Cisco :: STP With Switches Linked By Single Hub?

Sep 28, 2012

Question: how would STP or RSTP behave in a star topology with a hub in the middle?i.e. you have four switches all linked to the same central hub. Single links, no loops.Each switch would then get BPDUs from everybody.Going by theory, it should be OK since it still sees the root's BPDU and will see the link to the hub as the root port, despite presence of other BPDUs from other switches? No different from receiving an inferior BPDU from an upstream switch and a superior BPDU from a further upstream root switch.I guess I could lab it by turning off spanning tree on a switch to simulate a hub? I've never previously had to deal with STP issues where there are hubs that aren't strictly point to point bridging so to speak (ok they're not bridging but you get the drift).I've got a scenario I'm examining at the moment where this is the topology, except all switches have bpdufilter running hence effectively no spanning tree. I'm curious to know what would happen should I remove the bpdufilter.I realise there is zero benefit in spanning tree in this instance as I don't have any redundant loops to fall back on, but I'm reluctant to turn off STP on those vlans (since obviously theres stuff behind those switches). The BPDUfilter method seems like an elegant solution but I wonder if its actually necessary.(the hub is actually a VPLS mesh, most sites terminate PE to CE router but I'm playing around with switches as the termination points – run our own Q in Q, split vlans off before it gets to layer 3 as separation, etc.)

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Linked Cat3550 And ME3600 Switches Via Trunk Mode

Mar 27, 2013

I faced with a strange behavior of ME3600.For testing purposes I linked Cat3550 and ME3600 switches via trunk mode. All interfaces are  in Up state. But I couldn't ping SVI200 of Cat switch  from ME3600 and vice versa. [cde]
 
This scheme perfectly works with another L3 swithes. For example Catalist3750. I know that ME doesn't support VTP, DTP and so on. Also, I've tried latest software.

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG200-18 Switches With LC Single Mode Fiber SFP's

Dec 2, 2012

We have a project in which we are using 34 Cisco SG200-18's each with a MGBLX1 (LC Single Mode Fiber) SFP mini-GBIC.All the fiber's come back to one building where we must "bridge" all 34 fiber connections. What hardware should be used to accomplish this? A L2 switch? For example, a 12 port SFP Switch with Fiber SFP's accepting the first 12 fiber connections, then other switch with SFP for the next 12 and so on, until there is a overall capacity of 36 and having patch cables between the 3 switches?
 
what cisco or non cisco hardware would work with these SF200-18's to accomplish this?

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco LAN :: SA 500 - DMZ Over Single Uplink And Switches

Feb 7, 2013

I have an SA 500 with the optional port configured as the DMZ. The LAN ports are running the 192 range and the DMZ is the 172 range.
 
I have seperate offices (A few hundred feet apart) that have been connected  with 2 un managed switches up linked with a single wire. The 192 range stuff runs over this. I need to get the DMZ out to the second room and was asking about how to do this over the single up link and switches. (Trying not to run a second wire)
 
My lack of understanding had me draw up this diagram attached as a picture, to ask about. What it shows is me trying to get the DMZ through the up linked switches to the other room. I thought of using 2 routers, one on each end. I've been told this is incorrect and wont work.
 
Maybe a purchase of a second hardware and eliminate the switches? (up link the SA 500 to another device?) What should that device be?   

View 19 Replies View Related

Connect More Than One Switches In Single Network?

Jan 17, 2013

i have configured my network like below:

I have three lan ports in my server the IP is:

(1) IP: 10.10.10.2 SUBNET: 255.255.255.224
(2) IP: 10.10.10.34 SUBNET: 255.255.255.224
(3) IP: 10.10.10.69 SUBNET: 255.255.255.224

I have given IP as mentioned below to 1 to 30 pc connected in First Switch.

IP Starts From : 10.10.10.5 To IP : 10.10.10.30
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224
Gateway: 10.10.10.2

For 31 to 50 Pc in Second Switch

IP Starts From : 10.10.10.40 To IP : 10.10.10.65
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224
Gateway: 10.10.10.34

IP Starts From : 10.10.10.74 To IP : 10.10.10.85
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224
Gateway: 10.10.10.69

Pc are connected internally in separate switch. but can not connect all three switches & with server. Only Gateway 10.10.10.69 is connected with server.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Connecting Single ASA-5520 To Two Layer 3 Switches?

Sep 30, 2011

Connecting ASA 5520 to two Catalyst 3560G layer 3 switches. What's the best practice to connect the asa-5520 at the edge, to the core of my network? What I'm looking to do is connect two routed gigabit ports (gi0/2 and gi03) to two seperate layer 3 routed ports on catalyst 3560G. I'm wondering how to do it, or if there's any type of failover method? I'm running EIGRP in the network and the link to the first core switch has a /30 point to point connection. Everything works fine, I'm just not sure how to connect the second switch to the firewall. Should I use the a different /30 for the point to point connection to csw02 gi0/48? (See attachment) How would this affect traffic flowing through this interface? Would I have to duplicate rules I have on my inside (gi0/2) interface? Is there a way to make the inside2 interface standby some how? I want to know the best way to set this up, so in the event csw01 goes down I don't loose internet. Will EIGRP work it's magic and only use 1 path to the ASA? Should I even be using routed interfaces on the ASA and just use trunked mode?Running ASA 8.4?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG300 Management Of Multiples In Single Network

Jun 2, 2013

What tools are you using to manage multiple SG300 in a single network ? I can't find any good solutions on the cisco website.

View 1 Replies View Related

Routers / Switches :: Multiple Gateways On A Single Router?

Feb 28, 2011

We are in the process of installing time clocks at some of our sites around the USA. Our security department has asked that the time clocks be completely isolated from the rest of the network. The time clocks will be administered by ADP via a centralized firewall utilizing NAT. We have multiple subnets available at each site. Let me give an example to calrify what I would like to do. Example: Site A has 10.168.19.0 /24 user subnet and is configured for VLAN1 using 10.168.19.1 on the router as the default gateway. I would like to use subnet 10.168.20.0 /24 for the time clocks, configure it for VLAN2 and use 10.168.20.1 as the router gateway address for VLAN2. This should allow me to NAT one of our additional public IP addresses to the 10.168.20.1 gateway address thus completely isolating the time clocks from the remainder of the network. Problem is I have not done this before so I'm a little confused about how to configure it in the Cisco 3750 switches.

View 6 Replies View Related

Routers / Switches :: Configure 2 Static IPs Over Single Connection?

Jan 28, 2011

This is the situation in our Lab.We have one telephone line with broadband connection and a system which is connected to a modem to use this broadband facility. Recently we have taken two static IPs over this connection for a project work.Now what I want to know is, how to configure these static IPs, so that I can connect two systems (each one to one static IP) to use these static IPs and continue to access the internet in the 3rd (already present) system.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: 300 Inter VLAN Routing With Single Internet Gateway

Mar 31, 2012

I have six Cisco 300 Series switches in Layer 2 mode.  They are all connected using ports in Trunk mode.  These Trunks are tagged members of all VLANS.
 
I have one 300 series in layer 3 mode with IP address assigned to each VLAN.I would like to use one Internet gateway for multiple VLANS.  This gateway has numerous IP ports that forward to internal ip addresses on various machines.
 
All i9nternal clients use their respective VLAN IP as their default gateway.The Layer 3 switch is connected to one of the Layer 2's using a Trunk that is a tagged member of all of the VLANS.
 
I understand how traffic routes from a client to its respective VLAN gateway.  Where I am confused is how it routes from there to the Internet gateway? Internet gateway is 192.168.1.1.VLAN IP's are 192.168.2.1, 192.168.3.1, etc...
 
Should the Internet Gateway be patched into the Layer 3 switch or one of the Layer 2's using a separate "Internet" VLAN?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ASA-5525 - Connecting Multiple Switches To Single Firewall?

May 28, 2012

Could I configure and connect 3 Dell switches to an ASA-5525 Firewall which has got 8 interfaces.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: Single Mode Fiber Link Between SGE2000P And Catalyst 2960?

Jun 4, 2013

I'm working with a customer who has an SGE2000P and a Catalyst 2960 to setup and configure a single mode fiber link.  The SGE2000P has an MFELX1 fiber GBIC and the 2960 has a GLC-LH-SMD GBIC.  When I have the customer plug in his fiber, there is a power light that comes on on the MFELX1 GBIC. Neither GBICs/switches show that a link or activity is occurring, but the presence of that light makes me think that they are connecting somehow. Are these two switches/GBICs compatible?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Single Mode Fiber Support For WS-3750 Switches?

Mar 5, 2012

I'm looking for switches that support single mode fiber connections and would like to know if "WS-C3750-FS-S Catalyst 3750 24 100BaseFX + 2 SFP" and "WS-C3750G-12S-S Catalyst 3750 12 SFP" can serve the purpose?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Routing :: 3750x - Installing Single Mode Fiber / Switches Not Connecting?

Oct 22, 2011

Prior we only had 62.5u multi mode.I've got 3750x switches and new SM SFP and yellow fiber patch cables.  None of my links show connected.  No lights and trunk port interfaces show down/down.
 
Is there a special command you have to do on a port when using SM fiber?  Do you think I need cross over fibers?

Also, should I be able to see a laser signal light like MM or is SM a different frequency so it's not as visible as MM?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Two Switches Connected With Single Mode Cable

Jun 4, 2012

I am troubleshooting a fiber connectivity issue.Now I have two switches, one is 3750, and another is small biz 300 series switch. Both switch has a single mode smf gbic. Now I have two swtiches face to face and connect with a single mode cable. Do you think if I would get a link light on? Both ports are no shutdown.

View 3 Replies View Related

2510G Switches Sharing Single 1Gb Line To Servers But Internet Slow

Oct 13, 2011

About a week ago I changed over 9 HP Procurve switches that were previously stacking in series (yeah, daisy-chain) to a Access-Distribution type scenario with 2 (or 4 on server switches) Gb ports on each switch Trunked together connecting to a central full 48x Gb switch.

During this I updated firmwares on all the switches (most still on their shipped 5-8 year old versions) to the latest stable release (and in the process found out that HP switch firmware is absolutely brutal and untested - See ProCurve 2510G FW 11.16 as an example) .

I saw vast improvements across the network immediately after the change (wow, really? 9 48-port switches effectively sharing a single 1Gb line to the servers and internet was a bit slow? Don't tell my co-workers, they don't think that's possible ) .

The only thing that I didn't see an improvement in was on some Linux and BSD servers, which would top out at 11MB/s doing a SMB (SAMBA) transfer. These are managed systems part of our business system, but we still need to be able to pull local backups for ourselves. So I contacted our vendor. The vendor confirmed that the line speed is showing as 1000T-FDx (same as the switch is showing).

Vendor is now claiming that after these changes were put in place, the speed on their servers (and their servers ONLY) was reduced to a maximum of 5MB/s (~60Mb/s?) doing rsync transfers between themselves. And they are all on the same 2510 (48 port all 10/100/1000), which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to me. Furthermore this is on the ONLY switch on the entire network that had an updated firmware already installed - that's not even a possibility here.

I put some windows servers on that switch and can get 60MB/s+ all day (SMB transfers). I've also tried from their one server that I can access to doing an rsync or scp to another BSD box, and max out at 15MB/s (with 100% CPU usage on the test box - I'm assuming the decryption is pretty heavy?)There is absolutely no QoS, limiting, or any possibility of throttling the links the servers are on the switch. There are no excessive broadcasts saturating it, and the ports and cables test fine.

View 15 Replies View Related

Laptop Linked To Dtv Receiver

Jan 5, 2011

I recently linked my dtv receiver to the internet through my laptop. My question is, since I'm now sharing the connection, do I need to make any adjustments in the "network and sharing center" to keep sensitive info on my laptop safe?I do have Norton Internet Security.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-C3750X-12S-S Options To Achieve Putting All 4 Switches Into Single Stack

Feb 12, 2012

I have a couple of WS-C3750X-48T-L and a couple of WS-C3750X-12S-S, I want to stack all four of them together into a single stack. WS- C3750X-12S-S are running c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-58.SE2 whereas WS-C3750X-48T-L are running c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3.I have got a couple of queries as under:What are the options to achieve putting all these 4 switches into a single stack? Can the LAN Base switches upgraded to IP Base?

View 3 Replies View Related

Computers On Home Network Are Not Linked?

Aug 18, 2011

I have a Netgear Router connected by DSL to the Internet (through Roadrunner). I have a AT & T Microcell Tower and 2 computers connected to the Router: a desktop running Windows XP Home Edition wired to the Router and a laptop running Windows 7 connected to the router wirelessly. Both computers connect to the Internet without any problem. However, they do not communicate with each other. The laptop indicates a home network with all 3 devices, but cannot communicate with the desktop. The desktop does not show any network at all. It only indicates a connection through the Router.

View 1 Replies View Related

D-Link DIR-655 :: Client Associated Twice Before Being Secured And Linked?

Aug 19, 2011

I'm just wondering why my computer is being associated twice before being secured and linked when it obtains an IP address from the DIR 655 router. I am using the DWA-552 wireless card to connect to it. When I first started using them together, this wasn't happening. Then, all of a sudden, one day it just started showing "above message repeated 1 times" just below the log entry for the client being associated".

View 5 Replies View Related

Get Hostname / IP Of Each Computer Linked On Port Of Switch?

Jun 21, 2012

I'm trying to use MRTG and SNMP on a Windows Serveur 2008R2.I want to manage my Switch with mrtg, but it don't show me which computers or server are connected to the Switch's ports.All I have, in the .cfg file is the interface name ( like S0/0 ), which are useless for me, I would like to get IP adresses or hostname but mrtg doesn't seems to do it.Any of you know if Mrtg can do that ? or maybe there are some others ways to do that ?

View 1 Replies View Related

D-Link DIR-655 :: Web Filtering Doesn't Work When Linked To MAC Address

Jan 5, 2011

My DIR-655:
Hardware Version: A4
Product Page: DIR-655

The problem is that Website Filer doesn't work if on STEP 3: SELECT MACHINE of Access Control the machine was selected by MAC address. When the machine was selected by IP everything is fine.The problem is that IP addresses are assigned dynamically, so how to make sure that the policy would be applied to the same machine? 

View 8 Replies View Related

D-Link DIR-655 :: No Connectivity On Desktop That Is Directly Linked To Router

Aug 29, 2011

I know there are a lot of threads out there regarding connection issues, both with wireless & LAN connections, after updating firmware to 1.35.  To provide a snapshot of my setup...I have 3 GB switches throughout my home, a couple Ethernet enabled Blu-Ray players, 2 XBOX 360's, multiple satellite receivers with Ethernet, 5 PC's, 3 iphones, etc...you get the picture.  I also have 5 older DLink wi-fi cameras.  So, with this said my setup has been flawless for some time.  However, a week or so ago I upgraded my firmware on my DIR-655 to the latest version...everything still seemed fine at the time.  Yesterday I noticed we had no wireless internet so I went and checked.  Sure enough...no connectivity on my desktop that's directly linked to the router, etc.

I tried rebooting & then resetting the router...got connectivity, but as soon as I plugged my PC into the switch...no IP address.  I played around with settings, wiring configurations, etc...I'm pretty up to speed on this setup so I felt I exhausted every option.  I thought my router went bad...gave me an excuse to go get the latest so I brought home a NetGear N750...hooked it up.  As soon as I changed the LAN IP address range to condense the #of IP addresses I'm giving out again, the LAN connection to the PC was lost...I could not get it restored.  I finally got it working, bypassing the GB switch, but the wireless would lose connection literally after a few seconds.

I ended up taking the NetGear router back and bought the exact same DIR-655, but this time it was HW version B1 instead of A and it was firmware #2.00 or something like that.  I hooked it up when I got home...configured the system to exactly the way I had it before and PRESTO!!!  My system is working like it was before.  I can only think that the firmware upgrade I made on the previous router screwed something up in my system. 

View 4 Replies View Related

Linksys Wireless Router :: Wrt300n Linked To Wrt150n?

Aug 6, 2011

In my home I have a cable modem wired to a links wireless router a wrt 300n in my office (only hardwired used in there) and I do not get such good distance to my back bedrooms with my laptop. I have run a Ethernet cable dead center of the house for my sat receiver that is connected and wired to the 300wrt. Here is my question can I use the 150 like a hub or switch at the office connected to the cable modem and use the wrt300n router so that I get wireless on that side of the house. Or in reading here I see I can maybe use a bridge. I do have a older Linksys wrt150n sitting in a box.I have read until my eyes are almost bleeding and am not sure. How I can get a better signal on the other side of the house.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Get C2960-8tc-L Linked To Sge2000p Via The Gbic Ports?

Dec 7, 2011

I am trying to get a C2960-8tc-L linked to a sge2000p via the Gbic ports using GLC-SX_MM gbics but having no luck.Are these compatible and should I need to configure anything?

View 1 Replies View Related

Broadband :: Computer Hangs When Opened Internet Linked Software?

Feb 17, 2012

My desktop computer hangs when i use internet linked software like Mozilla and internet explorer. When i got hang i can't do anything but to press the restart on my CPU. But i can access only in Yahoo messenger and skype. It's really weird, I've been using it for a long time but i just only encountered it now. I tried to use my computer in safe mode with networking and it all worked! but why isn't it working in my normal mode. it's so hard

View 1 Replies View Related

Belkin F7D1301 / Baton IBLR6111A - NAT Capable Modem Linked For Failover

Jan 31, 2013

There are a total of 7 systems on the network. The network has evolved from two small shops (3-4 computers each) to a single one with a sum total of 7 systems. Historically there were two ISP (which the new management would like to continue). Thus there are two NAT enabled devices at the last-mile from each ISP

Belkin F7D1301
Baton iBLR6111A

Networking is almost an unknown to me. An ip config on the computers in the network brought the realization there are 2 sub-nets ... at least it looks like there are 2 sub-nets (192.168.1.x, and 192.168.2.x).

My gut tells me the above mentioned modem/router cannot be connected & configured to be used transparently for the computers connected to the other modem/router without additional hardware. Is this right?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5520 Single Firewall With 2 Core Switches

Jan 4, 2012

Two different WAN links get connected to the firewall via two routers.(Different ip subnets).I need to get this two wan streams seperatly to the core switches.Core switches sits.Active/Stanby senario. If the Active core goes down Stndby Core will have take over the traffic. My design is correct ,if not what do i need to change. ASA is 5520.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: RV110W - What Single POE Is Available

May 7, 2012

I have a client that requires a single router with POE for placement at an economical price. I was considering the Linksys WAPPOE12, but that is discontinued. What would work with that router?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: How To Upgrade Single RP ASR 1006

Aug 7, 2012

We are trying to upgrade our ASR1006 with single RP. We got an Warning message as "superpackage install over superpackage not allowed on active RP"
 
how to do the upgrade properly?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1841 - Many NAT In A Single Router

Nov 11, 2012

I have got a cisco 1841 router. I need to do many nat. I have got a lots of virtual interface on this router. How many nat inside and outside does it supports ? Can I do more than one nat insdie and outside in different virual interfaces on the same single router.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 7609 - Redundancy To Single ISP

Dec 12, 2011

First and foremost, what I have are 2 x 7204VXR (Gateways), 1 x 4507R-E (Coreswitch), and our ISP have 7609.Got some issues with redundancy with our ISP.
 
                                        7609
                                        I     I
                                        I     I
                               7204-A    7204-B
                                    |             |
                                    |    vrrp   |
                                    |             |
                                    -4507R-E-
                                          |
                                          |
                               internal network
 
Both outside interfaces of 7204 gateways are connecting to 7609 with different public ip block. I used VRRP for my internal nework and failover have been tested working.

Even tried to remove link of 7204-A and 7609, the failover works perfect. If I shutdown/ remove the link between my 4507R-E and 7204-A (primary gw_higher vrrp priority), vrrp redundancy/failover still works, but pings from internal network to internet is only 50% success....alternate 4 ping reply and 4 time out.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 881 W Limit VPN Traffic From Single IP

Jul 27, 2011

I have just set up a 881W appliance for a satellite office. At this time, we don't need a site to site vpn. However, I have EZVpn configured on it and working great so that I can connect from our main office for admin purposes. How can I setup up a firewall rule/policy in order for only our main office IP to connect to Ezvpn? I don't want to allow access to the VPN from any other IP other than our IP at our main office.

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved