Cisco Routers :: Rv082 Can Set Client Idle Timeout Someway
Nov 16, 2011
If i set up a pptp vpn between a Cisco rv082 router and a microsoft client,Can i set the client idle timeout someway? or Have a default value pre- configured for this?Because this device support 5 users to connect at the same time. It would be best for me, if the device drop the client if it does not use the tunel.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 18, 2012
I'm on WLC 5508 . It doesn't matter if passive client feature is turned on or turned off , when you try to increase "User Idle Timeout" you can see this message:
In our network, a lot of clients gets deauthenticated. I thought it would be useful to enable "Passive-client" feature, or increase "user idle timeout" , but how these works with each other?
View 15 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2012
i purchases cisco rv 082. i set MTU vale at 1500.i use public IP for WAN and just using one WAN.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2011
How to verify on the asa 5510 , the vpn-idle timeout,is running on default setting(30mts)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2012
Modem is a Netgear dgn2200
On the modem page with all the settings Under basic settings For connection it says Always Connected The box underneath says idle timeout 5 (that's in minutes)
I am unable to change that number or even get a cursor to appear in that box (I want to change it to a 0 - my internet connection has been dropping out when going idle). I can't right click or anything. That is using Firefox. When I say dropping out, I mean, the 3 computers on the network become unuseable - nothing works and things don't appear to be connected to the internet even though my green ADSL light stays on like it's connected - it is not.
I tried the same modem page in IE, and that box with the 5 in it is still showing 5, but this time it's just grayed out - again, can't be changed. The firmware updates are all upto date (apparently - according to it's check)
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2012
I have ASA 5510 with 8.2.4 and 8.0.x OS and all seem to have common problem of idle TCP connections not timing out. The host to host connections are coming over VPN tunnels. I have default timeouts on all the firewalls. I have tried changing global timeouts and as well as host specific timeouts using MPF but doesn't work at all ! The problem is when TCP connections are sitting idle in conn table for days and when connection limit of 50,000 conns reach the firewall starts behaving unpredictably dropping packets or unresponsive! I need the unused idle connections to timeout which is NOT happening either by changing global values or MPF.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2011
The behavior of some mobile devices ( as Iphone , Itouch, not Blackberry, not labtops ) with WL Controller (5508) is that, when the client doesn't use it, it disconnects after 480 sec.
The idle timeout configured is 900 sec.
Why the behavior is different in this type of devices? Increase the idle timeout is a solution?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2012
I have a CSS 11503 with a basic content rule for TCP 10000 going to a few backend servers. I was looking into the default timeout values for flows and when testing using telnet the flow didn't terminate as expected?
For example, i have no 'timeout multiplier' specified in the config and when i look at the output of 'show flow-timeout default' it tells me the default 16 seconds timeout is in effect for *. With that in mind, i telnet to the content rule vip on TCP 10000 and on the backend server using wireshark i can see the TCP threeway handshake. With no data passing i'd expect the CSS to terminate this flow after 16 seconds.. yet it takes exactly 128 seconds before wireshark shows the RST and the flow is terminated. 128 being 8 times the default 16 second flow timeout.
If i try to force the connection to close early by specifiying 'flow-timeout-multiplier 2' in the content rule, or even a multiplier of 40, it still waits 128 seconds to close the telnet connection.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2012
I have an SG300-20 here for testing (firmware: 1.1.2.0, boot version: 1.0.0.4, language version: 1.1.1.6 English). Everything seems to work on it, except, that if I choose Radius authentication by mac address only, then the switch does not honor the Idle-Timeout and Session-Timeout attributes from the Radius server (freeradius).
The setup is the following: I have a no name access point plugged in to switch port gi1. The port gi1 is set up for Radius authentication by mac address only. The access point itself is authenticated, no problem with that. If I connect through the access point by (say) a mobile phone, it is authenticated, no problem. The radius server does send the Idle-Timeout and Session-Timeout attributes, I checked it by running "freeradius -X", both are set to 30 seconds. Then I turn off the wireless card in my mobile phone and check the dot1x users by "show dot1x users". My mobile phone's mac address remains there for 5-10 minutes, so the Idle-Timeout and Session-Timeout does not work.
Another way I could resolv this problem is by explicitely asking the switch to reauthenticate the user. Unfortunately there is no CLI command to do just that, I can do however a reauthentication on a port using "dot1x re-authenticate gi1" (for example). But it does not work as it is expected: the switch uses the stored mac-address to reauthenticate the user, so nothing changes on the port (unless something changes in the radius server). I think it should work like the following: remove the authenticated user from the port, and whenever that mac address makes some network traffic, then reauthenticate as if it were a completely new connection. BTW: it would work for me also if I could just remove an authenticated user from a port, but I did not find a command to do that.
As a last resort I can simply shutdown the port, bring it up again ("shutdown" and "no shutdown" in the interface config), then all users are removed from the port and they all mush reauthenticate. But it causes a network outage for a couple of seconds for all users on that port, on a busy access point it is quite disturbing, and it is not an elegant way to do this.
So my actual question is: is there a way to remove an authenticated user either automatically (Idle-Timeout and Session-Timeout) or manually from this switch?
I enclose the relevant part of the running config.
interface range gi1-2
dot1x host-mode multi-sessions
exit
vlan database
vlan 2-4
exit
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2011
A customer of mine has two RV082 in different locations. The "main" router is providing a gateway-to-gateway VPN tunnel, and is also used by a few road warriors for VPN access. We've had some issues with the "main" router lately, so we've decided to exchange it for a brand new device (v3). The old RV082 was a hardware revision v2 device, so I had to manually rebuild the config on the new router. The new router is working fine so far - connectivity and gateway-to-gateway VPN are fine. IPsec Client VPN, however, doesn't work at all. The config of the new router is identical to the config of the old one, IPsec Client VPN used to work fine on the old router.
The router is running the latest firmware (v4.0.4.02-tm). I've been trying to make IPsec VPN work with "QuickVPNplus ver: 1.0.6" and the "Cisco QuickVPN Client v1.4.2.1". From what I understand, both programs first connect to the routers external IP and download some sort of VPN config file. The info in that file is then used to create the actual connection. The problem is that the config file is invalid. It contains HTML code instead of config data. This is the code: "<HTML><HEAD><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; URL=/cgi-bin/welcome.cgi"></HEAD><BODY></BODY></HTML>". The URL is the same I see when logging in to the admin interface of the router. The Cisco client tells me in its "wget_error.txt": "rwConnStart message=All 1 wget requests did not return a valid vpnserver.conf". Both clients connect to the router fine, and the config download itself is working - only the returned data is invalid.
I've already tried lots of stuff to make the problem go away - enabling/disabling the firewall, VPN passthrough options, and other things. I'm beginning to think that there may be a bug in the firmware I'm using, or that the way Client VPN works has changed in a way that makes connecting with a client implementing the "old" method impossible. By the way, PPTP is working fine, so we're using it as a temporary workaround. My client, however, isn't happy with this workaround - he bought a relatively expensive router so he can make use of its advanced features, after all.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2012
When I attempt to export the certificate for the quickvpn client via the router web interface, it looks as if the export works, and it asks me to save the zip file. However, upon opening the zip file I receive the error: The compressed folder is invalid or corrupted.
This happens in multiple browsers, from multiple machines.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2012
I have a Cisco RV082 and can successfully connect with the Cisco QuickVPN Client, 1.4.2.1. However, after 1 to 5 minutes I see the Windows 7 bluescreen indicating that the system has halted due to a problem with a driver. I have installed the latest Windows updates and reinstalled the client.
The bluescreen only occurs if I use the Cisco QuickVPN Client.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2012
I am trying to configure RV082 router with Mac Native VPN Client for my remote access. However, no matter what I did, I am not able to make it works. Can any one can give me an example of how to conguration my RV082 router and Mac Book Pro(Mountain Lion)?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2012
Is it possible to rename the default webauthentication URL from [URL] to something like [URL]. We are running on 7.0.98.0, is it possible to do http for web authentication and https for Mgmt access if we upgrade the controller software?
We configured our guest wireless with no layer 2 authetication so users can associate with an AP and get an ip adress but they can't go anywhere unless they have a valid username and password(web authentication) - does this affect the performance of an AP since there will be many people associated with each AP, is there any setting in the WLC to de associate a client from an AP if its idle for certain time.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2008
telnet/ssh sessions time out after 30 minutes of in-activity This only happens in the case of a server that is setup behind the firewall, and of course port forwarding is used. If one unchecks the radio button for the enable firewall the sessions do not timeout at all. This is very reproducable in all recent (1.3.9) versions of RV042 and RV082 routers.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2011
I have a 3825 configured as an EZVPN server with 881 routers as clients. One issue I am seeing is that sessions don't seem to time out, such as when a peer's public IP changes. Show crypto ISAKMP peer shows the same host (using device certificates for authentication) with multiple public IPs establishing sessions. I have ISAKMP keepalives configured on the router.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2012
Is there a way to change the timeout for the Client Excluded: MACAddress status? It seems like the exclusion is rather short. I'd like to have the ability to control the exclusion time. Using WLC-5508 7.0.116.0.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2010
Does RV082 can establish PPTP VPN connection as CLIENT? (i'm aware it can provide function of VPN PPTP server but could not find if it can act as client).To explain further: I'm based in Europe and use US VPN to access some US services like Netflix, Pandora, etc.. (i'm paying for US VPN account as service so I have no other choice than PPTP). I would like to establish permanent PPTP VPN tunnel with remote server so all computers in the house can go through tunnel when i browse for Pandora or Netflix for example (is this router capable of routing policy too so not all the traffic would be routed through tunnel?)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2012
ASA 8.2(5), uauth absolute timeout is disabled and inactivity timeout is set to 48 hours:
timeout xlate 48:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:00:00 absolute uauth 48:00:00 inactivity
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
timeout floating-conn 0:00:00
Users still get kicked out every 8 hours and they have to reauth. This is a logging message:
%ASA-5-109012: Authen Session End: user 'john', sid 839, elapsed 28801 seconds
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2012
We're getting the following message in the logs when we ry to connect: encrypted Informational Exchange message is invalid because it is for incomplete ISAKMP SA
One of the router is a V2 and the other is a V4 if that makes any difference.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2011
I have an RVS4000 with FTP download issues. I have the latest v1.3.3.5 software and the latest ISP (1.5). Regardless of any settings changes, my FTP downloads always timeout. I have tried a new basic router and had no issues, so it is not the PC, FTP software, or the ISP. I have even put my PC into the DMZ and still no resolution.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2012
At the moment I am trying to connect to a DHCP ISP, but the connection only last for 10-15mins and then it will automatically disconnected. Every time I reset the WAN port , service back to normal for another 10-15 mins >< The are no log or any error message when connection timeout. the status of the WAN port is normal "Up Up"I have tried this config on another ISP and everything work just fine!!!
Fiber connector -------> Cisco 1812 (FastEthernet1) --------->LAN
Router#sh run
Building configuration...Current configuration : 3205 bytes
!
version 12.4
service tcp-keepalives-in
service tcp-keepalives-out
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2013
We have an RV082 setup with WAN to the internet and LAN IP of 192.168.188.1.If I add a static route like so:
network: 192.168.166.0
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: 192.168.188.2
hop count: 1
interface: LAN
The device with IP 192.168.188.2 will be connected directly to one of the LAN ports on the router.Will that work to route, trying to get to 192.168.166.0 to the IP of 192.168.188.2?It just seems odd because the packets would hit the router then go back out through the LAN port.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 17, 2011
isco epc3925 in transparent bridge provided by isp with following wan details
ip=x.x.x.120 subnet=255.255.255.248 gw=x.x.x.121 and 2 dns server ip's
I can't get the one-to-one nat working. read in some forums that the rv082 can do the job.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2013
I have a Meraki Firewall that sits behind my Cisco RV082. The Meraki is setup to run a VPN connection with my server but I am having problems passing the VPN traffic through properly.
I have 2 Uverse Internet Connections that the RV082 using load balancing so that they are shared. I have 10 static IP's.
I am trying to come in on one of my static IP addresses throught the Cisco RV082 to the Meraki and after doing a capture on the meraki it appears that it is starting to receive data to intiate the VPN connection but when it sends data back to the VPN client machine it never makes it.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2012
I have reset my RV082 router (both wit the reset switch and the factory default wizard) and run the setup wizard but regardless I can't connect to shaw.ca which is my service provider. I notice that if I use http://192.168.1.1 the browsers (IE & FF) default to https://192.168.1.1 and then I am prompted for a certificate. I can enter if I ignore the request but after getting in I simply cannot connect to my ISP.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2012
Is it possbile to NAT to other subnets with the RV082. It is on a 192.168.41.x and I have a phone system on a 192.168.20.x. After searching all over others are saying no.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2013
I just set up a new Linksys/Cisco RV082 router with the intent to get VPN working from outside the building. I have gone through the setup and while everything looks good, I have not been able to connect yet. I have tried everything that I know how, and am now hoping to get the answer from some pros.
Here's my setup. We use Comcast Business class internet. The modem is plugged into WAN port 1 on the RV082. I'm using the router as a DHCP server, that is working fine. My local subnet is 192.168.0.0/220
Right now all I want is to be able to log in as a client using QuickVPN. I set up one user and a client to VPN tunnel using the router's config page. Here's the settings I have:
Tunnel Interface is setup on WAN1, checkbox is enabled.
Local Group Setup
Local Security Gatewaytpe: IP Only
Local Security Group Type: Subnet
[Code]....
It seems like something is blocking the connection, but seeing that I have tried this after disabling the firewall completely it doesn't make sense to me. I also went into the config page for the modem and set up the router as a DMZ. I have also tried connecting with the client built into Windows 7, but that doesn't work either, I just get "connection failed with error 619"
I have the port in QuickVPN set to auto, but have tried both 443 and 60443 with same results.
I ran a port scan at [URL] and it shows I have 3 ports open...80,443, and 1723
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2012
I have a VPN tunnel from one RV082 to another, first router has IP range of 192.168.1.0 and the second one has range of 18.18.18.0, the connection works fine, here is where the issue starts, I am at a PC in the 18.18.18.0 network and I ping an IP in the other one e.g. 192.168.1.50 and it pings fine, but when I try to RDP into it or do anything to it I get no response, is it a firewall issue? Is it a NAT issue? I am at a loss, now that IP i mentioned does have RDP enabled and working because it is being port fowarded in the 192.168.1.0 router and I can access it through the public IP.
Also a workstation with a static IP 192.168.1.18 I can ping it if im in the local network but if I am in the remote one I cannot at all.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2010
we have an RV082 router that a few days ago started restarting itself after normal usage.The simpton is that when people come to office, starting using the Internet the RV082 resets. It stays online for 3 to 12 minutes and then it resets again.
clicking on Reset to Factory Default in the web interfaceafter the reset, I confirmed that it was reset to factory default I reset it again using the reset buttomre-configure the RV082 manually.I also tested with another identical rv082 (hw version and firmware version) and after doing a backup of the config of the original rv082 and restoring it in the new rv082, the same problem happends.
View 20 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2013
I have an RV082 10/100 8-Port VPN Router and have configured the NAT table to allow for remote users, however I've run into an issue. It seems like there is a limited number of entries that you can put in the table,10, and I need to configure about 5 more IPs. Any way to expand the NAT table, or alternatively recommend a different router. I would also be willing to add another router to the network, but I have little experience doing that.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2012
Are the RV042 and RV082 routers SIP AWARE?I haven't had any luck finding documentation stating such.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2011
Just purchased a RV082 and once I switched a bunch of users over to it I can no longer access the web admin section. I have tried using both IE and Firefox and have used multiple workstations. I get to the login screen but it doesn't get any further. I am running the latest firmware v4.0.4.2-tm. It works for a while then just stops. The only fix is to turn off the device and back on and then it starts working again.
I've seen this issue on other small business cisco devices and had to stop using this because of this issue and switch to a higher grade cisco product but was hoping that this particular issue would have been resolved now across cisco's products.
View 7 Replies
View Related