Cisco Routers :: RV082 Freezes Every 2 Hours When Using Ipsec Tunnel
Jul 5, 2011
i have an ipsec tunnel between two rv082 routers. (1 v3 Hardware and the other with v2). On both devices are the latest firmware installed.
Everything working fine, the routers establish an ipsec connection but after about two hours, the router with hw version 3 freezes.... nor the wan neither der lan interface is pingable. I can only pull out the power cord. Below attached are the ipsec settings. It´s a Gateway to Gateway connection
View 7 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 18, 2012
I have a RV082 that has an issue keeping an IPSEC Gateway to Gateway VPN running from itself to our ASA 5510. At 8 hours of connectivity (I can almost set a clock to it) the Tunnel will say it is connected on the RV082 but on the ASA 5510 the tunnel is not up.
If I click on disconnect on the RV082 under the VPN Summary page things will come back up. from the ASA 5510 side there is nothing I can do to get things back (ping inside "vpn network" or even trying to make a connection to a networked VPN machine).
To make things more complicated I have another VPN on the RV082 to a PIX 506e that works with no issues. I also have another RV082 at another location with the same settings that keeps its tunnel with the ASA 5510 with out any issue. Some things I have tried to try and fix the issue are:
I upgrade the firmware on the Rv082 V3 from 4.0.0.7-tm (what it was shipped with) to 4.1.1.01-sp) - This seemed to have no effect.
on the RV082 I have changed the MTU from automatic to 1428 and 1452 - all this does is make the connection to the PIX 506e unstable like it is for the ASA 5510 I have changed this back to automatic.
since the time of stability seems to be 8 hours I have changed the "Phase 1 SA life time" and "Phase 2 SA life time" to 28800 both at the same time and individually - This seemed to have no effect.
The current configuration on the RV082 are:
Local security gateway type: IP Only
IP address: (local ISP provided static IP address)
[Code]......
View 19 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2013
We have tried a variety of options in an attempt to use Load Balancing (Protocol Binding) with an RV082 that has a site to site IPsec tunnel with another RV082. Both are v3.
Here is the issue. We have dual ISPs, one has great bandwidth, but we incur overages. The other has mediocre bandwidth, but has unlimited usage.
GROUP1 - We want most PCs to use the "unlimited" ISP for general surfing, email, etc. (Bound all ports for range of internal IPs to ANY dest to WAN1)
GROUP2 - We want to use the "faster" ISP for our VPN tunnel (mostly RDP and SIP traffic). (Bound all ports for range of internal IPs to ANY dest to WAN2)
So far everything works. The router will route traffic appropriately and GROUP 1 uses WAN1 and GROUP 2 uses WAN2.
Unfortunately, sometimes GROUP1 users need access to resources over the VPN (WAN2).
There is something not right with the routing. For example GROUP1 can ping and receive responses from devices on the other side of the tunnel, but GROUP1 can't access intranet sites on the other side of the tunnel. They also can't RDP to PCs on the other side of the tunnel.
Why does the router correctly route ICMP, but not RDP?
We've tried adding additional protocol binding rules for specific ports(80, 3389, etc) and ip ranges (both local and remote) to see if we could force GROUP1 traffic destined via VPN through WAN2, but it doesn't work.
Shouldn't VPN tunnels created and configured in the RVs not adhere to protocol binding? It just seems logical to me, but maybe I am missing something.
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2013
I installed QuickVPN v1.4.2.1 as it was in the download section on Linksys: [URL]
for the RV082 router we have. It connected but the program seemed buggy as there seemed to be no way to close the program after I used it so I wanted to uninstall it and install a more recent version of QuickVPN (side question: is it possible to VPN connect to my RV082 router with a different version of QuickVPN?).
I have Windows 7 Professional 64bit SP1 with all the latest updates. When I try to uninstall the program, at about the 25% mark of the window for 'QuickVPN Client Setup is preparing the InstallShield Wizard, which will guide you through the rest of the setup process. Please wait.' it seems to stop responding as holding the mouse over that windows just displayes a ring which goes round and round. I regret installing this buggy software on my PC.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 21, 2012
Region : Others
Model : TD-W8950ND
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 1.3.1 build 120406 Rel.32903n
ISP : PTCL
I am trying to establish IPSec VPN Tunnel between Linsys RV082 and TP-Link TD-W8950ND but failed.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2011
My RVS4000 router freezes up when a lot of data is being pushed through the Ipsec tunnel. Let me explain in detail.
On physical location A, I have an RVS4000 router (with IP 192.168.3.1) which is permanently connected with a WRVS4400 router (with IP 192.168.1.1) on physical location B. The Ipsec tunnel has been configured using the Easy Setup Wizard of Cisco and has been working fine and stable for months. Both routers have another Ipsec tunnel with another WRVS4400 router (with IP 192.168.2.1) on physical location C, but this router does not play a role in the problem below.Recently, I’m trying to set up a remote backup service between physical location A and B using “rsync”, which uses port 873. Due to the Ipsec/VPN tunnel, I could configure rsync to move the backup files from our NAS on location A (NAS has IP 192.168.1.2) directly to location B (NAS has IP 192.168.3.2). Both NAS-devices are of the brand Synology (DS211J). The Ipsec tunnel guarantees that the data is coded and thus secure.
However, when pushing the first batch of data, I noticed that the router on the receiving end (RVS4000) freezes up after approx. 1,5h after the batch has started, which is after approx. 1 gigabyte of data has been transmitted. The connection with the WAN is lost, also the VPN-tunnel is not working, I cannot ping the device or reach its configuration pages (on 192.168.3.1), the only option is unplugging it and letting it reboot. I’m thinking the router cannot deal with the huge amount of data that needs to be decoded. I tried 5/6 times, with always the same result (timing / amount of data pushed through before router freezes varies slightly).
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2012
I am using a Cisco RV110W (Firmware 1.2.09) in a branch and I would like to create a VPN Tunnel to another site that has a Cisco RV042 (firmware v4.2.1.02)
What would be the correct Configuration? the current configuration I am using is
in the RV042 i am using
Check Enable
Local Group Setup
Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
IP Address : RV042 Pulbic IP address
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2012
I'm trying to setup a VPN between an RV042 V3 and an RV082 V2 router. They get connected but no traffic gets through the tunnel. I tried with and without firewall,DPD, Keepalive, forward secrecy but nothing worked. What should I do? I don't want to throw out the V2 routers. V3 to V3 connects fine.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2012
I have a RV082 v2 with Firmware 2.0.2.01-tm with a Site-to-Site VPN to a Cisco ASA5510.
The PCs behind the RV082 can not see two webservers behind the ASA5510. Both servers have full DNS registration and are accessable from other sites with RV042 routers.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2011
VPN tunnel backup is not available on the RV016 firmware version 4.0.2.08 (it IS on the RV082. The data sheet and the manual for the RV016 is wrong. I have purchased several RV016 hardware V3 and several RV082 hardware V3. Both have the same current firmware version. We have noted that the RV016 does not have the VPN tunnel failover option found in the RV082. It also does not have split DNS (noted in the manual. A I would have thought that the firmware would provide equal options on the RV042, RV082, and RV016.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2011
According to the manual rv082, if you wan to use vpn.. check the enable
But I can't check enable botton... it's disable So i can't check
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2011
A customer of mine has two RV082 in different locations. The "main" router is providing a gateway-to-gateway VPN tunnel, and is also used by a few road warriors for VPN access. We've had some issues with the "main" router lately, so we've decided to exchange it for a brand new device (v3). The old RV082 was a hardware revision v2 device, so I had to manually rebuild the config on the new router. The new router is working fine so far - connectivity and gateway-to-gateway VPN are fine. IPsec Client VPN, however, doesn't work at all. The config of the new router is identical to the config of the old one, IPsec Client VPN used to work fine on the old router.
The router is running the latest firmware (v4.0.4.02-tm). I've been trying to make IPsec VPN work with "QuickVPNplus ver: 1.0.6" and the "Cisco QuickVPN Client v1.4.2.1". From what I understand, both programs first connect to the routers external IP and download some sort of VPN config file. The info in that file is then used to create the actual connection. The problem is that the config file is invalid. It contains HTML code instead of config data. This is the code: "<HTML><HEAD><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; URL=/cgi-bin/welcome.cgi"></HEAD><BODY></BODY></HTML>". The URL is the same I see when logging in to the admin interface of the router. The Cisco client tells me in its "wget_error.txt": "rwConnStart message=All 1 wget requests did not return a valid vpnserver.conf". Both clients connect to the router fine, and the config download itself is working - only the returned data is invalid.
I've already tried lots of stuff to make the problem go away - enabling/disabling the firewall, VPN passthrough options, and other things. I'm beginning to think that there may be a bug in the firmware I'm using, or that the way Client VPN works has changed in a way that makes connecting with a client implementing the "old" method impossible. By the way, PPTP is working fine, so we're using it as a temporary workaround. My client, however, isn't happy with this workaround - he bought a relatively expensive router so he can make use of its advanced features, after all.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2013
I have an RV042 VPN tunnel with an RV082.The RV042 has a public IP Address obtained by PPPoE, the RV082 has a public IP Address obtained via Static IP.The problem I see is a really slow performance. Both internet conections are idle and the performance is about 2 or 3 kbyte/s My question are if I should I enable any of this:
- Agresive mode
- NAT Traversal
- IP Compresion
- Dead Pear Detection
How can I troubleshot this slow performance?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2011
I'm using a RV082 with latest firmware v4.0.4.02tm in one of our branch offices. Sometimes the tunnel to the main office (IPCOP 1.4.21) fails.
Both sides display the status "tunnel connected" but IP traffic doesn't go through. If i try to ping the main office using the RV082 diagnostic feature, the RV082 seems to run into a loop...the window continues refreshing without any error message and i'm not able to cancel the test. If I restart the RV082 using the web interface, the "diagnose" and VPN problem still exists, even if the web interface told me that the device did a restart.
The only solution is to to a cold restart of the RV082. After that, the VPN tunnel works again....
This problem occurred 3 times in the last 3 weeks. I never hat this problem with previous firmware versions at this ot other sites.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2012
We have about 9 1900 routers and 1 ASA 5510 for partail mesh VPN network. So 8 1900 connect to 1 1900 and ASA located in HQ and datacenter. All worked well however there is one site running really strange. The tunnel between 1900 is up for a while and down. Reboot router seems to be the only fix. But tunnel to ASA does not seem to be down at all.
The issue happened again today, we rebooted the router on site but tunnel still not up. DEBUG shows: deleting SA reason "Death by retransmission P1 "
I can see alot of Apr 24 19:57:55.271: ISAKMP:(0): retransmitting phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
To me it seems like the IDE packet sent but never got reply and timed out. I did also check on the other end, the HQ. All other tunnels are still running fine on that router, just this remote site. Plus I got the similiar output when debugging on HQ router.
One thing do notice though, there was no match on both router for the ACL to match/permit ESP traffic... I asked on-site staff to reboot the modem used in remote site.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2011
Here is the situation: A CISCO871 router is configured to establish an IP SEC tunnel with a CISCO ASA5520. The configuration is OK about that. I wish to configure the same CISCO871 in order to establish a LAN-to-LAN IP sec Tunnel with another CISCO871 at the same time in order to reach private network. So, I have followed the Cisco procedure Document ID: 71462 "LAN-to-LAN IP sec Tunnel Between Two Routers Configuration Example"; it works, I can reach the peer private network BUT ONLY when the IP SEC tunnel with ASA is not established.
It seems to be a routing problem...I don't find how to configure to make both tunnels up and functional at the same time.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2013
Our ISP supplies a Cisco SRP-521w router with our WIMax connection but I have had no experience with these and they look like a ex Linksys product? What they a like for use as a spoke router connected to the core hub (Cisco 2921 ISR G2)?We would be using a GRE Tunnel protected with IPsec 3DES encrypted.The SRP would be using PPPoE to authenticate to the ISP.Any known traps and limitations with the Cisco SRP-521w?We currently use a Cisco 877 for this but wanted to save them fr our adsl links
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2012
We have 2 RV220W Routers installed in seperate offices. We are attempting to setup a IPSec tunnel between the two sites. So far we have been unsuccessful in getting this to work.On both sides, we are getting a successful connection established, but netiher site is recieving any packets. Both sides are transmitting packets though. We have exhausted our resources trying to figure out why.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2011
I recently purchased a RVS 4000 (firmware V2.0.0.3) and am having some issues creating a second (third...fourth?) IPSec VPN Tunnel. The first one is up and running just fine. On the VPN Summary screen it says [1 Tunnels Used 4 Tunnels Available].
When I go to configure the second tunnel, I select --New-- from the "Select Tunnel Entry" drop down and proceed to fill in all the connection information. When I click Save, it seems to be processing and after a few seconds just returns me to the same screen, with none of the information I just input and no connection created. No errors given.
I have another RVS4000 to connect at a different location which will require a similar setup, but don't want to do anything with it until I have the one mentioned above working fully.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 26, 2012
I have a VPN working between two locations using WRV210s at each end. Now I'm looking to replace one 210 with a new RV110W. Can I get the two to work together? The config is quite different.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2012
Is there any way to setup an IPSEC tunnel to be able to go from my subnet, 192.168.75.x and be able to reach anything on the other side of the tunnel, 192.168.X.X?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2013
I'm setting up a IPSec Tunnel between 3800 and 2600 routers over the internet.
Do I need to create a tunnel interface as they suggest in this document? [URL]
I just watched a couple of you tube videos saying I don't need to do that...
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 5, 2011
I have a RVS4000 at one location and a second RVS4000 at home. I have established an IPSec VPN tunnel between them and it is UP. I can ping the routers from each end no problem. I can ping the IPs listed in the "Local Group Setup" and the "Remote Group Setup" from both ends no problem. I can even open up a shared resource from a Win 7 machine (e.g. by typing \10.10.10.100 in start-run from a computer on my home network).
But - i can't ping anything else on one network from the other. What gives? I need to access a 10.10.10.101 machine but can't even ping it.
- both RVS4000 boxes have latest firmware (V1.3.3.5)
- home RVS4000 setup with IP 10.10.11.1
- home network has a server with IP 10.10.11.20
- other location RVS4000 setup with IP 10.10.10.1
- other location server setup with IP 10.10.10.100
Tunnel settings on home RVS4000 (the other location properly mirror these).
- Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
- Local Security Group Type : Subnet
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2013
I have a cisco RV180W with a IPsec tunnel to the head office. The tunnel is working good, but if I reboot the RV180W, the tunnel don’t reconnect automatically, I need to go in the admin interface to IPsec Connections Status and press on Connect.Is there a way to make the tunnel connect automatically?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2013
Is it at all possible to channel all/some data traffic through an established ipsec tunneled connection using the RVL200? I have successfully established an ipsec connection through RVL200 and RV042 routers and are able to connect to servers/computers behind it.Now I want to channel all or some traffic through the ipsec-tunnel for computers that reside on 192.168.1.0 subnet of RVL200 network.
Main office - RV042 router - 10.200.62.1
Remote office - RVL200 router - 192.168.1.1
I am trying to use the Advanced Routing option to add static routes but I am not 100% sure if I am configuring the routes correctly.To give an example of routing DNS requests for HOTMAIL.COM [65.55.72.183]: [code]For some reason this does not appear to work. I have also tried using the interface setting of WAN and tested - this also does not work.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2012
i'm using an rv220W and i whant to know if is it possible to assign vpn traffic to a vlan when i setup an ipsec tunnel?
example:
Im using different vlans on my rv220W.
Vlan 10: engineers (ex: 192.168.1.0/27) no intervlan routing
Vlan20: sales (ex: 10.0.123.0/24) no intervlan routing
This is what i need: - An engineer is on the road and when he makes a ipsec vpn connection => assignd to the vlan "engineers" so he can access the server/pc's in that vlan.and when someone from the sales group starts a vpn connection he needs to be in the vlan "sales" so he can access his pc/data,...
View 15 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2013
Is it possible to have a site-to-site IPSEC tunnel between 2 identical RV110W routers?I basically want one of them to initiate a secure tunnel with the second so that computers from one router subnet see the computers from the other router subnet.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2013
the RV110W IPSEC site-to-site tunnel, are there necessary 2 x public IPs for it to work, or only 1 public IP is enough? [code]If it works with 1 public ip, the "CLIENT" RV110W configuration should be straightforward (in Advanced VPN SetupRemote Endpoint i fill in the dyndns address?), but how do i setup "HOST" RV110W?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2011
I've mounted a IPSec G2G tunnel with Cisco ASA one end & Cisco router 1802 another end. The 1802 is connected to a BT 2wire Gateway Router to join the BT network. But from time to time, the tunnel goes down for several hours (or several minutes) then goes up again without reason.I've checked the IPSec configuration, it seems correct. Anyone has experience on the BT 2wire Gateway Router ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2012
I'm in process of purchasing a new Cisco routers for our branches that will be used primary to enable IPSec virtual tunnel interfce with "tunnel mode ipsec ipv4". does the default IOS IP Base supports this feature? or i need to purchase DATA license or SECURITY license?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2011
Can I have use a Gateway-to-Gateway IPSec tunnel whereby a user can surf the Internet using his local Internet connection and at the same time connect through the IPSec tunnel to a remote subnet using RVS4000 routers?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2012
I want a site to site vpn ipsec tunnel there wants to use two Cisco 880 routers that are connected to a modem / router is this possible?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2013
We have two offices connected using Site-to-Site VPN (IPSEC) as shown:(IP ficticius)Office 1 - We had to use 2 routers since we have a range of valid IPs: From a host in office 2 we normally ping 192.168.102.1 (gateway at office 1),But when pinging a host inside office 1 (eg: 192.168.102.8) 50% of packets have been lost.Could it be a hardware problem?
View 1 Replies
View Related
