line or may be other provider lease line.I want to merge or aggregate both WAN link, My concern is to merge both line (2+1) and get single one (Just like as Etherchannel thing) , get 3mbps for LAN for internet access.
I have D-link DSL 2750U wireless router. My PC and notebook are connected to router by Wi-Fi. They can share files or ping each other. I have a network storage unit plugged into router by an ethernet cable. Any of the computers cannot reach that storage unit or ping it. I guess my router isolates LAN network from WLAN network. Is there a way to combine them and get the router treat all devices connected to router in a single network?
I want to know how to have a double SSID but it's forbidden to have a wireless interruption with the wep which is on my cisco aironet 1242AG. I need to have wpa2 in addition of the wep.
I am having issues trying to combine two modules into one VDC. The modules are as mentioned below: When I try to combine module 1 & 10 as shown above, the nexus 7000 switch displays 'Not compatible'. I've read the online guide and it mentions that the F2 and M1 module cannot be combine into the same VDC. Problem is, my customer has already purchased the module, how do i solve this problem? If I separate the VDC, how does module 1 talk to module 10 if user wants to send traffic to Internet or Server Farm?
How to connect to LANs from one Computer Answer of : How to connect to two different LANs from one Computer with two LAN Cards :with 16 Port Switch in My Computer lab.
I have two complete and separate "networks", each with their own internet connections. One is for home use, one is for business use.
(1) Home network has a D-Link cable-modem/router to the ISP. Variable public IP address. NAT'd.This router is configured "as provided" by the ISP (except for a few port-forwards). DHCP serving is enabled, etc. If possible, I do not wish to change any major router settings.LAN IP Range: 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
(2) Business network has a 2-Wire ADSL-modem/router to a different ISP. Static public IP address. NAT'd.DHCP serving is handled by a Windows 2003 Server. I am happy to change any router and server settings.LAN IP Range:192.168.254.0/255.255. 255.0
I have a network printer. It is currently connected to the Home Network (1) and has a static IP address 192.168.0.8, but I wish it to be accessible by PC's on both networks.My first thought is to simply connect both routers LAN-side via an ethernet cable. However, I can't find a way to add a LAN-LAN static route on the Business Network router (it only has options for WAN-LAN static routes). Do I really need to internetwork the routers via the internet?!?
I'm currently switching from a certain internet provider to another and I'm forced to get another router. What I wanted to do is since the initial router has to be on the first floor, I'd like to have the second one on the top floor closer to my computer whereas they would share a dedicated connection between each other wirelessly so it would make my connection faster rather than just having my pc connect directly wirelessly to the initial router on the first floor. Is that possible?
I only have access to rather slow connections (256 Kbps). But since I have two lines and two modems, I was wondering if I could bond them together and make a faster one. My main modem is a Lynksys WAG120N Wireless-N ADSL2+ Modem Router, which as you can see is also in charge of both wired and wireless networks at my place. The second one is an older D-Link ADSL modem (JUST modem).Since I have an extra LAN port on my Lynksys modem, I want to know if and how I can connect the second modem, and combine the two rates.
I'm new to networking (at least at this level) and need some guidance. First, I have an Actiontec MI424WR (Rev. F) Coax Verizon Fios modem that I use as my home networking wireless router. From a LAN port on that I've connected a cable to the WAN port on my DIR-655 which acts as my gigabit office hard wire/wireless router. I need to keep the home network and the office network separate.All of my computers are Windows, either 7, Vista or XP.Connected to my Dir-655 on the office network are 2 wireless computers, a printer, an IOMEGA 1TB Home Personal Cloud NAS HDD, plus 2 desktop computers.The DIR-655 is set with a static IP address matching the range of the Actiontec. The DIR-655 is set for DHCP for the devices on the network (although 2 of the computers have static IP address).
When the DIR-655 had a Dynamic IP address set by the Actiontec, the IOMEGA NAS HDD kept losing connection with all the devices on the network. Only after I set the DIR-655 to static IP did that stop and everybody started to play nice. I'm not sure why that would make a difference, but it did.But regardless of whether it is set to dynamic or static, no computer on the network or program, even third party programs, can connect to ANY of the time servers out there... and I mean any of them. I've tried at least 20 or more of the standard and not so standard ones. The DIR-655's time is off, and it is set to get time automatically. None of my computers, or my IOMEGA NAS, can access time. The Actiontec, though, seems to be set correctly.Everything connects to the internet just fine. Web, email, auto product upgrades. Fine. So far it's just the time server thing which troubles.I done everything I know how to do to enable Port Forwarding through both routers for NTP > UDP 123 since that is the standard port for the Network Time Protocol, but I could have easily screwed that up.
We just upgraded our Sg300 series switches to the new IOS so we can get CLI access. The upgrade went fine but it seems we have two login prompts, the first being completely unnecessary as you can just hit return to get by it. IE here is the progression:
1. Connect SSH
2. Receive a "login:" prompt. Anything can be entered here, including just return
3. Login banner is displayed
4. Username Prompt is then displayed. Valid username required
I am trying to get rid of that first login prompt (IE Step 2) as it is causing issues with our configuration software. I have tried every line and authentication command I can think of, the only thing that gets rid of it is using none authentication which obviously we can't stay with. how did you get around it?
I have a DCP 3925 with 2 telephone and 4 internet ports.So, how can I combine DPC 3925 + E3000 to have more internet ports? and wich one is the best wifi than I can use ??Main router is the DPC 3925, where the internet is connected.
I need to connect my laptop that has a single wired network port to 2 different lans...currently I unplug the wire from wall port A and plug it into wall port B and back and forth. Is there something like a KVM switch, that can have wires from wall port A and B go in to with a single wire going out to the laptop's network card? Then I could just toggle a switch (push a button) to connect back and forth between the lan connected through wall port A and wall port B. Does such a device exist or would it make better sense to add another network card via USB and have both wall ports wired to the laptop all the time and use software to switch between each card?
how can i connect two offices in the same town.these two offices are separated by two kilometres.each office has ten rooms.how can i provide a secure intranet between the two offices ,what media can be used and hardware to provide a secure intranet via the two offices.
I am trying to get the Cisco 1921 to route between 2 LANs. I can ping from the router itself, but cannot ping across either, is there something I am doing wrong here:
version 15.1 ! no aaa new-model ! no ipv6 cef ip source-route ip cef