Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 - Multiple IPSec VPN Tunnel
Aug 29, 2011
I recently purchased a RVS 4000 (firmware V2.0.0.3) and am having some issues creating a second (third...fourth?) IPSec VPN Tunnel. The first one is up and running just fine. On the VPN Summary screen it says [1 Tunnels Used 4 Tunnels Available].
When I go to configure the second tunnel, I select --New-- from the "Select Tunnel Entry" drop down and proceed to fill in all the connection information. When I click Save, it seems to be processing and after a few seconds just returns me to the same screen, with none of the information I just input and no connection created. No errors given.
I have another RVS4000 to connect at a different location which will require a similar setup, but don't want to do anything with it until I have the one mentioned above working fully.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 5, 2011
I have a RVS4000 at one location and a second RVS4000 at home. I have established an IPSec VPN tunnel between them and it is UP. I can ping the routers from each end no problem. I can ping the IPs listed in the "Local Group Setup" and the "Remote Group Setup" from both ends no problem. I can even open up a shared resource from a Win 7 machine (e.g. by typing \10.10.10.100 in start-run from a computer on my home network).
But - i can't ping anything else on one network from the other. What gives? I need to access a 10.10.10.101 machine but can't even ping it.
- both RVS4000 boxes have latest firmware (V1.3.3.5)
- home RVS4000 setup with IP 10.10.11.1
- home network has a server with IP 10.10.11.20
- other location RVS4000 setup with IP 10.10.10.1
- other location server setup with IP 10.10.10.100
Tunnel settings on home RVS4000 (the other location properly mirror these).
- Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
- Local Security Group Type : Subnet
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2011
Can I have use a Gateway-to-Gateway IPSec tunnel whereby a user can surf the Internet using his local Internet connection and at the same time connect through the IPSec tunnel to a remote subnet using RVS4000 routers?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 26, 2010
Linksys Small Business VPN endpoint routers?
I have been trying for two days to setup a Linksys RVS4000 to a RVL200 IPSec tunnel and I can't get them to connect.
The internet is via optimum online home internet accounts. From what Cisco said, the ports necessary are 500, 4500, 443 and 60443.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2011
I have succesfully config an IPSec VPN Tunnel by using a Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320 and a RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with VPN.On the site of Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320 this is some info: [code] On the site of RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with VPN this is some info: [code] Remember that you can not be on the same range of IP, I mean, you can not have 192.168.0.X if the remote network is on 192.168.0.X, you have to change some of the Routers.I show the configuration on Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320: I show the configuration on RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with VPN:If all is correctly configured, you should see on Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320 the Status Connected:
If all is correctly configured, you should see on RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with VPN the Status Up.As you can see, I'm connected to the remote Router (RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with VPN) by my own web browser accesing by the local IP 192.168.0.10.I have used Authentication MD5, maybe is not the best one but I had no time to test SHA1, I will when I will have time.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2012
I am using a Cisco RV110W (Firmware 1.2.09) in a branch and I would like to create a VPN Tunnel to another site that has a Cisco RV042 (firmware v4.2.1.02)
What would be the correct Configuration? the current configuration I am using is
in the RV042 i am using
Check Enable
Local Group Setup
Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
IP Address : RV042 Pulbic IP address
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2011
I have 2 internet connections in my office one via Verizon Fios and another one via the local cable company. On the fios connection I have an RV042 VPN router and on the Cable company connection I have an rvs4000 router, I would like to know if there is a way I can connect the 2 so I can share a printer I have on one of the 2 networks from the other network without using the VPN feature, like via an ethernet cable connected between the 2 and some kind of static route maybe?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2009
I'm replacing my RVS4000 with the RV180 but having VPN connection issues with the RV180. Let me know the VPN tunnels work perfectly fine on the RVS4000.I have configured my RV180 for 3 VPN tunnels. My ISP is Comcast (cable) Business class with a Static IP. First VPN tunnel is to another Comcast ISP and the VPN works flawlessly - connects immediately.Second VPN Tunnel is to Business class ISP (Verizon-NJ) and VPN will NOT connect.Third VPN Tunnel is to Business class ISP (Cox Network-VA) and VPN will NOT connect.I had opened both the RVS4000 and RV180 up on a browser and both settings from the units were idential. I reconnect the RVS4000, VPN tunnels work great, I unplug and reconnect the RV180, the Comcast VPN works, but the other two do not.From what the log is saying "[IKE] WARNING: no phase2 found" and the other says "[IKE] ERROR: remote identifier not found". It has to be something with the RV180 that I'm missing or possibly configuring incorrectly.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2011
In an established IPSec VPN between a RVS4000 and IOS (2801), everything works great (RDP / UNC File Share / HTTP) - with the exception of SMTP and HTTPS.I can do pretty much everything over the tunnel that I need, except attempting to send anything over port 25 or 443, it's getting destroyed in the tunnel.I've completely disabled the firewall in the RVS4000 and on the IOS side, I just have an extended access list that permits the entire IP protocol. The tunnel works fine, as mentioned above, and stays up with no issues.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2011
My RVS4000 router freezes up when a lot of data is being pushed through the Ipsec tunnel. Let me explain in detail.
On physical location A, I have an RVS4000 router (with IP 192.168.3.1) which is permanently connected with a WRVS4400 router (with IP 192.168.1.1) on physical location B. The Ipsec tunnel has been configured using the Easy Setup Wizard of Cisco and has been working fine and stable for months. Both routers have another Ipsec tunnel with another WRVS4400 router (with IP 192.168.2.1) on physical location C, but this router does not play a role in the problem below.Recently, I’m trying to set up a remote backup service between physical location A and B using “rsync”, which uses port 873. Due to the Ipsec/VPN tunnel, I could configure rsync to move the backup files from our NAS on location A (NAS has IP 192.168.1.2) directly to location B (NAS has IP 192.168.3.2). Both NAS-devices are of the brand Synology (DS211J). The Ipsec tunnel guarantees that the data is coded and thus secure.
However, when pushing the first batch of data, I noticed that the router on the receiving end (RVS4000) freezes up after approx. 1,5h after the batch has started, which is after approx. 1 gigabyte of data has been transmitted. The connection with the WAN is lost, also the VPN-tunnel is not working, I cannot ping the device or reach its configuration pages (on 192.168.3.1), the only option is unplugging it and letting it reboot. I’m thinking the router cannot deal with the huge amount of data that needs to be decoded. I tried 5/6 times, with always the same result (timing / amount of data pushed through before router freezes varies slightly).
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2013
If there are any small business routers that offer one-to-one NAT? I have several public IP addresses assigned to me by CenturyLink. I have two servers that provide email and web hosting for two different domains. I want to put the client machines on one VLAN (VLAN Z) and assign it a public IP address (to keep server traffic separate). I want to put each server on its own VLAN (VLANs X & Y) and assign each server its own public IP address. I need the router to be able to provide a firewall and port forwarding for each VLAN. I also need to be able to route traffic between VLANs so the clients on VLAN Z can access their email and the websites on VLANs X and Y. I also need to be able to route DNS traffic between VLANs so each server can provide name resolution for their respective domains.
So, is this possible with a small business router or do I need to look at something different? I'm fairly certain this configuration is not possible with my current Cisco RVS4000. What it boils down to is I need a router that is capable of having multiple public IP addresses on the same interface and to forward those public addresses to private VLAN subnets. This would be one-to-one NAT if I understand it correctly..
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2012
The client has a Cisco RVS4000. There are 3 Internet devices need to be accessed from the outside and will use one public IP for one device. I don't see any options to setup on Cisco RVS4000 to do 3 NATs. If Cisco RVS4000 doesn't work in this situation, which router will do?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2011
I'm trying to set up a VPN tunnel between a Linux machine and a RVS4000 at a remote site (served via satellite connection). After many efforts, I finally succeeded (based on Openswan). However, while PINGing is OK, big packets (from the RVS4000 LAN to the Linux box) arrive corrupted.
I lowered the WAN MTU, with no success. What finally did the trick is to lower the MTU at the RVS4000 LAN interface. Since this is not possible via the Web I/F, I did it via telnet ("ifconfig eth0 mtu 1400"). However, this change is lost after router reboot. How can I make the LAN MTU setting permanent?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2012
We have about 9 1900 routers and 1 ASA 5510 for partail mesh VPN network. So 8 1900 connect to 1 1900 and ASA located in HQ and datacenter. All worked well however there is one site running really strange. The tunnel between 1900 is up for a while and down. Reboot router seems to be the only fix. But tunnel to ASA does not seem to be down at all.
The issue happened again today, we rebooted the router on site but tunnel still not up. DEBUG shows: deleting SA reason "Death by retransmission P1 "
I can see alot of Apr 24 19:57:55.271: ISAKMP:(0): retransmitting phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
To me it seems like the IDE packet sent but never got reply and timed out. I did also check on the other end, the HQ. All other tunnels are still running fine on that router, just this remote site. Plus I got the similiar output when debugging on HQ router.
One thing do notice though, there was no match on both router for the ACL to match/permit ESP traffic... I asked on-site staff to reboot the modem used in remote site.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2011
Here is the situation: A CISCO871 router is configured to establish an IP SEC tunnel with a CISCO ASA5520. The configuration is OK about that. I wish to configure the same CISCO871 in order to establish a LAN-to-LAN IP sec Tunnel with another CISCO871 at the same time in order to reach private network. So, I have followed the Cisco procedure Document ID: 71462 "LAN-to-LAN IP sec Tunnel Between Two Routers Configuration Example"; it works, I can reach the peer private network BUT ONLY when the IP SEC tunnel with ASA is not established.
It seems to be a routing problem...I don't find how to configure to make both tunnels up and functional at the same time.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2013
Our ISP supplies a Cisco SRP-521w router with our WIMax connection but I have had no experience with these and they look like a ex Linksys product? What they a like for use as a spoke router connected to the core hub (Cisco 2921 ISR G2)?We would be using a GRE Tunnel protected with IPsec 3DES encrypted.The SRP would be using PPPoE to authenticate to the ISP.Any known traps and limitations with the Cisco SRP-521w?We currently use a Cisco 877 for this but wanted to save them fr our adsl links
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2012
We have 2 RV220W Routers installed in seperate offices. We are attempting to setup a IPSec tunnel between the two sites. So far we have been unsuccessful in getting this to work.On both sides, we are getting a successful connection established, but netiher site is recieving any packets. Both sides are transmitting packets though. We have exhausted our resources trying to figure out why.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 26, 2012
I have a VPN working between two locations using WRV210s at each end. Now I'm looking to replace one 210 with a new RV110W. Can I get the two to work together? The config is quite different.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2012
Is there any way to setup an IPSEC tunnel to be able to go from my subnet, 192.168.75.x and be able to reach anything on the other side of the tunnel, 192.168.X.X?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2011
i have an ipsec tunnel between two rv082 routers. (1 v3 Hardware and the other with v2). On both devices are the latest firmware installed.
Everything working fine, the routers establish an ipsec connection but after about two hours, the router with hw version 3 freezes.... nor the wan neither der lan interface is pingable. I can only pull out the power cord. Below attached are the ipsec settings. It´s a Gateway to Gateway connection
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2013
I'm setting up a IPSec Tunnel between 3800 and 2600 routers over the internet.
Do I need to create a tunnel interface as they suggest in this document? [URL]
I just watched a couple of you tube videos saying I don't need to do that...
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 5, 2011
We have 4 RV 042 routers and cisco router at HQ, we have Site to Site VPN tunnels in between, All branch offices are connected to HQ via S2S VPN tunnels
10.10.1.0/ 24 HQ
10.10.2.0/24 Branch 1
10.10.3.0/24 Branch 2
10.10.4.0/24 Branch 3
10.10.5.0/24 Branch 4
now lets say i am branch 1, i can access 10.10.1.0/24 network but cant access 10.10.5.0/24 network, means i dont have branch to branch connection, it should be through HQ, means my RV042 at brnach should fwd all traffic to HQ for another branches also. Under VPN tunnel if i try to configure remote destination 10.10.0.0/21 its not allowing me it says network overlaping with local network, how i can sole it, I know how to do in cisco, we can permit those networks in access lists.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2012
I am setting up a customer site. One side is RV180W and the other side is Checkpoint 500W.
RV180W side
LAN - 192.168.100.0/24
Checkpoint side
LAN - 172.26.1.0/24
VOIP - 172.26.2.0/24
Need to setup an ipsec tunnel between the site. However, from the RV180W side, I can only ping the VOIP network, but not LAN. I have heard that RV180W only can talk to one remote network via ipsec, correct? workaround this other than changing out the RV180W?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2013
I have a cisco RV180W with a IPsec tunnel to the head office. The tunnel is working good, but if I reboot the RV180W, the tunnel don’t reconnect automatically, I need to go in the admin interface to IPsec Connections Status and press on Connect.Is there a way to make the tunnel connect automatically?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2013
Is it at all possible to channel all/some data traffic through an established ipsec tunneled connection using the RVL200? I have successfully established an ipsec connection through RVL200 and RV042 routers and are able to connect to servers/computers behind it.Now I want to channel all or some traffic through the ipsec-tunnel for computers that reside on 192.168.1.0 subnet of RVL200 network.
Main office - RV042 router - 10.200.62.1
Remote office - RVL200 router - 192.168.1.1
I am trying to use the Advanced Routing option to add static routes but I am not 100% sure if I am configuring the routes correctly.To give an example of routing DNS requests for HOTMAIL.COM [65.55.72.183]: [code]For some reason this does not appear to work. I have also tried using the interface setting of WAN and tested - this also does not work.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2012
i'm using an rv220W and i whant to know if is it possible to assign vpn traffic to a vlan when i setup an ipsec tunnel?
example:
Im using different vlans on my rv220W.
Vlan 10: engineers (ex: 192.168.1.0/27) no intervlan routing
Vlan20: sales (ex: 10.0.123.0/24) no intervlan routing
This is what i need: - An engineer is on the road and when he makes a ipsec vpn connection => assignd to the vlan "engineers" so he can access the server/pc's in that vlan.and when someone from the sales group starts a vpn connection he needs to be in the vlan "sales" so he can access his pc/data,...
View 15 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2013
We have tried a variety of options in an attempt to use Load Balancing (Protocol Binding) with an RV082 that has a site to site IPsec tunnel with another RV082. Both are v3.
Here is the issue. We have dual ISPs, one has great bandwidth, but we incur overages. The other has mediocre bandwidth, but has unlimited usage.
GROUP1 - We want most PCs to use the "unlimited" ISP for general surfing, email, etc. (Bound all ports for range of internal IPs to ANY dest to WAN1)
GROUP2 - We want to use the "faster" ISP for our VPN tunnel (mostly RDP and SIP traffic). (Bound all ports for range of internal IPs to ANY dest to WAN2)
So far everything works. The router will route traffic appropriately and GROUP 1 uses WAN1 and GROUP 2 uses WAN2.
Unfortunately, sometimes GROUP1 users need access to resources over the VPN (WAN2).
There is something not right with the routing. For example GROUP1 can ping and receive responses from devices on the other side of the tunnel, but GROUP1 can't access intranet sites on the other side of the tunnel. They also can't RDP to PCs on the other side of the tunnel.
Why does the router correctly route ICMP, but not RDP?
We've tried adding additional protocol binding rules for specific ports(80, 3389, etc) and ip ranges (both local and remote) to see if we could force GROUP1 traffic destined via VPN through WAN2, but it doesn't work.
Shouldn't VPN tunnels created and configured in the RVs not adhere to protocol binding? It just seems logical to me, but maybe I am missing something.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2012
I am trying to create a VPN between an SRP547W and a Cisco IOS router, in this case a UC540.I am running firmware 1.2.4 (003) Jan 11 2012. Now I can do this with an SRP527W and many other routers successfully. Including other IOS routers 1801, 1941 etc.
The issue I have is on the SRP547W I cannot create more than one IPSec Policy through a single IKE policy. I require this to route multiple v lans to our remote site. When I try to add an additional IPSec Policy I am give the error "IKE policy has been used by other IPSec policy"
This is possible to do on the SRP527W with latest firmware. I have tried rolling back to earlier firmware but instead I am given an error about overlap. Latest release note for this firmware suggest this issue was already resolved.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2013
Is it possible to have a site-to-site IPSEC tunnel between 2 identical RV110W routers?I basically want one of them to initiate a secure tunnel with the second so that computers from one router subnet see the computers from the other router subnet.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2013
the RV110W IPSEC site-to-site tunnel, are there necessary 2 x public IPs for it to work, or only 1 public IP is enough? [code]If it works with 1 public ip, the "CLIENT" RV110W configuration should be straightforward (in Advanced VPN SetupRemote Endpoint i fill in the dyndns address?), but how do i setup "HOST" RV110W?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2012
I'm in process of purchasing a new Cisco routers for our branches that will be used primary to enable IPSec virtual tunnel interfce with "tunnel mode ipsec ipv4". does the default IOS IP Base supports this feature? or i need to purchase DATA license or SECURITY license?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2012
I want a site to site vpn ipsec tunnel there wants to use two Cisco 880 routers that are connected to a modem / router is this possible?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2012
I am having all sorts of trouble connecting a Cisco RVS4000 to a Cisco ASA5505 over IPSec... I have used the "site to site" vpn wizard, I have a fress "factory reset" on my asa 5505...
View 11 Replies
View Related
