Cisco Routers :: Port Forwarding On RV110W With Ppoe Connection Never Worked
Jan 8, 2013
Here is the configuration : I newly installed for a client a RV110W (firmware 1.2.0.9) wich connect on the internet trough Dlink 320B (ppoe connexion, in France - the provider is orange). Wifi is ok, VPN is ok, wan is ok ...
But no way to make port forwarding works (form wan to lan of course). I tried to reboot the router, the modem, reseting router configuration before re-apply mine, it didn't made any change. I also tried single and range port forwarding, without any succes...
I installed firmware version 1.2.0.9 a couple weeks ago after seeing in the release notes that the port forwarding bug where clients would get 'no route to host' was resolved (one of the original posts found here:URL
After installing the firmware and confirming it's running I've seen no improvement. I still must reboot my router 2-3 times daily so clients can access the ports that are defined in the port forwarding module.
I am using a RV110W with the latest firmware 1.0.1.6 I have some port forwarding configured, which normally work. But sometimes, all port forwarding stop working. Everything else continues working normally, just all port forwarding don't work any more. I tried disabling the port forwarding and enabling them again, this doesn't work. Also disabling the firewall completely does not work. You have to reboot the router, then everything works fine again. When I make a portscan from outside with a "fresh" started router, the forwarded ports are open. When the error occurs and I make a portscan from outside, all ports that should be open (and have been open before) are closed.
I have a 2nd pc that i want to add to my basic home network. I have installed a fresh copy of Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit yet still have issues connecting to my router. There is basic activity but nothing on the internet I have tried to use command line netsh to force DHCP on it says it is but I am getting a subnet mask of 255.255.0.0 when everything else is 255.255.255.0 not sure if this matters as there are only 4 devices on the network.
I just bought and setup a RV110W. I noticed while scanning it from the WAN side that it always has port 443 open, even when remote management and VPN access are disabled. Why is this port still open, and how do I close it? Or is this a bug in the firmware? I am using firmware version 1.1.0.9, which is the most up-to-date for this unit. Having open ports allowing unsolicited contact from the WAN side, especially inadvertant ones, is a major security hole.
I am trying to connect from the outside to a TCP server inside my lan that is listening on Port 25565. I am using a RV110W. I did the DMZ IP for it.
From the Lan I can establish a connection (even with my dynamic dns address). As I try it from the outside the server log tells me that a connection has been establishen but it shows the gateways IP. Afterwards it tells me the connection hase bin lost (Time out).
As I set Port forwarding I even cannot reach the server from the out side and lan.
Just purchased a Cisco RV110W for our small business. We were told this was easy for us to use and secure enough for our small office and for our travelling sales staff to access our website.
We purchased 2 dedicated IP-addresses, 216.82.5.230 for access to one server, and 216.82.5.231 for access to a second server (these IP-Addresses given are just an example; not real).
These come into the single RV110W WAN port. The two servers are plugged into 2 of the 4 LAN ports.
But the WAN setup page only accepts one WAN IP-Address. So when we put in 216.82.5.230, the outside world can HTTPS into one server, but we don't know how to get them to HTTPS to the second server when the other staff uses 216.82.5.231.
In summary, how to use the RV110W admin panel to forward the HTTPS/SSL traffic from 216.82.5.230 to one server (setup internally on 192.168.10.20), and the HTTPS/SSL traffic from 216.82.5.231 to the other server (setup internally on 192.168.20.20 using the VLAN setup on this router)?
how to: port forwarding to 2 different destinations based on incoming WAN port
The default HTTP service works fine: TCP80/80-> 192.168.0.55
I have a couple of IP security camera's I'd like to be able to access remotely that also listen on port 80. I tried TCP & UDP 8009/8009-> 192.168.0.9 without any luck. Not sure how to handle the port redirects on the RV042G? Seems simple and was on the Symantec, could be user training :-)
I was able to do port redirect with the Symantec Firewall I'm replacing.
Is it possible to create a service which will forward public port 9010 to an internal IP address with port 23 ?
First of all, I do not like to open the public Telnet port to the inside so I would use another public port and second my ISP does not allow some public ports beneath port 80
I've set up port forwarding from an external port (9000) to an internal port (80) on our SRP541W, and for some reason, it's not working externally. If I access the public address from within the internal network, it works properly.
I have a netopia 3347W adsl modem/router that I have put in "ethernet bridge" mode. At that point the RV110W has to authenticate to ATT using PPPOE. I have verified the username/paswd for the PPPOE connection. The 110w will not complete the PPPOE connection. Looking at the logs it shows that it handshakes and authenticates with the PPPOE server. Then unexpectedly the log shows a termination with exit status 15. It then tries to renegotiate the PPPOE connection.
I have RV042 and E4200 routers . I tried the manual UPnP port forwarding using Rv042 router and was succesful ( by typing 192.168.1.1 in the explorer and logged in using user name and password )
I am using a linux embedded system whose Internal IP ,Internal port are mapped .This system is connected to one of the LAN ports
I want to try auto UPnP port forwarding both for RV042 router and Linksys E4200 routers
After enabling the Upnp option only and logging out ,Can i add a port mapping entry in this router without logging in using a C++ program which runs on linux embedded system .
I am trying to open up port 32400 on my 881w Cisco router but I have not had any success I need to configure manual port-forward to enable my Plex Media server.
I have a Cisco RVS4000 with Port 1 as a trunk connection to a Cisco SF300 switch. Port 1 on the router is configured 1untag,2tag,3tag,4ag. When connected directly to the router I can connect to the switches management IP. I would like to reach the switch remotely. I have set up DDNS and can access the router and I have have set a specific port to forward to port 80 on the switches management IP but this does not work. Should I not be able to Port Forward to the switch across VLAN 1?
Port forwarding on rv120 does not work. I have followed the workaround instructions: so i have created a firewall access rule on incoming port 21 to an internal ip address on the same port. The router has created the forwarding port rule. But port forwarding does not work. I have tried to use a custom service but nothing!
The router is reachable from wan, I can access via DNS the configuration page and I can ping the router on wan port.
Currently I have the RV042 router working in a dual WAN set up, it is configured to accept connections on numbers of ports like 80,443, 25 and forward them to a local ip.
The problem is this only works with WAN1. Is it even possible to forward ports for connections coming in over WAN2?
I', trying to open my ports 80 and 37777 and have successfully opened them on my linksys router but behind that I have an at&t modem/router....My questions is how do I find the URL number to access my second router to open the ports on it also?
I am trying to access home security camera from outslide my house.I have an AT&T internet coming into the house. They have a router that comes into the house and that splits off to another router in my house which carriers CAT5 all over the house. One of the wires go to another router that I use for my wireless devices.One of those wireless devices is an security camera.Here is my question. I want to view the camera from the internet outside the house. I have followed the instructions given by the manufacture for port forwarding. I have port forwarded the wireless router since the camera is connected to it. Is that wrong since the DSL is coming in one router and then going to another and then to the wireless
I've got a pretty simple setup where port forwarding was working without a hitch.My old router (wrt54g) was forwarding RDP requests (over 3389) to my computer's ip. No problems. Then I switched it out with a WRT160N wireless router (and upgraded firmware), and I just can't seem to make the connection.
I've followed all the simple tutorials, ala:
[URL]
Still no luck...! I've ensured my ip is the one the router is pushing connection attempts to, dropped firewall and filtering... still nothing (I've even tried connecting from within the network, using my computer's name) without any success.
I just got a new rv120w and want to set it up, like my old router. I have a webserver that people around the world, should be able to visit, but I can't figure whats wrong. You can see my settings in port forwarding here.
I have a RV042 with Port Forwarding configured for RDP. This Port Forwarding Rule is being applied before my ACL - so subnets that are not authorized through are being allowed in. Firmware version 4.0.0.07.
I'm having yet another issue with my RV220w. I thought this would be a wise buy, but I keep finding reasons to hate myself for buying this router.Anyway, I need to forward port 3389, Windows Remote Desktop Protocol to one of my internal servers. I have defualt NAT, defualt firewall, etc. etc. I have seen documentation that says that Firewall -> Port Forwarding is non-functional, so I attempt to set up port forwarding via Firewall -> Access Rules. I did not see "RDP" or any other obvious acronym for Remote Desktop Protocol in the services list. So, I made a custom service, called RemoteDP, TCP protocol, port 3389 to 3389.No, I cannot RDP to my server from WAN. This was easily achieved with a cheap NETGEAR router from 2005.
Today i installed an RV180 VPN router as replacement for a netscreen ns-5GT.Exactly the same configuration, everything works, except port forwarding from WAN to a host inside NAT.My ports are open (online port-scanner sees the ports as open), the hosts are accepting connections, but a connection can't be made.Probably a bug in the firmware.
We have the following proplem with the RV 120w router with the last firmware. We can't manage to set up port forwarding. So the situation is like this: we have WAN ip: 192.168.2.68 and our router connects to VPN server and gets an IP like 10.0.10.X. In the inner network we have PCs and a DVR (digital video recorder) with ip 192.168.1.215. Our DVR uses 3 main ports like 81 (http) and 37777 (tcp), 37778 (udp) and we try to make port forwarding with the router interface like the manual says (look and the sceenshot). But when we try to enter our DVR and see the picture from the outside network (we type in browser 192.168.2.68:81) nothing happends. It just dosen't work.
Before cisco we used d-link router and everything worked just fine with the same port forwarding rules.So we need to enter WAN address in Cisco and show the 81 port in the address bar and see the picture from the DVR 192.168.1.215 from the inner network.
Service: TEST Port type: UDP Starting port: 5060 Ending port: 5070
and I want to forward it to a specific IP. Then, if I create a new port forwarding rule for this service it asks me to specify a single port number to be used internally as:
Action: Always Allow Service: TEST Source IP: Any Destination IP: 10.0.0.100 Internal Port: ?
I want to forward all ports from 5060 to 5070 to the internal range 5060 to 5070.
i have a WRVS4400N Router and behind that router i am running a OPENSWAN Server. I know that the WRVS4400N has a VPN Service on board, but for specific reasons i'd like to use my own ipsec server.
The problem is that i cannot forward the IPSEC Paketes (4500 and 500) coming from the internet interface to the LAN. All other port forwardings like SSH works. I think the reason is that the IPSEC Services (Pluto, etc.) are already running on the router and therefore the pakets cannot be forwarded. The log shows all forwarded port (e.g. SSH) but does not show any IPSEC traffic.
I'd like to turn off the VPN Service on the router, but I cannot find any configuration switch that allow my to do so.
Background: Port forwarding external port 1234 to internal port 123 on a NAS appliance (ip 192.168.1.111) Successfully accessed NAS like this: [URL] Everything was working perfectly for several weeks Last week I changed the subnet to 172.17.888.x
Problem: Everything back to normal on the LAN except that port forwarding to the NAS no longer works.
Gerfingerpoken: I opened another port (1235) and forwarded that to the NAS (in addition to the original port). No success.
I tried a port scanner. The port scanner reported that port 1234 was open on the router, but didn't mention 1235. I repeated with yet another port. Same result: only port 1234 is reported open by the port scanner. Software rebooted the router, same result Hard reset (button) the router, still no change.
QUESTIONS: 1. How can I test if the router is actually forwarding new ports? (software tool?)
I have recently replaced an RV082 router that had failed with a new RV082. The previous router was set up to forward port 443 ssl requests to a server in the network. Worked flawlessly for years and that is why I replaced it with same model. The new router is also set up to forward port 443 ssl requests to the new server. The issue is that the router responds with its own certificate and does not forward the request to the server.
We've run into some difficulty trying to take advantage of multiple WAN IPs in conjunction with the SRP547
What we're trying to acheive is the ability to port forward from our distinct public IPs to different internal servers. Looking at the options under Port Forwarding it looks like we can only configure forwards at the "WAN interface" level, but our problem is that we can't work out how to set up separate interfaces for each of our Public IPs...
Our ISP provides us with a fully managed NTU/router with a single "Internet" ethernet port, which we can use by statically configuring IPs on our end. For this configuration this port has been directly patched to the WAN ethernet port on the SRP547W.
We have been allocated a 255.255.255.248 (/29) subnet, giving us 5 usable IPs after the ISP's gateway address is taken into account, like so: a.b.c.208 Network Address (/29 subnet) a.b.c.209 ISP Gateway a.b.c.210 IP1
[Code].....
I should mention at this point that we're running on firmware version 1.02.01 (023).
Is there a CLI or other method of configuration that might work if the web interface won't?
I made a custom port forward using tcp ports 2121-2130 to a private IP address on my network (192.168.1.8). Whenever I do this, RV220W CPU usage spikes to 98-99% and my Internet connection starts lagging a lot. Just disabling the port forward from the administation console fixes this. I'm running the latest firmware.
Some days ago I bought a new RV180W router with firmware 1.0.1.9. The router is configured with PPPoE and I need to forward some port (a basic operation for a router!!!). I try in every way but it doesn't work. My old router works well. [URL]
I am not a tech guy but have to take care of some basic IT stuff. I had Ether fast cable/DSL router and it got changed with RV 120W router. there were comment that internet is now working slowly - what could be the reason for this?
I copied most of settings. First big technical problem was with phone. It stopped working - call could get through but when answered there was no sound. We use linksys modem for VoIP. I called operator and was told to disable sip alg. I did that and service improved a little. When answering a call sound could get through but would stop for few moments and then continue. Operator told me to forward port 16384 to 16482 to VoIP modem IP. But I can only set forwarding for one port at the time in "Port forwarding" settings. Is there a way to forward to port range?
I have an RV082 V2 with 2.0.2.01-tm and I am having trouble with getting my Sprint Airvana to connect properly to the mobile service. I've read on the Sprint forums indicate putting the Airvana in the DMZ generally allows the device to work properly; however, none have the RV series routers for tips on how to do this appropriately. This device used to work fine behind the RV082, but I reset it one day and it no longer works.
The Airvana is a femtocell/router device with a WAN port and 3 LAN ports. If I connect the Airvana directly to my cable modem, I get the appropriate connection and can then make calls through the device instead of through the Sprint connection; I live in a basement unit and get crappy signal without the device. This proves the device works and that my ISP is not blocking the ports. Sprint indicates the device uses UDP 53, 67, 68, 500 and 4500. Their support sucks and they insist I put the Airvana before my router. I absolutely do not want to use the Airvana as the router. There are almost no configuration options in the router interface and it needs to be rebooted somewhat regularly, which would drop internet access throughout the house for 10-15 minutes while it reboots and finally establishes an internet connection.
As soon as put the Airvana behind the RV082, I no longer get the appropriate connection. I can, however, plug my computer into one of the LAN ports on the Airvana and connect to the internet in general. I have the router assign a static IP to the Airvana, and tried forwarding the required UDP ports to the IP. This did not fix the problem.
I can certainly troubleshoot the port forwarding issues, but I would also like to look into putting the device into the DMZ, if possible. I've not worked much in this area, so I am unsure how to appropriately configure the router to allow this to happen. Is it possible to have the Airvana in the router DMZ without having a public IP for the device itself?
