Cisco Routers :: Does RV180 Support DNS Made Easy In Its Dynamic Client
May 2, 2012
I'm currently using DynDNS for my Dynamic DNS Provider with the RVS4000, but I'm looking at upgrading to the RV180 and switching my Dynamic DNS provider over to DNS Made Easy since I can get all my DNS hosting under one roof. Does the RV180 support DNS Made Easy in its Dynamic DNS client? If not, could it be added in a firmware update?
I'm considering upgrading a small business to the newly released RV180 or RV180W.Does the RV180 series support 6rd (IPv6 rapid deployment?).I see 6rd documented in the other small business routers (e.g. RV110), but I can't find it in the RV180 documentation.
Web server is behind Cisco RV180 VPN Router. Port 80 is forwarded to web server. all the rest is default. when web application requests user's host address, then it appears as coming from our router's local address (10.0.0.1). what needs to be configured so that RV180 would pass on client's original IP?
I've enabled jumbo frames in Networking -> LAN (Local Network) -> Jumbo Frames on an RV180W running the base firmware (1.0.0.30).The switch seems to pass jumbo frames just fine (like ... almost every switch these days), but the router itself silently drops jumbo frames.ss this a known bug?This makes enabling jumbo frames on clients impossible, since it will break some external connectivity. (I.E. when two endpoints are on networks with jumbo frames, they will then negotiate a high MTU over the WAN, but the router will silently drop large frames and they won't get an ICMP Fragmentation Needed, etc. because the router simply drops large frames).
How do I submit an RFE (Request For Enhancement) to the Cisco SBR team to encourage them to implement the missing support for VLAN to VLAN firewall rules that was available in the RVS4000 (See [URL]) and that was supposedly added to a beta release of the RV220W firmware (See [URL])?
Just setup a Cisco 2821 acting as the easy vpn server. All good, however, the easy vpn client, say for example doing a speedtest, is REALLY slow.
For example, both the client and server have 100M / 5M connections and doing some local speed tests thru the isp, on the client side we are seeing 4M/2M? We have very few vpn clients right now, so I can't see the Cisco 2821 being overloaded.
I have tried messing with the mtu, adjust-mss settings on the wan port on the 2821, but, no real changes?
I am supporting a small cluster of AP541N WAPs and would like to know if there is an easy way to manually disconnect an associated client (recognized by MAC address) from the Associated Clients screen in the Access Point Configuration Utility Status view. That type of feature might come in handy with unruly bandwidth hogs down the road.
I have access to network 10.3.1.0 /24 but I am not able to access 10.3.2.0/24 and other networks behind the Easy VPN server.I am using a software client to connect to the server.I have configured split tunnel to the network 10.3.0.0 /16 and it shows up in the route details too. I can ping 10.3.1.0 network but not 10.3.2.0 and so on.The Easy VPN server is configured on Cisco 861 with VPN module. [code]
Is it possible with ASAVPNSERVER 5520 and an EasyVPN 5505 Client to have the client do split tunnel to a single public IP address? Both devices are on 8.2(5) 33. Could you possible provide sample config for split tunnel?
I setup RV042s at a clients offices for the VPN support and am now finding that multiple sip clients behind the router does not work. I found a thread on tech and it looks like there's a case open for the issue. url... How to get this working other than assigning IPs for the phones and dealing with different ports.
I currently have an RV180 in a small business set-up and curently being accessed remotely by laptops (Quick VPN) and Ipads/Android ICS tablets (PPTP). All is working well but I've become concerned about the security risks of PPTP and would like to shift the tablets to IPSec.
1) For a small business are the PPTP risks real?
2) What are the alternatives for Android ICS? I can't find a Quick VPN client for Android, has anyone seen one.
3) I can't get the core IPSec VPN in Android to connect to the RV180? Is this possible? Has anyone succeeded?
A user with Easy VPN client connects to a 876 ISR (router A). This router also has a site-to-site VPN to another 876 ISR (router B). What I want to achieve is that the user dials in to router A and can access the network on the remote end of the site-to-site tunnel (router B) In diagram:
user (192.168.18.x) - Easy VPN - Router A (192.168.16.x) - sitetosite - Router B (192.168.17.x)
I have added routes in router B to the 192.168.18.x network with router A as next hop, but I can't reach the other segment.
I'm looking to use 861s at few remote sites connecting to a 881 in the main office using Easy VPN. If I was to get 2 ISPs at the main office, can I configure it in a way that if the primary WAN failsover to the secondary, the VPN tunnels from remote sites will also failover?
Would you recommend an ASA 5505 at main office over the 811?
We just upgraded to ASA 8.4.4.1 and the latest CSD image, 3.6.6203. We currently have a DAP set up to scan one group policy for a secific AV but wanted to start implementing this for all group policies and including several different flavors of AV (so anyone could connect from anywhere as long as a pre-approved AV is installed). We are going to allow about 20 different versions of different AV's and I've tested a couple already and they're successful.
My issue right now is trying to allow (or deny) AV that is installed on an Android tablet (and potentially Apple devices). The tablet has avast Mobile Security installed, and even if I select Vendor: Alwil as a whole, it still does not recognize it and denies the user. I have tested on a PC and it works fine. Is there something that I am missing or are mobile AV programs not included in the DAP policies? Is this going to be considered for future versions of CSD or ASA or are we going to continue to consider Android and Apple devices "secure" and not in need of an AV?
Does the 22xx Series FEX support static or dynamic LAGs between itself and a server?Imagine a server with dual 10G NICs, and I need to connect them to the SAME 22xx FEX....can I set up a LAG between the two 10G NIC ports and two 22xx FEX Host ports? Does it depend on how the FEX is connected to the parent 55xx?
I have an RV180 VPN router.I try to enable the VPN users with PPTP or QuickVPN but is not working.For PPTP sometimes my windows 7 connects to the router, sometimes doesn't connect with a random error message.When it connects, the windows 7 from outside the lan can see the computers from inside the lan but the computers from inside the lan cannot see the windows7 one. This is random also. When i succed to connect, from that computer, the internet is not working anymore.I tried to set the VPN in the same subnet as lan, i tried with different subnet. Is not working.I updated the last firmware. The same.Restore factory settings couple of times, the same.
I noticed if you add more than 10 access rules to the Access Rule table, you are unable to reorder past the first 10.Steps to reproduce:Create 11 rules of the same stream direction, outbound or inbound (...I found the bug with outbound, did not test inbound).try to reorder one of the first 10 rules to the end of the list, either by entering "11" manually, or by pressing the down arrow.System responds that "11" is an invalid number, or that the rule cannot be moved.This issue is not reported in the "Known Issues" section of the release notes for 1.0.1.9.
Which vpn client to use on os x ? (the one included in os x or another?) Which VPN configuration to use on RV180 ? and Which ports to open on RV180 Firewall ? (or any other parameters)
In both cases above, after I started to suspect QOS, I entered a narrow IP range to test and then a MAC to test. Using a VLAN seems to work fine and generate no errors - even a VLAN for the same associated host(s).
I have a support case open about this - didn't get too far yet, but now with a better repro, maybe they will.
I currently have an RV180 in a small business set-up and curently being accessed remotely by laptops (Quick VPN) and Ipads/Android ICS tablets (PPTP). All is working well but I've become concerned about the security risks of PPTP and would like to shift the tablets to IPSec.
1) For a small business are the PPTP risks real?
2) What are the alternatives for Android ICS? I can't find a Quick VPN client for Android.
3) I can't get the core IPSec VPN in Android to connect to the RV180? Is this possible?
I have RV180 configured with two VLANs. First VLAN is untagged and second VLAN is tagged. The purpose is two have two subnets, with the second subnet used for guest access. Both VLANs have DHCP server enabled. First VLAN is 192.168.1.0/24 and the second VLAN is 192.168.2.0/24, When I connect a computer with untagged Ethernet interface, it gets an IP address from DHCP server on the first subnet i.e. 192.168.1.100 and it can successfully access Internet. When I connect a computer with tagged Ethernet interface (I am using VLAN ID 10), it gets an IP address from DHCP server on the second VLAN i.e. 192.168.2.100. So far so good. I can successfully ping hosts on the Internet i.e. ping www.google.com. But I cannot access Internet from the web browser. I captured Wireshark trace and here is what I see...
1. TCP SYN. Source IP 192.168.2.100, destination IP A.B.C.D. Ethernet frame has VLAN tag (VLAN ID 10) 2. TCP SYN ACK. Source IP A.B.C.D, destination IP 192.168.2.100. Ethernet frame has VLAN tag (VLAN ID 10) 3. TCP ACK. Source IP 192.168.2.100, destination IP A.B.C.D. Ethernet frame has VLAN tag (VLAN ID 10) 4. TCP Data. Source IP 192.168.2.100, destination IP A.B.C.D. Ethernet frame has VLAN tag (VLAN ID 10) 5. TCP Data. Source IP A.B.C.D, destination IP 192.168.2.100. Frame is untagged
The problem is at #5. Packet came back from the Web Server. RV180 properly NATed it to the local IP address. But it did not add VLAN tag.
I just recieved a new RV180 yesterday and it will not connect to my switch. Router was updated to the newest firmware, reset to factory settings. I did change the ip and ip range. Router works fine with one computer attached direct. As soon as I connect my sf300-24P to it, the WAN and LAN lights all light up and then go out. Only the WAN will light back up. I have no connectivity to the router. I plug the laptop to the router directly and no LAN lights come on and can not see the router with arp -a.
I'm having issues getting QuickVPN to connect. I think it's an issue pinging the gateway but I'm not 100% sure. We are using Comcast Business, I have placed the RV180 in the DMZ. The setup looks like this: Internet -> Comcast router -> RV180 (DHCP) -> rest of network.
Is there a guide to setup a VPN connection using this router? I've follow the setup guide provided by cisco but I'm having issues. When attempting to connect using the quick vpn client, I get error messages.
Any news on a new firmware for the RV180? I have the most recent version but it still has lots of bugs. IPSec needs polishing. In addition the Logging functions don't work well. I can't send to a syslog and when I try to email the logs I get a email saying there is no data even though several pages of enteries are visible in the web GUI. I've checked the profiles and they are correct. I even tried using just the 'default' profile but no luck.
I have a Cisco Small Business RV180 and I have several VPN users configured. IPsec between my home router (also an RV180) and work router (router in question) is working fine, several PPTP users working fine and 1 QVPN user that works as well. I set up another qvpn user and it didn't work. I went back into the router to check and make sure I hadn't goofed something up and saw that I had 8 lines, 1 and 2 were the QVPN users and 6 other PPTP users, however, the "pages" footer (for lack of a better word) only displays 1 -5 of 5 instead of the 1-8 of 8 I would expect it to show.I dumped the cfg file and opened it up, all 8 user configurations show up. One was my user account which showed negative numbers for the logon time, something like -1day -hours -minutes -sec, so I thought that that might be locking up the router or something so I deleted my PPTP account but it didn't allow the new user access. I deleted all PPTP accounts and no luck there either.I'm running firmware 1.0.2.6.
I am contemplating replacing my Juniper Netscreen 5GT with this new RV180.
serial number 161303LB RVC180 V01
However, it will not connect to my ISP (DSLExtreme) using the same settings I have been using for multiple years. DSLExtreme is using AT&T DSLAMS, as you likely know, and I am unaware of anything unique about how they serve DHCP?
The Cisco wizard sits on the WAN configuration check forever, and never connects. I have rebooted it and allowed it to sit for fifteen minutes trying. I think that is enough.
The 5GT WAN interface is configured for "DCHP Client" and that is how the RV180 is configured.
It is a standard 6MB DSL line, I have tried both the existing cable, as well as the provided one to connect to the D-Link 2320B modem/bridge, which, as I indicated, syncs almost instantly with the Netscreen. No difference when the cables are swapped.
My brand new RV180 seems not to be able to exceed 1.1 MB/s WAN download speed. Using a simple Linksys WRT-320N I used to have 5-6 times this speed. Value is with default settings, various sources (HTTP/NEWS downloads). Trying to improve this wit QoS-settings dows not improve this in any way.
The RV180W would not connect to an AT&T DSL connection using PPPoE (modem in bridge mode), or behind the DSL Modem/router with the DSL modem/router providing a dynamic IP to the RV180W or a cable modem (TimeWarner Roadrunner dynamic IP). I upgraded the firmware yesterday and now the RV180W will connect to a dynamic WAN IP, but it still will not connect using PPPoE.
I have also noticed the admin interface is only accessible about 75% of the time. When going to 192.168.1.1 the login prompts either don't come up or if they do, after logging in, the screen never fully loads after that. I have to reboot the router to get it to work.
Also, the router has not yet pulled DNS from either the DSL or the cable modem. I had to manually enter those addresses.