I'm trying to setup a VPN between an RV042 V3 and an RV082 V2 router. They get connected but no traffic gets through the tunnel. I tried with and without firewall,DPD, Keepalive, forward secrecy but nothing worked. What should I do? I don't want to throw out the V2 routers. V3 to V3 connects fine.
View 1 RepliesI have a RV082 v2 with Firmware 2.0.2.01-tm with a Site-to-Site VPN to a Cisco ASA5510.
The PCs behind the RV082 can not see two webservers behind the ASA5510. Both servers have full DNS registration and are accessable from other sites with RV042 routers.
VPN tunnel backup is not available on the RV016 firmware version 4.0.2.08 (it IS on the RV082. The data sheet and the manual for the RV016 is wrong. I have purchased several RV016 hardware V3 and several RV082 hardware V3. Both have the same current firmware version. We have noted that the RV016 does not have the VPN tunnel failover option found in the RV082. It also does not have split DNS (noted in the manual. A I would have thought that the firmware would provide equal options on the RV042, RV082, and RV016.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAccording to the manual rv082, if you wan to use vpn.. check the enable
But I can't check enable botton... it's disable So i can't check
Environment :linksys wrt300n v1.1 which can have ddwrt-mega. Willing to tunnel all lan's outbound traffic through an ssh tunnel.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a RV082 that has an issue keeping an IPSEC Gateway to Gateway VPN running from itself to our ASA 5510. At 8 hours of connectivity (I can almost set a clock to it) the Tunnel will say it is connected on the RV082 but on the ASA 5510 the tunnel is not up.
If I click on disconnect on the RV082 under the VPN Summary page things will come back up. from the ASA 5510 side there is nothing I can do to get things back (ping inside "vpn network" or even trying to make a connection to a networked VPN machine).
To make things more complicated I have another VPN on the RV082 to a PIX 506e that works with no issues. I also have another RV082 at another location with the same settings that keeps its tunnel with the ASA 5510 with out any issue. Some things I have tried to try and fix the issue are:
I upgrade the firmware on the Rv082 V3 from 4.0.0.7-tm (what it was shipped with) to 4.1.1.01-sp) - This seemed to have no effect.
on the RV082 I have changed the MTU from automatic to 1428 and 1452 - all this does is make the connection to the PIX 506e unstable like it is for the ASA 5510 I have changed this back to automatic.
since the time of stability seems to be 8 hours I have changed the "Phase 1 SA life time" and "Phase 2 SA life time" to 28800 both at the same time and individually - This seemed to have no effect.
The current configuration on the RV082 are:
Local security gateway type: IP Only
IP address: (local ISP provided static IP address)
[Code]......
I have an RV042 VPN tunnel with an RV082.The RV042 has a public IP Address obtained by PPPoE, the RV082 has a public IP Address obtained via Static IP.The problem I see is a really slow performance. Both internet conections are idle and the performance is about 2 or 3 kbyte/s My question are if I should I enable any of this:
- Agresive mode
- NAT Traversal
- IP Compresion
- Dead Pear Detection
How can I troubleshot this slow performance?
i have an ipsec tunnel between two rv082 routers. (1 v3 Hardware and the other with v2). On both devices are the latest firmware installed.
Everything working fine, the routers establish an ipsec connection but after about two hours, the router with hw version 3 freezes.... nor the wan neither der lan interface is pingable. I can only pull out the power cord. Below attached are the ipsec settings. It´s a Gateway to Gateway connection
I'm using a RV082 with latest firmware v4.0.4.02tm in one of our branch offices. Sometimes the tunnel to the main office (IPCOP 1.4.21) fails.
Both sides display the status "tunnel connected" but IP traffic doesn't go through. If i try to ping the main office using the RV082 diagnostic feature, the RV082 seems to run into a loop...the window continues refreshing without any error message and i'm not able to cancel the test. If I restart the RV082 using the web interface, the "diagnose" and VPN problem still exists, even if the web interface told me that the device did a restart.
The only solution is to to a cold restart of the RV082. After that, the VPN tunnel works again....
This problem occurred 3 times in the last 3 weeks. I never hat this problem with previous firmware versions at this ot other sites.
We have tried a variety of options in an attempt to use Load Balancing (Protocol Binding) with an RV082 that has a site to site IPsec tunnel with another RV082. Both are v3.
Here is the issue. We have dual ISPs, one has great bandwidth, but we incur overages. The other has mediocre bandwidth, but has unlimited usage.
GROUP1 - We want most PCs to use the "unlimited" ISP for general surfing, email, etc. (Bound all ports for range of internal IPs to ANY dest to WAN1)
GROUP2 - We want to use the "faster" ISP for our VPN tunnel (mostly RDP and SIP traffic). (Bound all ports for range of internal IPs to ANY dest to WAN2)
So far everything works. The router will route traffic appropriately and GROUP 1 uses WAN1 and GROUP 2 uses WAN2.
Unfortunately, sometimes GROUP1 users need access to resources over the VPN (WAN2).
There is something not right with the routing. For example GROUP1 can ping and receive responses from devices on the other side of the tunnel, but GROUP1 can't access intranet sites on the other side of the tunnel. They also can't RDP to PCs on the other side of the tunnel.
Why does the router correctly route ICMP, but not RDP?
We've tried adding additional protocol binding rules for specific ports(80, 3389, etc) and ip ranges (both local and remote) to see if we could force GROUP1 traffic destined via VPN through WAN2, but it doesn't work.
Shouldn't VPN tunnels created and configured in the RVs not adhere to protocol binding? It just seems logical to me, but maybe I am missing something.
I found this guide in order to send all traffic from RV042 branch office to the RV082 in the central office: [URL]
But that guide is for v2 hardware. I tried and did not work, so I wonder if there is newer info for v3 hardware (firmware v4.2)
I have a RV042 in a brach office connected via working VPN Tunnel to a RV082 central office. I want to route all traffic from the brach office to the RV082 in the central office.
We have offices in USA and Venezuela.In our USA office we have a RV042 router and in Venezuela we have a RV082 router.We have connected a VPN tunnel (gateway-to-gateway) between both offices.
The point is:How could we redirect the internet traffic from our Venezuela office (RV082) to the USA Office (RV042) to navigate using USA public IP's?
The reason for this is that we need to use online streaming services which are only available for IP's from USA and we can't use them from the Venezuelan IP's.
We can not use the PPTP option since the equipment which will use the streaming services (like hulu, crackle, etc.) in Venezuela is a Google TV device which doesn't allow the configuration of proxy navegation or PPTP VPN connections itself. That's the reason why we need to do that through the routers.
we've buyed a WRVS4400N to create a IPSEC VPN tunnel to our client in order to access some applications.
After a while trying to configure the router, we have archieved it and the VPN tunnel is up. We can see the tunnel up from here and from client's side as well.
Our client supposendly have created the tunnel in order to access a list of specific IPs in the range 10.113.x.x, but if we try to access this IPs via telnet whe cannot obtain any response.
Making a tracert, we obtain...
C:UsersHuexxx>tracert 10.113.56.177
Traza a 10.113.56.177 sobre caminos de 30 saltos como máximo.
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 * * * Tiempo de espera agotado para esta solicitud.
3 * * ^C
... and therefor the client doesn't receive any packet at its firewall.
I've tried to establish a static route for 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 to their remote gateway, but I'm unable to add any entry to static routing list... The router tries to do something, but afterall I cannot see the new entry...
What can I do to route the traffic through the tunnel?
I am using a RV110W as a VPN client to establish a VPN conection since some months. So far everything works fine. But all traffic is routet thru the VPN tunnel. Now I try only to route specific adresses thru the tunnel but not the internet acess.
RV110W is in Gateway mode
WAN interface is connected with internet
I am using PPTP with PAP and MPPE for VPN
so far no static routes (I could not set e.g. a route to 0.0.0.0 because web-interface says its not a valid adress)
Goal is to route only traffic for the target network thru tunnel and the rest direct via WAN interface.
Is it at all possible to channel all/some data traffic through an established ipsec tunneled connection using the RVL200? I have successfully established an ipsec connection through RVL200 and RV042 routers and are able to connect to servers/computers behind it.Now I want to channel all or some traffic through the ipsec-tunnel for computers that reside on 192.168.1.0 subnet of RVL200 network.
Main office - RV042 router - 10.200.62.1
Remote office - RVL200 router - 192.168.1.1
I am trying to use the Advanced Routing option to add static routes but I am not 100% sure if I am configuring the routes correctly.To give an example of routing DNS requests for HOTMAIL.COM [65.55.72.183]: [code]For some reason this does not appear to work. I have also tried using the interface setting of WAN and tested - this also does not work.
i'm using an rv220W and i whant to know if is it possible to assign vpn traffic to a vlan when i setup an ipsec tunnel?
example:
Im using different vlans on my rv220W.
Vlan 10: engineers (ex: 192.168.1.0/27) no intervlan routing
Vlan20: sales (ex: 10.0.123.0/24) no intervlan routing
This is what i need: - An engineer is on the road and when he makes a ipsec vpn connection => assignd to the vlan "engineers" so he can access the server/pc's in that vlan.and when someone from the sales group starts a vpn connection he needs to be in the vlan "sales" so he can access his pc/data,...
I have a Cisco 527w which we are wanting to deploy to our remote sites however i've found a bug. We use ADSL with an IPsec tunnel as primary and 3G APN for failover . When the ADSL goes down the route via the IPSec tunnel remains and i am unable to route the traffic via the APN backup without disabling the VPN tunnel .
View 0 Replies View RelatedI configured ASA5520 and RV042 for site-to-site IPSec VPN tunnel.Tunnel get connected, but no ping, no traffic between both end network.
Network:
=======
192.168.113.0/24----------192.168.113.6 -ASA--------public, static IP address------Cisco 2821--------Internet
192.168.10.0/24-----------192.168.10.1 -RV042-----public, static IP address------Cisco 2821--------Internet
ASA5520 config:
----------------------
name 192.168.10.0 VPN
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
nameif NET
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.113.6 255.255.255.0
[code]....
i have a 7201 router with NPE-G2. i have a design which i have the option to send all the traffic through a GRE tunnel or a L2TPV3 tunnel.which method is more CPU consumption ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedRegion : Others
Model : TD-W8950ND
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 1.3.1 build 120406 Rel.32903n
ISP : PTCL
I am trying to establish IPSec VPN Tunnel between Linsys RV082 and TP-Link TD-W8950ND but failed.
Currently I have a VPN tunnel setup between our company locations. Location A has Linksys RV016 and Location B has RV082. Everything has been working with no problems for the past 2 years with only minor disconnect issues in the VPN tunnel between the locations.
For the past 2 weeks I have been running into issues with the Tunnel. Users in Location B are reporting problems with losing connection to applications that are hosted in Location A. At first I start with doing a ping to router address in Location B and I get "request timed out". Next I login to router in Location A and under VPN I notice that the VPN tunnel is not disconnect (I see disconnect button). Once I click on Disconnect the screen refreshes and that seemed to restablish connecting with router in Location B. The drop connection has been been going on for the past 2 weeks and only happens once a day specifically between 1 PM and 3 PM EST. I have been reading all over the internet and no luck at all. The VPN tunnel settings are the same on both routers and under Advanced options both Keep Alive and Dead Peer Detection (DPD) are checked.
I'm trying to setup a VPN Tunnel between RV082 and WRV200.The RV082 has an static IP, the WRV200 has a dynamic IP. I have to Dyndns.org in the WRV200.I have setup the RV082 tunel auth like: Dynamic IP + email.In the WRV200 I setup the hostname with the username, and the domain with the domain part of domain entered in the RV082.In the RV082 VPN Log I got: Initial Aggressive Mode message from 11.22.33.44 but no (wildcard) connection has been configured.It seems to be working the IPSEC setup but the RV082 does not accept the connection because of a missmatch in the Remote Security Gateway Type parameter in the RV082.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using a Cisco RV110W (Firmware 1.2.09) in a branch and I would like to create a VPN Tunnel to another site that has a Cisco RV042 (firmware v4.2.1.02)
What would be the correct Configuration? the current configuration I am using is
in the RV042 i am using
Check Enable
Local Group Setup
Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
IP Address : RV042 Pulbic IP address
[Code].....
In our USA office we have a RV042 router and in Venezuela we have a RV082 router. We have connected a VPN tunnel (gateway-to-gateway) between both offices.
The point is: How could we redirect the internet traffic from our Venezuela office (RV082) to the USA Office (RV042) to navigate using USA public IP's?
The reason for this is that we need to use online streaming services which are only available for IP's from USA and we can't use them from the Venezuelan IP's.
We can not use the PPTP option since the equipment which will use the streaming services (like hulu, crackle, etc.) in Venezuela is a Google TV device which doesn't allow the configuration of proxy navegation or PPTP VPN connections itself. That's the reason why we need to do that through the routers.
Currently I have users that connect with the Cisco VPN client to our PIX 515e. Our corporate network is also directly connected to our partners network, sharing common address space. I want to be able allow our VPN users to connect to certain resources on their network. Since they already have routing for our address space, can I allow the VPN to only NAT traffic to certain destination addresses with a local IP address on our network? That way the partner's network does not have to change any routing since they would see the source address as a local IP on our network.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe're getting the following message in the logs when we ry to connect: encrypted Informational Exchange message is invalid because it is for incomplete ISAKMP SA
One of the router is a V2 and the other is a V4 if that makes any difference.
I try to make a gre tunnel with 2 cisco routers 2901, ping responds between tunnel ip's ends, but I don't have pings from the pc's inside the networks. [code]
View 7 Replies View Relatedi have 2 routers, 2821 and 2811. they are connected via GRE over IPsec, and all of the traffic from 2821 is being routed to 2811 with a default route to its tunnel interface. 2821 needs to access internet through 2811 valid ip address, my question is that how should i nat the traffic on 2811 so that 2821 can access the internet?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI try to make a gre tunnel with 2 cisco routers 2901, ping responds between tunnel ip's ends, but I don't have pings from the pc's inside the networks.
[code]....
i am curently troubleshooting a ipsec l2l VPN between
1. ASA 7.2(4) to SSG-140
2. Cisco 871W to SSG-140
In both scenario's the tunnel is nicely established, and traffic goes into the tunnel, but nothing comes out. All encap's, but no decap's
It seems like a routing issue, but we can not find anything on both sites.
So maybe i m running into a (known) issue between cisco VPN equipment and the SSG-140?
Could it be a proxy-id issue? Cause they configure stuff like 10.1.1.0/24 and i configure 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
is it possible to tunnel all TCP traffic to UDP under port 137?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe just migrated from a single 5510 to a dual (failover) 5520, It seems that everything is working except the remote VPN. We can establish a tunnel and authenticate as local users, (going to LDAP when all is working) but no traffic is passing. I know I am overlooking something but cant see it. [code]
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have set up an ipsec tunnel between a Cisco ASA 5505 and a Fortigate 80c. The tunnel is set up as I execute pings from inside behind ASA to inside behind FG, however I cannot get connectivity to hosts behind the Fortigate (traffic is allowed through policies configured on the FG). What I noticed in packet tracer is that traffic is dropped at the step 'Vpn lookup' To troubleshoot I have configured a test ('fake') vpn connection through the vpn wizard and get the same result in packet tracer. I run 8.4 software on the ASA and this is part of the relevant config.
View 1 Replies View Related