Cisco Switches :: SG 300-10 Multicast Routing On VLans 10 / 20 And 30
Apr 9, 2013
I am IT teacher at a middle school in Nuremberg, Germany. We have in our school 5 VLANs, 4 Switchtes, 1 L3 switch and 1 router.
2 months ago the old L3 switch (Catalyst 3550-12T) is broken. In the short term I've borrowed a Catalyst 3750G-24, so that the network continues to function. Now a SG 300-10 switch was purchased. This should be configured the same as the 3550-12T or 3750-24G.The network looks like this (there are much more PCS than in this image):
VLAN ID
VLAN Interface
DHCP
DHCP-pool
[Code]....
The DHCP server in VLAN 30 is also a FOG server. The Fog server images all PCs in school. PCs in VLAN 10, 20 and 30 boot from PXE. The MS Server in VLAN 10 has been configured by the DHCP options 66 and 67.
The Catalyst 3750G-24 routes the multicast, but the SG 300-10 I do not have the option of using the commands ip multicast-routing distributedip pim sparse-dense-modeto work and must configure igmp. I'm having problems with the igmp-configuration on the SG 300-10. Therefore, I have uploaded the configuration of the 3750G-24 and the configuration of the SG 300-10 (without ACL).
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 18, 2013
I have the need to filter multicast between vlans as described below. PIM Sparse-Mode is being utilized for this multicast network and changing any Vlan to PIM Dense mode is not an option.
- Vlan 217 and Vlan 4 should not be communicating on mcast with any other vlan, including eachother (each vlan isolated).
-Vlan 64 and Vlan 80 are able to communicate witch each other on mcast but not with any other vlans (isolated vlan group).
-All other vlans can communicate mcast freely.
What I've created thus far is below. It does not appear to be the most elegant solution and would be difficult for the administrators to adjust as new requirements come along. Yes, I will be adding the appropriate link-local multicast addresses so as to not break routing and other dependent technologies.
ip access-list ext ANY_CONN
permit ip any any
ip access-list ext MCAST_INTRA_217
permit ip 224.0.0.0 15.255.255.255 133.106.197.32 255.255.224.0
permit ip 133.106.197.32 255.255.224.0 224.0.0.0 15.255.255.255
ip access-list ext MCAST_ISOLATE
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2012
This is the deal, I used Acronis for imaging workstations. Obviously when I do that it drags everything down to a halt, as all the ports are being flooded with packets. So what options do I have to image (as opposed to doing it after hours or try to plug all the computers into one isolated switch? = )
VLAN 1 has well everything in it, PXE server, DHCP server and workstationsVoice VLAN 100 is on every trunk or connection a workstation would be attached to.
There is another equipment I'm not illustrating... although a part of me wonders if my topology is correct.
In any case, I've read about IGMP Snooping, CGMP, etc-- but I think the 2960S are only capable of IGMP Snooping.
And from there I'm a little confused about configuration of IGMP...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2012
A brief background on the setup: I recently switched out my switch. It was a Cisco 3750 10/100 switch and I wanted to upgrade to Gig. The cost of a Gig+POE 3750 is too much to bite so I opted for the SG300. My router is a Cisco 891. Here is the setup:
Cisco 891:
two SVI's: vlan1 and vlan 100
Vlan1 = 10.0.1.1/24
[Code].....
With the 891+3750, I was able to add "ip pim sparse-dense-mode" on all the SVI's and hosts could join any multicast group, irregardless of which vlan the host was a member of.
Now I've changed switches, and I dont get the same love. I have the PIM statement on both SVI's on the 891, but Im unsure of what I need to configure on the SG300. I have enabled "Bridge multicast filtering" + "IGMP snooping". What can I do to get similar functionality using the SG300 + 891? I assume this is my lack of understanding IGMP in general, but was able to get away with it using the PIM statements on the 891+3750 stack.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2011
How do you enable multicast traffic on 2900 series switches?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2012
We are currently migrating from Cisco 6500 switches to Nexus 7000 switches. I need replicate the following multicast configuration on the 6500 switches in the simplest way so Multicast is functioning on the Nexus 7000 switches.
Cisco 6500 configuration.
ip multicast-routing
interface Vlan8
description
ip address 10.128.46.2 255.255.240.0
[code]....
how we can enable multicast on the Nexus 7000 switches in the simplest form so this will continue operating.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2011
I have a 2x Cisco 3750G switches (Stacked) that are part of an IP Video Surveillance System .All network is set to 1 VLAN (VLAN 1 default).The Cisco SWs ( Core ) are configured with IGMP Querier + Snooping .Connected to the Cisco SWs are 4 Fiber Rings(Loops) for redundancy . RSTP and IGMP Snooping are enabled on all the network SWs .Network Architecture Figure :
When all Fiber Rings (Loops ) are connected , the Cisco and Ring SWs spanning-tree tables show the blocked and forwarding ports properly .I am able to connect all my IP Cams + Encoders to the Ring SWs and connect my Servers + WorkStations to the Cisco SWs to record and view the multicast ip streams .All streams from Rings 1 ,3 and 4 are getting normally to the Servers + WorkStations through multicast ( IGMP Snooping are filled correctly on the Cisco and non-Cisco SWs ) . All multicast streams are joined normally except for Ring 2 .The Multicast streams passing through Ring 2 will operate normally for around 2 hours then after that the Fiber SWs begin to flood their multicast traffic causing the cams on the same switch to drop off the network .
I checked the Configuration of all the SWs on Ring 2 but all are are the same .
What is weird is that I have to set all the streams to unicast to stop the flooding just on Ring 2 (All other rings are not affected ) then after some time if I enabled a video multicast stream on one of the SWs of the Ring it will be streamed properly to the Servers + WorkStations ( All IGMP tables along the way will be filled properly ) then again after 2 hours or so , the flooding will start again suddenly and all IGMP table entries for the SW on Ring2 will be empty . No problem occurs on the other Rings which have more multicast streams .
View 0 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2013
I try to pass multicast traffic between two vrf on the same 3750 switch. I have IP services IOS and sdm template routing.
here is my config:
ip routing
!
ip vrf vpn2
rd 1:1
mdt default 232.1.1.1
route-target export 1:1
route-target import 1:1
[code]....
Now I'm stuck - I don't know what to do to pass multicast traffic. Do I have any chance to run this config on 3750 chassis?Perhaps "Configuring Multicast VPN Extranet Support" document will be useful, but it concerns Catalyst 6500? [URL]
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2013
I have a SG300-28P that is our Main VLAN Switch. Though the VLANs that I have on it are there mostly because of our Edge Router and our AP541Ns.We have the Following VLANs defined (Subnets Changed to conseal Piblic IPs) [code]
VLAN200 and VLAN201 come into Our Edge Router and out on a Single GE Port via VLAN Tagged to thje SG300.The SG 300 Splits them out to Untagged Ports and they are connected to Two Firewalls, each with a IP in the 200 and 201 Subnets. The AP510 has the VLAN200, VLAN192 and VLA101 tagged Subnets sent to it. The AP521 has three SSID, each associated with a Paticular VLAN.
This all works fine, though there are a few hidden flaws. Since all of the VLANs are present, both Internal and Public IPs, one could craft packets form one network and use the SG300 as its gateway to the other subnet and Gain Access. How can I isolate the Subnets, so that I can still use the SG300 as a Default Gateway for the 10.1.0.0/16 Network Make it so if someone from the 10.1.0.0/16 netwok accesses the 201.201.201.0/24 Subnet it uses the SG300's 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 default router (the Firewall IP) and not the VLAN InterfaceIf somone in the 201, 200, 192 Subnets uses the SG300 as a Gateway and tries to access a 10.1.0.0/16 address it gets blocked.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2011
I've seen lots of posts from people having problems routing traffic between two vlans with some complicated examples. Any simple step-by-step example for an SG300 switch (in layer 3 mode) to configure two vlans and sending traffic between the two vlans without an external router?
-VLAN1 10.10.10.0
-VLAN2 10.10.20.0
I've tried to do this through the GUI and can't seem to make it work. I'm missing something in the GUI.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2011
I have recently purchased 2 SG 300 switches, 1 x SG 300 52 & 1 x SG 300 10, and I am hoping getting the following set-up working.To assist I have drawn the following simple network diagram (below) which hopefully makes it a little clearer what I am trying to do:I have 2 companies occupying a single office with the requirement to share printers/devices etc... so basically I am looking to set-up 2 VLANS (say VLAN 10 & VLAN 20) with inter-vlan routing. To add a little complexity the main comms area is located in the basement of the building, this houses the 2 DSL routers and 2 Servers, one for each company. I am proposing putting the SG 300 10 port switch in here and then use the 3 uplinks I have been given to connect back to the SG 300 52 which is in a patch cabinent 2 floors up. I want to use 2 uplinks (in a LAG) for Company A and 1 uplink for Company B. FYI. DHCP is being served out by each respective router.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2012
How to get vlans working properly between sub-interfaces on a ASA and a trunk port on a switch.There seems to be issue with the VLAN's being assigned to the correct VLAN and this information being properly sent to the ASA over the trunk.
We seem to be unable to ping most of the interfaces except for one on the switch. Sometimes if we are lucky we are able to ping a host on a different vlan that is on the switch. This seems sparadic at best.
Logs on the ASA show traffic does not seem to be assigned properly to the correct sub interface. We have access rules on the ASA disallowing traffic not part of the same vlan. For example you will see networkA blocked on networkB when it really should be directed through networkA's sub interface.
Any example commands for the ASA and Switch for at least the basic requirements to enable all the VLAN's to communicate properly with the ASA?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2012
I am aware that private-vlans are not supported on edge switches like 2960 series - so my question is would it be possibel to ceate private vlans on say just the core switch which would be a 3570 or 4506 that supports private vlans and then just trunk these to the edge like normal vlans?what I need to achive is to have edge port not able to communicate to each other even across switches - which cannot be done using 'protected' port so need the private vlan feature?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
I am aware that private-vlans are not supported on edge switches like 2960 series - so my question is would it be possibel to ceate private vlans on say just the core switch which would be a 3570 or 4506 that supports private vlans and then just trunk these to the edge like normal vlans?
what I need to achive is to have edge port not able to communicate to each other even across switches - which cannot be done using 'protected' port so need the private vlan feature
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2013
I used two sf-300 switch and create 4 vlans and intervlan routing is working fine.
Port 1 - 10 -------------> Vlan 1
Port 2 -20----------------> Vlan 2
Port 3 - 30------------------> Vlan 3
Port 4 - 40--------------------> Vlan 4
giga1 -----------------> connected to router (This router used for intervlan routing).
SF-300 Port 1 is connected to Internet Modem. This modem worked as dhcp server also for vlan 1, my problem is that when vlan 1 is not communicate to vlan2,3,4 and 2,3,4 are not communicating.
How i can communicate vlan 1 to 2,3,4 vlan.
how i can connect the modem in switch? Access port or Trunk port ( Presently available in vlan 1 Access port)Any route i need to make? sf-300 or modem or router?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2011
does the SG300 switches can be used with Microsoft NLB in Multicast mode?I know on traditional Catalyst switches you can statically "map" IP's to mac's and then to multiple ports but this doesn't seem to work correctly on the SG switches - it gives an error about the mac not being not Unicast?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2012
My internet router acts as an IGMP Proxy for the LAN and distributes IPTV there. The router is connected to one of my three SG 300 10 Cisco switches (connected to one another via uplink port). Now I want all switches to send multicast traffic to only the recipients of such traffic (PCs with VLC and Network Media Players) connected to either one of them. How do I have to configure the switches to do so and not flood the LAN with multicast traffic, is it enough to enable IGMP Snooping on each switch?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2012
I have 2 switch groups.
2 SGE2010's with VLAN's defined as 10,20 and 30
Vlan 10 is the management VLAN, and it uplinks to our border router.Vlan 20 is the workstation VLAN, and all workstations point to the switch as their default GW? Vlan 30 is the ip phone VLAN, and all phones use this as their gateway.
I would like to put a LAG between said switches, we have some servers on the ip phone switch that need to be accessed by the workstation clients, and the single 100mb link through the router is probably not going to be enough.As I understand it, because the switches have different networks on them, a simple lag will not work. I did create a lag, and assign ip addresses to each side, however in that mode, it doesn't appear I can block vlan 10 from transiting the LAG, and with out that block I will end up with a logical loop, and spanning-tree will block one of the uplinks, or the LAG itself.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2012
I was looking for configuring QOS for two VLANS i have created. these will be for voice traffic vlan 22 and video traffic vlan23. i also have three other vlans for pc's, wireless devices and our cnc machines. we have 5 switches that are all SG30028P's with a single switch doing the intervlan routing (operating at layer 3). all of the switches are trunked back to the main switch and ive been through the guide written on how to do this on a single switch which i dont think is layer 3.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2012
I'm going to have several SG300-28P switches to setup. I'll need to create multiple vlans for data, voice, and wireless traffic. I have the following questions in setting up this configuration:
VLAN 1 Management
VLAN 100 Data
VLAN 200 Wireless
VLAN 300 Voice
1) For managing the switches via IP, will LAN1 be the default management network? Should I create a seperate VLAN for managing the switches?
2) For uplinking the switches together, I plan to trunk a port to connect the switches together. What's the configuration on the trunk port to forward all vlans from one switch to another?
3) On some ports, I want to configure a trunk for two vlans (Data and Voice) where the phone has a pass through for PC. The phone supports tagging for the PC and the VoIP traffic. For example on port 10, would VLAN 100 and 300 be set to tagged?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2011
I am trying to set up three vlans across two switches. The switches are Cisco SG200 and SG 300 series. There are 20 devices connected to the two switches including a router for Internet. Among these devices are five wireless access points all hardwired to the LAN. If I understand correctly the first thing I have to do is aggregate the two switches. I ran two cat5 cables to ports 1 and 2 of each switch. As I understand it all I need to do is to create SAG with the two ports on each switch. I think I need to use tagging but I don't really understand how to do this. Once I get the trunking set up correctly I want to create one vlan to which all devices will belong for Internet access. The other two would be for data and VoIP. Do I create vlans with the same name on both switches? When I assign the devices (by port) do I need to enable tagging? Which type of port setting should I use? I am assuming that by including the acess points in the vlans will mean that any wireless device connected to them will have acess to the Internet and the devices in the same vlan.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2013
I want to use Multicast TV VLAN with my SG300-10 to join Multicast Groups in different Data VLAN's. It's working fine, but the problem is that it isn't possible to add all the Multicast Groups to the Multicast VLAN because each TV channel use other groups. For me it's only to handle if I can use wildcards to add a specific range of multicast traffic to the Multicast TV VLAN. Is that possible with that Switch?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2012
We're replacing our older catalyst switches with new SG300 family switches and have a Microsoft NLB cluster for some services that run in multicast balancer mode.
We currently do L3 routing to the network with the cluster and have the following IOS configuration line in the specific switch to let users on other subnets to access the services.
arp 10.20.1.226 03bf.0a14.01e2 ARPA
How do we replicate this using the SG300 series in L3 mode? Whenever I try to add a manual ARP entry I get an error message that says that the MAC address is not a valid unicast address?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2011
If there is C6509E as core switches and C3750 Switches running layer 3 at the User dept uplink to the C6509E Switches, what will be the multicast command that should be implemented at both end? CGMP or IGMP or do not need to implement this snooping as well?
Users (IPTV) -> C3750 (Access Switch) -> C6509E (Core Switch) -> C6509E (Server Farm Switch) -> IPTV Servers
Do we need to configure multicast at C3750 Switches (Access Level) at the User dept? Let's say the IPTV Mulitcast is 239.1.1.1. How can we build up this multicast configuration based on this scenario?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2012
At our site we have a 4510 core switch and 3750x switches in our IDFs. The 3750 switches are connected to the core via DOT1Q trunks in a server client setup. We are putting in an Informacast/Berbee server witch will send pages and text to the cisco phones. We also have 1 3750 switch connecting to the core via a layer 3 port channel. If we put the Informacast server on the phones vlan would I just need to enable ip pim sparse-dense mode on that vlan only and enable multicast routing, ip multicast routing?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2012
Why do we need MP-BGP (and not BGP) to exchange multicast prefixes between multicast domains?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2012
I am trying to get WOL working across different VLANS on a SG-300-10 Switch in Layer 3 Mode. To achieve this, I've setup an UDP-Relay (GUI menu IP Configuration) for UDP-Port 7 to 255.255.255.255 (this should flood all interfaces with the paket), however, WOL doesn't work across different VLANS. When I am connected directly to the corresponding VLAN, WOL works fine within the same subnet.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2012
How shall i use different vlans outside another gateway in sg-300 28? Example:
vlan2 192.168.2.0/24 gateway 192.168.2.1 outside router gateway 192.168.2.254
vlan3 192.168.3.0/24 gateway 192.168.3.1 outside router gateway 192.168.3.254
should me doing in sg-300 28?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2012
Trunk from 3500 going into SF300-8 #1 QNQTrunk from SF300-8 #1 going into trunk SF300-8 #2QNQ from SF300-08#2 going into Trunk SF300-24, All Vlans from Network 1 seem to be communicating properly between the 3550 and SF300-24 and is isolated from the Transport Network by QnQ. I am having one problem, I can not ping the SF300-24 or get to the management interface. I am able to access other devices on the SF300-24 Vlan1 from devices on the 3550 Vlan1 and vice versa.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2013
At the moment i have 2 internetconnentions with 2 different modems/routers. The computers are currently direct connected to the router.I'm considering adding a switch in the network and i hope i can make 2 different vlans each for one internet connection. The two networks should not be able to connect eachother.But i dont know what switch i need to do that. Do i need a Sg-200 or a SG-300 switch?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 26, 2012
I have 2 SG300-10 switches, and I need two VLANs, one for internal network and one for WiFi APs.I need ports 1->4 on both switches to be part of 1st VLAN and ports 5->8 on 2nd VLAN; and port 10 uplink to 2nd switch.How I set up the VLANs and interface VLAN mode?
[code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2011
My ISP is providing me with 1 public IP on a /30 network and 14 public IPs on a /28 network. In this example the 10.0.0.1 is the default gw provided by my ISP and 10.0.0.2 is my SF300-08. If I setup my router to route to 10.0.0.2 as the default gw through the interface between the switch and router, can I configure the static routes in the switch to route further to 10.0.0.1?
is it possible to have these 2 networks on different VLANs and configure inter-VLAN routing? I don't want the switch accessible from the 10.0.0.2 IP.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2011
I am having problems accomplishing these tasks with my new SG 200-18.
I have a LinkSys WRT54G2 connected to port 1. I would like ports 2-8 to be in one VLAN with access to the Internet and to be able to share their printers, hard drives, etc. with other computers on ports 2-8. I would like each of ports 9-16 to be on a separate VLAN with access only to the Internet and no other ports on the switch. I would like to be able to manage the switch from any of the ports 2-8.
After I create the VLAN 1009 (see screenshot below), port 9 can browse the Internet and cannot see the other ports on the switch which is correct. However, ports 2-8 can no longer access the switch at 192.168.1.20 in order to manage the switch.
View 10 Replies
View Related
