I have a ASA 5505 Sec Plus. I would like to allow outside hosts to our mail server and also our FTP server. So i would like to allow only SMTP, HTTP (for Outlook Web Access) and FTP.
View 10 RepliesI just try to ping a internal Host but it want to go.
Laptop<===>ASA5505
Connected is the Laptop at Ethernet 0/2 Inside
My running-config is a clear config, only VLAN 1 has a IP and Ethernet 0/2 is up.
But If I try to ping to the Laptop I get the followed:
asa5505# ping 192.168.1.100
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.100, timeout is 2 seconds:
?????
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
asa5505#
From the Laptop to the ASA5505 I can Ping successfully.
Wondering if on the ASA (8.4) its possible to do something like what DNS rewrite does, but with IP requests. Scenario. Mobile phone accesses a web app inside our network fine over cellular. Once it comes inside on to wifi it still has the public IP address cached so the ASA doesn't allow its request to loop around and the app appears broken. We're considering lowering the TTL on the DNS host entry but I think we are battling phones/mobile OS's that don't have a strict adherence to name resolution standards. A lot just seem to refresh their caches every 10-15 minutes.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have Cisco ASA 5505 installed and use as default gateway. I go to Internet through the ASA5505 Here is my Problem.I can not ping from ASA prompt(ASA#) to my Laptop connected to the ASA, but i can ping the ASA inside interface from laptop i can not use ASDM and the VPN Tunnel is not working between the sie
ASA# ping 10.10.10.12
???????????
100% lost
Laptop c
C:/ping 10.10.10.1
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here is the Topology
INTERNET .<=========================>ASA<===============================> LAPTOP
I disabled window firewall on the Laptop , but no goof result.
I have ASA 5520. I cannot ping the host(192.168.1.20) which is inside firewall from outside hosts. Inside host (192.168.1.20) is translated into (198.24.210.226) using static NAT.From outside host, I used "PING 198.24.210.226". Is it because I used dynamic PAT for inside hosts?
interface GigabitEthernet0/0nameif outsidesecurity-level 0ip address 198.24.210.230 255.255.255.248!interface GigabitEthernet0/1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
[Code].....
We are using an ASA with 8.4 in transparent mode. Connection fails when a host on inside tries to connect to a server on outside. This server uses mac-address 0100.5E00.0000 to load balance but replies with real mac-address.Firewall logs "Deny TCP".ARP inspection is disabled.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen I tried to upgrading PIX525 6.3 to 7.0 , Not able to Ping the host from the PIX 525 Inside interface which is on the same subnet, Also from the host to Inside Interface , Tried with Directly connected laptop with Cross cable and using Straight cable via switch, But the results end with fail.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 5520 in production at a customer's site between an outside 802.11 network and an inside server. The server can get to outside hosts OK, and the traffic is being NATed properly, and sockets initiated by the server on the inside can pass data both ways, but I need to allow outside hosts the ability to send 'announcement' UDP packets to the inside server. I thought this might be an outside-NAT-required issue to get the traffic routed, but I need the inside server to see the actual outside host source IP in the UDP packet, so I basically set the outside host up similar to the inside host, just without the NAT table on the firewall -- it's subnet is outside the destination (inside server) subnet, and its gateway is the outside interface of the ASA, the same way the inside server is able to get to hosts outside. The firewall should just route the packet with a destination of the inside subnet once it sees that it hits a 'permit' ACL.
I have the appropriate ACL's set up, and when I do 'show access-list' I see policy hits for the 'permit' statements where the outside host is generating the announcement and it's hitting the ACL. I even duplicated the ACL into list 101 and 102, and applied 101 for inbound traffic on the outside int, and applied 102 for outbound traffic on the inside int, and I'm seeing policy hits on both permit statements outside and inside, so it looks like the traffic is being passed on to the inside interface and permitted, but the server isn't seeing the packets.
I can ping the outside interface from the outside, but cannot ping the inside interface or any inside hosts from the outside, even though I have 'permit icmp any any' enabled on the ACL on both ints. When I remove the firewall and put the outside clients on the same subnet, the server sees the packets just fine.
I set up the same scenario in my lab with an ASA 5505, with the same results. Below is the running config from the 5505 in the lab. The production firewall is running a slightly older version of ASA, so I made the configuration as basic as possible on the 5505 to match the config in the field:
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.3(1)
!
hostname ciscoasa
enable password Guh9Xxhb9mcC8lV1 encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
!
interface Vlan2
description Outside WAN Interface
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan3
description Inside LAN Interface
nameif inside(code)
I have 2 web servers that replicate between them (two different internal ip). My idea is that if one of them will not work, the other to do the relay.I have a Cisco ASA 5505 I can do a nat for each machine. How should I set ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedBased on the configuration pasted below, we believe the host (10.0.2.200 / 255.255.255.0 GW: 10.0.2.1 with external DNS servers configured) should have access to the web. However, it cannot resolve any names nor can it connect outside.
[code]....
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 in our office. We are currently using Interface 0 for outside and 1 for inside. We only have 1 Vlan in our environment. We have two three switches behind the firewall. Today the uplink to Interface 1, to the firewall, on the switch went bad. I want to setup a second inside interface on the firewall and configure it as failover incase this happens again. I want to attach it to the other switch. Can I do this? If so, what do I need to do? would it only be a passive/standby interface?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure our ASA 5505 so that our users can access our ftp site using [URL] while inside the firewall. Our ftp site is setup so that you can reach it by either browsing to the above url or by browsing to ftp://99.23.119.78 but we are unable to access our ftp site from either route while inside the firewall. We can access our ftp site using the internal ip address of 192.168.1.3.
Here is our current confguration:
Result of the command: "show running-config"
: Saved:ASA Version 8.2(1) !hostname ciscoasaenable password qVQaNBP31RadYDLM encryptedpasswd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encryptednames!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 !interface Vlan2nameif ATTsecurity-level 0pppoe client vpdn group ATTip address pppoe setroute !interface Ethernet0/0switchport access vlan 2!interface Ethernet0/1!interface Ethernet0/2!interface Ethernet0/3!interface Ethernet0/4!interface Ethernet0/5!interface Ethernet0/6!interface Ethernet0/7!ftp mode passiveobject-group service DM_INLINE_TCP_1 tcpport-object eq ftpport-object eq ftp-dataport-object eq wwwaccess-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any host 99.23.119.78 object-group DM_INLINE_TCP_1 access-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq ftp access-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq ftp-data access-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq www access-list 100 extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq ftp
[code]....
I updated an ASA 5505 to 50 users, but I still can only connect 10 hosts. In Licensing it show 50 insides hosts. I also tried to update to ASA 8.4.5 but that did not work.
View 2 Replies View RelatedInstead of using a IP address I would like to use a host address that points to a NTP pool.An example would be:ntp server 0.north-america.pool.ntp.org Can this be done on the ASA series?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 5505 that currently has inside/outside interfaces and everything is working just fine. I am trying to create a DMZ that will essentially be just for vendors/guests. the DMZ will have full access to the outside (Internet) but no access to the inside. I am using the FW for DHCP, and 8.8.8.8 and 4.2.2.2 for DNS. I currently have 1 laptop in the DMZ vlan, and it is getting a correct IP, and it is showing 8.8.8.8 and 4.2.2.2 in ipconfig. I can ping/tracert 8.8.8.8/ 4.2. 2.2/74.125.137.147(what url... resolved to on a laptop connected to the inside vlan), but I cannot ping nor browse to url.... [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe recently purchases the Cisco ASA 5505 to get familiar with it, possibly buying more appliances for our branch offices. However, since the appliance is installed, our SIP telephones no longer register with our SIP service provider.
The SIP phones are all on 10.0.1.0/24 while the SIP provider is external via the outside network. I copied our configuration below. how to enable SIP for all 10.0.1.0/24 hosts and ports 5060, 5160, 5260, 5360?
gcxfw# show running-config
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.4(3)
[Code].....
I have a standard ASA 5505 with inside, dmz and outside with the default security levels, 100/50/0. we have an email server inside which has been NATed and is working fine. However users accessing the wireless on the dmz are unable to access their emails on https (443). How do I allow SSL access ONLY to users on the dmz using ASA 8.4 commands or ADSM 6.4?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have 2 ASA and would like to build a Side-to-Side VPN between these ASA. So I can learn something about configure a ASA for different thinks. But now I don`t can Ping from a Client to the Internet-Router.My Configuration is:
Client IP 192.168.1.100 <===> ASA Inside 192.168.1.1 /Outside 192.168.178.254 <===> Router 192.168.178.1
Is there something wrong at my config? or do I need inside private Adresses and at the Outside Global IP`s.
At the Router I have a Static Route that the 192.168.1.0 / 24 ist to find over Gateway 192.168.178.254
I have a 5505 with Base license running ASA software v8.4(2) that has been working happily for a while with an inside and an outside VLAN.
The outside has a single statically configured public IP, and I have a number of static NAT rules to expose a few internal servers as well as Dynamic-NAT for all devices on inside to gain access to the Internet... the main bits of the config are below:
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan2
[code]....
I now have a requirement to add a "dmz" VLAN for guests to have access to the Internet using a dedicated wireless AP, but not to any of the inside resources. As the ASA has a base license I have configured "no forward interface" to the inside vlan, which suits the purpose fine
interface Vlan12
description Used only for guests access to the Internet - no access to the corporate resources
no forward interface Vlan1
nameif guests
security-level 20
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
My problem is that when I try to add NATing from the dmz to the outside I get a:
ERROR: Address a.b.c.d overlaps with outside interface address.
ERROR: NAT Policy is not downloaded
with either:
object network guests_subnet
subnet 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
nat (guests,outside) dynamic interface
[code]....
Having had a look at the ASA Configuration guides, all the examples I can see with several "internal" VLAN's being NAT'ed use one external IP per VLAN - is this a feature/restriction of the ASA software? Are there any workarounds? Or is the overlap in the error message really about the current NATing to the inside VLAN which is done on the "any" 0.0.0.0 subnet - would the following then work:
object network obj_any
subnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside,outside) dynamic a.b.c.d
object network guests_subnet
subnet 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
nat (guests,outside) dynamic a.b.c.d
I have a test ASA 5505 with the setting below:
How can I connect to the internet (Vlan 1 to VLan 11)
[code]....
I have an ASA 5505 with the typical inside/outside interfaces. I also have a DMZ that I've named remote for all of my ISP VLAN'd remote offices to connect. I've set the security levels on both the inside and remote interfaces to 100. From remote 192.168.71.0 network I can ping to the remote interface on my ASA, 12.230.129.66/8, but can't ping anything on the inside network, 192.168.1.0, or the web. From my ASA I can ping the router directly attached to the remote interface, 12.233.136.162/8. From my inside 192.168.1.0 network I can hit the web fine, but cant ping the remote router 12.233.136.162 or the remote network..
I dont' know if I missing something with routing, or with the two interfaces w/ same security...or what?
Here's my config. I've also attached an awesomely bad network map.
Result of the command: "wr t"
: Saved:ASA Version 8.2(5) !hostname ciscoasadomain-name wec.wnetenable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encryptedpasswd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encryptednames!interface Ethernet0/0switchport access vlan 2!interface Ethernet0/1!interface Ethernet0/2switchport access vlan 3!interface Ethernet0/3!interface Ethernet0/4!interface Ethernet0/5!interface Ethernet0/6!interface Ethernet0/7!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip [Code]...
I'm using an ASA5505 (8.4(1)) and would like to block port 80 on a specific host in the LAN so machines in other remote LANs connected via VPN can't access this port on the host. Devices in the local LAN should have access to this port on the host. Here are the commands I'm using:
-access-list block_port extended deny tcp any host 10.20.10.20 eq 80
-access-list block_port extended permit ip any any
-access-group block_port out interface inside
These commands are not working as I would expect them to. When I browse to http://10.20.10.20 from a remote machine over the VPN tunnel I am able to access the host web server.
I have a new ASA 5505 and all is working fine, I can CLI and ASDM into it, but just can't ping the inside interface, do I need to enable a feature to make this work somehow?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am connecting the inside interface to an upstream switch and therefore will need to assign a static IP address to the inside address as I did below:
#sho int ip brief
Vlan1 123.123.123.123 YES manual up up
I will also use this to manage the ASA. I am having a problem with the network configuration of the inside interface as I can't ping the gateway and/or the in IP of the inside interface.Do I need to add any routes?
I am unable to Telnet/SSH/RDP from my inside network to my DMZ. I am not sure where the problem lies, I am able to use VNC from the inside to the DMZ (ports 5800, 5900), and also establish connection on Ports (26700-26899). I have a computer connected directly to the DMZ and those services work to all networks on the DMZ.I have attached Logs of successful VNC connections, unsuccessful RDP and Telnet sessions, and the running config.
View 23 Replies View RelatedFor some reason there are some sites that I cannot access websites from inside interface.One such example is lxer.com where I am receiving this message in the browser:The connection has timed out The server at www.lxer.com is taking too long to respond.This has "suddenly" happened, and so I am wondering what others have done when such things has happened. My outside has a dhcp-IP, and I have noticed that this address had changed, so I corrected this in my router settings.ASA version is 5505
These are my settings:
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.4(2)
!
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name example.no
enable password 123412321 encrypted
passwd 1231231 encrypted
names
[code]....
I trying to allow traffic between 2 inside interfaces with the same security level. VLAN1 and VLAN15. The are on different physical ports on the ASA. I tried to configure this through the GUI Web interface and checked ' enable traffic between two or more interfaces with the same security levels'. With this ASA version, I do not need NAT to allow this, correct?
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname ciscoasa
[Code].....
We have an ASA5505 UL bundel, updated with this license "L-ASA5505-SEC-PL=" to enable traffic from DMZ to Inside. No NAT or rules deployed for that yet.
On the Inside we have Exchange 2007 in a single server installation. The public url for smtp, ActiveSync, OWA and Outlook Anywhere is mail.company.se. There is a static NAT for outside traffic to access above mentioned services on inside. Now, on DMZ there is the WLAN for guests to access the Internet. How ever, our Smart Phones with WLAN turned on, cannot sync to the Exchange Server on the Inside! The DMZ gets IP-addressen from ASA on DMZ Interface with external DNS configured. How can I configure the ASA to achieve the function of ActiveSync from DMZ to Inside with the public URL from the phones?
I have a cisco asa 5505 and i need a public ip address on the inside of my network without NAT. for example: I can create a static nat translation rule, but this is not what i need.
isp -> x.x.x.1 /29 (outside asa) (inside network) x.x.x.2 /29
Is this possible?
I have an ASA 5505 that I'm trying to set up a guest network on. I've configured an interface as a trunk and allowed the 2 vlans but I'm not getting any layer 3 to it. The switch connected to it is a 3560 and port is configured as a trunk with the same vlans.
I can't ping the ASA inside interface but I see its MAC address in the swtich's table.
[code]....
I have an ASA 5505 running 8.2(1), that is configured with three interfaces as follows:
Inside (security 100) 10.0.0.0 /24
Inside 2 (security 100) 192.168.0.0 /24
Outside (security 0) internet
Inside is connected to my internal network, inside 2 is connected to the network of a sister organization, outside is outside.
I'd like to be able to route between from inside to inside 2, and have NAT translate me to inside2's address.
I have inter-interface traffic configured, and when I use a NAT exemption, I can route fine. But the resources on network 2 must see my request as coming from the inside2 interface IP.
My customer is running an ASA5505 with 8.3 code.
The have a somewhat flaky proxy between their inside LAN and the firewall. I'd like to have a configuration as follows:
LAN > Proxy > VLAN 1 (eth0/2) on ASA
and
LAN > VLAN 1 (eth0/3) on ASA
So that in the event of Proxy failure (let's just say it loses power) the eth0/3 interface will kick in.
This appears to be easily configured according to the documentation:
"The following example creates two redundant interfaces:
hostname(config)# interface redundant 1
hostname(config-if)# member-interface gigabitethernet 0/0
hostname(config-if)# member-interface gigabitethernet 0/1
hostname(config-if)# interface redundant 2
hostname(config-if)# member-interface gigabitethernet 0/2
hostname(config-if)# member-interface gigabitethernet 0/3"
But these commands don't seem to be available on a 5505.
i have an asa 5505 firewall with asa version 8.2(1). my asa connected on wan port over isp router on internet.inside users connected over dlink switch and the allied telesis 24 ports switch on this asa. the inside users are blocked and they can't communicate. all inside ports of asa 5505 are in one vlan and all ports are switch ports. the configuration of my firewall is
: Saved : Written by xxxxxx at 11:26:22.109 CEDT Thu Jul 7 2011 ! ASA Version 8.2(1) ! hostname asa5505 domain-name dri.local enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted names ! interface Vlan1 no
[Code].....