I have a sf300 with (2) vlans (1) ] vlan for data and vlan (100) is my voice vlan I have Vlan (100) tagged traffic, and my VoIP pbx as an access port only to vlan (100) all other ports are trunk ports with vlan (100) tagged and vlan (1) untagged traffic. I get no outbound audio on calls I can call out hear them fine they cant hear me. I am wondering if my tagged traffic leaving the phone is being striped and if so were. I have CDP turned off.
We are trying to setup a WAP4410N with 2 SSID's. One SSID for our private network and the other for guest internet access. On the VLAN and QoS page there is a setting for priority. What would be the suggested values for this setting? We obviously want our private network to receive priority over our guest network.Also, does VLAN Tag setting need to be on Tagged to determine private from guest traffic?
We are trying to config vlan 10 for data and vlan 20 for voice on the same port - port 1 of swtich SF300-24P to run both data and voice on different vlans.Do I have to add vlan 10 as an untagged vlan to port 1 and add vlan 20 as an tagged vlan to port 1?If I do not want to assign the native vlan 1 to port 1, how can I remove it ? The GUI page - assign VLAN to port does not allow to remove it.Aslo, what mode shall I set up on port 1? General, trunk or access ?
now we have 2 switches: SF300-24..on one SF300-24 we config it at layer 3 mode with VLAN configuration same as following [code] And we use port 26 on 2 switches SF300-24 is trunk mode then we connect both SF300-24 switches.But on SF300-24 layer 2 cann't inderstand VLAN from Sf300-24 layer 3..How to config VLAN on 2 switches SF300-24 Layer 3 and SF300-24 layer 2?
In my network I got 3 SF300 24 p switches. I managed vlan 10 for data and it is also a native vlan and vlan 20 for voice ,1st switch is the core switch and im having a problem in connecting them ?
my new Cisco SF300-48. I want to create 2 vlan (vlan 1 & vlan 2). The switch is set at layer 2. example : vlan 1 (port 1, 2, 3) , vlan 2 (port 4, 5, 6) vlan 1 can communicate each other (port 1, 2, 3) and vlan 2 can communicate each other (port 4, 5, 6)But vlan 1 cannot communicate with vlan 2.
I have a Cisco SF300-24P deployed at a customer prem running only a couple VLAN's - 1 customer related and 1 for management. Recently the customer inquired about changing his connection to Q-in-Q. I have changed the interface type to customer but then it selects vlan 4095 as the vlan associated to that port. How do I change that vlan or by default is that the only vlan I can use? Currently the customer is using vlan 904 and would like to continue to use that vlan in the Q-in-Q config.
I got question about Cisco SF300-24P- is it possible to have management vlan in other vlan than in default vlan?I have default vlan 10 and voice vlan 20, I need to reach switch through voice vlan so I need to set up, interface vlan 20 with ip address. I ask these, because in gui, under Management Interface, IPv4 interface,under Management VLAN, I can only choose vlan 10, which is my default vlan, I dont have option to set ,up, in this case, vlan 20 as management vlan.
I have a SF 300-24 24-Port 10/100 Managed Switch and I am trying to set some VLANs. The image below shows how I want it to be setup:Since the remote site goes through the Internet, making port 20 an 802.1Q trunk over the two VLANs will give WAN connectivity to VPN/E-mail.I've tried all sort of settings [ see attachments] but can't get it work.
i have a asa5505 and sf300-48,in the sf300 have ip defult-gateway 192.168.1.93 and have internet in vlan2 but vlan 3 not work. ping from "vlan3" to "vlan2" its ok.
I am trying to hook up a SF300 switch to a cable modem and then plug some phones into the switch that are configured with static IPs. I am able to access the switch without an issue, but need it to pass traffic from the phones to the network and it is not doing so. We cannot do trunking because we are not using BSoD modems yet (next phase). For now, we just need the switches to pass everything from the phones to the network as is. Any ideas?
I am trying to roll out a new internet router. The problem I am faced with is the LEC only supports VLAN 1227 and greater, specifically they are assigning me VLAN 2528. I am able to create the sub-interface and setup dot1q encapsulation for VLAN 2528, but the vlan database does not have the ability to add VLAN 2528 to it so I am unable to get layer 2 up and going, thus preventing me from getting the implementation done.
i have a Catalyst 2960S since 2 days. I am a new user, i like to configure the switch! my first problem is: i have 2 v LAN vlan1/24 and vlan200/24. I'd like to config port1 to be tagged on the 2 v LAN i know from hp port must be tagged. how can i config port 1 to be tagged on vlan1 and vlan200? and port 2 to be untagged in vlan1 and untagged in vlan200?
We have a Cisco Aironet 1130AG Wireless AP (firmware 12.4) and have a guest wireless network (internet only) and corporate wireless network configured on it. They are kept separate by having different VLANs assigned to them. When a laptop connects to the guest network I see the DHCP request go out and it is tagged with the correct VLAN. The problem is when a laptop connects to the corporate network I see the DHCP request go out but there is no VLAN tagged on the packets. This causes a problem because both of our DHCP servers (on VLAN 1 and 3, remote DHCP servers no DHCP running on the Aironet [Doesn't seem like this version has a DHCP server]) are sending responses and sometimes the corporate user will get an IP address on the Guest subnet.
Our corporate network is setup on VLAN 1 which is configured as the Native VLAN on the Aironet. Will this cause the Aironet not to tag these packets with any VLAN information? Any other thoughts as to why it isn’t tagging these packets to a VLAN?
I have setup a new SFE2000 switch to work in Layer 3 mode using the IP address 192.168.100.254 on VLAN 1.I would like VLAN1, 2, 3 and 4 to be able to communicate with each other while VLAN2 (Guest) needs to be restricted from everything except web access and dhcp assignment from our server.I have been playing with various ACL's in an effort to accomplish this but so far I have drawn a blank in getting this working.
We have one SGE2000P switch that we are testing in Layer 3. We have a very simple configuration with some vlans that we want to route to our corporate network, but I want to test if there is actually traffic coming out from the up-link port first.
1- Created the vlans: VLAN1: 10.10.1.12 /16 (native) VLAN10: 172.16.10.1 /24
I'm setting up an SNMP poller to retrieve the ARP table (ipNetToMediaPhysAddress) from my SF300 switches. I can retrieve the table from SF300-24P and SF300-48P switches running Firmware Version 1.0.0.27, but get garbage for the MAC address when retrieving that same table on the same model switches running Firmware Version 1.1.1.8. Is there an outstanding defect on this code level? How can I retrieve the table showing the IP address to MAC address mappings?
I have a sf300 with (2) vlans (1) ] vlan for data and vlan (100) is my voice vlan I have Vlan (100) tagged traffic, and my VoIP pbx as an access port only to vlan (100) all other ports are trunk ports with vlan (100) tagged and vlan (1) untagged traffic. I get no outbound audio on calls I can call out hear them fine they cant hear me. I am wondering if my tagged traffic leaving the phone is being striped and if so were. I have CDP turned off.
getting a SF300 to properly route IP between 2 VLANs. I've watched the demo video and performed everything it showed, but I get the most bizarre half-way results. I haven't done anything on Cisco routers in about 15 years, so I'm a little rusty.
We have an office LAN with a cable modem/router for Internet access where the modem/router has IP address 192.168.1.1. We have the usual 24 bit prefix net mask. The SF 300 is connected to this network on port 1.
I have configured port 1 to VLAN 1, interface in Access mode, assigned a static IP address of 192.168.1.36, which is a free address on our office LAN. I have configured port 2 to VLAN 2, interface in Access mode, assigned a static IP address of 192.168.3.1 I put a static route in the modem/router, pointing 192.168.3.0/24 to 192.168.1.36.
I have a PC on 192.168.3.10 attached to port 2.
The SF300 can ping 192.168.3.1, but not 192.168.3.10. 192.168.3.10 can ping 192.168.3.1. It can also ping 192.168.1.1, and can pull up an HTTP router admin page from 192.168.1.1. 192.168.3.1 can be pinged from anywhere on 192.168.1.x, but 192.168.3.10 cannot be pinged from 192.168.1.x. Finally, 192.168.3.10 cannot ping any other addresses on 192.168.1.x except 192.168.1.1, and cannot reach the Internet.
Here's my configuration:
switch6d919d#show runconfig-file-headerswitch6d919dv1.3.0.59 / R750_NIK_1_3_647_260CLI v1.0set system mode router file SSD indicator encrypted@ssd-control-startssd configssd file passphrase control
i have a small network with Polycom phones connected to the sf300 switch and have the pc's daisy chained via the second switch port on each phone. i have the pc traffic running on the default vlan 1 and the voice traffic running on the voice vlan 100. can i do bandwidth management on a vlan/port basis or is that not necessary. i want to ensure that the voice traffic is never impacted by the pc traffic on the same cable.
I have a new install with 3 SF300 switches, setup as vlan 2, the switch connected directly to the 2901 router has no problems, plug in a phone and it gets an IP, but if connected to either of the two swtiches behind the first switch, they do not get an IP. I am seeing the DHCP request hitting the router, and the router sending the IP to the phone, but it never gets the IP.
All ports are setup as trunk on vlan 2 including the ports that connect the switches together. Not sure what the problem is, but they are going live tomorrow and only have 48 out of 120 phones.
Trunk from 3500 going into SF300-8 #1 QNQTrunk from SF300-8 #1 going into trunk SF300-8 #2QNQ from SF300-08#2 going into Trunk SF300-24, All Vlans from Network 1 seem to be communicating properly between the 3550 and SF300-24 and is isolated from the Transport Network by QnQ. I am having one problem, I can not ping the SF300-24 or get to the management interface. I am able to access other devices on the SF300-24 Vlan1 from devices on the 3550 Vlan1 and vice versa.
An end user is looking to connect 21x IP Cameras to the switch and they require at least 6W port port. Now, the datasheet states that each port on the SF300 provides 15.4W.I need to double check so that the end user will not start connecting the IP Cameras and then half of them might not fire up.
cisco 2811 - DHCP server..If IP Phone 3905 installed in SF 300 he does not receive an ip address. [code] If IP Phone 3905 installed in the Catalyst 2960 - all OK.
My ISP is providing me with 1 public IP on a /30 network and 14 public IPs on a /28 network. In this example the 10.0.0.1 is the default gw provided by my ISP and 10.0.0.2 is my SF300-08. If I setup my router to route to 10.0.0.2 as the default gw through the interface between the switch and router, can I configure the static routes in the switch to route further to 10.0.0.1?
is it possible to have these 2 networks on different VLANs and configure inter-VLAN routing? I don't want the switch accessible from the 10.0.0.2 IP.
We have a mitel 3300 PBX that is our DHCP server. It feeds an old Foundry Networks switch that nobody knows the password for anymore so I can't even look in it to get some clues. What I think I know is this.
Phones plug into the switch, PC's plug into the phone.
I am assuming this to be the case becase all the PC's get those numbers and when booting up a phone it comes up and says "vlan2 pri 5" during the DHCP discovery.
Like I said the Mitel 3300 is the DHCP server and our internet access is from the firewall's trusted port.
I have put the switch in L3 mode via the console. No matter what I try, the PC will always get IP addresses in vlan2's subnet. Even if I plug the PC directly into the switch.
I have factory reset this baby and all I have done at this point is put it back in L3 and changed the default ip address so I can get to the web GUI.
I am looking for some technical specs on the SF300 series which I can't seem to find in the 300 series data sheet: the maximum delay for traffic through the switchbuffer size for each switchportwhether or not the ports are suitable for shielded cable and connectors
