Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Verifying NAT Is Fully Disabled Between Two Interfaces?
Jun 24, 2012
I am trying to configure two inside interfaces without NAT. I am not using nat-control and I have added exemptions for the two networks. I can communicate between the two networks and to the Internet just fine.I would like to verify that NAT is disabled between the two interfaces. I also need to make sure that the Interface IP (specifically for the traffic from inside-test to the inside network) is not added to packets between the two networks. I would like to be able to verify this as well. In other words I need to have the Source IP address from the originating connection on the inside-test network passed along through to the Inside network device without being replaced by the Interface's IP address. This is a test config for a production environment that will be using a load balancer. The config I have may be working in this regard and the load balancer may be replacing this IP address (that is what I am trying to test), but I am not certain.So far I have the following NAT related running-config command (in regards to these two interfaces):
access-list NAT_Exempt extended permit ip 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0 interface insideaccess-list NAT_Exempt extended permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 interface Inside-testaccess-list NAT_Exempt extended permit ip 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0access-list NAT_Exempt_2 extended permit ip 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0 interface insideaccess-list NAT_Exempt_2 extended permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 interface Inside-testaccess-list NAT_Exempt_2 extended permit ip 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 0 access-list NAT_Exempt_2nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0nat (Inside-test) 0 access-list NAT_Exemptnat (Inside-test) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
global (outside) 1 interfaceglobal (Inside-test) 1 interface
View 11 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 16, 2011
We have an ASA 5510 firewall. There are 4 ports on it configured as 2 outside, one inside, and one DMZ. We have two cable modems attached to the outside ports. Our plan is to have the "inside" port directed to one outside port/cable modem, and the DMZ port directed to the other outside port/cable modem.
We have been able to get the "inside-to-outside" setup to work but not the "DMZ-to-outside" setup (at least at the same time).First off, is this possible? If so, what are we likely missing - some way to have a second default route for the DMZ?(My manager is the "Cisco person" here, not me, so I may not have enough info.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2012
We have ASA FW 5010 in our organization and we have 4 DMZ's under the DMZ interface on ASA and all DMZ's are created on sub interfaces and assigned different VLANS on each DMZ's.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2011
I know with a ASA5510-SEC-BUN-K9, you can increase eth0/0 and eth0/1 to gigabit with the right IOS. Is the same possible with the CSC version of the ASA?
Exact pn is ASA5510-CSC10-K9. I believe I only have the base license for the ASA, but the security plus for the CSC.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2013
I am trying to determine if this is possible or not. I have tried several configurations and I can only get half of it to work.
LAN (10.1.1.0/24) =====> <===== OUTSIDE (T-1)
ASA5510
DMZ (10.1.10.0/29) ====> <===== BACKUP (DSL LINE)
The Cisco ASA5510 currently is configured with the following interfaces: inside, outside backup, and dmz.The backup interface routes to the internet via a DSL modem, it normally is not active.The outside interface routes to the internet via a T-1 line.The inside interface is our local LAN and the DMZ has our email server on it.I am wondering if there is a way to configure the ASA5510 so all internet traffic from the inside LAN goes only through the DSL modem and all the DMZ traffic only goes through the T-1 line. No inside traffic (inbound or outbound) should go through the T-1. No DMZ traffic (inbound or outbound) should go through the DSL line.
I can get the LAN to use the DSL line with no problem, but the DMZ to T-1 side causes reverse-path errors.I am not looking for redundancy or failover protection.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2012
I have an ASA5510 running 8.2 code and I have over 200 static nats from the outside to the inside interface and that is how I expose our systems to the Internet. If this inside interface fails we also have a bypass interface that also terminates on the internal network but I am not sure how the nats will behave given they are statically mapped to the inside.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2012
I am using Cisco ASA5510 Firewall in my network. Upgraded the Memory and Flash to 1GB and 512MB.But the 5 interfaces ports are 10mbps.Can it possible to upgrade the module of Interfaceses from 10mb to 1gb?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2011
I've been trying to figure this one out for quite a while. I currently have 2 inside interfaces (data, phone) and I am moving to 3 inside interfaces (servers, workstations, phones). I have not been able to get any traffic between the interfaces. With the current setup it was not a major problem. With the new setup it will be a major problem.
Below is a sanitized version of the config.
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname BOB
[Code].....
View 11 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2013
Today I run into a problem with enabling ICMP traffice between two inside interfaces on ASA5510 (version 8.2). I tried to ping from 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.2.2 Failed. But I can visit outside websites or ping from any of the two addresses above to 8.8.8.8 So I checked the configuration shown as follow
<omitted>
interface ethernet0/1
nameif inside
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2012
I connected AP 1522 to AC power source and this is the message that i received on the console port.
%CDP_PD-2-POWER_LOW: All radios disabled - AC_ADAPTOR (0000.0000.0000)
Why this message apear ?This is not sufficient power to bring up radio interfaces?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2011
I have an ASA 5520, currently running version 7.25-k8. I'm preparing for an upgrade to version 7.25(4), so I transferred the software code (obtained via Cisco download) to the firewall vis SCP. I then issued the "verify flash:asa725-k8.bin" and it fails. It comes back with the error that the CRC did not verify, Data Integrity has been compromised". My first thought was the image did not copy correctly, so I deleted it and transferred it again. I got the same error. Then I decided to run a verify against the actual current code that was running on the firewall, and it came back with the same error. I don't understand what the problem is. I don't tend to think it's an SSH key related problem, as the method I use to access the firewall is via SSH and I have no problems. Worth noting,this firewall is part of an active/standby pair, and I observe the same behavior on the failover unit, it fails to verify.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2012
I currently have a site to site VPN running connecting a branch office and the Main office using a ASA5510 and ASA 5505. currently PC's at the branch can access the network in the main office using interface 0/1, but we have added another ip range using interface 0/2 and I can't seem to route the traffic to both interfaces. I currently have 0/1 as inside 192.168.10.1 which works, and have added 0/2 as Inside2 192.168.20.1. I know I am forgetting something, any commands to route incoming VPN traffic so PC's at the branch office can connect to both IP ranges?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2012
ASA 5510 have two model Bun-K9 and Sec-Bun-K9 from the datasheet find out difference Port related and Redundancy. My questions is : Have any major difference for Security service between two model ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2011
I Get a mail From Someone which claims which says that they are forwarding a mail from someone How do i find out that the mail i have received s from that original person onlyBecause that person is not replying to me directlyHe forwards mail to a second person{assume} and that person forward me the mail::how do i find out that the mail i have got is really originated from that first person only
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2012
In the latest code, is VPN still disabled when using contexts? If you use a 5520 as an ISP based firewall for customers, then what would be used for VPN access? Also how many contexts does a 5520 support, and would putting 2 interfaces into an etherchannel for inside, and 2 for outside work? Reason I ask about that, the inside and outside would connect to 2 different core routers. I would be for an MPLS setup.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2012
ASA 5520
version 8.2
My client has the inside network on interface gig0/1.100 and the guest network on gig0/2.200. The whole 10.77.1.0/24 network needs to be able to reach the server with IP 10.47.47.80 using HTTP. The access list is in place ont the guest interface to allow traffic to the server. The problem is that when I do a packet trace to see the traffic flow, it is dropped on a NAT rpf-check. NAT control is disabled. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2012
I used to have the problem where QuickVPN keeps on trying to verify the network because the RV042 cannot get the final ping to the client.I then bought a RV042 HW version 3 on the VPN side and I installed RV042's at the clients as well.This may look like overkill but believe me, it gives peace of mind, it made things a whole lot better, everybody happy.I am going to set up tunnels but for the time being the clients use QuickVPN. The above setup is all good if people access the vpn from the same source.
I now have a problem where one of our people is in Vietnam and she cannot access the vpn due to the "verifying network" loop.Looking at the log everything looks great, I compared a successful connect with an unsuccessful one and the logs are identical.The only difference is that the final ping is blocked (recorded in the QuickVPN log on the client side).The client uses W7 with firewall on.No need to repeat suggestions, such as turing printer sharing off, I have been through all that. isn't this simply caused by the ISP in Vietnam blocking pings ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2011
I have disabled Unicast RPF on a Cisco ASA 5510 for one specific interface. However, how do I verify that RPF indeed has been disabled on that particular interface? It doesn't show up in the config, neither does it up when I issue the command "sh int interface'.
To disable the RPF feature, I issued the following command: no ip verify reverse-path interface interface_name
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2011
I am having problems with the Cisco VPN Client software version 5.0.07.0290 installed on a Windows 7 x64 Client.When attempting to connect through the VPN client I am being prompted with the following error: [code]
The client did not match the firewall policy configured on the central site VPN device. Cisco Systems Integrated Client Firewall should be enabled or installed on your computer.
The backend infrastructure used is a Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator which has a Cisco PIX 525 Firewall.When the Firewall is disabled, the connection is made with no errors. But obviously, this is not good practice.The problem seems to lie with the Local Client Firewall?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2013
We have RV220W at corporate office...intent is to have (5) groups of (3) users each connecting via VPN. Had assumed would be using QuickVPN and have set up users, etc and connections at current locations are quick, smooth, reliable. I have set up (2) locations (6 users so far). However, after 4th connection (no matter where or in what order) client hangs at "Verifying Network" and doesn't complete connection. So, I have unique usernames, etc but each of the (3) at a location are hitting the router with the same IP. Is this the problem? I'm sure the RV220W can handle 15 simultaneous connections, but can the router deal with (3) connections from the same external IP?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2012
I have a 2960 switch connected to another. The I need to verify that vlan0010 on one switch is forwarding tagged traffic between the other switch it is hooked up to through the Gi0/1 port. How do I verify this? I have a server that's multihomed (Broadcom) on the other side an it is supposed to be on this vlan with one of it's network interfaces. We had a pwer outage and now it cannot communicate on this vlan. However, everything else on the vlan can reach all the other nodes accept this server in the front of my building. All the devices in the same room are linked to the same switch which has one port (fa0/17) on vlan0010 and can ping eachother just fine. The server is hooked to port 24 on my server room switch and Gigabit port one goes to a fiber converter all the way to the back. It then gets converted from fiber to cat5e again and links into the switch (2960) in the backroom.
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2012
I heard that the WS-C3560E-24PD-S and the WS-C3750-48PS-S have a limitation on the number of 7945s supported (ie i can only run 10 or 15 on each switch before the power runs out). Any knowledge with these pieces of equipment verify the maximum supported? I'm having trouble finding documentation showing any maximums.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2013
I have a client that is running an ASA5512-X. When I initially installed it, they were having issues sending out emails. I disabled ESMTP inspection and thought it resolved the issue. Recently, they upgraded to Exchange 2010 and are still having an issue with some emails getting hung up in the queue. If I watch the ASA when they try to telnet to the external mail servers that do not work, they get a SYN timeout.
I am not sure why this would happen since ESMTP is disabled. They are running 8.6(1) on the ASA.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 15, 2011
I recently installed a new RV120W router at one of my customer's office. I have 2 users connecting using the Quick VPN software.The first one is running on a Windows XP Pro SP3. Everything works great on this PC.The second PC is running on a Windows Vista - The QUICKVPN client stays at Veryfing Network and Eventually I get an error " The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait?I have disabled Firewall on both PCS for troubleshooting purposes.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2012
I have disabled windows firewall in Windows 2003 server control panel but only few ports are shown opened when i scanned with advanced port scanner why other ports are closed.How to open the closed ports?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2012
I am able to ping from Switch to firewall inside ip and user desktop ip but unable to ping from user desktop to FW Inside ip.. config is below for both switch and FW Cisco ASA5510....
TechCore-SW#ping 172.22.15.10
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.22.15.10, timeout is 2 seconds:
[Code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2011
I have two ASA5510's set up in failover, and the secondary keeps crashing after doing the interface checks when bringing failover up. This only happens if I try to upgrade the image on the secondary to anything newer than 8.4.1 (I've tried with 8.4.1-11 and 8.4.2). The primary one run just fine with new images.
I don't have the exact error right now, as I need to do a screen capture from console. It's just a huge crash dump.Are there anything I might have missed during the upgrade? Should I cold-boot both the firewalls in the correct order?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2009
In ASA 8.0,I have following queries related to redundant interfaces
a)While configuring redundant interface can the redundant interface again be divided into logical interface like red1.1 , red1.2 ?
b)Is Redundant interface supported in the Multiple context mode
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 15, 2013
Having upgraded to 8.3 from 8.2 I and read much about the differences , it seems that 8.3 deals with NAT in a much more managed method.However I am confused on how one would NAT a network object to multiple interfaces? i.e I know you can specficy a NAT adddress within the network object howeveer this only allows you to specific a single IP address.What if I want to talk accross multiple interfaces how would I specify this?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2011
i have an ASA 5520 running ver 8.4(1). have attached my interface config below and need to do the following, NAT traffic coming on GigabitEthernet0/2.101 to GigabitEthernet0/1, i.e. packets with destination 10.21.110.25 will be forwarded to 10.11.21.25, will a nat (Production,Advocate_MPLS) static ... statement work ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description Production
nameif Production
security-level 100(code)
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2012
I have put 2 physicl interfaces (te0/8 & 9) on the ASA-5585 into a PO and am assigning ips/vlans to the sub-interfaces. I have 2 issues: - Why am I not able to ping the other sub-interface from the ASA itself? (I can ping the 1st one), Secondly, why the IPs are not visible in "sh int ip brief" ?Although I can see them in "sh ip" ..
/actNoFailover(config-if)# int po17.100
/actNoFailover(config-subif)# vlan 100
/actNoFailover(config-subif)# ip add
[Code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2011
Do i need to create 2 objects for nating a server to 2 different interfaces?That is an inside server published in two different dmzsAutomatic migration to 8.3 creates 2 objects (one for each nat)Can I do the same with only one object? like this or I need an object for each nat?
object network server
host 192.168.128.10
nat (inside,dmz) static 172.24.1.10
nat (inside,dmzguests) static 10.10.0.10
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2012
Can ASA sub-interfaces run separate IP Sec VPN tunnels eg
There are 02 sub-interfaces of 01 physical interface of Cisco ASA5510 [ASA Version 8.2(5)] and I need to run 01 IP Sec VPN tunnel on each of these
View 1 Replies
View Related
