Finding Switch With 10GBE Uplink To Go With QNAP TS879u?
Mar 8, 2012I am looking for a Switch with a 10GBE uplink to go with a qnap TS879u with a 10 GBE card.
View 19 RepliesI am looking for a Switch with a 10GBE uplink to go with a qnap TS879u with a 10 GBE card.
View 19 RepliesWe have a 5 node VMWare cluster connected to an EMC NS20 using VMWare over NFS.Right now, our only bottleneck is network and even that is not limiting. We are considering updating our infrastructure and since networking seems to be the the only real issue, they want me to research that first.So I thought I would get a server, throw in a 10Gbe NIC, get a cheapo 10Gbe switch, get some cheapo NAS (or build one) that can do 10Gbe and start testing...Wrong. What a CF 10Gbe still is. At first I just assumed I'd go with 10Gbe over copper. How naive of me. So once I realized that the most "cheapo" 10GBase-T copper switch would run me about $9,000, I shrugged and starting looking at 10Gbe over optics...
IS there a cheapo (relatively) switch out there for someone wanting to test 10Gbe?? Like $5,000 or less?EDIT: BTW, before this goes off-topic into teaming 1Gbe connections being good enough and such, let me say that we are planning for the future here. As I said, we aren't currently limited in any area right now. However, we see that if there was an area we need to focus on, it would be network. So to that end, we'd like to start testing what the future has to offer. We've already tested and are using link aggregation and such at the 1Gbe level.
We're looking for Cisco switches with the following attributes to serve as the core switches in a production network:1U (or close), fixed config20 or more 1GbE copper ports4 or more 1/10GbE fiber ports (SFP+)Not ridiculously expensive So far the closest fit we've found for these requirements is the SG500X-24. However, since the SG500X-24 is a "small business" switch we're concerned that the reliability may not be up to the levels of Cisco's enterprise switches, the support level may not be sufficient, the 12MB packet buffer may not be enough to support wire-speed operation (or efficient communication between hosts on 1GbE and 10GbE ports), and so on. But in looking through Cisco's entire current switch line (a daunting task...) this seems to be the switch that best fits the specifications above. So, some more appropriate switch that fits the listed requirements?s why the SG500X-24 would be a poor choice for a production network? Have you had positive experiences with using the SG500X-24 as a mission-critical switch?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need 10gigbit uplink for this switch. What are the other devices that i need order along with this device.And what is the diff between X2-10GB-LR= and CVR-X2-SFP.if i take CVR-X2-SFP, in future how can i upgrade from one gig to 10 gig?for current use i need 10gig support required. so what are all the other devices that i need to order.Fiber multimode and distance 15Mt only.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a question regarding uplink ports on a switch. Specifically the SFP+ variety. Could these uplink ports be used to connect directly to a fileserver? To be more specific, would the uplink port on the HP 3800 Switches connect directly to a file server that has the SFP+ card installed?
View 6 Replies View RelatedIm now in charge of a medium/big size network (around 1200 machines).I found some connection pattern that im not shoure if it is correct.I migth be wrong, but i think this kind of connection would cause a continue RSTP change of topology (confusing about the 'direction' of the route to take), so having some latency period (this pattern of connection can be repeated several times in the whole network).BTW, there is no special configuration in switch A for saiyng that port 50 is not being used as a uplink port.
View 5 Replies View RelatedAt our office we have a weird performance problem with the following switches and connectivity:
Internet |
SG300-24 (L3) core switch (in our server room)
|SG300-10P (L2) access swtich (in our meeting room) |
SG500-28P (L3) switch (in our meeting room)
We are building a new computer infrastructure that is connected to the the SG500-28P. As you can see above the SG500-28P in our meeting room has an uplink to the SG300-10P in the same meeting room. And again the SG300-10P has and uplink to the SG300-24 in our server room. From the server room, there is connectivity to internet. The network uses a multiple VLAN's and routeing between them. Bootom line is, the internet VLAN ID 10 is tagged to trunk ports and available on the SG500-28P. So client get connected straight into the internet based VLAN.
The performance on the SG500-28P switch itself from VLAN to VLAN is very fast. But... the uplink connection tot the internet and other VLAN's on the core switch are very and very slow! At least 10 times slower than normal. So if I plug a laptop in the SG500-28P and go from uplink to uplink, it is slow! But... when I connect the same laptop to the SG300-10P the connection with only one uplink it is fast. As if three switches is to much. I can't figure out why.
I implemented the 3560E switch, this one have two Giga bit ethernet/10-Gigabit Ethernet module slots. I used the Twin Gig Converter Modules and one SFP. All configuration was applied in the Ten Giga bit, however the interface giga bit ethernet is UP UP state and the Ten giga down down.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have configured about 20 of these switches now, and notice in the port listings a TE1/1//1 TE1/1/2 and GI1/1/1 GI1/1/2 uplink port. There are only two uplink SFP+ ports. I now have a reason to install with a 1Gb uplink to the Core. I am using a GLC-LH module at each end. I did configure the TE1/1/1 port for the uplink. Does not work though..Do I need to configure the two GI1/1/1 and 1/1/2 ports for uplink, remove the TE configuration for the uplink to work? Using the UNIVERSAL code with a LANBase license.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI was trying to uplink a switch today on a 1500m run of SMF. I have a 6509 core switch with a 16 port GBIC module. On that end I have a WS-G5486-LX with a 3m SC to LC patch cable.On the other end I have a 3750G with a GLC-LH-SM SFP. I have checked my fiber path and it seems good, (by sight, did not have an OTDR avialable).I can't get the link up at all. Tried swapping Tx Rx at one end, Tried different transceivers. Tried different patch cables. Nothing worked. At about the mid-point of my fiber run the cable passes through another network closet with a core switch for a separate network. If I break my fiber path there and try to connect in either direction it works. The only differences are the length of the fiber run and that the core switch on the other network has a CLC-LX-SM SFP.Is it the distance? Or is there some issue connecting a GLC-LH-SM to a WS-G5486-LX?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI need a L2 switch with dual AC power supply and RJ45 uplink The optin I got was WS-C3560X-48T-L + C3KX-PWR-350WAC , but the problem is with uplink . There is no RJ45 1G uplink , there is only option for SFP uplink The another option was WS-C2960G-48TC-L , but there is no dual AC power supply option a good model ( Dual AC power supply , RJ 45 uplink ports (Gig) , with 48 port 100/1000 UTP)
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a new Cisco 2960 S series switch with a basic configuration that needs to be uplinked or daisy chained to a Cisco 3750 switch. I am not getting any connectivity to the network with either a straight through or crossover cable. the port remains in amber but a 'show interface' indicates that the interface is up. I can manage the switch with a PC patched into any port on the switch with a static IP address. Must be something very simple that I am missing. Outlined below is the configuration.
Refresh_SW1#sh ver
Cisco IOS Software, C2960S Software (C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE3,
RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: [URL]
[Code].....
Right Now we are using Cisco switch model c4006.and we are looking to replacement for the same . Below are our requirements.
1: Around 120 Ports (100 Mbps)
2: Around 30 Ports (1Giga)
3: Layer2/Layer3
I am looking for an IP Services IOS image for a WS-C3750E-24TD-E switch.Currently have a two switch stack composed of WS-C3750E-24TD-E & WS-C3750G-12S-E.Current IOS running: IP Base.
I need to be able to remove the stub mode for EIGRP, so I am looking for an IP Services image for WS-C3750E-24TD-E switch to be able to run full EIGRP. But I am not able to find one. What is the main difference between WS-C3750G & WS-C3750E switch?Is this even possible for the WS-C3750E?
Any switch that supports 4096 multicast groups?I am working on a system that includes over a dozen catalyst 2960 switches. The customer has pointed out the 2960 switch does not satisfy the requirement to support 4096 multicast groups (even though it is more than adequate for the number of active multicast groups). It looks like the 3560 supports more multicast groups than the 2960, but is still far less than the requirement.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a small business network including 2 QNAP 219 NAS servers. Several times we have noticed, the connection to the servers are lost. We have tried to restart the servers without luck. But when we restart the router, all problems are gone and we can reconnect.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAside from the obvious differences between these two NAS`s (processor speed, max users, max groups etc) what are the actual real world differences in functionality between the two?
I`m also wondering what the `turbo` bit refers to?Any pros/cons of each??
I notice that my Cisco switches have 2 fiber GBIC ports on them each and while i have been around networking for quite some time i have never dug that much into fiber. So after some quick googlefu i learned that there is lots of different types and compatibility problems.
The 2 switches i would like to connect are a WS-C3550-12T and a WS-C3550-48-EM.From what i have read these are 1000-base-fx?
I cannot seem to see my server behind a cisco router. I have a feeling it is because our network phone system may be robbing the IP address?We have two fixed IP addresses.The first one, is assigned to the router.We have two swtiches set up behind router and all the other network stuff interanally wrks great.We also have full internet access. When I type the IP in on the web, it accesses the talkswitch phone system.I have set the internal IP to the server as fixed.I have port 21 open for FTP.When I run a test, the internet sees port 21 open. However, I cannot seem to cal lup the server over the internet. Could the talkswitch system somehow be interfereing with the logon?What would the proper syntax be to access the server?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI recently upgraded my linksys E1000 to: linksys E4200 ( i needed gb port)
In my QNAP I can scan for upnp routers to set the forwarding port automaticly.
But it keeps telling my, it can't find an upnp router on my network. My E1000 was found without any problem!
If I open the port manually for example FTP 21. I cannot get acces from the internet, it keeps telling me its closed.
I forwarded it to the right ip. an clicked to apply. The website from QNAP says the E4200 is certified for upnp
So tho sum up: I cannot acces my NAS from the internet.
My setup:
Modem/router (ZIGGO) --- Linksys E4200 ---- QNAP 412 turbo
Linksys E4200 firmware 10.04
9x3750E stacked switch (WS-C3750E-48PD-SF0) (15.0(1)SE2
C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M)
2x10Gbe uplinks from EMC NAS
At a basic level, we have found that the 10Gbe uplinks have slow read performance with or without a port-channel configured (2-3 minutes for a 700MB file to desktop from the NAS) We switched back to testing a 1Gbe and the read speed is normal. Another anomaly is Win7 / 2008 machines read speed is fine from the NAS while the 10Gbe uplinks are in production?!
Write speed is great on 10Gbe. Only read speed is affected!! the switch is not reporting anything abnormal. We looked at SMB/SMB2 as another possible cause...
mls qos is enabled on the switch but not sure if this is affecting performance.
Is the ANY config that I need to carry out on the interfaces to get the read speed working as it should for both Win7 and WinXP. (MTU is 1500 throughout the enterprise, NAS included).
What is the case with redundant Sup engine 10GbE interfaces. We can only get one in active state, the other interface stays inactive? Can we have all four interfaces active sharing the backplane?
Mod Ports Card Type Model
---+-----+--------------------------------------+------------------+-----------
3 6 Sup 7L-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP7L-E
4 6 Sup 7L-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP7L-E
Mod Redundancy role Operating mode Redundancy status
----+-------------------+-------------------+----------------------------------
3 Active Supervisor SSO Active
4 Standby Supervisor SSO Standby hot
I've got a Cisco 877-M at home which i picked up to replace the old Linksys/Cisco WAG160N, which was having dropout issues on my line?I've got a running config going on the router which is currently quite happily handling our LAN requirements (DHCP,IGMP Proxy, Firewall,DNS), but what I want to do is have an upload link QoS policy, which makes sure everyone can be able to access the net with little hassle (Not so much worried about the Downlink QoS, our connection can burst at time to 900k/sec (Currently on a 8160/384 ADSL1 Line, RIM, 300m Cable Length verified by ISP)I'd have to get the running-config from the router when I get home, but for a Home based network, what would be required in setting up a policy for Upload, to allow the following Protocols prioritised access to the net:
HTTP (Top Priority)
IMAP (Top Priority)
POP3 (Top Priority)
Streaming Audio (Med Priority)
BT (Low Priority)
These are the main ones.
So the 2T comes with 2 10GE and 3 GE uplink ports. Can you use all 5, one or the other, a mix, or what? How does that work? It's not really clear from reviewing the products webpage or data sheet.
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy DIR655 is A4 with firmware v.135.
My normal uplink speed is above 4 Mbps but the speed goes down to 0.4 to 0.8 Mbps. The above unit was received from D-Link as a replacement for the same reason, but it worked for at lease 12 hours.
If the power is OFF/ON cycled, the normal speed comes back but last only about 10 minutes.
I have an SA 500 with the optional port configured as the DMZ. The LAN ports are running the 192 range and the DMZ is the 172 range.
I have seperate offices (A few hundred feet apart) that have been connected with 2 un managed switches up linked with a single wire. The 192 range stuff runs over this. I need to get the DMZ out to the second room and was asking about how to do this over the single up link and switches. (Trying not to run a second wire)
My lack of understanding had me draw up this diagram attached as a picture, to ask about. What it shows is me trying to get the DMZ through the up linked switches to the other room. I thought of using 2 routers, one on each end. I've been told this is incorrect and wont work.
Maybe a purchase of a second hardware and eliminate the switches? (up link the SA 500 to another device?) What should that device be?
We have a single HP 2810 switch being used for an iSCSI SAN.We want to replace it with dual higher end switches.But we've got another SAN to also setup now - Dell Equallogic PS6010E - that has 10gb iSCSI SFP+ ports.Can the 4 x SFP+ uplink ports on the Dell PowerConnect PCT5548 or the HP 3800-48G-4SFP+ switch be used for just the 10gb iSCSI, while the other 48 handle the 1gb iSCSI?We were told the uplink ports don't have buffering, making them bad ports for iSCSI traffic and only useful as uplinks to another switch.We only need 8 x 10gb ports (4 for 2 servers, and 4 for the Equallogic SAN), so if the above would work, it would probably save us $10,000 from having to buy a separate 24 port dedicated 10gb switch to handle it.
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe need rededunt uplink in Cisco 2960 from Cisco 3550 , one uplink is primary and one is for backup.As per current scenerio one uplink in Cisco 2960 interface fe0/1 from Cisco 3550 int fe0/1 through OFC cable configuration 2960 int fe0/1 interface fe0/1desciption *** Connect to Cisco 3550 port 1 ***switchport mode accessswitchport access vlan 2spanning-tree guard loop Configuration Cisco 3550 int fe0/1desciption *** Connect to Cisco 2960 port 1 ***switchport mode accessswitchport access vlan 2spanning-tree guard loop We have facing the problem when OFC cable down , so now we are considering anather OFC via anather route to connect same Cisco 2960 Switch in Fe0/2 from Cisco 3550 int fe0/2 so when primary uplink goes down then backup uplink which is connect to Cisco 2960 fe0/2 from Cisco 3550 fe0/2 it's up.what is the command we need configure as per my require in both the Cisco 2960 and 3550 swith in interface and global mode also.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have a router with 2 service providers connectivity with different ASN and running with BGP.I've announce few IP-prefix by ISP-A and Few Prefix by ISP-B.Both are working well with redundancy.But,Problem is here, that the all uplink bandwidth goes through ISP-A link.I want to make it that, ISP-A routed ip-Prefix's upload data will go through ISP-A & ISP-B IP-Prefix's Upload data will go through ISP-B Link.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have an older Wireless Access Point router (BEFW11S4) which I retired when I purchased a Wireless-G Broadband Router (WRT54G). I have added a 5th PC to my home computer network that does not have wireless capability. So now I have exceeded the 4-port limit of the WRT54G. Can I UPLINK from a Wireless Access Point router (BEFW11S4) to a Wireless-G Broadband Router (WRT54G)? I browsed the BEFW11S4 User Guide and could not find specific setup instruction for connecting another switch.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhy the nexus 2k has 8 uplink ports ?
the nexus 7k or 5k can be devided into 4 virtual devices ( using vdc)and making 8 uplink ports in the 2k will allow us to use the extender for all the 4 vdc's with 2 uplinks ( for redundancy ) from each vdc
I have a two Cisco 4510R each with two sup V-10GE redundant. The code on these sup modules are 12.2(31r)SG3. I need some assistance in getting this setup worked out. I have all four of the 10GE populated with appropriate optics. I setup a link from one 4510R to the other using these interfaces. From the documentation I found I had to use Tengi1/1 and Tengi2/2 as the redundant pair. I plugged the up link into these ports. The Tengi1/1 (active supervisor) links up and works fine. But when I look at the ports port Tengi2/2 it isn't showing link or active. Now port 2/1 (nothing plugged into it) is showing as active.
Now is the redundancy supposed to be 1/1 and 2/1? If so, the switch is in production, when I move the connection over from 2/2 to 2/1 will it cause a outage? The reason for this is I now have a system with a 10G port and would like to utilize one of the other 10G ports. Is that possible? Or does it have to be a lag/redundant up link to work (say to another switch)?
i was checking the datasheet of 500X series and got confused regarding the 10GE uplinks. how many 10GE ports can be used for uplink and which transceiver should be used for 10GE copper uplink? for example, SG500x-24 switch has 24GE ports and 4x10GE uplinks. can i use the 4x10GE ports for uplinks or only 2 ports are for uplink and the rest for stacking?
View 6 Replies View Related