Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 DNS For Inside Clients?
Aug 3, 2012
We got an ASA5510 (8.2x) with an inside, guest and outside interface.On the guest interface, we have DHCP function on the ASA.On the outside, there is web-ssl vpn (dns hostname on a public isp-dns server) configured.
When an user on the guest net tries to get connected with the web-ssl dns-name, it resolves the public, outside interface-ip , the ASA dropps it.
I know, with static NAT it can be resolved url...but on this scenario, we are trying to build a connection from a guest inside IP to the public-ip form the outside ASA interface.If the guest users try an web-ssl connection on the guest-ASA IP, it works with a certificate error ( because there is no internal DNS on the guest net to resolve the dns name to the guest-interface IP).
So how can this be achieved? Can the ASA provide DNS server function? Can a NAT static entry (outside ip to interface guest) solve it? It's the only solution an inhouse DNS server in the guest-net?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 11, 2012
I am able to ping from Switch to firewall inside ip and user desktop ip but unable to ping from user desktop to FW Inside ip.. config is below for both switch and FW Cisco ASA5510....
TechCore-SW#ping 172.22.15.10
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.22.15.10, timeout is 2 seconds:
[Code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2011
I have a ASA 5510 with asa8.4(2) and asdm6.4(5)205. Have a new basic config, nothing special at this time. I just cannot seem to get from the inside to the outside. From the outside interface I can ping, so I have a good Internet connection. [code]
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2011
My customer has a 5510 with the inside interface connected to a routed port on a Cat3560G.When I look at the arp cache on the 5510 all inside IPs have the MAC of the 3560's routed port. [code]
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 1, 2012
I cannot seem to determine exacly why I am not able to ping from the inside to outside using the standard 100/0 security levels respectively. I am dynamic natting the inside to the outside interface, something I don't usually do but cannot see why ICMP's are not passing through.
The Packet trace tool says there is something in the ACL but there really isn't.
Is there simply an issue of Natting to the WAN interface on a 5510?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2012
We currently have a central hub using an ASA5510 and then a few site-to-site VPN connections to our support staff homes. The devices at the homes are Cisco routers. We were running version 8.25 on the ASA and all was working fine. We recently upgraded to version 8.42 and although all the functionality of the network is ok and it does what it should, our support staff cannot ping, ASDM or telnet to the ASA inside interface anymore whereas they could before the upgrade. The home VPNs all run on a 10.30 subnet (i.e. 10.30.1.x, 10.30.2.x etc etc). I can post our config (security edited of course), but it is quite a big config. The command management-access inside is specified and the 10.30.0.0/16 subnet is permitted to ASDM and Telnet. Are there any extra things that have to be done in version 8.42 to get this to work as the support staff do have to access the firewall for configuration purposes. At the moment, they have to telnet to one of the routers on the local LAN and then Telnet to the firewall from there.Prior to the upgrade, they were all able to ping the inside ASA interface and also telnet and HTTPS to it from their PCs at home. Now they cannot and the only change made was an upgrade to 8.42. Immediately after the upgrade none of them can ping the interface anymore and it seems it can only be accessed from the local LAN. I cannot find any access-lists that might be blocking the packets so can only assume it's something in the way 8.42 works.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2012
We have 2xASA5510. I have 2 Inside interfaces as INS_STAFF and INS_QUEST and two Outside interface OUT_STAFF and OUT_QUEST which is in sapareta ISP's. All interfaces is assinged to different vlans. now i want to nat INS_STAFF to OUT_STAFF and INS_QUEST to OUT_QUEST,because I'm having two default routes it gets impossible to do. Plus I want to make failover with my ASA's. I know that i can solve this problem with PBR on router.but I haven't it . make context's and separate each Inside and Outside alone?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2012
I have been asked to set up remote access VPN on an ASA 5505 that I previously had no invlovement with. I have set it up the VPN using the wizard, they way I normally do, but the clients have no access to anything in the inside subnet, not even the inside interface IP address of the ASA. Thay can ping each other. The remote access policy below that I am working on is labeled VPNPHONE, address pool 172.16.20.1-10. I do not need split tunneling to be enabled. The active WAN interface is the one labeled outside_cable. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2011
I've been trying to figure this one out for quite a while. I currently have 2 inside interfaces (data, phone) and I am moving to 3 inside interfaces (servers, workstations, phones). I have not been able to get any traffic between the interfaces. With the current setup it was not a major problem. With the new setup it will be a major problem.
Below is a sanitized version of the config.
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname BOB
[Code].....
View 11 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2013
Today I run into a problem with enabling ICMP traffice between two inside interfaces on ASA5510 (version 8.2). I tried to ping from 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.2.2 Failed. But I can visit outside websites or ping from any of the two addresses above to 8.8.8.8 So I checked the configuration shown as follow
<omitted>
interface ethernet0/1
nameif inside
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2011
I have an ASA5510 running in production. I have about 28 site-to-site vpn tunnels that have been working perfectly for the last year or so. I was running 8.0.4 and recently upgraded to 8.2.4. Since the upgrade, I have an issue that I haven't figured out. One of my clients with a tunnel can no longer FTP us. When I do a packet tracer on the ASA, all phases are "ALLOW" but at the very end, the action is "drop" due to "IPSEC spoof detected." None of my crypto config for the tunnel including the crypto ACL has not been changed. This same tunnel had NO issues prior to the 8.2.4 upgrade.
I thought about trying to disable "inspect FTP,. I am running FTP passive mode on the ASA so I don't believe "inspect FTP" is required.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2011
I have a PIX 515E that I want to use to as a border between my internet connection and my Cisco AIR1131AG. I have configured the PIX to have the outside interface as a dhcp client which gets its dynamic IP address from the cable modem. the AP is connected to the E1 inside interface. Now I could see the E1 interface from the arp table from the AP but I cannot ping it. From the firewall I don't see the ARP table from the firewall. and i cannot ping the AP. what is wrong with the configuration? side note, i am able to connect to the AIR1131AG from my laptop I was not able to retrieve an IP address.
FW1 - CONFIGURATION
interface Ethernet0 description uplink towards the techsavvy modem speed 100 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address dhcp setroute !interface Ethernet1 description >>> WIFI LAN ACCESS <<< nameif inside security-level 100 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2011
We have a setup where clients on the internal network send/receive their emails through Microsoft Outlook client, while the Exchange server is hosted on the internet, outside the organization.The clients are connected to a Cisco switch, behind an ASA5510 Firewall. The Firewall is connected to an internet router, with double NAT (On the ASA and Router).
the outlook clients disconnect from the Exchange server, sometimes for hours, and then reconnect again. During these disconnections, the same client PCs are able to browse the internet normally. There are no restrictions for the traffic going from the inside to the outside. During the disconnections, if we try to connect using a public IP bypassing the ASA & router,.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2012
I am able to reach VPN clients (Anyconnect) only from hosts directly connected to the ASA's inside interface subnet. However, hosts on other internal subnets (177.1.10.0 & 177.1.11.0) are unable to connect to clients on VPN. The ASA is running ver 8.4. [code]
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2012
I have a strange issue on my ASA 5510 (8.4). I can't ping or connect to the VPN clients but the VPN clients can ping/connect to any inside resources. I have checked all the NAT extemtion entries.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2013
I am facing a problem with Cisco ASA remote access VPN, the remote client is connected to VPN and receiving IP address but the client is not able to ping or telnet any internal network.I have attached running configuration for your reference.
-FW : ASA5510
-Version : 8.0
Site to Site VPN is working without any issues
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2013
I have a Cisco ASA 5510. I am trying to copy large files between DMZ and INSIDE network and it is copying at awfully a slow speed. I thought it might have been related to duplex mismatch but it doesn't seem to be. DMZ interface is set at 100 full duplex. I programmed the port on the managed switch where the DMZ uplink is connected to be 100 full duplex. I even hard set the NIC on server to be 100 full. Nothing worked. So, I come to a conclusion it isn't the duplex mismatch but there gotta be something else on Cisco ASA. I was googling for this issue and came across it could be a QoS policy. Now, checking my ASA I see a any to any global service_policy where it is defined to inspect certain protocols where 'netbios' is one of them (among others such as 'ftp', 'tftp', etc. Could the slow copying be related to the above policy? Could there be a bandwidth limitation between DMZ and INSIDE interface? How do I check?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2013
I have two ASA5510 each with a security plus license and 10 SSL VPN licenses, in active/standby mode at version 8.4(4)1. It only allows up to two vpn clients (AnyConnect & SSL VPN) at a time, any extra vpn client would receieve "Login Failed" message.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2012
ASA 5510 have two model Bun-K9 and Sec-Bun-K9 from the datasheet find out difference Port related and Redundancy. My questions is : Have any major difference for Security service between two model ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2012
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 in our office. We are currently using Interface 0 for outside and 1 for inside. We only have 1 Vlan in our environment. We have two three switches behind the firewall. Today the uplink to Interface 1, to the firewall, on the switch went bad. I want to setup a second inside interface on the firewall and configure it as failover incase this happens again. I want to attach it to the other switch. Can I do this? If so, what do I need to do? would it only be a passive/standby interface?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2011
I've recently upgraded my old firewall from a PIX to an ASA5505 and have been trying to match up the configuration settings to no avail. I have is that I can't ping the new firewall on it's inside interface, despite having "icmp permit any inside" in the running config. Secondly, the server I have on there ("Sar") can't connect out to the internet.I've included the ASA's running config incase anybody can see if something stands out. I have a feeling it's either not letting anything onto the inside interface, or there is no nat going on. Lastly (and possibly relevant), the firewall is actually going at the end of a vlan, which is different to the firewall's inside vlan number. I don't know if this is actually the problem because the server can't connect out even if connected directly into the firewall.
View 32 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2011
I am trying to configure our ASA 5505 so that our users can access our ftp site using [URL] while inside the firewall. Our ftp site is setup so that you can reach it by either browsing to the above url or by browsing to ftp://99.23.119.78 but we are unable to access our ftp site from either route while inside the firewall. We can access our ftp site using the internal ip address of 192.168.1.3.
Here is our current confguration:
Result of the command: "show running-config"
: Saved:ASA Version 8.2(1) !hostname ciscoasaenable password qVQaNBP31RadYDLM encryptedpasswd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encryptednames!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 !interface Vlan2nameif ATTsecurity-level 0pppoe client vpdn group ATTip address pppoe setroute !interface Ethernet0/0switchport access vlan 2!interface Ethernet0/1!interface Ethernet0/2!interface Ethernet0/3!interface Ethernet0/4!interface Ethernet0/5!interface Ethernet0/6!interface Ethernet0/7!ftp mode passiveobject-group service DM_INLINE_TCP_1 tcpport-object eq ftpport-object eq ftp-dataport-object eq wwwaccess-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any host 99.23.119.78 object-group DM_INLINE_TCP_1 access-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq ftp access-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq ftp-data access-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq www access-list 100 extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq ftp
[code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2012
I have two control point, two firewall the second one is linked inside one DMZ from the first firewall route is good and inside the DMZ from first firewall I have servers too.so to be more clear we could call as IP for the DMZ from first firewall, Interface IP 1.1.1.1 that generate this DMZ with first firewall (netmask 255.255.0.0)
inside the DMZ I have an interface from second firewall with IP 1.1.1.5 and inside DMZ 1.1/16 I have servers too keep one test server with IP 1.1.1.3.The LAN passing the second firewall is 2.2.2.1 ever 16 bits of netmask (255.255.0.0) inside the DMZ generated from second firewall I have a machine with IP 2.2.2.9 that need to access in TCP services on machine 1.1.1.3
TCP packets from 2.2.2.9 pass the second firewall and arrive inside DMZ with net 1.1/16 and arrive to server with IP 1.1.1.3 defaul gateway (to answer to originating machine with IP 2.2.2.9) is 1.1.1.1 ASA interface 1.1.1.1 claim a missing related as it haven't mapped the connection that has passed on first firewall. I need only that 1.1.1.1 route packets to second firewall (who own net 2.2/16) avoiding to be trappen in missing related check
at start it was working! around 1 year ago we upgraded IOS to 8.4 and ever so late (one year) doing maintenance to a machine I discovered it was no longer talking with these server on net 1.1/16
I have found on cisco docs chapter 51 and TCP State Bypass before was working, is something that has changed inside ASA IOS 8.4 ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2012
We were having a discussion of ios firewall vs. asa for smaller clients(less than 50). On using ios firewall(zbf or cbac)and an asa 5505/5510. One of the arguments brought up on using ios firewall on the router is that a router will do an ip sla failover. I have configured a number of isr's for this and i know it works good.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2011
I have two ASA5510's set up in failover, and the secondary keeps crashing after doing the interface checks when bringing failover up. This only happens if I try to upgrade the image on the secondary to anything newer than 8.4.1 (I've tried with 8.4.1-11 and 8.4.2). The primary one run just fine with new images.
I don't have the exact error right now, as I need to do a screen capture from console. It's just a huge crash dump.Are there anything I might have missed during the upgrade? Should I cold-boot both the firewalls in the correct order?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 10, 2012
i have a ASA5510 in the office, that already configured 3 context, namely, admin, user, server.in the server context, the last running config was not saved, and there was a power trip last friday night. 1 of the sub interface was affected, and i need to recreate that interface.I am getting the below error, it only allow me to do changes those pre-defined interface.how to I create extra sub interface?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2011
I have a ASA5510 and I have a question about the speed the ports can handle, here is one port:
-interface Ethernet0/2
- speed 100
-shutdown
- no nameif
-no security-level
-no ip address
it's ethernet and not fastethernet so I figure it will only go to 10Mbps, but at the same time I can hard code the speed to 100.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2012
i have cisco ASA 5510 Firewall using in my network, i have planning to upgrade the Flash memory from 256 mb to 512 mb and the RAM from 256 mb to 1GB.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2013
I have inherited a PIX 525 environment and I need to document a lot of stuff to catch-up on what is going on. I was gathering IP address information and ran "show interface outside" and "show interface inside" and noticed the same IP assigned to both. I checked the MAC address and they are different. This IP is also listed as the Management IP. So I am sort of confused. What condition would warrant both the inside interface and outside interface along with the Management IP having the same IP?
The PIX and the hosts it comms it monitors do live in a VLAN controlled by a Brocade switch which also is our gateway out.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2010
I have 2 questions.Om my cisco 2811 (IOS 12.4(15) T9 IPBASE W/O Crypto) i am using 3 interfaces.And i have a pool of Global addresses: 200.x.z.97-200.x.z.126 255.255.255.0
FastEthernet 0/1 description WAN interfaceip nat outsideip address 200.x.y.253 255.255.255.0
GigabitInterface 0/2/0description DMZ interfaceip nat insideip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
GigabitInterface 0/3/0description LAN interfaceip nat insideip address 192.168.0.251 255.255.255.0
[Code]....
View 8 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2011
I have ASA5550 ruuning Version 8.3(1) with inside and outside interfaces as below [code] On the inside : I have a server (10.20.10.36) that need to be accessed from an outside host (Y.Y.131.34) , so I have the below NAT/ACL rules. [code] is it right that I have to add two ACL entry for outside host to the NATed IP of the inside server , then again add another ACL entry from the same outside host to the private IP of my inside server o get this communication done?
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2011
I have deployed a read only domain controller in our DMZ as part of a domain-related project. That machine needs to be able to reach domain controllers on our internal network. To do so, it should traverse our ASA 5510, going from the DMZ Interface (security level set to 60) to the Inside Interface (security level set to 99).
I've created an ACL as following (alerting hostnames in the example):
access-list dmz_access_in extended permit ip host dmz.rodc.domain.local object-group int-domain-controllers
I've read in various spots that you have to create a NAT when traversing security levels, going from a less trusted interface (DMZ) to a more trusted one (internal.) Since this link will carry domain traffic, we do not want to create a real translation. Thus, I created a stand-in NAT that points to its own IP as follows:
static (dmz,inside) dmz.rodc.domain.local dmz.rodc.domain.local netmask 255.255.255.255
Long story short, the connection fails. I'm able to access other hosts in the DMZ and on another interface configured with the same security level (which I've explicitly allowed), but trying to go from the less-trusted DMZ to the more-trusted internal fails.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Oct 18, 2012
A Cisco ASA running 8.2.5 with 3 interfaces: Outside (Sec lvl 0)/-nternet IP / DMZ (Sec lvl 2)-192.168.8.0/24 / Inside (Sec level 100)-192.168.1.0/24
An ACL on the DMZ which looks like this:
access list DMZ_IN permit ip 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0 any
access list DMZ_IN deny ip any any
access-group DMZ_IN in interface DMZ
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (DMZ) 1 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0
Nat Control is not enabled (by default) There is no nat exemption, static identity nat or any nat of any kind set up between the Inside and DMZ.The question is: Will the DMZ network be able to initiate connections to the Inside network or will only outside (internet) access be permitted?
A) No, inside access will not be permitted, only Interenet access will be permitted, because there is no NAT exemption or Static Identity NAT between the lower level security interface (DMZ) and the Higher level security interface (Inside), regardless of the DMZ ACL rule with a destination of ANY.
B) Yes, access to the Internet and the Inside can be initiated because NAT control is disabled and there is an ACL that permits DMZ traffic to 'ANY' destination.
View 4 Replies
View Related
