Cisco Firewall :: ASA-5510 - SIP ACL Traffic Not Working
Jun 11, 2013
I have an ASA with an outside ACL that is configured to allow 208.84.248.95 SIP/5060 to 1x.x.x.46. I show no hits. I added an ACL to do a packet capture, it sees the packet coming into the ASA but not going to the Serv Prov interface. I see hits on the vuong ACL but not the production acl_out ACL.. What is up?
NOTE:ACL_out is the ACL we use to allow outside traffic to enter our network.
FW1(config)# sh access-list | i 1.x.x.46
access-list acl_out line 1 extended permit ip host 63.x.x.140 host 1x.x.x.46 (hitcnt=0) 0xc09a9387 (*NO HITS)
access-list acl_out line 658 extended permit udp host 208.84.248.95 host 1x.x.x.46 eq sip (hitcnt=0) 0x0f327179 (NO HITS)
[code]...
It was tested and verified from the inside network to make sure the server is listening on that port. Below we created an ACL to allow all IP from another test PC to the Server IP 1x.x.x.46. We did a telnet to port 5060 and it showed hits but not on the acl_out ACL.
Below we applied the same ACL to the ServProv interface to see if traffic was going where it was supposed to . By trying to telnet to the 1x.x.x46 IP from 63.x.x.140 IP. Looking below, no traffic appeared on the capture2.
Capture 1 above shows the last 3 incoming messages initiated from 63.x.x.140 to the 1x.x.x.46! Vuong ACL belows shows 3 more hits.....nothing on the acl_out ACL???
FW1# sh access-list vuong
access-list vuong; 1 elements; name hash: 0x29df3e90
access-list vuong line 1 extended permit ip host 63.x.x.140 host 1x.x.x.46 (hitcnt=6) 0x2759fa92
[code]...
I have a classical "inside + DMZ + outside" configuration.I also have a mail server in DMZ which have to be allowed to reach any destination on the outside (internet) at least on the SMTP port, of course.If I make an access rule that allows traffic from that server to "any", everything works fine, but doing so the server is allowed to reach any destination, including what is behind the inside interface (internal network).I didn't find any other option to tell the ASA machine to allow any destination, but on the outside interface only.I do believe is possibile to have the ASA to allow any kind of traffic from a host on the DMZ to the outside interface only, but I didn't figure out how.
P.S.: I'm using a 5510 machine running version 8.2
Just wondering if there are any methods or commands, natively, in the asa5510 for determining all traffic in to and from a certain server passing through the asa. This would be without a syslog server or something similar.
Core Internal Network -> Cisco ASA 5510 -> DMZ Switch.If i send a ping reguest from internal network to servers in DMZ Switch over the ASA 5510, i can see a delay in response, some times this delay can be more than 80ms, this is a problem for the web applications in http traffic.How i can find what's happening on my ASA? I disable the inspect traffic over the IPS, disable the policy maps below, reload the two boxes, but doesn't works, the problem still persists. [code]
I'm currently using ASA 5510 with software 8.4.1 and I have an issue with nat configuration. I used the following config line:nat (inside, dmz) source dynamic LAN Pat1 destination Server1 Server1
The traffic is not flowing and when I use Packet Tracer, packets are dropped at the NAT rule with the following error: Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule.The only ACE I have is permit ip any any.
I have manually configured the Firewall ASA 5510 from existing PIX to match the configuration, however when I connect the firewall to the Network, no traffic is flowing in either direction. I have the Inside network on the 172.29.0.0 subnet and the outside network on 20.2.0.0 subnet. I am attaching the cofiguration file.
One Host on inside network needs to access customized application hosted on Internet. Its a customized application run on port 80, 443, 5000-to-50020
How do I allow this host access for this specific application. I got ASA 5510 and host is in the inside network, we also got an ACL on inside interface to have control.
-Host IP on inside network - 172.16.30.15 -Application to access - 74.219.x.x -Inside ACL name - inside-acl
I use ASA 5510 and I would like to log VPN traffic ( for example, as soon as a remote user try to connect to the asa). I would like this log be send to a specific mail address. I already configure Email Logging for severity ( level 3) and it works well.
Is there any difference with traffic shaping capability on the 5510 as opposed to the 5505? is there anything the 5510 can do that the 5505 cant? with regards to TShaping?
i would like to use ISP2 for all http/https/ftp traffic.how could I force my ASA to set a different gateway for http/https/ftp traffic ?i have tried several solutions such as nat/pat rules, nothing seems to work.
FTP traffic routed from outside to the inside interface works fine. I have another interface with multiple sub-interfaces and vlans configured. FTP traffic routed from the outside to vlan2_servers is not making it through the firewall. I must be missing something. I have attached my config.
I have ASA 5510 8.4 Firewall where more than 20 Site to Site VPN Clients are configured on it. how to see the traffic for one Specific Site to Site VPN.Actually this site to site vpn is always keep dropping for every minute. I'm sure its a problem at the other end.The remaining 19 VPNS are UP and working without any problem. How to see the traffic for specific vlan.More over we dont have any syslog server in our network. Is their any chance we can check the traffic on the firewall?
I have a private network behind a configured Cisco ASA 5510. I need to send data back and forth between a server on the inside network and a device on the outside network on port 44818. No amount of configuration is allowing this to happen. The packet tracer always fails on of the implicity "deny" rules, even though my other rule should explicitly permit it. I also realize I need to set up routing from my outside network to the inside network, but I cannot see from the documentation how to do that on this particular port without simultaneously breaking my outside connection.
The inside IP for the ASA is 192.168.25.1 The outside IP for the ASA 192.168.11.54
Here is my current configuration:
: Saved : Written by enable_15 at 08:49:25.956 UTC Thu Feb 2 2012 ! ASA Version 8.2(5)
I have little experience with firewalls, what I've learned has been by dealing with issues like this that arise from time to time.I know, I need to upgrade the version. It's in the works now. Anyways, my question/problem is: Today I've received reports of slow internet access/activity and have noticed myself that it seems a bit slow today. On the dashboard of our asa 5510 the "outside interface" traffic usage is running contstantly high. It's at the top of the graph. How can I tell what is causing the spike in utilization. It usually runs at about 1500-2000 Kbps, and now it's up over 10,000.
We are using an ASA 5510 as our gateway to our ISP. All of our VOIP traffic is sent to an Internet SIP provider for our outbound calls. Our pipe to the Internet is 100Mbps metro ethernet. I am trying to find a way to provide QoS for this traffic so that I can reserve 20Mbps of the available 100Mbps pipe for VOIP traffic.From what I've been able to figure out so far I would use a combination of priority queues and traffic policing. However, it seems that this is nearly impossible to accomplish because I cannot control the remote device that my ASA connects to because it is the ISP device. I could police traffic on the inside interface of the ASA. However, lets say that a client on our network starts downloading from an Internet host and the downloaded traffic saturates my Internet connection. I could police this incoming (from the Internet) traffic on my outside interface of the firewall. This would drop the packets but the bandwidth would have already been used by the time it reaches my firewall.Would the fact that I'm policing incoming traffic on my outside interface cause the sender to throttle down their transmit rate because packets are being dropped? Would this achieve my goal of guaranteeing available bandwidth for my VOIP traffic by not allowing other traffic to saturate the link?Most documents I find regarding this topic describe providing QoS for VOIP traffic traversing a VPN connection in which case you could configure both end devices.
We have Cisco ASA 5510 256RAM running 8.2.4 with CSC 6.3.1172.4, it slows down internet traffics drastically when we do speed test, we get something like this, It the computer is bypassing the CSC, it gets This was done when there's very low traffic on the LAN and CPU is low usage on the CSC. The CSC has been re-imaged also but still doesn't solve the problem.
Recently moved into the hardware firewall space and have a ASA 5510. Having some issues trying to get traffic through the box to my 4 dedicated servers. all the servers have static IP's and are connected to a private switch into one of the ethernet ports on the firewall(0/2). Public internet connection into another(0/0). 1 of my servers has a connection to the management port, and the public switch, and this is the one im trying to do the configuration on.
Im unsure what to set the IP address of my "outside" interface as. need to have RDP,FTP, HTTP traffic going to each of the 4 servers independently, pretty sure i can get the rules in place to allow this, but cant seem to get any traffic to go through the firewall to any of the other 3 servers.
I need to route to sub nets form 2 different ASA interfaces. The ASA also has an outside interface works like gateway for internet access. Here is my configuration:
ASA Version 8.2(1) host name ICE3 names interface Ethernet0/0 name if outside security-level 0 ip address 201.199.xxx.xx 255.255.255.248 [Code]....
I would like to know if there is a way to apply in the Cisco asa 5510 traffic shaping not for a interface but a single IP address.For example i would like to limit the bandwith for the IP address of my FTP server.
What we are trying to accomplish here use two ISP's (one cable and one T1), use the Cable line for site-to-site VPN and use T1 line for all internet traffic. We currently use the following configuration: Cisco 2820 routers terminating the T1 -> HP switch -> Cisco AS 5510 port 0 -> port 1 to LAN switch (Nortel 5510)We want to force all VPN traffic (using 10.0.0.0/24 subnets - 10.0.1.0, 10.0.2.0, etc) through a cable connection, perhaps on port 2 of the ASA, then all non VPN traffic goes to the T1.
I want to block some social networking sites using ASA 5510-CSC-SSM, As I searched and come to know that ASA 5510 can't inspect and intercept for https traffic because it is encrypted while traversing throught the ASA. I want the ASA to make functioning for https too, not only http. Can i perform this task by updating any software on existing device?
enabling traffic between interfaces on the ASA 5510. Of course I have an outside interface E0/0 and an inside interface (E0/1) for normal operation. The idea was to enable one of the remaining interfaces on the 5510 to attach an internal network resource to for management in case we lost our switch. I am using E0/0 as the outside interface and the inside interface is E0/1. I am wanting to attached a management device on the same inside network IP address range for simplicity. I have E0/2 configured for the same security level (100) as the other inside interface and I also have enabled same-security-traffic permit inter-interface as well but I still cannot access the device on that port. Is there something else I am missing? I guess the best way to explain this is that I want ports E0/2 and E0/3 to act like a "switch" so to say...... The ASA 5505 lets you do this pretty easy but having trouble on the 5510.
I have a rule which permits traffic to a web server and logging is enabled. But when I go to syslog I am only seeing traffic which has been denied. What needs to change to be able to see the logged traffic on permit rules?
We are now using a ASA 5510 firewall and we would like to configure a internet load balance traffic in our environment.For example, some IP addresses go through local gateway for internet routing but some address go through VPN tunnel gateway.
A recently added outbound rule has left my SMTP communications broken. I have since removed the rule, and had Cisco do some damage control, but it's still dropping some of the SMTP traffic. I get a number of NDR messages each day like the one below:Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Christopher, Curt Sent: 8/19/2011 9:38 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
[URL] on 8/21/2011 9:49 AM Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified. Please retry or contact your administrator. <630.SM.Local #4.4.7>
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Christopher Curd Sent: 8/19/2011 9:38 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: JWillar@email.com on 8/21/2011 9:49 AM Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified. Please retry or contact your administrator. <630.SM.Local #4.4.7>
I've attached an image of my configuration (ASDM GUI). The part of the image highlighted in green are the SMTP rules. The part highlighted in yellow is another rule that I added about a month ago to block a SYN attack. This rule may be part of the problem because of the order it is in the list. Not sure, though.
I have had two Cisco techs Putty into my ASA to check things out. I think they've done all they can. I wonder at this point if it be wise to just reload the last good running-config I have prior to the Outbound rule being added.
we're looking to use an ASA5505 or 5510 as our firewall but want to see if one of them can prioritize traffic. I know it does QoS but we're wanting to dedicate x amount of our bandwidth to traffic based on destination IP address. Is that possible and does it take a license upgrade?
We have a small cisco 1800 series workgroup router that seperates our network from the outside world. The data coming into our network goes into the router on interface fa0/1 and comes out on interface fa0/0. fa0/0 is split into 2 sub-interfaces (fa0/0.2 and 0/0.3). These sub-interfaces correspond to a desktop and server vlan on our network. The workgroup router is connected to a 3560G trunk port (we'll call it switch 1) and switch 1 connects to another 3560G (we'll call it switch 2). Recently I was asked to add another layer of security to our network by installing an ASA 5510 firewall and forcing certain types of traffic to authenticate using their domain credentials for our network. The firewall was set up between the router and switch 1 in transparent, multi-context mode. There are 2 security contexts, 1 for the desktop vlan and 1 for the server. Both have the same security settings applied to them since we want the same behavior regardless of whether they are trying to access the servers or the workstations.
I am having an issue when implementing an additional internet connection on our ASA 5510. The new connection is "TWCOutside". I was my understanding that static NAT would force our externally hosted servers (Email, PPTP VPN, and FTP) to continue to utilize the "ATTOutside" connection. Our remote site-to-site VPN traffic has two static routes configured to force it to continue to use the ATTOutside connection.When I switch the metric on the 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 98.103.148.145 route to 1, and change out default dynamic xlate to use "TWCOutside", it "mostly" works as expected. Email, the PPTP VPN server, and our remote site-to-site VPN server continue to use the ATTOutside connection as designed. Our end users begin using the new connection for thier internet browsing.
However, our FTP server, in the DMZ, completley loses outside access. It cannot ping to 8.8.8.8, or resolve DNS queries. The is a static NAT statement for this server, as it is using one of our dedicated public IP addresses. I need it to continue to do so for the next few weeks.Effectivley, we just want to give our end users internet browsing on the new TWC link, but leave everything else on the old ATT link for the time being. The only problem I am having is the DMZ connection. I am currently "rolled back", so no one is using the new connection until I figure this out. I can easily switch the metric and dynamic PAT back to using the TWC connection, but I need to have some things to try with the DMZ before doing so. [code]
