Cisco WAN :: 1841 Combine / Merge Bandwidth Of 2 ISP And Get Single
Oct 1, 2012
I have cisco 1841 router and two types of ISP line (Different provider):
1. Lease line = 2 mbps ( it is terminated over cisco 1841 router); For internet-access purpose
2. DSL = 1 mbps; For internet-access purpose
Our cisco 1841 router have only two fastethernet port, first for WAN Port where 2 mbps lease line terminated , second for LAN which is connected to Cisco switch and 1 mbps adsl line running seperatly which is not part of cisco 1841 router. i am planning to buy HWIC card for extra wan port on existing router where i will terminate 1 mbps adsl line or may be other provider lease line.I want to merge or aggregate both WAN link, My concern is to merge both line (2+1) and get single one (Just like as Etherchannel thing) , get 3mbps for LAN for internet access.
setting up a simple internet plan for a place, but a LAN center needs crazy fast internet, faster than most large enterprise class offices that take up an entire floor or two. Otherwise there is too much lag in games like first person shooters. We are expecting to have 60 computers, plus people bringing their own gaming rigs from home and laptops as well, xbox, ps3 and other consoles, all accessing the internet at the same time to varying degrees, with no room for lag. There is a LAN center in california that has 200 or more computers and they pay for 9 t3 lines, which is thousands and thousands of dollars per month. Plus the initial equipment to set that up from what I can find on cdw is many thousands of dollars also. Something like 10,000 for a router with 4 expansion bays, and 4000-6000 dollars for a t3 expansion card, bringing the total to around 22-28,000 for equipment to do just 4 t3's. Plus the monthly cost. Since we don't need all of the traffic to be secured like a high end business class line like a t3, I was considering what it would be like, and how one would set up, having multiple cable internet lines coming in. They make cable wic cards for cisco routers. 4, 50meg cable lines would give us 200 down and 40 up but I don't know how to make that work without having multiple public ip's. I was thinking that if I did have multiple public ip's on the network I could just divide the computers up so that they are in groups, using all of the public ip addresses for gateways, so that the load is split pretty evenly, but still, there should be a more seamless way to do this, I just don't know what it is. At the rate for business cable internet, 4 lines would probably only cost around 700 dollars a month, which is much better than probably 5 grand a month for several t3 lines.
I have a small call center and we are struggling with adequate dsl bandwidth for our voip. The providers cannot give us more upload bandwidth. Any way to combine the bandwidth of two or more lines so that the server/switch sees increased bandwidth for upload?
I'm going to combine 2 512 kbps ADSL line in my PC. i know that it would be much better to get a 1 MB ADSL connection...but the problem is where i live now there is not better speed than this! Well i have a PC with 2 LANs - 2 phone lines - 2 ADSL modems - as far as i learned from Google , by no means it is possible to combine them to have 1 MB data rate but it is possible for example IDM would works with one 512 and another program with another 512..!! And load balancing is the only solution for this which it needs a special routers ! it is somehow difficult for me to provide one ..!! so my question is :
1- Is there any other solution for combining this 2 lines?! I heard something about teaming. 2- Is it possible to use load balancing by software? 3- How about the efficiency and ping time?
I have got a cisco 1841 router. I need to do many nat. I have got a lots of virtual interface on this router. How many nat inside and outside does it supports ? Can I do more than one nat insdie and outside in different virual interfaces on the same single router.
I have installed ASA 5520 firewall and 1841 Cisco router. firewall is connected to internet and the router. Router is connected to Network. There two networks available. I have completed the configuration. but problems. i dont know how to do the bandwith sharing for these networks.
I am trying to restrict bandwidth for a particular LAN IP address on my network using policy maps but it does not seem to be working, My LAN IP address is 192.168.20.199 which i am trying to limit the bandwidth on.
VLAN ===> FE 0/1 {With subinterfaces - ALL INSIDE LAN INTERFACES} ==> ROUTER ===> BVI 0/1 {WAN Interface - OUTSIDE}
i am doing NAT for my clients in LAN to WAN - Static NAT i want one of my client who is excessing some service with his Public IP to get a specific amount of bandwidth ... as right now he is hogging all the bandwidth .i have 1841 router.
we have a bandwidth pipe terminating on 1841 BVI interface... now we want to limit all the traffic going from inside to WAN circuit to half... for example 10 Mb pipe we want to reduce to 5 mb on bvi interface.. how this can be done .. as of not there is not need to police any specific type of traffic .. this needs to be done for any traffic from inside to outside...
I need to know the Cisco 1841 Router FE Maximum Bandwidth Support and the Cisco 3825 Router GE Maximum Bandwidth Support. I cannot find this information in Cisco for these old devices.I would like to have the platform capability for all situation (only IP base, with QoS, with ACL, with encryption, etc.)
We have some point-to-point sites linked with our HO with 10-30mbps speed. We have provided DID telephone lines to these sites as well.
We want to limit the bandwidth with 1mb bandwidth only and also make sure that the voice traffic (DID telephone lines) gets the priority over all other traffic even if they are utilitizing the 1mb link completely. We have some Cisco 1841 routers that we are planning to configure on the main uplink on each of these sites. how to give the priority to the voice traffic yet limiting the bandwidth to 1mb.
This is existing network diagram and find attached file for configuration of Router and L3 Switch:ISP provided 6 Mbps internet access link with ethernet Handoff which is terminated over Cisco 1841.ISP also provided pool of 30 Public ip's 125.63.74.33 /27 , range from 125.63.74.34 to 125.63.74.62.In my current setup, all Inside to ouside traffic going out through 125.63.74.34 public ip because this public-ip NAT overload with Router F0/1 interface.
1) I want to divide 6 Mbps link physically into three parts 2Mbps, 2Mbps, 2Mbps for three VLANs.
2) I want to also configure each vlan IN/OUT traffic with different Public ip. is it possible or not ?
Vlan2 = 172.25.162.0 /24 => Inside to outside / Outside to inside traffic through 125.63.74.40 Vlan3 = 172.25.163.0 /24 => Inside to outside / Outside to inside traffic through 125.63.74.41 Vlan4 = 172.25 164.0 /24 => Inside to outside / Outside to inside traffic through 125.63.74.42
How can i configure above desired setup with CBWFQ
What I want to do is combine a sad 1.5M DSL connection and a long range WiFi signal into a single connection for a rural area home.I am looking for any effective solution (including boosting WiFi output signal beyond FFC suggested values). The WiFi long range antenna (DISH + gutted LNB) receives a full bar 40+ Mbps signal from 11 miles away. DSL is standard 1.5M over DSL Modem.
I have 2 LANs in my own PC & 2 Routers (TP-Link WR941N each) with 2 internet accounts (512Kbps each) connected to the same ISP signal & company using NanoStation 5 from ubnt.As u know the connections work separately by default!! (I use Windows 7 64bit)Can I merge them to get double speed (download/upload simultaneously) using reg edit or special software or method?
I just installed a new RV016, and have it up and running currently using just one WAN (cable) on the Internet2 port. Just FYI I do plan to have a second WAN on Internet1 (DSL) once I get this next step working and want that to be the dafault provider, hence the use of Internet2 for this first connection.I already have a WRVS4400N installed that has a whole network on it that will be independant to the new the network and am trying to connect the WRVS4400N to my RV016. It is currently plugged into port 8 of the RV016 and the port is currently set to VLAN2.I know just enough to be a danger to myself here. :-) The RV016 is using the default IP of 192.168.1.1 while the WRVS4400N uses 192.168.10.1.I do know that "Typically, a Cisco RV0xx Series router is used as an access router, with a single LAN subnet. By default, the firewall is pre-configured to deny LAN access if the source IP address is on a different subnet than the router’s LAN IP address. However, you can enable multiple subnets to allow this router to work as an edge device that provides Internet connectivity to different subnets in your LAN."Hence I have added added the 192.168.10.1 subnet with mask 255.255.255.0 (to the RV016) and have tried switching the WRVS4400N from Gateway mode to Router mode. The RV016 can see it but nothing on the WRVS4400N network has any internet access, while computers on RV016 do. I assume this is because of the firewall blocking the traffic.
I'm trying to combine dynamic and static NAT on a SR520. My dynamic NAT is specified with:ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.7.255 In addition to this I want to perform static NAT for a couple of selected internal hosts. I can do this:ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 10.85.10.2 which works fine but means that the source address 192.168.1.5 is translated to 10.85.10.2 for all destination IPs. What I want is for the above static translation only to occur for a particular destination subnet.To accomplish this I have tried:
ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 10.85.10.2 route-map toOtherSite route-map toOtherSite permit 10 match ip address 150 access-list 150 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
But this does not appear to work. Instead it seems to render the host 192.168.1.5 unable to progress through the NAT, whether the destination subnet is 192.168.10.0/24 or not, and I can't work out what I'm doing wrong.
I have 2 LANs in my own PC & 2 Routers (TP-Link WR941N each) with 2 internet accounts (512Kbps each) connected to the same ISP signal & company using NanoStation 5 from ubnt. As u know the connections work separately by default!! (I use Windows 7 64bit) Can I merge them to get double speed (download/upload simultaneously) using reg edit or special software or method?
My apartment complex limits each connection to 200KBps but each connection has the same IP so I thought there has to be an easy way to combine the connections. Is there a way to connect the wired network i'm connected to with the wireless one?
I am having issues trying to combine two modules into one VDC. The modules are as mentioned below: When I try to combine module 1 & 10 as shown above, the nexus 7000 switch displays 'Not compatible'. I've read the online guide and it mentions that the F2 and M1 module cannot be combine into the same VDC. Problem is, my customer has already purchased the module, how do i solve this problem? If I separate the VDC, how does module 1 talk to module 10 if user wants to send traffic to Internet or Server Farm?
I have D-link DSL 2750U wireless router. My PC and notebook are connected to router by Wi-Fi. They can share files or ping each other. I have a network storage unit plugged into router by an ethernet cable. Any of the computers cannot reach that storage unit or ping it. I guess my router isolates LAN network from WLAN network. Is there a way to combine them and get the router treat all devices connected to router in a single network?
I have a DCP 3925 with 2 telephone and 4 internet ports.So, how can I combine DPC 3925 + E3000 to have more internet ports? and wich one is the best wifi than I can use ??Main router is the DPC 3925, where the internet is connected.
We have 1 mpbs bandwidth line, but most of the time we are getting only 300-500 kpbs download speed, i want to send statistics report to our ISP, what will be best procedure to test the bandwidth report, i have checked in some websites like bandwidthplace and speedtest but these sites are not accurate, how to check the actual bandwidth we getting from ISP against 1 Mbps. We have solarwinds monitoring tool in this i have configured the WAN interface for 1 mbps
I want to combine two network ,like 2 in 1we are 10 friends we have two internet connection we assume 1st connect as : "A" which is of Mbps bandwidth internet and second is "B" which gives us band width on per user from VPN setup which have a great sharing server My question is that we want to utilize A for browsing, streaming etc and B for sharing server .
Question: how would STP or RSTP behave in a star topology with a hub in the middle?i.e. you have four switches all linked to the same central hub. Single links, no loops.Each switch would then get BPDUs from everybody.Going by theory, it should be OK since it still sees the root's BPDU and will see the link to the hub as the root port, despite presence of other BPDUs from other switches? No different from receiving an inferior BPDU from an upstream switch and a superior BPDU from a further upstream root switch.I guess I could lab it by turning off spanning tree on a switch to simulate a hub? I've never previously had to deal with STP issues where there are hubs that aren't strictly point to point bridging so to speak (ok they're not bridging but you get the drift).I've got a scenario I'm examining at the moment where this is the topology, except all switches have bpdufilter running hence effectively no spanning tree. I'm curious to know what would happen should I remove the bpdufilter.I realise there is zero benefit in spanning tree in this instance as I don't have any redundant loops to fall back on, but I'm reluctant to turn off STP on those vlans (since obviously theres stuff behind those switches). The BPDUfilter method seems like an elegant solution but I wonder if its actually necessary.(the hub is actually a VPLS mesh, most sites terminate PE to CE router but I'm playing around with switches as the termination points – run our own Q in Q, split vlans off before it gets to layer 3 as separation, etc.)
I have a client that requires a single router with POE for placement at an economical price. I was considering the Linksys WAPPOE12, but that is discontinued. What would work with that router?
First and foremost, what I have are 2 x 7204VXR (Gateways), 1 x 4507R-E (Coreswitch), and our ISP have 7609.Got some issues with redundancy with our ISP.
7609 I I I I 7204-A 7204-B | | | vrrp | | | -4507R-E- | | internal network
Both outside interfaces of 7204 gateways are connecting to 7609 with different public ip block. I used VRRP for my internal nework and failover have been tested working.
Even tried to remove link of 7204-A and 7609, the failover works perfect. If I shutdown/ remove the link between my 4507R-E and 7204-A (primary gw_higher vrrp priority), vrrp redundancy/failover still works, but pings from internal network to internet is only 50% success....alternate 4 ping reply and 4 time out.
