Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 To Use A Gateway To Gateway IPSec Tunnel

Oct 17, 2011

Can I have use a Gateway-to-Gateway IPSec tunnel whereby a user can surf the Internet using his local Internet connection and at the same time connect through the IPSec tunnel to a remote subnet using RVS4000 routers?

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Routers :: RV8082 Setup A VPN Tunnel With Gateway-to-Gateway

Apr 8, 2012

I have two Cisco RV8082 Routers which I would like to setup a VPN Tunnel with Gateway to Gateway.  One location is a static IP Address.  The other location is a dynamic IP address.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: WRVS4400N VPN IPsec Gateway To Gateway Setup?

Jan 29, 2012

Just bought 3 WRVS4400N, I wanted to setup gateway to gateway VPN.  I followed the instructions on the WRVS4400N admin guide and VPN does not connect.  I also downloaded the VPN setup wizard and that also did get the gateway connected.  Everything seems to be correct.  Do I have to enable anything else?  Firewall setting?
 
Below is my config.
 
IPSec VPN Tunnel: Enabled
Tunnel Name: TUN01 
Local Security gateway: IP only
WAN1 IP: 192.168.100.1
SUBNET: 255.255.255.0
Local Security type: subnet
LOCAL IP: 10.10.10.1
SUBNET: 255.255.255.0

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 QuickVPN - The Remote Gateway Is Not Responding

Apr 4, 2012

I am trying to connect with QuickVPN to my RVS4000 in another location. I get this message: "The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait?'

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 - Multiple IPSec VPN Tunnel

Aug 29, 2011

I recently purchased a RVS 4000 (firmware V2.0.0.3) and am having some issues creating a second (third...fourth?) IPSec VPN Tunnel. The first one is up and running just fine. On the VPN Summary screen it says [1 Tunnels Used  4 Tunnels Available].

When I go to configure the second tunnel, I select --New--  from the   "Select Tunnel Entry" drop down and proceed to fill in all the connection information. When I click Save, it seems to be processing and after a few seconds just returns me to the same screen, with none of the information I just input and no connection created. No errors given.

I have another RVS4000 to connect at a different location which will require a similar setup, but don't want to do anything with it until I have the one mentioned above working fully.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 - IPSec VPN Tunnel / Cannot Ping From One Network To Other

Aug 5, 2011

I have a RVS4000 at one location and a second RVS4000 at home.  I have established an IPSec VPN tunnel between them and it is UP.  I can ping the routers from each end no problem.  I can ping  the IPs listed in the "Local Group Setup" and the "Remote Group Setup" from both ends no problem.  I can even open up a shared resource from a Win 7 machine (e.g. by typing \10.10.10.100 in start-run from a computer on my home network).
 
But - i can't ping anything else on one network from the other.  What gives?  I need to access a 10.10.10.101 machine but can't even ping it.  
 
- both RVS4000 boxes have latest firmware (V1.3.3.5)
- home RVS4000 setup with IP 10.10.11.1
- home network has a server with IP 10.10.11.20
- other location RVS4000 setup with IP 10.10.10.1
- other location server setup with IP 10.10.10.100
 
Tunnel settings on home RVS4000 (the other location properly mirror these).
  - Local Security Gateway Type :  IP Only
  - Local Security Group Type : Subnet
  [code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV082 Gateway To Gateway VPN Not Resolving Remote DynDns

Feb 14, 2013

I've got two RV082's connected. Each has a dynamic IP (changes typically every few weeks). I've configured the tunnels on both ends with a local and remote "Remote/Local Security Gateway Type" of "Dynamic IP + Domain Name(FQDN) Authentication".If I look at the VPN Summary tunnel status, it shows an IP address of "mydomain.dyndns.org 0.0.0.0" under the "Remote Gateway" column heading. The Tunnel Test "Connect" button is N/A.I can resolve both of the mydomain.dyndns.org entries on both sides of each VPN using the Diagnostic DNS lookup tool within each router. If I hardwire a fixed IP address for the Local and Remote Gateway everything works just fine. VPN is good.
 
I just can't seem to get the "mydomain.dyndns.org" function to work. It appears the router can't resolve the dynamic IP from the domain names on each of the routers.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: How To Manage Port 80 Hosts Via Gateway To Gateway VPN (rv220w)

Aug 30, 2012

I replace our aging rv082 routers with wireless rv220w routers. The gateway to gateway vpn works great, however I am no longer able to manage our print servers port 80 management page. I can ping any host with success, and I can manage hosts that have a port 10000 or 8000 web interface - but no port 80 ones... I had no issues when using the old rv082 routers...

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Gateway-to-Gateway Inter VLAN Routing?

Jul 6, 2012

I picked up a pair of RV220W's and before I spent loads of time at a remote site, I figured I'd go through some VPN testing at home to make sure I could get it setup properly.  What this means is I've plugged the Internet uplink into a switch, then from the switch into both routers & configured them (using unique static IP's for each) from there.  For what its worth: While I have some IT experience, I don't have strong networking experience.
 
I setup several VLAN's on the local RV220W, and the end result is to make it so that an asset at the remote site with an IP in any of the ranges (192.168.121.0/24, 192.168.131.0/24, 192.168.141.0/24 and any future VLANs) can communicate with/access resouces at the local site.  Likewise, an asset at the local site with an IP in any of the ranges (.121, .131, .141 + any future VLANs) should be able to reach the remote resources (currently just 192.168.181.0/24, but future VLANs as well).
 
This evening I tried to focus on the relevant VPN pages of the Administration Guide to get the VPN up.  Leaving the defaults I got as far as establishing a link between both sites and it seems that things are working right: From the remote site (.181) I can access the local site (.121, .131, .141); and from the local site I can at least ping resources (a laptop) on the remote site. (Yay!)
 
However, when I physically connected an asset that had a 192.168.121.X, 192.168.131.X and 192.168.141.X IP addresses to the remote RV220W (which is 192.168.181.0/24), I couldn't see it from the remote or local sites.I assume this is expected.  But I'm reaching out to the community to see what other possibilities might be available becuase networking is a weak area for me.  I figured it might be something like a Static [or Dynamic] Route but I really am not 100% sure.
  
'TECHNICAL' SPECS
 
 Local Router LAN/WAN Settings:
LAN IP: 192.168.121.1 on default VLAN (1)
VLAN 13 defined 192.168.131.1 with DHCP enabled; Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
VLAN 14 defined 192.168.141.1 with DHCP enabled, Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
Inter VLAN Routing enabled for all VLANs

[URL]

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Gateway To Gateway Tunnels Not Reconnecting

Apr 11, 2013

I have two Cisco RV042 Routers, they are being used to connect two offices, i have created a standard gateway to gateway connection, fixed public ip addresses on both sides and everything works fine, except when the tunnel gets disconnected, it does not connect back automatically, i have to log into either  router console and click the connect button to get the tunnel working again, this is really annoying since it happens once or twice a day at least.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV016 Gateway To Gateway RV082 Won't Connect

Mar 9, 2012

New hardware here, requesting a bit of your knowledge, We are tryingin to setup a simple gateway to gateway  VPN
 
HomeA Has an RV016 with a public static IP
Local Group Security Gateway type is IP Only with the IP
Local Security Group Type is Subnet, with the local IP class 192.160.0.0
Remote Security Gateway Type: Dynamic + Email
Email address  some@emailaddress.com
Remote Security Group Type: Subnet
IP Address 192.168.1.0
IPSec Setup as default with nice password.
 
HomeB has an RV082 with a dynamic ADSL link
Local Group Security Gateway type is DynamicIP +Email
Email address  some@emailaddress.com
Local Security Group Type is Subnet, with the local IP class 192.160.1.0
Remote Security Gateway Type: IP Only
Remote Security Group Type: Subnet
IP Address 192.168.0.0
IPSec Setup as default with nice password.
 
The idea is for HomeB which has a dynamic IP, to reach HomeA, which has a static IP and connect. But they just wont. I have not clue what's wrong, I followed the instructions, maybe i miss interpreted something. I could share the VPN logs for both., Im getting a lot of errors there.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Getting VPN Gateway To Gateway With NAT For Multiple Subnets / RV082?

Feb 11, 2012

I have a pair of RV082 routers and I'd like to configure gateway to gateway VPN tunnel as described in a cookbook, "How to configure a VPN tunnel that routes all traffic to the Remote Gateway," (file name Small_business_router_tunnel_Branch_to_Main.doc).  I followed this cookbook and found that my while the Main office has internet connectivity, the branch subnet doesn't have internet connectivity. 
 
Routing does behave as advertised, where all traffic does go to the main office.  However, the 192.168.1.0 subnet in the branch office does not get internet connectivity.  I've read in other posts that the Main office router will only provide NAT for the local subnet, not the branch office subnet.  Is  there a way to configure the RV082 router to provide NAT for all subnets?
 
If not, which Cisco product will provide the VPN Tunnel connectivity as well as the NAT for all subnets?  Can the RV082 be used as part of the final solution or are my RV082s a  wasted expenditure?

Following is the configuration that I'd implemented, (real IP and IKE keys are bogus). 
  
Gateway To Gateway    
Remote                                                   Main Office
 Add a New Tunnel
Tunnel No.                  1                                               2
Tunnel Name :               n1-2122012_n2-1282012        n1-2122012_n2-1282012
Interface :                  WAN1                                    WAN1

[code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Gateway To Gateway VPN Between RV110W And RV042G?

Mar 19, 2013

I am trying to set up a gateway to gateway VPN connection between a RV042G (central site) and a RV110W (newest firmware) which is used for presentation purposes on various customer's sites. The RV042G has a static IP. The RV110W has different IPs, depending on where it is used.
 
Basic VPN settings are clear to me (we have another VPN between two RV042G with static IPs). I set up the VPN connection on the RV042G wth the following settings for "Remote Group Setup":
 
Remote Security Gateway Type : IP + Domain Name (FQDN) Authentication IP by DNS resolved: mydomain.no-ip.org Domain Name: router12345
 
The value "router12345" is what I have configured in the RV110W as "Host name" in the network settings.
 
This configuration does not work so I am obviously doing something wrong. Do I have to use "router12345.mydomain.local" instead if I configured "mydomain.local" as the domain name in the RV110Ws network settings? For my tests the RV110W has a WAN-IP of 192.168.178.100 because it is located behind a DSL-Router. The external IP of this DSL-router is 178.0.x.x. The resolved IP  from mydomain.no-ip-org is 192.168.178.100 but when I look in the RV042G log I see the requests coming withg the external IP (178.0.x.x). Is this the problem? The last message I see in the log is "no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK".
 
Or can I use "IP + Email Address (USER FQDN) Authentication" instead (where can I enter this email address in the RV110W?). Or do I have to use "Dynamic IP"?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042G - Gateway To Gateway VPN

Dec 19, 2012

I exchanged a RV042 v1.2 (Firmware 1.3.13.02) by a new RV042G v3. (Firmware 4.2.1.02).
 
My problem is now the following: The old RV042 established the Gateway to gateway VPN connection as soon as an IP- address of the remote location was requested. The new RV042G stays on „Waiting for connection“ all the time and does nothing at all. The connection works by clicking „CONNECT“ or by ticking Keep-Alive in the advanced tunnel settings but NOT automatically as before. Is this a firmware issue or have I to configure something additional?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco RVS4000 Setup As Gateway

Aug 30, 2011

I have a side client who's recently upgraded their internet service from a single T1 to a 100mb fiber line. TW Telecom brought the fiber line into their building and run it through a Cisco 3400 which hands it off to TW Telecom's Adtran 4430. If I take my laptop and assign it the appropriate IP and subnet and plug straight into the Adtran I get close to full speeds so I can rule out the ISP (I think).

It comes out of the Adtran to a Cisco RVS4000 setup as a gateway and then feeds off to a Cisco SG200-50 and Cisco 248G switches. Anything from the RVS4000 and beyond on the customer side will only receive a quarter of the speeds I get if I plug straight to the Adtran. I talked to the tech from TW Telecom and they have confirmed the Adtran is hard coded for 1GB Full Duplex speeds so I'm going to assume the RVS4000 needs to match that. I'm not 100% sure on how to make sure the RVS4000 is set to that. In the Admin GUI for the RVS I've gone under the L2 Switch Port Settings and set them to match the Adtran but it makes no difference.

I'm getting some sort of port duplex conflict and need to figure out where to make adjustments.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750e InterVLan With RVS4000 Gateway

Jan 4, 2012

I have a RVS4000 connected to my cable modem which I use as my gateway, the IP address of the RVS is 192.168.3.254
 
I have a 2811 with 3 subinterfaces of which I can ping all of them from my PC which at the minute is in VLAN 1, the only network that can connect to the outside world is VLAN 1, how can I enable the other 2 vlans to connect to the internet?
 
My set-up details are
 
Router
 
interface FastEthernet0/0.1
description *** Data Network***
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native

[Code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Tunnel Linksys RVS4000 To RVL200 IPSec

Dec 26, 2010

Linksys Small Business VPN endpoint routers?

I have been trying for two days to setup a Linksys RVS4000 to a RVL200 IPSec tunnel and I can't get them to connect.

The internet is via optimum online home internet accounts. From what Cisco said, the ports necessary are 500, 4500, 443 and 60443.

View 17 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: How To Setup IPSec Tunnel - 2320 And RVS4000

Aug 6, 2011

I have succesfully config an IPSec VPN Tunnel by using a Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320 and a RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with  VPN.On the site of Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320 this is some info: [code] On the site of RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with  VPN this is some info: [code] Remember that you can not be on the same range of IP, I mean, you can not have 192.168.0.X if the remote network is on 192.168.0.X, you have to change some of the Routers.I show the configuration on Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320: I show the configuration on RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with  VPN:If all is correctly configured, you should see on Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320 the Status Connected:
 
If all is correctly configured, you should see on RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with  VPN the Status Up.As you can see, I'm connected to the remote Router (RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with  VPN) by my own web browser accesing by the local IP 192.168.0.10.I have used Authentication MD5, maybe is not the best one but I had no time to test SHA1, I will when I will have time.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Security :: Rv042 Vpn Openswan Gateway To Gateway Linux Unbutu

Sep 13, 2012

config setup
protostack=netkey
klipsdebug=none

[Code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Tunnel Between 2 ASA 5505s With Same Default Gateway?

Jan 4, 2012

Is it possible to create a site-to-site ipsec vpn (lab environment) between two 5505's (ASA IOS 8.2(5) & asdm-645-206) with the same default gateway. I.E. a back to back site-to-site VPN tunnel or do I need to deploy a router and hang each 5505 off a different interface? We have plenty of public IP's but only one default gateway to our ISP (Internet).

View 2 Replies View Related

Linksys Wired Router :: RV082 Gateway To Gateway VPN Not Connecting?

Jan 24, 2012

I recently swapped out an RV082 with a newer model (still RV082 but black and a different interface). I configured the Gateway to Gateway VPN exactly as it was before but none of the three other RV082's will connect. I have tried deleting the connections several times to no avail. I have aggressive mode disabled and have tried with the firewall on and off. Below are the settings (IP's have been X'd out) and the log.

Settings:
IP OnlyIP Address : X0X.X0X.20.31Local Security Group Type : IPSubnetIP RangeIP Address : Subnet Mask :  Remote Group Setup
Remote Security Gateway Type : IP OnlyIP AddressIP by DNS Resolved : Remote Security Group Type : IPSubnetIP RangeIP Address : Subnet Mask : AES-192AES-256AES-128 AES-192AES-256  AES-128 IPSec Setup3DES  Keying Mode : ManualIKE with Preshared keyPhase 1 DH Group : Group 1 - 768 bitGroup 2 - 1024 bitGroup 5 - 1536 bitPhase 1 Encryption : DES Phase 1 Authentication : MD5SHA1Phase 1 SA Life Time : secondsPerfect Forward Secrecy : Phase 2 DH Group : Group 1 - 768 bitGroup 2 - 1024 bitGroup 5 - 1536 bitPhase 2 Encryption : NULLDES3DES Phase 2 Authentication : NULLMD5SHA1Phase 2 SA Life Time : secondsPreshared Key : Minimum Preshared Key Complexity : EnableLOG:

[code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Linksys Wired Router :: VPN Gateway To Gateway With Two RV042 Constantly

Jul 11, 2012

My two RV042 , one at home and the other one at my working site, constantly lost VPN connection after successfully connected.Both Firmware are identical. [code]

View 1 Replies View Related

Linksys Wired Router :: RV042 Gateway To Gateway Connection?

Feb 8, 2011

we do have 2 Rv042, one in my office and one in my house.. in the office we do have static ip and at home none.. question is can i connect the two RV042?

View 1 Replies View Related

Linksys Wired Router :: RV042 - Gateway To Gateway VPN Connection

Mar 22, 2011

I have some problems in my network with Gateway to Gateway Vpn Connection using two Rv042 routers.
 
I cannot ping the computers with static ip configuration.
 
In local an remote computers who have DHCP ip configuration i can ping each other .

View 1 Replies View Related

Linksys Wired Router :: RV082 Gateway 2 Gateway VPN Can't Ping

Jul 26, 2012

We have a VPN setup between two Cisco RV082 routers, the VPN status shows as connected however I can't ping the other network.  I am unable to ping between routers, let alone ping computers behind those routers. 
 
We have 2 branches, branch 1 is on a static IP and branch 2 is Dynamic.  I am able to connect via QuickVPN from Branch 2 to Branch 1 and remote desktop to computers, however have yet to VPN/remote desktop in the opposite direction.
 
To me it seems like a firewall issue at branch 2, but what's causing this.  Also they are currently running 2 differnet firmware version not sure if this would cause a problem.

View 1 Replies View Related

Linksys Wired Router :: RV042 / Setup A Vpn Gateway To Gateway

Apr 6, 2013

i am trying to setup a vpn Gateway To Gateway  when i setup the vpn i can ping  the 2 rv042 i cant see any computer in the network places when there comect we need to see the computer in the network places so are pos will run?

View 1 Replies View Related

Linksys Wired Router :: RV0XX Gateway To Gateway VPN?

Mar 6, 2011

I have an RV082 and a RV042. I have been able to successfully establish a gateway to gateway vpn connection between them both, and I can remotely administer each router through the VPN connection, but I am unable to ping computers from one side of the connection to the other. For example, a computer in the 10.10.1.0 subnet can't see / ping / communicate with a computer in the 192.168.1.0 subnet. 
 
Below are the configurations for each. Aside from the static IP configurations and the VPN configurations, no other changes were made to the routers. RV082 DHCP Enabled Tunnel Status: Connected Local Group Setup
 
IP Only: X.X.X.66Local Security Group Type: SubnetIP Address: 10.10.1.0Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0Remote Group Setup

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5520 8.4(3) Tunnel Default Gateway And Various Subnets

Apr 9, 2012

I am struggling on a problem for over 2 weeks despite of various researches.
 
We have a Cisco router, then an ASA 5520 8.4(3).
The private interface of the ASA is connected to a switch, and so on connected to one interface of the router.
The private interface is as following : 129.88.63.253 255.255.248.0 (/21) =>
It is in the 129.88.56.0/21 subnet
 
Here is the part of the router config we are interested in  :
!
interface Vlan32
ip address 129.88.63.254 255.255.248.0 (this is the tunnel default gateway configured on the ASA - 129.88.56.0/21 subnet)
ip address 129.88.71.254 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 129.88.75.254 255.255.252.0 secondary
ip access-group CVPN-depuis-129.88.56 in
ip access-group CVPN-vers-129.88.56 out
ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx allow-default
no ip redirects
mls rp ip
!
 
On the ASA, there is currently one default route for the tunneled traffic :
route Private 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 129.88.63.254 tunneled
As you can see, it's on the same subnet as the primary IP address of interface Vlan32 on the router.
 
The scenario is as following :
- we can connect to the VPN with the appropriate alias (LDAP connection), then we get an IP address in the defined range (it's a local ASA pool)
- the pool is : 129.88.71.0/24
- but, once we are connected, we can't do anything, because it seems like we don't have any network access

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 2921 / Split Tunnel VPN Connected But No Gateway

Jul 10, 2012

I followed:[URL]And my VPN connection is established on 2921.However when I successfully connected to the router via VPN,  ipfoncfig shows default gateway being 255.0.0.0,My CISCO2921 GI0/0 has default 10.10.10.1 IP assigned, I want to access this interface with CISCO CP.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco :: OSPF - Router As A Gateway And Has An Own Gateway?

Jan 29, 2013

Can a router using OSPF propagate that he is a router with default-information originate... at the same time when he got an own gateway of last resort to an IP-adress? If so, how? I can't get it to work.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: RV042G / 1721 - Gateway To Gateway VPN

Mar 23, 2013

I try to install a Gateway to Gateway VPN between a RV042G router (LAN1) and a 1721 router (LAN2). The VPN is connected. I can ping the devices from a LAN to the other in the two way.
 
But otherwise I can't access to the devices of LAN2 from LAN1 like with telnet, HTTP, mstsc, ....

And it is OK to access to the devices of LAN1 from LAN2....
 
Normally I access to all the resources of LAN2 with the Cisco VPN Client but i try to change it with this router. The firewalls are off on all the computers I look.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Wrong Default Gateway VPN IPSEC ASA5510

Nov 24, 2011

I've configured a VPN IPSEC on my ASA5510. It Assigned IP/NETMASK/Gateway via a DHCP Server on the LAN.The problem is that when a client is connected to the VPN , it takes the right IP and NETMASK. ( 192.168.1.109 / 255.255.255.0) but the Default Gateway is wrong ( 192.168.1.1). It should be the default Gateway of my LAN router ( 192.168.1.229).

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1841 Tunnel Without Default Gateway Not Connecting

Feb 12, 2012

I'm trying to configure an IPSEC VPN + tunnel for multicast data. When the default gateway is set on the router (1841) it works fine but if I only set a route to the IPSEC peer via our gateway then the tunnel fails to come up. The end point is to a 3rd party. [code]
 
I found that if I add a static route for the tunnel destination via fa0/0, the public facing interface, the tunnel comes up..ip route 10.23.4.2 255. 255. 255. 255 FastEthernet0/0
 
and I can then ping the tunnel IP at the far end - 10.23.0.5.Why would that be? Is there a better way to do this without using a default route??

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved