I could access from outside to dmz but after i moved to IPv6 as there is no nat needed, i applied the acl's but dont know where i'm going wrong. I need access from outside to dmz web server.
View 4 RepliesIs this possible and if so what commands do i need to configure on my ASA 5510 for it to work.I have two web server within my DMZ and i want to access the outside url of on on the web server from the other. Currently i can access the internet from both webserver server but not the url form either webservers.
E.g. config
webserver 1 https://xxxxxx.xxxxxxx.com ---> public ip---> dmz ip
webserver 2 https://xxxxxx.xxxxxxx.com ---> public ip---> dmz ip
I've been attempting to fix this issue or confirm the issue is not with the firewall and I have kind of run into a road block. This is my problem as I understand it. A client of mine has a VPN tunnel built over a point to point connection of some kind (this client is fairly new to me) and is unable to access some hosts on the remote end of the VPN tunnel from the LAN side of the firewall. The LAN IPs are NAT'd as they leave the network from the HPH-Point-to-Point interface to the remote end. Just as a point of reference, the LAN IP of 129.200.11.19 is said to be working, however the range of 129.200.20.25 - .50 is not. I've tried packet-tracer but with the NAT happening over a VPN tunnel I am not sure if I am doing it correctly.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an issue with my mail server(SME Server) which is behind a Cisco ASA 5500(firewall) problem is that if one leaves my network they can receive but can not send email via my SMTP also internal people can only send if they use the IP address of the server rather than the domain [URL]
here is my layout
ISP - ASA 5510 - LAN (includes mailserver)
below is my sanitized ASA 5510 config. got an IPv6 T1 from at&t and im unable to pass any traffic from my LAN clients out.
:
ASA Version 8.2(2)
!
enable password PoBmYYxuAzCciKRA encrypted
[Code].....
Trying to figure out how to configure the VPN client side to access a remote LAN.
Lan A - 172.16.17.0 - ASA5505 8.2(3)
Lan B - 200.200.0.0 - ASA5510
Cisco Client - V5
At present there exist a VPN tunnel between LAN A and LAN B. The client has a VPN tunnel to LAN A to run software package X on the LAN A server. The client also needs to run software package Y which needs access to a database on LAN B. The computers on LAN A have no problem using package Y since a VPN tunnel exist between LAN A and LAN B. How can I get the Client to also access LAN B on the same tunnel created when the client connects to LAN A? I can't seem to get packets that are directed to LAN B to cross the Client tunnel to A which would then hopefully move onto the LAN A/ LAN B tunnel.
I am trying to configure access to several remote offices for users who VPN into our main datacenter. The datacenter has a 5520, and the branches are connected through IPSec L2L VPNs. Branches all have 5505 or 5510's. Remote users use IPSec via the Cisco remote Client. Remote access into our data center works, and the L2L VPNs are perfect...just now that i need remote users to access the branches after Remote access VPNing (for support) i cant get that part to work.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have an ASA-5505 running 8.2(1) with a Bosch DVR 600. When a machine is on the local subnet, it can see the video; however, when it's moved to the DMZ, the unit can be accessed, but all video screens are black and an java script error pops up as follows: [URL]
This message does not pop up when on the local subnet. Additionally, in the login screen, there is a language selection, and sometimes all languages are blanked out. There is a space for them, but they don't display.
I've tried this on a half a dozen machines, either XP or Win7 with IE8 and IE9, and they all do the same thing. I disabled http inspection, but that doesn't work. I also did a packet capture, and the only packets that traverse the ASA.
I need to understand if ASA 5550 ver 8.2(1) is comptible with IPv6, if not what is the upgrade path to make it IPv6 compatible. The requirement is dual stack of IPv4 and IPv6 should run in the same HA cluster and later will shift IPv6 completely.
The existing infrastructure is equipped with ASA with HA Active/Active mode. The command output for required details are attached here in txt mode.
I tried to create an ACL for IPv6. But the acl always drops my packetes. Only in case I allow an Permit Icmp6 any any statement. It works.
With detailed IPv6 entries. I have got drops.
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside; 6 elements; name hash: 0xd5eb1808
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 1 permit ip host fe80::21d:71ff:fe99:d1c0 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0xbb4badda
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 2 permit ip host 2001:a128:0:170::1 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0x473626da
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 3 permit ip 2001:a128:0:170::/64 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0x5b6258d3
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 4 permit icmp6 2001:a128:0:170::/64 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0x7778f0a9
This is the one with the permit icmp6 any any statement, it works !!
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside; 6 elements; name hash: 0xd5eb1808
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 1 permit ip host fe80::21d:71ff:fe99:d1c0 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0xbb4badda
ipv6 access-list ipv6-inside line 2 permit ip host 2001:a128:0:170::1 any log informational interval 300 (hitcnt=0) 0x473626da(code)
I want to ask that does ASA 5580 support the nat-pt for IPv6?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure Zone Based Firewall (IOS 15.2T) on Cisco 881 router for IPv6. Current setup is simple:
Zone:
LAN --> WAN zone security LAN
zone security WAN
!
class-map type inspect match-any Internet-cmap
match protocol dns
match protocol http
match protocol https
[ code ] ........
Current configuration behaves as expected for IPv4, but blocks all IPv6 traffic. If zone-security is removed from WAN interface IPv6 works normally (connected to Internet). As soon as zone-security is enabled on WAN interface all IPV6 traffic is discarded when connecting to Internet from local LAN.
Error messages on console: Half-open Sessions source destination tcp SIS_OPENING/TCP_SYNSENT
Are there any special settings for ZBF which should be turned on for IPv6 protocol?
i have a 5505 running 8.4, and my ISP is giving me a /64 IPv6 Prefix. Basically, I have a subnet between my ASA and my ISP's box which is my outside, running into a private subnet (192.168.0.0), as most of ISP does.I have my ASA behind, and i'd like to turn on IPv6 for my inside hosts, but the problem is that I can't modify the routing on y ISP's side, and thus it will assume all host are directly connected in my outside. Thus, I would need some kind of Neighbor Discovery Proxy on the Outside of the ASA. Is there such feature ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm having several issues with IPv6 and ZBF. I've narrowed one of them to a very simple setup. I tried 15.1(4)M in GNS2 and 15.1(4)M3 on a 1812.
The setup is
[PC] ----- [R1] ------ [R2]
R1 and R2 are interconnected by IPv6 only and there is a tunnel over that link to carry IPv4 from R2 to PC.
And I'm trying to ping PC from R2 with IPv4. We're looking at the R1 config mainly. (the other are included for completeness)
When I try to ping the PC from R2, I get this on R1 console:
%FW-6-DROP_PKT: Dropping icmp session [::]:0 [::]:0 on zone-pair zp_vpn_to_lan class cm_icmp with ip ident 0
Which really doesn't make much sense because zone vpn and zone lan are purely IPv4 and should never see IPv6 traffic as such ...
If I remove all ZBF related config, then traffic flows without problem.
R1 config
class-map type inspect match-all cm_icmp
match protocol icmp
policy-map type inspect pm_icmp
class type inspect cm_icmp
inspect (code)
My VPN users are able to access IPV4 resources, but not IPV6, all of my other user who are not VPN users are able to access everything V4 and V6. So my network goes:
IPV4 flow = FIOS > ASA5505(IPV4 Router) > Switch > ipv4 Clients
IPV6 flow = FIOS > ASA5505(IPV4 Router) > switch > win2k8 (IPV6 Router / Tunnel) > ipv6 clients
Unfortunately I didn't discover any configuration switches concerning an IPv6 firewall! So the important question is: Is there any firewall implemented at all? And if so, does it confirm to RFC6092.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI get stuck in a problem,What can be the reason for not working my configuration or any other reason that can be .
[CODE].....
I want to access my ASA 5505 from internet.how I can achieve it.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have been testing out IPv6 configurations on a 5520 running 8.2(4). We have assigned EUI-64 prefix addresses to sub-interfaces to allow clients to auto-configure there IPv6 IPs and it works correctly. I used ASDM to do the original configuration and noticed that there were two different ways to do it, both of which seem to work. I can add a prefix under the Interface IPv6 Addresses dialog box and check EUI64 or I can add it under the Interface IPv6 Prefixes. But using the two methods yields two different interface configurations:
1.
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.40
vlan 40
nameif test
[Code].....
active# sh running-config
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.2(5)
!
hostname active
domain-name dhalahore.org
enable password 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
[code].....
We have a ASA5510 with a webserver in the DMZ network 10.2.2.0/24. We now want this web server to be able to access the Exchange server in the Inside network 10.1.1.0/24. I researched this and it seemed straight forward according the the Cisco document below:
[URL]
I'm looking to do this with smtp so I added these lines to the config:
static (inside,DMZ) 10.2.2.30 10.1.1.11 netmask 255.255.255.255
access-list dmz extended permit tcp host 10.2.2.2 host 10.2.2.30 eq smtp
The configuration line:access-group DMZ in interface DMZ Already existed in the configuration so didn't need to be re-entered.
ASA Version 8.0(4)
!
hostname xxxx
domain-name xxxx.com
enable password xxxxxxxxxxxx encrypted
passwd xxxxxxxxxxxxxx encrypted
names
[code]....
I have Cisco ASA 8.0(5) and I need to block specific url to acees my https server in dmz ?I read about websence technology, but I think it's not free right? Also I read abotu policy inspection map's but in my case is HTTPS not http ..
View 1 Replies View RelatedASA 5520 running 8.2
Is it possible to do static (inside,outside) with the outside address being IPv6 and the inside IPv4?
If yes, is it possible to do this in parallel with an existing static mapping that goes IPv4 to IPv4?
At this moment (firmware 1.0.3.5) the router has no IPv6 firewall and therefore when used in a typical dual stack IPv4/IPv6 network it has no protection regarding IPv6 traffic. Hopefully this will be fixed with a firmware update before the World IPv6 Day on the 6th of June 2012.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWould like to learn from you what tools I could use in a Network that provides IPv6 visibility and also completely blocks IPv6 from being tunneled through ipv4 only networks.
I have tested this from Linux running some internal penetration test apps,but specifically running Teredo tunneling in Local LAN that is able to completely bypass security paremeters such as websence filtering servers and be able to accessing internet IPv6 sites, even its equivalent IPv6 address based on its IPv4 PAT address could be pinged from outside.. is like the PIX firewall never existed - wide opened door .
Blocking in outbound and inbound direction udp ports 3545 and 3544 seem to done the trick in dropping IPv6 at the PIX/ASA from being tunneled out or in.. Is this so ? Realy ? not to fast!! None of our local systems - users PCs or servers have IPv6 stack enabled as a policy, however, in reality this poses a serious thread.
For example, Teredo tunneling running in a host inside LAN say by a user who is a hacker can use different UDP ports from the standard listening udp 3545/3544 ports, host will still be able to tunnel IPv6 through IPv4 again, in this case I want to have tool or a strategy that can detect this internally beside being blocked at the firewall, I am looking at AIP for our ASAs would this help? What other tools could I utilized to have some sort of IPv6 awareness in our LAN without having to rung IPv6 that can provide some visibility of this invisible traffic in IPv4 LANs.
To show up the ASA as a hop in a traceroute, one can use the 'set connection decrement-ttl' feature in a policy map.During my tests I recognized, that this behaviour only affects IPv4 traffic.
An IPv6 traceroute still does not show the ASA as a hop.How can I configure the ASA to show up as a hop in an IPv6 traceroute?The ASA is a 5520 with v8.4(1) installed.
I have a PIX 515e running version 7.2(4).I have 2 interfaces - DMZ3 (sec lvl 50) and LAB (sec lvl 100) behind the pix. There is also the OUTSIDE interface (sec lvl 0) which connects to the internet.In DMZ3 I have a webserver - x.x.124.217/24 (host is NATed via static command to public IP)In LAB I have a server - x.x.1.203/24 (entire range is NATed via NAT/Global statements to public IP)The server in LAB needs to access a webserver in DMZ3. From the internet both of these hosts have public addresses that are NATed into the inside addresses. I can reach the webserver from the internet, but not from the LAB interface.I think I have to add a static command so that the LAB host can access the DMZ3 host without accessing the internet.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 5505, 2 sites that are internal, 1 external IP (dhcp from cable modem). While on my laptop, ipad, iphone, I cannot access the server via it's external IP address. I MUST use the internal IP in order to access this site. I have heard of hairpinning, internal dns server(don't really want this).
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have switch cisco 2960 ,When you boot it displays the message that is unknown for me.
View 4 Replies View RelatedGot an ASA5525-X with 8.6 release. We have an inside interface (10.11.1.0/24) and a DMZ interface (10.254.1.0/24). On that DMZ interface theres an SMTP server; by using the Public server feature in ASDM we created a rule so we have mapped the 10.254.1.29 internal ip to an external ip 217.x.x.x Everything is fine; working ok, but for several reasons we need to access the public ip 217.x.x.x from an inside ip (10.11.1.10). I tried to do it by creating an exemption for the dynamic nat; if i don't do that i have a 'deny ip spoof from...' message rolling on my syslogs.Seems to do the trick.....but only for pings! i ping the public ip from the inside ip, and got the reply from the internal ip on the DMZ. But if i want to telnet port 25 from inside to public; its not working.
View 7 Replies View RelatedBesides MAC address filtering, is there another good / easier way to keep visiting laptops etc from plugging in a CAT cable and accessing a LAN protected by a perimeter firewall?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have some problem with the ASA 5510 ver 7.0(6). My manager wants to keep this as backup. tried lots of things but still users not able to access internet nor can i ping anywhere.For example when i ping 4.2.2.2 i dont get any reply.The runing config is below for ur ref :
HQ-ASA-01# show running-config
: Saved
:
[Code]......
I need to create a firewalled segment that not only separates hosts from general population, but also from each other. The solitary confinement of firewalled segments.I know that I could create a bunch of sub-interfaces, one for each host or group that needs to be isolated, but I'd really rather not have to do that if possible. 1) It could become a management nightmare between ACLs and sub-interfaces and 2) it's a waste of IP addresses.s there any way that I can create a bunch of separate VLANs behind the firewall and have them all terminate at the firewall, using a single firewall IP address for the gateway?
VLAN 1 - hosts 1.1.1.5 and 1.1.1.6VLAN 2 - hosts 1.1.1.7
Firewall DMZ Interface - 1.1.1.1VLAN 3 - hosts 1.1.1.8 and 1.1.1.9
This way, the hosts are isolated and can't talk to each other unless they're on the same VLAN.I'm working with an ASA 5510 running 8.2.4(4).