Cisco VPN :: To Allow All Traffic Between Site To Site VPN 2911
May 1, 2013
I have 3x site-to-site vpn connections setup on my Cisco 2911 router which is based at Head Office. They all connect OK but there appears to be some ports blocked.Access any applications using HTTPS Our Proxy Agent uses port 8280 - When the internal address is used, it doesn't work. When the public address is used, it works. Printers are unable to use scan to email - Port 25.I'm confident that nothing is being restricted at the remote sites as all of these functions worked on our old Head Office router.All i want to do is allow ANY traffic to and from Head Office and all the VPN sites. I'm fairly new to this type of router having made the jump from small business equipment.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 3, 2013
I have two Cisco routers - 2911 in HQ and RV180 in branch office. Because in HQ LAN network I have some development servers, to which guys from branch office need to have acces, I decided to setup VPN site-to-site between HQ and branch office. Everything went quite smoothly, on both devices I see, that ipsec connection is established. Unfortunately I am not able to ping resources from one network to other one and vice versa. Below is the configuration of 2911 router (I skipped som unimportant (imho) configuration directives) :
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
[Code].....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2011
I have a Cisco 2911 router configured with a couple of VPN tunnels . The issue that I am having is that I cannot access the servers (WEB,EMIL) thru the tunnel . After looking around found out that adding a route-map to my static NAT rule will fix the issue . Once I do that I am able to access the serves thru the VPN but my local machines lose internet access .So I have to delete the access list The issue seems to be with the Access list 110 permit ip [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
[code] Site-to-site VPNs in place between Site A and Site B and between each site to the DC. Site A and Site B have Cisco 2911 routers, there are ASA’s at the DC. The existing Site-to-site VPNs carry data and voice traffic between the sites (though voice and data is on separate VLANs in separate subnets)
ISP1 currently used for the existing circuits at Sites A and B but we have experienced issues with them recently which has disrupted service. So new circuits are to be installed at each site with ISP2. (See basic diagram attached which shows current set-up with intention to get new circuits via ISP2 installed)
We have 3 ports on our Cisco 2911 routers with 2 ports already in use for the existing connections (1 for the LAN and 1 for the WAN connection to ISP1) Can we simply use the 3rd port for the connection to ISP2 or would it be far more advisable to use a 2nd router (for redundancy, etc)
Would it be feasible to have a set-up where we have e.g. voice traffic go over a site-to-site VPN via ISP1 and data traffic go via site-to-site VPN via ISP2 but each can take over from the other in the event of a failure?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2011
I have a Cisco 2911 router and a Cisco RV 120W router and i would like to establish a VPN tunnel between theese two. I have defined the settings on the Cisco RV 120W router and i just want the Cisco 2911 to follow those. setting up a connection with Cisco IOS.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 29, 2012
Is there a way to set up a Site-to-site VPN between RV042 & Cisco 2911? I "googled" this and obtained a document, but it is not regarding Cisco 2911: [URL]
Routers are needed to setup it successfully. I have tried on both routers several configuration steps, no success...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2013
I am attempting to establish a Site To Site VPN between our SA540 and 2911 routers and somewhere I have a misconfiguration that eludes me. I suspect maybe in the 2911 Transform Set? Here is the output from the SA540. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2011
Using 3G USB modem on a Cisco router 2911 can you establish site to site VPN?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2011
Im trying to configure a IPsec site-to-site between Cisco 2911 and Cisco RV 120W routers and im having some trouble with it. Hoping some could shine some light on this matter. Posting my running config on 2911 and also the config of the Cisco RV 120W (.jpg)
View 17 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2011
I have a remote office with a dual WAN router (2911) in front of an ASA (5510). Our main office currently has an ipsec site to site vpn to that remote office ASA. The router has two ISPs. ISP-A is the wan link used for the site to site and has provided us with a /28 public address space which we use on the ASA outside interface for the site to site. Now we are in the process of getting a second ISP which will also provide a /28 or /29 public address space. I would like to use that second ISP for backing up the site to site in case ISP-A link goes down. I think I have the IP SLA config worked out. My question involves NAT. On the router I would like to configure a static nat that only takes place if ISP-A goes down. In other words, if everything is working fine, then the router does not nat the ASA outside address, but if the ISP-A link goes down, then the router will NAT the ASA outside address to one of ISP-B provided public addresses.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2012
I'm trying to setup VPN S2S. Office router 2911 ip a.a.a.a, remote office ASA 5505 8.4(3) with ip b.b.b.b, but no luck.
2911 config:
!
version 15.2
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
!
[code].....
View 14 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2012
Got an ASA5505 connected to another endpoint running IPsec and being NAT'd at each end to a 10.0.0.0/24 network. I can pass other types of traffic through the ASA 5505 but not RTP traffic. The moment it is NAT'd and hits the firewall rules it gets denied by the default deny at the bottom of the list.
Currently the rules are as follows
Incoming External
allow ip any any
allow tcp any any
allow udp any any
default deny
[code].....
It wont allow us to setup a voip call...however when the same call manager sets up a voip call NOT using this ipsec tunnel it works just fine.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2012
Got an ASA5505 connected to another endpoint running IPsec and being NAT'd at each end to a 10.0.0.0/24 network. I can pass other types of traffic through the ASA 5505 but not RTP traffic. The moment it is NAT'd and hits the firewall rules it gets denied by the default deny at the bottom of the list.
Currently the rules are as follows
Incoming External
allow ip any any
allow tcp any any
allow udp any any
default deny
[code]....
It wont allow us to setup a voip call...however when the same call manager sets up a voip call NOT using this ipsec tunnel it works just fine.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2011
I have some challenges with a VPN config I recently setup for a client.I have at the HO the following:
- 1800 router
- Avaya phones and Gateway
- 1MB radio internet access
At the BO(branch office), i have:
- 871 Router
- Avaya phones
- 256k internet bandwidth
The only reason we setup the VPN in the first place was for the phones at the BO to be able to connect to the gateway at the HO and also able to make calls and receive calls as if the phones were at the HO.The phones at the BO successfully register to the HO, but are unable to recieve calls and dial out. Everytime I try to make a call, the phone displays a "connecting..." message. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2010
We have several site-to-site IPSec VPN's setup.
All are running on ASA's 8.2(1).
All have a Security Association Lifetime (Time) of 8 hours.
All have a Security Association Lifetime (Traffic Volum) of 4608000 KiloBytes.
We have an issue when we do Oracle logshipping between the sites.
This triggers the Traffic Volume rekey as can be seen by this entry in the logs: -
%ASA-7-702307: IPSEC: An inbound L2L SA (SPI= 0x169FA1C1) between and (user= ) is rekeying due to data rollover.
However it does not appear as if the renegotiation is occurring properly. Within 10 to 15 minutes data stops being transmitted along the link, even though the IPSec tunnel still appears up in the ASDM GUI.
The 'fix' for this is that we are using is to login to the ASDM GUI and bounce the link by going to Monitoring => VPN => VPN Statistics => Sessions => IPSec Site-to-Site. Then select the appropriate VPN tunnel and click on 'Logout'. This forces a link renegotiation which works fine.
I have attached a logfile from the local ASA (there's nothing in the logfile of the remote ASA until we bounce the VPN tunnel).
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2011
I have 2 ASA 5505 Firewall, I Configured Site 2 Site VPN no both the fitrewall, as i have a dual ISP, i am able to create the tunnel with primary but once my primary is down i am not able to create the tunnel with back up ISP. During the troobleshoothing by typing Show isakmp sa and Show ipsec sa, i can see my tunnel is up, but not able to decap the packets.
As it will look like
#pkts encaps: 15, #pkts encrypt: 15, #pkts digest: 15 #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts verify: 0 #pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0 #pkts not compressed: 15, #pkts comp failed: 0, #pkts decomp failed: 0 #pre-frag successes: 0, #pre-frag failures: 0, #fragments created: 0 #PMTUs sent: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, #decapsulated frgs needing reassembly: 0 #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2012
At the main site, I have 3 5508 WLCs each part of a mobility group (wlcMain-MG). In NCS, under "System/Mobility Groups" for each controller, I see each controller listed as "local" with the other Controllers listed with the group name "wlcMain-MG". None of the SSIDs are "anchored".
I have a new site with a 2500 series WLC that I would like to push out 2 SSIDs. This site contains two customers. One customer is the Main customer with the second customer leasing space.
I have the Cust2 WLAN at the remote site set to have traffic egress out of a local interface on the 2500 WLC (this traffic is then tunnelled back to their Main location via an ASA which houses the DHCP scope for that vlan). I can connect to this SSID, obtain an IP Address off the ASA and am tunnelling without issue.
For the Cust1 WLAN at the remote site, I would like to broadcast an SSID from the Main location on those same APs which are registered to the 2500. It is my understanding, that I anchor the SSID at the Main site and identically configure the SSID at the remote site. This will allow the end user to authenticate to the RADIUS server at the Main site and be placed upon the correct vlan (we are using DOT1x and dynamic vlans).
For my test, I am starting simple. I have created a test WLAN with no authentication. At the main site, on 5508 WLC3, I have created the test WLAN, and placed the interface into a low security vlan (call it VLAN-low). I have anchored this test WLAN to that controller. At the remote site, I have created the same WLAN (but placed it into the management interface for now - the VLAN-low does not exist at the remote site) and configured that WLAN to anchor back to the WLC3 at the main site. I am unable to obtain an IP address from the remote site. I have placed the remote site WLC in the wlcMain-MG as well. How close does the code need to be on the controllers - the 5508s are at 7.0.116.0 and the 2500 is at 7.0.220.0? What could I be missing?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2011
A user with Easy VPN client connects to a 876 ISR (router A). This router also has a site-to-site VPN to another 876 ISR (router B). What I want to achieve is that the user dials in to router A and can access the network on the remote end of the site-to-site tunnel (router B) In diagram:
user (192.168.18.x) - Easy VPN - Router A (192.168.16.x) - sitetosite - Router B (192.168.17.x)
I have added routes in router B to the 192.168.18.x network with router A as next hop, but I can't reach the other segment.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2013
I am trying to establish routing between two Site to Site vpn tunnels, both of which are terminating on the same outside interface of my Cisco ASA.
find attached Network Diagram for the same. All Firewalls used are Cisco ASA 5520.
Both VPN tunnels between Point A and Point B, Point B and Point C too are up. I have enabled Same security level intra interface permit command also.
How do i enable traffic originating from LAN Subnets behind Point A to reach LAN Subnets behind Point C without having to create a Seperate tunnel between Point A and Point C
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2011
I have set up a site to site VPN from a Cisco ASA 5580 to a Netgear FVS318v3 using 3DES, MD5, GH 2 and preshared key, My VPN Tunnel is always up, I can see on the netgear and firewall ASA that the connection VPN is established at both phase 1 and phase 2 level, but no traffic is flowing through the tunnel sometimes. The only way I can see the traffic passing, it is reload the tunnel on the firewall netgear.the configurations on the firewalls are same.
I can see the requests of the ASA Red_Lan to server located at the remote site, behind the Netgear Firewall and observe traffic on the ASA but on the outside/inside interfaces of the firewall Netgear there are not traffic. Is necessary to configure and others parameters for VPN?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2011
I'd like to create a site-to-site vpn between an SRP527 and an other vpn gateway. The problem is i don't see how to route all traffic from the local network (network defined by the lan ip interface of the SRP527) to the other vpn gateway? It seems to be only possible to define the destination network (accessible via the vpn) with ip/mask (but only for "small" network: for exemple i tried with 10.2.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 and it's ok but i tried with 10.0.0.0 mask 255.0.0.0 -> it's not working. I obtain the message "invalid ip")
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2013
I do have a 5505 up and running, and passing data... url...Now I am trying to get a IPSEC VPN tunnel working.I actually have it up (IKE phase 1 & 2 both passed), but it is not sending/receiving data through the tunnel.
The networks concerned: name 10.0.0.0 Eventual (HQ Site behind Firewall)name 1.1.1.0 CFS (Public Network Gateway for Palo Alto Firewall - Firewall IP: 1.1.1.1)name 2.2.2.0 T1 (Remote site - Outside interface of 5505: 2.2.2.2)name 10.209.0.0 Local (Remote Network - internal interface of 5505: 10.20 9. 0.3) On a ping to the HQ network from behind the ASA, I get port map translation creation failed for icmp src inside:10.209.0.9 dst inside:10.0.0.33 (type 8, code 0)
I am suspecting that there is a NAT error and/or a lack of a static route for the rest of the 10.0.0.0 traffic, and that I may have to exempt/route the traffic for the HQ network (10.0.0.0), but I haven't been able to get the correct entries to make it work. [code]
View 22 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2011
I want to configure QoS for voice traffic over a site-to-site VPN tunnel. I have a Cisco 851 router on the branch end and a Cisco 1800 router at the HQ. The setup is an Avaya Gateway located at the HQ and the idea is that the phones at the branch office are connected over the VPN tunnel to the gateway at the HQ.
I have a 1MB internet link at the HQ from a service provider and 256kbps internet link (from a different service provider) at the branch office. The branch office has just 3 users.
View 12 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2012
I have a functioning site-to-site VPN between two ASA 5505 appiances. Sub-net on one side is 192.168.20.0/24 (inside I/F) and on the other side is 192.168.30.0/24 (inside I/F). VPN is built over public Internet (outside I/Fs of those two ASAs).
Now I connected another subnet on 192.168.30.0/24 - e.g. 192.168.35.0/24. Traffic from 192.168.30.0 subnet is routed to 192.168.35.0 via Gateway at 192.168.30.250 IP.
My task is to make packets from 192.168.20.0 subnet to go to 192.168.35.0 subnet and vice versa.
I setup a static route on 20.0 ASA's Inside interface as 192.168.35.0 255.255.255.0 to 192.168.30.250. I also created NAT examptions for outbound packets from 20.0 to 35.0 and inbound as well. I also added destination network of 35.0 to VPN cryptomap traffic selection (on both ASAs).
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 2, 2013
I'm working with a client who has a site to site VPN between the main office and a branch office. The main office is 192.168.200.0/24 and the branch office is 192.168.1.0/24. The issue is when the branch office users use the VPN in they receive a 192.168.200.x address, however, they cannot access a server or any other resources at the branch office.
They have a SSL-VPN 2000 connected to a TZ100 at the main office and a Juniper device at the branch office. I did try setting the Tunnel All mode on the NetExtender but that does not allow me to access the resources at the branch office. Additionally, those users at the main office can access the resources at the branch office without getting on the VPN.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2011
I've setup a site-to-site vpn between 2 5505s, with 1 subnet per site directly behind the ASAs.The VPN establishes connection successfully, but i can only access resources from site2 to site 1. E.g. I can ping or rdp from a server in site2 at IP 192.168.3.250 to a site1 server at IP 192.168.10.250. I cannot make the opposite connection, i.e. 192.168.10.250 to 192.168.3.250.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2012
Using the Cisco Configuration Professional software I have created a site to site VPN connection (between a cisco 1841 and 1811).The tunnel appears to be up as far as the routers are concerned, but I am unable to ping anything on the remote networks. I thought route maps may have had something to do with this but I cant see what is worng with them.Just so you know, the 1841 device already has a functioning VPN tunnel to another site. The peers I am concerned about are 141.0.59.x and 109.238.78.x.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2011
I have an ASA5520 and need to set up multiple VPN's to some vendor sites. All these vendors are using 192.168.1.0 networks. All have public IP's and very little knowledge so are unable to NAT from their end.The idea is to create some /28 blocks of IP's (172.29.0.0/28) and manage this on our end.
How do I get this to work?
example: (all IP's are fictional)
tunnel1
VPN
My side "outside" 10.10.10.10
Their side "outside" 20.20.20.20
Networks
My side "inside" 172.30.30.0
Their side "inside" 192.168.1.0 NAT'ed to 172.29.0.0/28
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2012
I had to edit an ACL on an active S2S VPN today because traffic was being denied from a host onsite to a host on the remote site (port 449). After I made the change, we tried to make the connection again, but it was still denied. Do we need to tear down the S2S vpn for the change to the ACL to take effect? Also, what if we just wait for the connection to rekey itself? Will it work after that?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2012
I have an 881 ISR router in which I need to configure a site to site ipsec vpn with a vendor. The vendor will not accept traffic from RFC 1918 addresses (private addresses), so the outgoing vpn traffic needs to be natted to a public IP. I'm not sure how to get the vpn to work with NAT.
Is this something that I could do using the Cisco Configuration Professional app, or should I forget that and do it strictly from the cli?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2011
On my 2911 router, can I have both an Easy VPN server, and a site-to-site VPN? Also, with an Easy VPN, is it possible to specify another internet (outside) IP address in my assigned range as the address remote users use . . . rather than the specific IP address assigned to the interface?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2012
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2012
We have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
View 1 Replies
View Related
