I got a 5MBps Lease Line Connection via FAST ETHERNET PORT. i got a Cisco 1841 Router.
I want to distribute bandwidth in this ratio 2MBps/2MBps/1MBps
2MBps = Office Connection
2MBps = Computer Laboratory Connection
1MBps = WIFI Connection
1841 has only 2 Fast Ethernet ports
so im planning to add up a 2modules of 2-Port Fast Ethernet High-Speed WIC for Cisco Integrated Services Routers
This is existing network diagram and find attached file for configuration of Router and L3 Switch:ISP provided 6 Mbps internet access link with ethernet Handoff which is terminated over Cisco 1841.ISP also provided pool of 30 Public ip's 125.63.74.33 /27 , range from 125.63.74.34 to 125.63.74.62.In my current setup, all Inside to ouside traffic going out through 125.63.74.34 public ip because this public-ip NAT overload with Router F0/1 interface.
1) I want to divide 6 Mbps link physically into three parts 2Mbps, 2Mbps, 2Mbps for three VLANs.
2) I want to also configure each vlan IN/OUT traffic with different Public ip. is it possible or not ?
Vlan2 = 172.25.162.0 /24 => Inside to outside / Outside to inside traffic through 125.63.74.40
Vlan3 = 172.25.163.0 /24 => Inside to outside / Outside to inside traffic through 125.63.74.41
Vlan4 = 172.25 164.0 /24 => Inside to outside / Outside to inside traffic through 125.63.74.42
How can i configure above desired setup with CBWFQ
We have some point-to-point sites linked with our HO with 10-30mbps speed. We have provided DID telephone lines to these sites as well.
We want to limit the bandwidth with 1mb bandwidth only and also make sure that the voice traffic (DID telephone lines) gets the priority over all other traffic even if they are utilitizing the 1mb link completely. We have some Cisco 1841 routers that we are planning to configure on the main uplink on each of these sites. how to give the priority to the voice traffic yet limiting the bandwidth to 1mb.
I want to implement site to site vpn among our Head Office and Barnch routers (300 Sites).Head Office Site I have a cisco 7200 Router Im going to terminate the VPN conection on that.Branches we are having cisco 1841 series routers. They all are capable of working with VPN.In the present it is act like a EazyVPN Server for selected sites(30 sites).Is there any license limitations in Cisco 7200 Router ?Can I run both Site to site VPN and Eazy VPN Server together ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have installed ASA 5520 firewall and 1841 Cisco router. firewall is connected to internet and the router. Router is connected to Network. There two networks available. I have completed the configuration. but problems. i dont know how to do the bandwith sharing for these networks.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to restrict bandwidth for a particular LAN IP address on my network using policy maps but it does not seem to be working, My LAN IP address is 192.168.20.199 which i am trying to limit the bandwidth on.
Cisco_1841#sh policy-map interface fa0/0FastEthernet0/0
Service-policy input: Bandwidth_Allocation_In
Class-map: BWTest_In (match-all) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0
[Code].....
VLAN ===> FE 0/1 {With subinterfaces - ALL INSIDE LAN INTERFACES} ==> ROUTER ===> BVI 0/1 {WAN Interface - OUTSIDE}
i am doing NAT for my clients in LAN to WAN - Static NAT i want one of my client who is excessing some service with his Public IP to get a specific amount of bandwidth ... as right now he is hogging all the bandwidth .i have 1841 router.
we have a bandwidth pipe terminating on 1841 BVI interface... now we want to limit all the traffic going from inside to WAN circuit to half... for example 10 Mb pipe we want to reduce to 5 mb on bvi interface.. how this can be done .. as of not there is not need to police any specific type of traffic .. this needs to be done for any traffic from inside to outside...
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have cisco 1841 router and two types of ISP line (Different provider):
1. Lease line = 2 mbps ( it is terminated over cisco 1841 router); For internet-access purpose
2. DSL = 1 mbps; For internet-access purpose
Our cisco 1841 router have only two fastethernet port, first for WAN Port where 2 mbps lease line terminated , second for LAN which is connected to Cisco switch and 1 mbps adsl line running seperatly which is not part of cisco 1841 router. i am planning to buy HWIC card for extra wan port on existing router where i will terminate 1 mbps adsl line or may be other provider lease line.I want to merge or aggregate both WAN link, My concern is to merge both line (2+1) and get single one (Just like as Etherchannel thing) , get 3mbps for LAN for internet access.
I need to know the Cisco 1841 Router FE Maximum Bandwidth Support and the Cisco 3825 Router GE Maximum Bandwidth Support. I cannot find this information in Cisco for these old devices.I would like to have the platform capability for all situation (only IP base, with QoS, with ACL, with encryption, etc.)
View 1 Replies View RelatedImagine I am designing a small network with a C2900 router running OSPF and in the future BGP with service provider. Please see attached diagram.The router is connected to (2) C3750 Layer 3 distribution switches. Then one C3560 layer 2 switch to serve future IP phone users and desktops.
Question:
a)If I connect the router interface to the (2) 3750 switches, if I make the router interface fa0/0 and fa0/1 as a trunk to accomodate VLAN 200 and other future VLANs, don't I have a problem with overlapping networks between router interface fa0/0 and fa0/1?
b)Alternatively, I could make the Router1 fa0/0 and fa0/1 configured with IP addresses and advertised in OSPF. Then the SW1 fa0/24 and and SW2 fa0/24 I could make as 'no switchport and create a routed interface port' with IP addresses, also running OSPF. Question is, from a scalable design perspectie, would you create 2 management networks and use those when assigning the IP addresses for Router1 fa0/1 and fa0/2? Because again Router1 fa0/1 and fa0/2 obviously need to be placed on different networks to avoid overlapping. So my question is more about proper network planning design to make this scalable to accomodate future VLANs in the future.Using trunks between the Router1 and SW1 option:
Router1
int fa0/0
description connection to SW1
no ip add
int fa0/0.200
[code]....
I have some Cisco 2651 routers, I was trying to implement MPLS on those routers, Can i accomplish this upgrading newer IOS version? link to download the supported IOS.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are trying to implement the ZBF on our router to assist us in limiting the intial impact of DDOS attacks.We have configured the below and it appears that it's not working, as when un der attack the statistics don't increae.
[code]...
My client is asking can the Cisco ASA 5505 implement MAC ACL in Cisco ASA 5505 which is now running in Router Mode.I have tried to search the document and also tried the ASDM in the Cisco ASA 5505 but could not see any way to do the ACL by MAC address.At the same time how to find out that by using command line the ASA 5505 able to run MAC ACL in router mode?
View 2 Replies View RelatedMay I know what the redistribution is? Is it the redistribution of routing information between different AS numbers ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe tried to distribute the softwer ( 12.4.23 ) via LMS 4.1 but we got the following message:Device is locked for exclusive access.The supported protocols for image transfer are: TFTP
SWIM1001: The input parameters to the Image Distribution/Image Import/Image Activate are invalid. You may have used incorrect Device Data for this task. Check the application log file for more details.
Device Upgrade Result : Failed
End Time:Mon Mar 05 15:53:17 CET 2012
Earlier we used LMS 3.2 and it gave same messages,The hardver is cisco 2620XM and actually used IOS is c2600-advipservicesk9-mz.124-3.bin ,We need to upgrade large number of devices via LMS.
I'm currently unable to upgrade certain devices since Cisco Prime incorrect believes there is not enough room in the flash partition.For example.
Getting the following error messsage trying to upgrade some Cisco 871 routers: "Catastrophic - SWIM1200: Selected Flash partition requires minimum (28 MB) to upgrade selected software/image."The images are around 18 MB in size. Why does Cisco Prime thinks its 28 MB in size? Bug?
I opened a discussion a while ago and had some great feedback but I am still racking my brains to figure this out,I have 2 routers each with a dedicated connection to the same ISP. I am using MED to influence my advertisements to the provider,I have 2 core switches (6509) with multiple vlans, each vlan has an HSRP address of .10 shared by the switches
My routers and switches are using iBGP to communicate. Both routers connect to vlan 1 on the core switches,I want to influence my traffic from the vlans to go to specific routers, so that I utilize both routes at all times (when possible), ensuring symmetric routing at the same time.
I think I have the following options
- PBR, I'd set this on the routers fastethernet interfaces and match based an two different ACLs
set the next hop as the ISP router 1 when matching ACL 1
set the next hop as the ISP router 2 when matching ACL 2
My concern is if I lose a link (say to ISP router 1), all traffic matched by ACL 1 is blackholed
- HSRP was suggested to me.
configure 2 standby groups on the routers with different priorities
allocate different HSRP addresses matching each vlan (to act as a core switch default gateway)
My concern here is I'd need the routers HSRP virtual IP addresses as the BGP neighbors on the core switches?
I have Westell Ultraline series3 modem/router , the problem is i can only connect to the router/internet if i enter the IP address and DNS manually , which is not much of a problem except I have a vonage phone and can't type the ip address in it , so here's how the settings looks like , let me know what i should be changing
[IMG]file:///C:/Users/GL/Pictures/Network.png[/IMG][IMG]file:///C:/Users/GL/Pictures/Network.png[/IMG]
I have been able to get EIGRP working successfully in the lab like I want.
Attached is the network overview:
We have a Data Center and Corporate office connected via Point to Point Fiber link, eventually we will have two of theseTwo 4948E switches in the Data center acting as cores setup with GLBPCorporate Office has a 3750X acting as a coreCurrently two 4948E's are connected to each other via Port Channel and a L2 trunkTwo set of ASA 5520's one acting as a firewall and for Cisco Any Connect and second for site to site VPN
What is the best way/pratice that I can distribute this DMZ via EIGRP? Should I just leave it static on the core like this?
We are running with Cisco ACS v4.0 AAA server, Here I need the use of Proxy distribution table.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have Wireless LAN Controller 4400 running. Currently all 50 APs are running at one port of WLC. I have studied on Cisco site, that its best to run 24 APs per port of WLC and total 48 in total. My all APs are running at one port. is there any issue if i run all 50APs on one port and is this any bottleneck?Also if i want to shift half APs to second port, What will be configuration for WLC?
View 6 Replies View Relatedin RME->Software Management-> Software Distribution -> By Devices [advanced], what is the file format we should have here, when we try to deploy many IOS images at once?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi am using Cisco ASA5510 Firewall on my network at the distrubution Layer . The Private IP Address is in the network for Users and PAT is use.I have a client who has configured the RDP on port2000. when the Users behind the Firewall in my Network tried RDP it does not work it shows configuring remote Desktop only. i am able to telnet the Client said server with port 2000 but unable RDP.Is any changes required on my firewall as a tesult the RDP works.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI am having a strange issue deploying universalk9-150-2.SE2 to our 2960S. All the switches are stand alones.LMS gives an error when asking to upgrade the image but the fact is that the new software wents through - if I manually reload the switch everything is fine.why is RME showing an error if the new image seems to have been deployed?
View 23 Replies View RelatedWe currently support multiple companies' infrastructure on a single Prime Infrastructure 1.2 server. We are using lifecycle licenses. Is it possible to assign licenses to various Businesses? For example, can I upload 100 licenses for Company-X and 100 licenses for Company-Y and when adding devices into Prime, tell it which licenses pool to pull from? Could something like this be accomplished with virtual domains?
View 3 Replies View Relatedusing the 55xx as a L3 Distribution switch or even as a Core. By enabling the L3 features does it allow you enabled L3 SVI's for VLAN interfaces or are there interfaces on the daughter card that are used for routing instead?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe are using CISCO Catalyst 6500 switches as collapsed core/distribution switches (2 layer architecture). I want to connect approximatly 10 application servers to the network. Can I connect the servers directly to the catalyst 6500 switches using WS-X6148E-GE-TX line cards? The other option is to use access switchs and then connect the servers to the catalyst 6500 through access switch(Catalyst 3750).
View 6 Replies View RelatedWe have 4507 distribution switch in our network.I am trying to enable ssh in those switches but seems that ssh command is not supporting. IOS version - cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.03.00.SG.151-1.SG.bin
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been working on redesign of our network which was very challenging but almost there.We have a limited budget of around £20k(32k Dollor) Max. The cabling has been done before my time and it is very messy and cheap so you can not do a proper cisco hierarchical model at all.I can not have multiple links from each access layer switch to the core/distribution and as a result i had to connect some access switches together to introduces redundancy in a nutshell,we have two buildings, main building which has the server room in it and the other building which is just bunch of office. i have introduced a partial mesh on the normal building and have tried to introduce full mesh on the main building .
View 9 Replies View RelatedThe two stacked Cisco 3750G Access switches on a particular floor in my coy just lost connectivity to the distribution Switch this morning. This meant that all Users connected to it couldnt connect to the Internet nor access local network resources.I couldn't ping the Switch IP, I couldn't also access the Switch via Console port. Each time I tried to gain access via the console port, I keep getting "Authentication Failed" message.What should I do next? How do I gain access to the Switch?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI had a lot of questions when I began planning a pair of Nexus 7000 switches as a replacement for our 6500. How to publish my design and config. This is a medium sized network. I would have loved to see somone's configs for a similar implementation.
[URL]...
I have some questions in regards to network equipment I want re-utilize for my distribution layer in one of my buildings.The choices at the moment are:
OPTION 1.) 2x WS-3550-12G's (HSRP)
OPTION 2.) 1x WS-6509 with cards:
What option would be better from a performance aspect? We want to have network, voice, and wireless data go through this distribution layer switch(es).This is exisiting equipment I already have and can not buy anything else at the moment.