Cisco Routers :: RV082 V4.0.4.02 - Tunnel To Main Office (IPCOP 1.4.21) Fails
Oct 27, 2011
I'm using a RV082 with latest firmware v4.0.4.02tm in one of our branch offices. Sometimes the tunnel to the main office (IPCOP 1.4.21) fails.
Both sides display the status "tunnel connected" but IP traffic doesn't go through. If i try to ping the main office using the RV082 diagnostic feature, the RV082 seems to run into a loop...the window continues refreshing without any error message and i'm not able to cancel the test. If I restart the RV082 using the web interface, the "diagnose" and VPN problem still exists, even if the web interface told me that the device did a restart.
The only solution is to to a cold restart of the RV082. After that, the VPN tunnel works again....
This problem occurred 3 times in the last 3 weeks. I never hat this problem with previous firmware versions at this ot other sites.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 21, 2013
I just joined this company and they already ad a VPN to one of their partners that provides them access to some resources. We have now added a 2nd location but the partner wouldnt allow a 2nd VPN tunnel so the decision was made to give the new location a ASA5505 to tunnel thru the main office to access the resources at the partners site.Using ASDM i believe i was able to setup the tunnel to the main office but there is no resource there to use. Now i'm stuck and i do not know what to do to get to the partner site
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2011
I have a rv082 small business router and the current firmware will not apply. I downloaded the v4.04 firmware update and tried to apply it yet the update does not seem to work. I have downloaded it a second time and used the UPDATE FIRMWARE button to load and apply but no change.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2012
I've been noticing that occasionally our 2nd Gen RV082 fails to allow internal admin management until a manual restart. After the restart, all seems to be fine and traffic/router is very responsive. The following describes typically how the issue occurs: Internet traffic is rather slow and unresponsiveContent is failing to load for end usersWebsite are loading but with images or css failing to loadWebsites fail to load and appear offline (not all, but some such as ebay for example)We recognize there is a problem, let's try to access the local router adminFails to load the log-in prompt, so we manually reboot the deviceAll is operational for now We are running Firmware Version: 2.0.0.19-tm. [URL]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2012
I'm trying to setup a VPN between an RV042 V3 and an RV082 V2 router. They get connected but no traffic gets through the tunnel. I tried with and without firewall,DPD, Keepalive, forward secrecy but nothing worked. What should I do? I don't want to throw out the V2 routers. V3 to V3 connects fine.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2012
I have a RV082 v2 with Firmware 2.0.2.01-tm with a Site-to-Site VPN to a Cisco ASA5510.
The PCs behind the RV082 can not see two webservers behind the ASA5510. Both servers have full DNS registration and are accessable from other sites with RV042 routers.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2011
VPN tunnel backup is not available on the RV016 firmware version 4.0.2.08 (it IS on the RV082. The data sheet and the manual for the RV016 is wrong. I have purchased several RV016 hardware V3 and several RV082 hardware V3. Both have the same current firmware version. We have noted that the RV016 does not have the VPN tunnel failover option found in the RV082. It also does not have split DNS (noted in the manual. A I would have thought that the firmware would provide equal options on the RV042, RV082, and RV016.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2011
According to the manual rv082, if you wan to use vpn.. check the enable
But I can't check enable botton... it's disable So i can't check
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2012
I have a RV082 that has an issue keeping an IPSEC Gateway to Gateway VPN running from itself to our ASA 5510. At 8 hours of connectivity (I can almost set a clock to it) the Tunnel will say it is connected on the RV082 but on the ASA 5510 the tunnel is not up.
If I click on disconnect on the RV082 under the VPN Summary page things will come back up. from the ASA 5510 side there is nothing I can do to get things back (ping inside "vpn network" or even trying to make a connection to a networked VPN machine).
To make things more complicated I have another VPN on the RV082 to a PIX 506e that works with no issues. I also have another RV082 at another location with the same settings that keeps its tunnel with the ASA 5510 with out any issue. Some things I have tried to try and fix the issue are:
I upgrade the firmware on the Rv082 V3 from 4.0.0.7-tm (what it was shipped with) to 4.1.1.01-sp) - This seemed to have no effect.
on the RV082 I have changed the MTU from automatic to 1428 and 1452 - all this does is make the connection to the PIX 506e unstable like it is for the ASA 5510 I have changed this back to automatic.
since the time of stability seems to be 8 hours I have changed the "Phase 1 SA life time" and "Phase 2 SA life time" to 28800 both at the same time and individually - This seemed to have no effect.
The current configuration on the RV082 are:
Local security gateway type: IP Only
IP address: (local ISP provided static IP address)
[Code]......
View 19 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2013
I have an RV042 VPN tunnel with an RV082.The RV042 has a public IP Address obtained by PPPoE, the RV082 has a public IP Address obtained via Static IP.The problem I see is a really slow performance. Both internet conections are idle and the performance is about 2 or 3 kbyte/s My question are if I should I enable any of this:
- Agresive mode
- NAT Traversal
- IP Compresion
- Dead Pear Detection
How can I troubleshot this slow performance?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2011
i have an ipsec tunnel between two rv082 routers. (1 v3 Hardware and the other with v2). On both devices are the latest firmware installed.
Everything working fine, the routers establish an ipsec connection but after about two hours, the router with hw version 3 freezes.... nor the wan neither der lan interface is pingable. I can only pull out the power cord. Below attached are the ipsec settings. It´s a Gateway to Gateway connection
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2012
I bought 2 RV180 to setup a VPN tunnel between a remote site and central office.The VPN tunnel is established, I can ping from central office to remote site but browsing on that server fails. [code]
Seems the routing is not really working through the VPN Tunnel.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2013
We have tried a variety of options in an attempt to use Load Balancing (Protocol Binding) with an RV082 that has a site to site IPsec tunnel with another RV082. Both are v3.
Here is the issue. We have dual ISPs, one has great bandwidth, but we incur overages. The other has mediocre bandwidth, but has unlimited usage.
GROUP1 - We want most PCs to use the "unlimited" ISP for general surfing, email, etc. (Bound all ports for range of internal IPs to ANY dest to WAN1)
GROUP2 - We want to use the "faster" ISP for our VPN tunnel (mostly RDP and SIP traffic). (Bound all ports for range of internal IPs to ANY dest to WAN2)
So far everything works. The router will route traffic appropriately and GROUP 1 uses WAN1 and GROUP 2 uses WAN2.
Unfortunately, sometimes GROUP1 users need access to resources over the VPN (WAN2).
There is something not right with the routing. For example GROUP1 can ping and receive responses from devices on the other side of the tunnel, but GROUP1 can't access intranet sites on the other side of the tunnel. They also can't RDP to PCs on the other side of the tunnel.
Why does the router correctly route ICMP, but not RDP?
We've tried adding additional protocol binding rules for specific ports(80, 3389, etc) and ip ranges (both local and remote) to see if we could force GROUP1 traffic destined via VPN through WAN2, but it doesn't work.
Shouldn't VPN tunnels created and configured in the RVs not adhere to protocol binding? It just seems logical to me, but maybe I am missing something.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2012
We have a main office and 4 remote offices (only showing 1 remote office in the diagram). We are using GRE over IPSec VPNs to the remote offices which terminate on the 2811 router in the main office. We are using the 2811 as it is the only device that we have that can terminate GRE. The 2811 router is connected to the outside switch and is configured with a public IP address. We also have a ASA5510 in the main office which is connected in the same manner and is used for Web, e-mail traffic etc.Both the main office and remote offices have a 10Mbps Internet connection.
We have an issue with voice quality between sites as we are finding it difficult to control bandwidth utilization in the main office. When users in the main office download web content it can saturate the 10Mbps Internet connection causing voice quality issues. We have configured outbound shaping on the branch routers to make sure that aggregate inbound traffic from all branches to the main office does not saturate the link but we cannot control traffic from the Internet.I understand that controlling inbound traffic from the Internet is difficult without controlling QoS on the ISPs side. Is there any way that can reserve inbound bandwidth to ensure that web traffic does not impact voice? Also in this design, which is the best place to configure outbound QoS from the main office?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2012
I have been told to connect our branch offices over outdoor point-to-point wireless CPE. The wireless brand is Orthogon. The Main office got cisco 4507 L3 switch where all building switches terminate. DHCP,DNS and all application are hosted in main office. The branch office got ONE 24 port POE Switch cisco 2960 where all users will be connected, On Port 0/24 of 2960 switch at branch will terminate the outdoor Wireless and other end will be terminated on 4/15 of 4507 at main office? what command I need at both interface where Wireless is terminated.when we connect floor switches to 4507 we got these commands on access switches
vtp mode client
vtp version 2
vtp password cisco1
vtp domain LIC
Fiber termination port configuration - switchport mode trunk
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 17, 2012
I am trying to configure access to several remote offices for users who VPN into our main datacenter. The datacenter has a 5520, and the branches are connected through IPSec L2L VPNs. Branches all have 5505 or 5510's. Remote users use IPSec via the Cisco remote Client. Remote access into our data center works, and the L2L VPNs are perfect...just now that i need remote users to access the branches after Remote access VPNing (for support) i cant get that part to work.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2011
We have used two Cisco RVS4000 to create the IPSec VPN between the main office and the branch office. The main office has SBS 2008. There is a Windows Server 2008 as the domain controller in the branch office. One branch office user has a laptop which is not in the domain, but his exchange account is set up in the Outlook. When he connects the laptop to the branch office network, he cannot connect to the exchange server and get the emails. Is there any configuration to set up in the router, server or Outlook?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2011
I have an existing VPN tunnel from my branch office to corporate.I want to allow my employees to establish a VPN connection to our local branch office where we have a local server, and not go through the corporate office.Can I set up a direct VPN connection to my router/ firewall at the branch office, even when there is a VPN tunnel already connected between my office and corporate?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2011
Equipment Cisco1921, HWIC-1ADSL, 2 x GB Ethernet interfaces (Only one used for local LAN) Software IOS Version 15.1(1)T2..I have been asked to configure this router to provide an IPSEC tunnel back to our central office.We have been provided with an ADSL business class 7MB service from Telecom Italia, they have presented the circuit to our office with no terminating equipment (wires only). Telecom Italia have provided us with some IP addressing information as follows (I will not disclose the entire IP address) [code]
I can see that the packet count is increasing both inbound and outbound on the ATM interface. I have read many documents and tried many different way to try and get this resolved, I even logged a call with Cisco but no dice.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2006
A group of Citrix Clients connect to a Citrix Metaframe Server. The port numbers involved are Citrix Metaframe (TCP/UDP 1494) and MS Terminal Server (TCP/UDP 1604).
The network is configured such that the communication between the Citrix clients and server goes through a GRE tunnel. Traceroutes from client to server, and vice versa, confirm that it passes thru the GRE tunnel. There's no ACL, firewalls or NAT devices along the IP path, in both directions.
The issue is, all Citrix clients can ping to the server but some fail to log on to the server; some have no problem. Also, other applications, e.g. PCAnywhere, can go through. If the GRE tunnel is taken away, all Citrix clients can log on to the Citrix server.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2012
I upgraded an ASA 5505 from 8.3(2) to 8.4(4) this evening. The 5505 is a backup and used to perform testing prior to production changes. After the upgrade was complete, a VPN tunnel began to fail. I did a limited search online to see if this was a known issue or something new. I also reviewed the release notes but did not see anything that matched the issue I received.
My concern is that this tunnel configuration is scheduled to be deployed to the production firewalls next week after their upgrade. But if it failed on the upgraded test unit, it may fail on the production units.
I downgraded the backup unit to 8.3(1) and verified that the tunnel indeed worked at that level.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2012
At the main site, I have 3 5508 WLCs each part of a mobility group (wlcMain-MG). In NCS, under "System/Mobility Groups" for each controller, I see each controller listed as "local" with the other Controllers listed with the group name "wlcMain-MG". None of the SSIDs are "anchored".
I have a new site with a 2500 series WLC that I would like to push out 2 SSIDs. This site contains two customers. One customer is the Main customer with the second customer leasing space.
I have the Cust2 WLAN at the remote site set to have traffic egress out of a local interface on the 2500 WLC (this traffic is then tunnelled back to their Main location via an ASA which houses the DHCP scope for that vlan). I can connect to this SSID, obtain an IP Address off the ASA and am tunnelling without issue.
For the Cust1 WLAN at the remote site, I would like to broadcast an SSID from the Main location on those same APs which are registered to the 2500. It is my understanding, that I anchor the SSID at the Main site and identically configure the SSID at the remote site. This will allow the end user to authenticate to the RADIUS server at the Main site and be placed upon the correct vlan (we are using DOT1x and dynamic vlans).
For my test, I am starting simple. I have created a test WLAN with no authentication. At the main site, on 5508 WLC3, I have created the test WLAN, and placed the interface into a low security vlan (call it VLAN-low). I have anchored this test WLAN to that controller. At the remote site, I have created the same WLAN (but placed it into the management interface for now - the VLAN-low does not exist at the remote site) and configured that WLAN to anchor back to the WLC3 at the main site. I am unable to obtain an IP address from the remote site. I have placed the remote site WLC in the wlcMain-MG as well. How close does the code need to be on the controllers - the 5508s are at 7.0.116.0 and the 2500 is at 7.0.220.0? What could I be missing?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2012
We are using a 5510 and have issues trying to use VPN with full tunnel to connect from inside the firewall to a customer site. I don't seem to have a problem when using split tunnel profiles. How would you troubleshoot this?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2011
I have an AC 3.0 connection that works fine prior to CSD. Once I've enabled CSD I get CSD to load and then the AC tunnel fails. Ive attached the DART bundle and a few screen shots.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2012
What Happens if I Used 2 to 4 more wireless routers acting as Main Routers in my network? that their DHCP are enabled? would it cause connection Disturbance? I Have 4 Cisco Linksys E300 all of thier DHCP are enabled..so they have 192.168.2.1,192. 168. 3.1, 192.168.4.1, 192.168.5.1
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 21, 2012
Region : Others
Model : TD-W8950ND
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 1.3.1 build 120406 Rel.32903n
ISP : PTCL
I am trying to establish IPSec VPN Tunnel between Linsys RV082 and TP-Link TD-W8950ND but failed.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 2, 2011
Currently I have a VPN tunnel setup between our company locations. Location A has Linksys RV016 and Location B has RV082. Everything has been working with no problems for the past 2 years with only minor disconnect issues in the VPN tunnel between the locations.
For the past 2 weeks I have been running into issues with the Tunnel. Users in Location B are reporting problems with losing connection to applications that are hosted in Location A. At first I start with doing a ping to router address in Location B and I get "request timed out". Next I login to router in Location A and under VPN I notice that the VPN tunnel is not disconnect (I see disconnect button). Once I click on Disconnect the screen refreshes and that seemed to restablish connecting with router in Location B. The drop connection has been been going on for the past 2 weeks and only happens once a day specifically between 1 PM and 3 PM EST. I have been reading all over the internet and no luck at all. The VPN tunnel settings are the same on both routers and under Advanced options both Keep Alive and Dead Peer Detection (DPD) are checked.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2011
I'm trying to setup a VPN Tunnel between RV082 and WRV200.The RV082 has an static IP, the WRV200 has a dynamic IP. I have to Dyndns.org in the WRV200.I have setup the RV082 tunel auth like: Dynamic IP + email.In the WRV200 I setup the hostname with the username, and the domain with the domain part of domain entered in the RV082.In the RV082 VPN Log I got: Initial Aggressive Mode message from 11.22.33.44 but no (wildcard) connection has been configured.It seems to be working the IPSEC setup but the RV082 does not accept the connection because of a missmatch in the Remote Security Gateway Type parameter in the RV082.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2012
I am using a Cisco RV110W (Firmware 1.2.09) in a branch and I would like to create a VPN Tunnel to another site that has a Cisco RV042 (firmware v4.2.1.02)
What would be the correct Configuration? the current configuration I am using is
in the RV042 i am using
Check Enable
Local Group Setup
Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
IP Address : RV042 Pulbic IP address
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2013
my RV042. The main login password has expired but it will not let me change it at all. Basically I try to login but get the error 'The old password has expired. Please change the password'. But with no prompt at all for a new password and just a return to the login page. Tried various different browsers, tried the old default password but nothing will work. There seems to be no way of changing it and I cannot login.
I really don't want to reset it to default as I have numerous VPN tunnels configured and various other settings.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2012
main computer will not connect to internet but laptop does
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
Environment :linksys wrt300n v1.1 which can have ddwrt-mega. Willing to tunnel all lan's outbound traffic through an ssh tunnel.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2013
trying to setup universal wifi extender. Lights indicate system is on and connected to my computer. however wps and link rate lights are not on.
View 1 Replies
View Related
