Is there a way to set up a Site-to-site VPN between RV042 & Cisco 2911? I "googled" this and obtained a document, but it is not regarding Cisco 2911: [URL]
Routers are needed to setup it successfully. I have tried on both routers several configuration steps, no success...
I have no problem configuring both devices to successfully connect when the juniper firewall isn't in the picture. But due to policy; the RV042 at our main site must sit behind the firewall.
I've got the port forwarding setup but I'm not able to connect. I know I"m missing some configuration on the RV042 but I can't think of it! I've attached a GIF to give an example of both setups.
I have got two CISCO RV042 .I need to configure a site to site VPN .
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently bought two RV042s to create a site to site VPN for a client. I have several of these setups installed at other locations but this is the first version 3 hardware I've used.It seems like the dynamic IP functionality of the VPN setup may not be working correctly. I've verified all settings on each router match and have deleted/recreated the setup several times just to make sure. Here's the logs from the router with a static IP.
Nov 29 06:49:51 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0): deleting connection
Nov 29 06:49:51 2012 VPN Log added connection description (g2gips0)
Nov 29 06:49:51 2012 VPN Log listening for IKE messages
Nov 29 06:49:51 2012 VPN Log forgetting secrets
Nov 29 06:49:51 2012 VPN Log loading secrets from '/etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.secrets'
Nov 29 06:49:51 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0): cannot initiate connection without knowing peer IP address
Nov 29 06:49:51 2012 VPN Log (g2gips0): cannot initiate connection without knowing peer IP address
I've tried both dynamic IP + email and dynamic IP + FQDN to authenticate the router using the dynamic IP and both give the same error as above.I did a firmware update hoping to fix PPPoE which seemed to be broken with a Netopia modem in bridge mode so both routers are on the latest firmware, v4.2.1.02.
May I know can the 2 models WRVS4400N and RV042 perform site-to-site vpn with each other?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an RV042 connected to another RV042 via site-to-site VPN. The tunnel has been solid for months, but when I did an actual read/write test between PCs at either endpoint, the speeds were quite slow.
Endpoint A has a line speed of 25/5.
Endpoint B has a line speed of 50/7-ish.
Read/write test from A to B was about ~3 write and ~7 read. Does this sound normal for these routers? I was hoping for better performance than that.
We having 2 nos 1941 routers we need configure site to site vpn on this routers send the configurations . 1st side having server and 2nd site we having 10 users. 2 side users wants to access trough vpn in that server .any IOS required are defualt IOS is enof on 1941 k9 Router.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have two Cisco routers - 2911 in HQ and RV180 in branch office. Because in HQ LAN network I have some development servers, to which guys from branch office need to have acces, I decided to setup VPN site-to-site between HQ and branch office. Everything went quite smoothly, on both devices I see, that ipsec connection is established. Unfortunately I am not able to ping resources from one network to other one and vice versa. Below is the configuration of 2911 router (I skipped som unimportant (imho) configuration directives) :
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
[Code].....
I have a Cisco 2911 router configured with a couple of VPN tunnels . The issue that I am having is that I cannot access the servers (WEB,EMIL) thru the tunnel . After looking around found out that adding a route-map to my static NAT rule will fix the issue . Once I do that I am able to access the serves thru the VPN but my local machines lose internet access .So I have to delete the access list The issue seems to be with the Access list 110 permit ip [code]
View 5 Replies View Related[code] Site-to-site VPNs in place between Site A and Site B and between each site to the DC. Site A and Site B have Cisco 2911 routers, there are ASA’s at the DC. The existing Site-to-site VPNs carry data and voice traffic between the sites (though voice and data is on separate VLANs in separate subnets)
ISP1 currently used for the existing circuits at Sites A and B but we have experienced issues with them recently which has disrupted service. So new circuits are to be installed at each site with ISP2. (See basic diagram attached which shows current set-up with intention to get new circuits via ISP2 installed)
We have 3 ports on our Cisco 2911 routers with 2 ports already in use for the existing connections (1 for the LAN and 1 for the WAN connection to ISP1) Can we simply use the 3rd port for the connection to ISP2 or would it be far more advisable to use a 2nd router (for redundancy, etc)
Would it be feasible to have a set-up where we have e.g. voice traffic go over a site-to-site VPN via ISP1 and data traffic go via site-to-site VPN via ISP2 but each can take over from the other in the event of a failure?
I have a Cisco 2911 router and a Cisco RV 120W router and i would like to establish a VPN tunnel between theese two. I have defined the settings on the Cisco RV 120W router and i just want the Cisco 2911 to follow those. setting up a connection with Cisco IOS.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am attempting to establish a Site To Site VPN between our SA540 and 2911 routers and somewhere I have a misconfiguration that eludes me. I suspect maybe in the 2911 Transform Set? Here is the output from the SA540. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedUsing 3G USB modem on a Cisco router 2911 can you establish site to site VPN?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIm trying to configure a IPsec site-to-site between Cisco 2911 and Cisco RV 120W routers and im having some trouble with it. Hoping some could shine some light on this matter. Posting my running config on 2911 and also the config of the Cisco RV 120W (.jpg)
View 17 Replies View RelatedI have a remote office with a dual WAN router (2911) in front of an ASA (5510). Our main office currently has an ipsec site to site vpn to that remote office ASA. The router has two ISPs. ISP-A is the wan link used for the site to site and has provided us with a /28 public address space which we use on the ASA outside interface for the site to site. Now we are in the process of getting a second ISP which will also provide a /28 or /29 public address space. I would like to use that second ISP for backing up the site to site in case ISP-A link goes down. I think I have the IP SLA config worked out. My question involves NAT. On the router I would like to configure a static nat that only takes place if ISP-A goes down. In other words, if everything is working fine, then the router does not nat the ASA outside address, but if the ISP-A link goes down, then the router will NAT the ASA outside address to one of ISP-B provided public addresses.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have 3x site-to-site vpn connections setup on my Cisco 2911 router which is based at Head Office. They all connect OK but there appears to be some ports blocked.Access any applications using HTTPS Our Proxy Agent uses port 8280 - When the internal address is used, it doesn't work. When the public address is used, it works. Printers are unable to use scan to email - Port 25.I'm confident that nothing is being restricted at the remote sites as all of these functions worked on our old Head Office router.All i want to do is allow ANY traffic to and from Head Office and all the VPN sites. I'm fairly new to this type of router having made the jump from small business equipment.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to setup VPN S2S. Office router 2911 ip a.a.a.a, remote office ASA 5505 8.4(3) with ip b.b.b.b, but no luck.
2911 config:
!
version 15.2
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
!
[code].....
I am trying to set up a Site to Site between two RV042 with static IP at both routers.at the log at site 1 i get: packet from XX.XXX.XX.167:5: initial Main Mode message received on 10.2.32.1:500 but no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK.At site 2 i get: packet from xxx.xxx.xxx.146:500: initial Main Mode message received on 192.168.1.1:500 but no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK.I have tuned off the firewall and added a Port forwarding to the router ip and port 500.Tried with different autentication methods, but get the same message.
View 1 Replies View Relatedhow to configure a site-to-site VPN between RV042 router and 1941 router?
View 0 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to establish a site to site VPN using ipsec between an RV220W in the UK and an RV042 in Italy to no avail.The RV042 tells me it's "waiting for a connection" and it gives 0.0.0.0 as the remote address (i'm using Dynamic addressing at both ends). I can ping the remote address with a response.The basic parameters I'm using is 3DES with SHA1, but the RV042 offers an option for Perfect Forward Secrecy which the RV220W does not (I've tried toggling this) and the RV220W offers and Extended Authentication mode which I can't see on the RV042.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI configured every thing in both site, there is a connection between my sites BUT I can't access my resources from Site B with it has RV042. It also shows that it connected to my ASA in Site A but there is no traffic between sites !!! I don't know what should I do now ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy problem is VPN Site2Site between Cisco and Linksys routers: after a troubles vpn tunnel now seems up but no data is passed accross tunnel.This is configuration of Linksys RV042 (Firmware Version: 1.3.12.6-tm, seems last for this hardware [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5525 and need to configure site to site ipsec vpn to 3 peers. I currently have an existing /28 public address from my ISP that is used by other services.Is there a way to use this existing ip range to configure IPSEC tunnels to 3 peers ?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI am attempting to configure Radius authentication accross a site-to-site VPN for my ASA 5510-01 for remote access.
ASA5510-1 currently has a live site to site to ASA5510-2.
ASA 5510-1 - 10.192.0.253
ASA 5510-2 - 172.16.102.1
DC - 172.16.102.10
ASA5510-01 can ping the DC and vica versa but is unable to authticate when i perform a test. ASA5510-01 can authenticate to a DC on it;s own LAN but not on the remote LAN that DC sits on.
I have double checked the 'Server Secret Key' and ports as well as various users which all work locallly. ASA5510-02 authenticates to DC with no problems.
I am configuring Site-to-Site VPN with another company. I already make a couple of tunnels but with this one I have a problem. They I already using on their side my local network 192.168.10.0/24 (server is 192.168.10.10) so we need to use imaginary network 172.16.0.5 as server address. Now I need to do NAT 172.16.0.5 to 192.168.10.10 but I am not so good in that.
View 1 Replies View Relatedsample configer ASA 5512-x v.9.1 for VPN site to Site, i use to configure on ASA 5510 V.8.2 but on ver 9.1 i never configure. my is use that i dont know to how to configure nonat. i saw some configration as in the attach file they just to show configure VPN but we did not see nonot on command.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to configure a site-to-site VPN using a Cisco 881 router on my end and connecting to an ASA5510 on my suppliers end.Our supplier has configured their end and I do not have access to their configuration.
They told us we have to NAT all inside address' to a single address (192.168.89.1) as this is the only one they will let through their firewall/tunnel.I know how to set up the VPN but not too sure how to set up the NAT part.
My sanatized config is attached. The code I am using to NAT my inside network to the single address 192.168.89.1, and send all traffic accross the VPN tunnel as this address is correct? With the router running this config the VPN tunnel does not connect.
I want to configure QoS for voice traffic over a site-to-site VPN tunnel. I have a Cisco 851 router on the branch end and a Cisco 1800 router at the HQ. The setup is an Avaya Gateway located at the HQ and the idea is that the phones at the branch office are connected over the VPN tunnel to the gateway at the HQ.
I have a 1MB internet link at the HQ from a service provider and 256kbps internet link (from a different service provider) at the branch office. The branch office has just 3 users.
I'm trying to configure a Site-to-Site VPN in a Cisco ASA 5505 firewall which is behind an ISP router (Cisco 800 Series) configured in routing mode (not bridging) and with a static nat of all the ports to the firewall (avoiding bridging mode of the router). [code]
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have ASA 5555-x and configurated site to site vpn. Now that our side wants to receive multicast messages from the other side. In this case i know that i must configurate gre tunnel on router. because asa is not supported gre tunnel. i have also router 2811. I know that we need to add a cisco router behind the firewall in order to receive multicast messages.
configurate site to site vpn on asa and gre tunnel configuration on router.
I have 16 customers using RV042 router all 11 have the RV042 router different ISP's. After eleminating every thing else we were down to the routers. Two of the customers we built linux boxes to do the routing and firewalling and VPN, etc. Once in place the problems went away. Which confirmed it was the RV042 router causing the problem.
We watched the traffic and after about 2 hrs the router tells both ends to reset. End of communication.
My question is how do we stop the router from terminiating the connections. They are not bandwith hogs. They are nessessary connect connections.
Having some issues getting a site to site VPN connected between two RV042. Any experience getting this to work behind a Motorola SBG9000.Will I be able to get this working? Or will I have to organise a cable modem through my ISP instead
View 1 Replies View Relatedi am trying to configure a site to site VPN with one of my remote offices.
I have used the ADSM Wizard to go through the steps, and i have added the necessary access rules. However, when i try and do a packet tracei get the following error (ad-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule. (see screen shot below)