D-Link DIR-655 :: Time Server Getting Blocked / Double Routers
Aug 30, 2011
I'm new to networking (at least at this level) and need some guidance. First, I have an Actiontec MI424WR (Rev. F) Coax Verizon Fios modem that I use as my home networking wireless router. From a LAN port on that I've connected a cable to the WAN port on my DIR-655 which acts as my gigabit office hard wire/wireless router. I need to keep the home network and the office network separate.All of my computers are Windows, either 7, Vista or XP.Connected to my Dir-655 on the office network are 2 wireless computers, a printer, an IOMEGA 1TB Home Personal Cloud NAS HDD, plus 2 desktop computers.The DIR-655 is set with a static IP address matching the range of the Actiontec. The DIR-655 is set for DHCP for the devices on the network (although 2 of the computers have static IP address).
When the DIR-655 had a Dynamic IP address set by the Actiontec, the IOMEGA NAS HDD kept losing connection with all the devices on the network. Only after I set the DIR-655 to static IP did that stop and everybody started to play nice. I'm not sure why that would make a difference, but it did.But regardless of whether it is set to dynamic or static, no computer on the network or program, even third party programs, can connect to ANY of the time servers out there... and I mean any of them. I've tried at least 20 or more of the standard and not so standard ones. The DIR-655's time is off, and it is set to get time automatically. None of my computers, or my IOMEGA NAS, can access time. The Actiontec, though, seems to be set correctly.Everything connects to the internet just fine. Web, email, auto product upgrades. Fine. So far it's just the time server thing which troubles.I done everything I know how to do to enable Port Forwarding through both routers for NTP > UDP 123 since that is the standard port for the Network Time Protocol, but I could have easily screwed that up.
The problems looks like this: I'm able to browse the web without any problems until at random points of time - might be 2 hours after I turn on my PC or 5 or even half an hour the port 80 gets blocked - actually more like it hangs it self. As whatever I try to open i get "waiting for response" going and going. It's not even returning "page not found" error or anything. To top everything all other ports work fine - i can use https, ping run tracert - no problem there.
I've spend two days looking for some answer on the web but came up empty. I've scanned for malicious software with ad-awar and malwarebyte anit-malware - nothing came up. After restart of the pc everything comes back to normal but its frustrating needing to do that every now and then.
My home network looks like this: I have some broadband modem that is connected to local wifi TP-LINK router (Model No. TL-WR340G/TL-WR340GD). There are four devices using this connection - two pc's (laptops), android phone and android tablet.
I have access controls setup on my DIR-825 which work fine until there is a power outage and my router comes back up.I am using Automatic Time Configuration and have the NTP server set to ntp1 [URL]When the router comes back up I checked to make sure the NTP server option is still enabled, and it is, however the current time is totally wrong.To fix this I had to go to the pull-down, select 'ntp1.dlink.com' and then save the settings. After this the time is correct again.This is as bad as not having the Automatic Time Configuration option at all, since I can't guarantee that the power won't go out. I do not have a UPS hooked up to back up the router, nor do I see why I should need one if the Automatic Time Configuration actually worked.know if there is a way of making the Automatic Time Configuration reliable so the time on my router is automatically corrected when the power comes back up?
I have one Cable Modem/Router built in (Netgear CGD24N) and I wish to use two routers (the other being the DIR-655). The Netgear is a fantastic Cable Modem but a ****py router, but I wish to use both. One will be situated upstairs and the other downstairs.I have connected the two at different locations via the wall and the DIR-655 successfully went to the Netgear login page (as I went to 192.168.0.1) but internet connection was not working, whereas the Netgear internet was working. This was connected LAN to LAN.
Another procedure I have tried was connecting to them LAN - INTERNET (INTERNET being the D-link one) and received the following message: "The addressing of the Internet side learnt thru DHCP conflicts with the addressing selected for the LAN side. Internet communications will be disabled until you have changed the LAN side addressing to resolve the problem."
I just bought a WAP321 Wireless AP. I wonder why it cannot sync with our time server automatically. Every time I reboot it, the system time become "Fri Dec 31 1999 12:00:00 UCT". I have to do the sync manually by clicking on the "Save" button under the menu Administration > Time Setting.
AI have a Dir-825 router. The 5GHz is turned off and the wirless is on G/N. I have shawcable for my isp and my firmware is 2.06 and its a Rev B Router. I also have Qos Engine on for allowing me to have 2 xboxes on Open NAT.problem is my wireless signal for some wired reason is VERY weak. A while ago it used to work really far way outside. It was around 150ft distance at 4 bars. Now for some reason I can't even go upstairs without getting a 1 or 2 bar signal.
i have had my dir-655 one year now, have never had wireless problems with it until now.my notebook's internet gets very slow somedays, i just restart my router and then internet speed works normally.i have:
I'm setting up WHS 2011 for the first time. When attempting to set up Remote Web Access, WHS continues to recoginze my E4200 model information and router IP address but delivers the message 'Remote Web Access to Your Server is Blocked'. Cisco and MS say the router is compatible with WHS and that it should set up through the wizard but no luck following many attempts, including manual set up of DHCP Reservation and Single Port Forwarding on ports 80/443 (not sure I did this correctly).
I've taken the router back to default settings with the exception of enabling Remote Management under the Remote Management Access section of the Administration menu tab; tried again with the same result. What settings to change to make this work?
I am trying to create a server in a game called Minecraft. I have forwarded port 25565 (which I put in the server settings for incoming connections and I checked that 10 times so that is ok) on my thomson TG787. I've opened the same port on my firewall in windows 7. I've disabled my firewall completely. But it's still blocked. It's simply doesn't work..I'm 100% I fixed it on the router.
I am trying to create a server in a game called Minecraft. I have forwarded port 25565 (which I put in the server settings for incoming connections and I checked that 10 times so that is ok) on my netgear wnd3700. I've opened the same port on my firewall in windows 7. I've disabled my firewall completely. Everything should be cool, but still, checking with canyouseeme.org and asking friends to join. It is still blocked. It simply doesn't work.. I checked my router for any firewall but couldnt see any.. So yeah I'm 100% I fixed it on the router, unless someone is gonna tell me that there is still an option in the router that might fix it.. but I think I did something wrong in the firewall..Although I have been trying to get this to work all day.. I'd rather get some advice on the firewall or other options in my router. Btw, I am using AVG free edition, and I am pretty sure there is no firewall in that version, but there might be something I have to disable in order for this to work ?
UPnP renew entry 255.255.255.255 <-> 68.98.71.182:61041 <-> 192.168.0.197:61041 UDP timeout:-1 'Teredo' (this one repeated 13 times just in that 1 info slot)
Blocked outgoing ICMP packet (ICMP type 3) from 192.168.0.197 to 109.185.100.195
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 108.170.42.83:80 to 68.98.71.182:36792 as SYN:ACK received but there is no active connection
this goes on for a multiple of different ip's and i believe its due to the fact that the game i play is p2p
QoS is off spi is off udp and tcp endpoint independent firmware version 1.21 i am using wireless cable isp using motorola sb5101 i believe i port forwarded the ports used for the game but that didnt work so i put my computer into dmz. I've also noticed a lot more jitter then i used to have and my upload speed is down about 4mbps. Was thinking it might just be outdated firmware?
Yesterday I had the snapshots setup to be sent to my gmail account and now they've been blocked as spam. Is there anyway to get around this? The motion detection area is set to 90% so I see why I'm getting a bunch of snapshots. Is there a setting I can change on my gmail account or is the only option to reduce the percentage? I'd prefer to get all of the emails.
Is it possible to get both allowed and blocked web access logging? I'm using the 2.06NA firmware and no matter how I configure the router, I just can't get it to work, so either I'm missing something or the firmware has a defect, I hope its me, but I fear its a defect.
On my network I have a Netgear ReadNAS connected and I'm using an add-in (ReadyNAS Remote) that simplifies the log in to for both internet and LAN-users. However, I get a lot of the following entries in the log when that add-in is being used.
When an internet user log in via ReadyNAS Remote: "Blocked outgoing TCP packet from 192.168.0.xxx:3649 to xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50125 with unexpected acknowledgement 3320366884 (expected 754541166 to 755655246)"
When a LAN-user log in via ReadyNAS Remote: "Blocked incoming TCP packet from 69.xxx.xxx.xx:80 to xx.xx.xx.xxx:50329 with unexpected sequence 3004123085 (expected 3004136875 to 3004393915)"
Does the Host file allow connections to your computer?Although I have placed some server names into the host file, Wallwatcher 5.0 is indicating that those servers have made connections. This didn't seem to be a problem before I took some online advice to add servers to my host file. I use iptables on a WNDR3700 router with DD-WRT firmware. In the iptable rules I've also blocked these servers. One example is cnbc7.net and a couple of U.S. Akamai servers.
We are having a workgroup of 12 Pc connected using a switch (hub) having all Windows XP SP2 and some of them registered Kayspersky antivirus 2011. We have internet access using D-Link 2460T (DSL wireless ADSL router) connected to our LAN using a network wire and having DHCP enabled. Everything was working well for 4-5 years but recently a problem appeared.
I've been fighting with getting VPN connections working properly with my Dlink router. I set up virtual servers for PPTP and L2TP and could usually get the first attempt to work. Subsequent client connections would always fail.The logs display the following-Dropped GRE packet from 192.168.0.10 to 64.232.xxx.xxx as unable handle packet header. Blocked incoming GRE packet from 64.232.xxx.xxx to 76.105.xxx.xxx.What seemed to fix it was going to Firewall Settings and setting UDP Endpoint Filtering to Endpoint Independent and TCP Endpoint Filtering to Address Restricted.
Using a Samsung Galaxy S2, iPod Touch 3rd Gen, and Nook Color, they are all experiencing retry problems, even when 3 feet from the DIR-601. When I use them my log gets filled with messages like:Blocked incoming TCP Ack packet from 192.168.100.201:2926 to 209.85.145.113:80 with unexpected sequence On the devices I see the downloads/content taking a long time to appear and often I get a blank page or "Retry" messages. I purchased two DIR-601s and get the same problem with both. They are both running 1.02NA firmware. The WLAN is Time Warner cable modem. Prior to this I had a Linksys WRT-54 that gave great performance, though just at B/G speeds. I was hoping for a performance boost but right now the N speeds are slower than B with the retries.
i have been trying to forward port 25565 for a server on a game called minecraft. I have a bt homehub 2 and i have followed everything on portforward.com and on several videos and still no luck. I have B.T net protect plus so I don't know if the firewall is blocking the port
Region : UnitedKingdom Model : TD-W8951ND Hardware Version : V1 Firmware Version : Latest ISP :
In trying to make sure it was NOT wide open to the internet (amongst many other problems of setting it up, which I ,may address later if I can actually connect to the thing ever again) I told it to only accept connections from a range of address inside the LAN. Now it wont accept anything except telnet from the LAN.Short of wiping out 6 hours of trial and error configuration and resetting it, are there any other options I can exercise via the telnet interface?
Region : UnitedStates Model : TL-WDR4300 Hardware Version : V1 Firmware Version : Latest ISP :
The UDP connections are being blocked when I use my VPN. I can connect for a while but soon after a while, the connection doesn't work. I can't even access the router page.
I'm trying to set up a website filter on my DIR-601. I created a policy for 2 MAC addresses, with a schedule from 10AM-6PM, selected "Block some websites", and disabled logging. Under website filter, I added some entries, and selected "DENY computers access to ONLY these sites". When the policy is enabled, and I try to access one of the blocked websites, it gets blocked correctly ("The URL access was denied by administrator.") However, for all other websites, I get "server unexpectedly dropped the connection" errors, eg "Safari can�t open the page [URL] because the server unexpectedly dropped the connection. This sometimes occurs when the server is busy. Wait for a few minutes, and then try again." or in Chrome "No data received. Unable to load the webpage because the server sent no data." This happens with ALL non-blocked websites. I'm using hardware version A1, firmware version 1.01NA.
My Verizon USB connection to the internet, suddenly stopped connecting to napster. Prompt says: "Server is unavailable at this time." No one at Verizon has a clue about fixing the problem, which Napster says is a Verizon connection problem..What to do??
We want to get a network time server appliance that will be used only as a device to provide time to network devices as well as workstations. Our network infrastructure contains CISCO 3750G's, 4506's and 6509E.
I have a Cisco 819 router which has a built in GPS capability. GPS recieves a very accurate time from the satellite. Is it possible to use this accurate time source to set the time on the router, and then use it as an NTP server?
i bought me a router so that me and a few other friends could play to star craft 2, but i would like to know that if i could play an LAN with NO internet on it?
I have inherited a Cisco VPN 3005 and need to configure an interesting scenario:
2 LAN-2-LAN tunnels: 1 required an outside IP and has an existing static NAT of 192.168.1.1 -> 12.2.1.1 for 0.0.0.0 as the destination.I now have a need to created a new NAT for 192.168.1.1 to translate to 10.99.1.1 for destination of 13.3.1.1, 14.3.1.1 and 15.3.1.1.
Is it possible to have the above scenario, or even NAT 12.2.1.1 from the first NAT back to 10.99.1.1??
I am sending TACACS administration logging to a syslog server. When the messages show up on the syslog server, they are 5 hours ahead of the actual time. Time on the ACS is correct - local logging shows the correct time. Time on the syslog server is correct...all other devices/systems sending syslog messages to it are coming through with the correct time. why the ACS syslog messages would be 5 hours ahead?
ACS5.2 time sync breaking once in near around one month and not able to authenticate after that .I am using domain controller (Windows Server 2008 R2) as NTP server for ACS .
What is the reason for it , is there any bug in 5.2 release or do i need to configure a thired device and point as NTP for ACS and domain controller.
I have 2 LANs in my own PC & 2 Routers (TP-Link WR941N each) with 2 internet accounts (512Kbps each) connected to the same ISP signal & company using NanoStation 5 from ubnt.As u know the connections work separately by default!! (I use Windows 7 64bit)Can I merge them to get double speed (download/upload simultaneously) using reg edit or special software or method?
I have two RFC1918 domains I wish to connect, can I use double NAT with PAT so that each domain is represented as one single ip address with each session a port of that address-
The link is a private point to point link with a /32 mask so could I use this as the PAT address ?
Facing a problem of double multicast on one of our cisco 3750 switch. On checking with sniffer it was found that out of double packet’s one packet is having source mac-address of vlan and another packet is having a source mac-address of switch base mac-address.
