I have just purchased a SG300-28P switch I am using a GUI to do my config. I cant create VLANs just fine on this but I can not assign IP address to the VLANs.
I just want to have a Data and Voice VLAN on this I am planning on leaving data on VLAn 1 but I can't seem to find an option to assign an IP address to my voice vlan.
For some odd reason I cant access this switch using a console port.
I am trying to assign static ip address on vlan 1 interface , the model no of switch is SG300 & the firmware version is 1.1.2.0 .But whenever I type the IP address & press enter , a question is popped up asking for confirmation (switch0d851f(config-if)#ip address 1.1.1.1 255.0.0.0.
Please ensure that the port through which the device is managed has the proper settings and is a member of the new management interface.Would you like to apply this new configuration? (Y/N)[N] N )
I need to know how to configure each port in switch SG300-10 to vlans, i need to configure one port "trunk" with catalyst switch and assign 4 ports to different vlans. any solution?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm going to have several SG300-28P switches to setup. I'll need to create multiple vlans for data, voice, and wireless traffic. I have the following questions in setting up this configuration:
VLAN 1 Management
VLAN 100 Data
VLAN 200 Wireless
VLAN 300 Voice
1) For managing the switches via IP, will LAN1 be the default management network? Should I create a seperate VLAN for managing the switches?
2) For uplinking the switches together, I plan to trunk a port to connect the switches together. What's the configuration on the trunk port to forward all vlans from one switch to another?
3) On some ports, I want to configure a trunk for two vlans (Data and Voice) where the phone has a pass through for PC. The phone supports tagging for the PC and the VoIP traffic. For example on port 10, would VLAN 100 and 300 be set to tagged?
I have 2 SG300-10 switches, and I need two VLANs, one for internal network and one for WiFi APs.I need ports 1->4 on both switches to be part of 1st VLAN and ports 5->8 on 2nd VLAN; and port 10 uplink to 2nd switch.How I set up the VLANs and interface VLAN mode?
[code]...
i am trying to get a SG300 work as a router between VLAN's?So fare without any lock?Test setup one SG300 switch and 2 PC's ?Ping works from host to VLAN IP's, but not from host A to host B
Here is the host configuration
<TABLE style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; WIDTH: 400px; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid" class=jiveBorder border=1 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 mcestyle="BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; WIDTH: 400px; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid">
[code]...
Here is the switch configuration
SG300 with FW 1.1.2.0 configuration i L3 mode
set system mode router
confip routing (needed on SG300??? - ti is on a 3560 i PacketTracer)
vlan databasevlan 5vlan 6vlan 7
[code]...
I have a SG300-28P that is our Main VLAN Switch. Though the VLANs that I have on it are there mostly because of our Edge Router and our AP541Ns.We have the Following VLANs defined (Subnets Changed to conseal Piblic IPs) [code]
VLAN200 and VLAN201 come into Our Edge Router and out on a Single GE Port via VLAN Tagged to thje SG300.The SG 300 Splits them out to Untagged Ports and they are connected to Two Firewalls, each with a IP in the 200 and 201 Subnets. The AP510 has the VLAN200, VLAN192 and VLA101 tagged Subnets sent to it. The AP521 has three SSID, each associated with a Paticular VLAN.
This all works fine, though there are a few hidden flaws. Since all of the VLANs are present, both Internal and Public IPs, one could craft packets form one network and use the SG300 as its gateway to the other subnet and Gain Access. How can I isolate the Subnets, so that I can still use the SG300 as a Default Gateway for the 10.1.0.0/16 Network Make it so if someone from the 10.1.0.0/16 netwok accesses the 201.201.201.0/24 Subnet it uses the SG300's 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 default router (the Firewall IP) and not the VLAN InterfaceIf somone in the 201, 200, 192 Subnets uses the SG300 as a Gateway and tries to access a 10.1.0.0/16 address it gets blocked.
How to setup 3 SG300-52 (in L2 mode) as per this diagram:Port 1 on all switches should be able to talk to each other and access the blob at the right.The ports 25 on the other hand should only be able to talk among themselves in their own private vlan. They are to carry sensitive traffic. So I created 3 vlans, vlan 78 for ports gi1, gi51 and vlan 10 for port25,49,50 and a dummy vlan: 666 with the intent of segratating vlan 10 from vlan 78. My attempts so far have failed. ports gi49-50 are configured as trunk ports and gi1,gi51 as access ports as the following cli output (excerpts of the startup config):
vlan database
vlan 10,78,666
exit
interface vlan 1
ip address 172.16.10.11 255.255.255.0
[code]....
Ports gi1 can talk to each other and access the blob but ports 25 refuse to talk to each other. But as soon as I remove the access links to the blob they can! Obviously, at that point port gi1 lose access.Is such a topology feasable or even advisable?
I've seen lots of posts from people having problems routing traffic between two vlans with some complicated examples. Any simple step-by-step example for an SG300 switch (in layer 3 mode) to configure two vlans and sending traffic between the two vlans without an external router?
-VLAN1 10.10.10.0
-VLAN2 10.10.20.0
I've tried to do this through the GUI and can't seem to make it work. I'm missing something in the GUI.
I supplied 3 numbers of SG300 series switches for the sole reason to have inter-vlan routing. I created 4 VLANs in the switches and made one switch as Layer 3 switch and other 2 as Layer 2 switch. Inter-Vlan routing is working fine. I am able to ping PCs from different VLANs. But I am not to access shared folders. Customer has installed Window 2003 server installed and it is in VLAN 1. There are some folders created in this server and it is very important for users to have access to the folders.Also, I am not able to access shared folders in other VLANs. I have created a case with Cisco small business and I got a reply saying that the switches will not support shared folder feature, which I think is not real. I am getting a very time to implement this solution in the network. I have a Sonicwall firewall after Core switch which is connected to ISP.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a SG300 Switche working in layer 3 mode.I configured 3 VLANs on the switch, assigned all ports, given IP addresses to VLANs interfaces, etc.Now I want to implement ACL to permit or deny access between vlans and hosts.Can I apply an ACL to a whole VLAN (in or out) like Catalyst models?I mean apply the ACL to the entire vlan or the only way in this model is to implement that ACL port by port?Every time I have a new port configure to work in a Vlan I have to implement the ACL?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI just received a new Cisco SG300-10 and am configuring it in Layer 3 mode. I am trying to setup multiple routed VLANs going back to a FiOS Actiontec router. My configuration is as follows.
Fios Router: 192.168.1.1
Assigning DHCP 192.168.1.2 through 100.
SG300-10 has VLan 1 ip 192.168.1.5 used for Mgmt.
VLAN2 is 10.0.2.1
VLAN3 is 10.0.3.1.
I have a static route set on the fios router for both subnets setup as follows.
Destination 10.0.3.0 Gateway 192.168.1.5 Netmask 255.255.255.0 Metric 1
Destination 10.0.2.0 Gateway 192.168.1.5 Netmask 255.255.255.0 Metric 1
I have a laptop connected to Gi8 on the Cisco (Vlan 3) and statically assigned 10.0.3.3, with a gateway of 10.0.3.1. DNS set to the fios router (192.168.1.1).
Everything pretty much works EXCEPT, I cannot get out to the internet from either vlan. Traffic routes between vlans/and the default subnet on the fios without issue.
When I ping out, DNS resolves, but will not go past the fios router. Am I missing a setting somewhere?
What i am trying to achive is allow only specific mac addresses on switch and deny all others by using MAC ACE. What should i do? First deny any any and then permit or ?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi have a SG300-52 Switch, route mode is enabled, and it is using the latest IOS.I have created 4 Vlans in this switch, till this point its OK, but once i try to give ip addres to the created Vlan either from the GUI or CLI the switch is not responding. i have to go and manually reset the switch using a pin.
View 8 Replies View RelatedIn troubleshooting another issue I set up another SG300 on the same VLAN as my SG300-28P and then setup a Monitor Port on it to see what Broadcasts I was getting.
Low and behold the SG300-28P is sending out quite a few Broadcast Packets. Most of them are the same, ARP Request for its Default Gateway Address. Others are for a few other AD Servers on our network.
Arp Entry Age Out is set to the default of 600000 with "Normal Age Out" selected. Though in a few minutes of logging Packets, there were almost 7,000 broadcasts from it for the its Gateway Address. The Gateway Address that it has is the IP of a Cisco ASA 5510. Is there some TTY on the ARP entry like DNS?
This is the Wireshark Packet. The Frame check sequence is Bad, what can cause that?
No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 1737 67.457763000 Cisco_a9:93:84 Broadcast ARP 64 Who has 10.1.0.3? Tell 10.1.2.3 [ETHERNET FRAME CHECK SEQUENCE INCORRECT]
Frame 1737: 64 bytes on wire (512 bits), 64 bytes captured (512 bits) on interface 0 Interface id: 0 WTAP_ENCAP: 1 Arrival Time: Jan 8, 2013 14:44:06.952611000 Pacific Standard Time [Time shift for this packet: 0.000000000 seconds] Epoch Time: 1357685046.952611000 seconds [Time delta from previous captured frame: 0.000106000 seconds] [Time delta from previous displayed frame: 0.000106000 seconds] [Time since reference or first frame: 67.457763000 seconds] Frame Number: 1737 Frame Length: 64 bytes (512 bits) Capture Length: 64 bytes (512 bits) [Frame is marked: True] [Frame is ignored: False] [Protocols in frame: eth:arp] [Coloring Rule Name: ARP] [Coloring Rule String: arp]Ethernet II, Src: Cisco_a9:93:84
[code]....
These are our first switches and seems like GUI is lot different than the online. Out intervlan routing is o not working. I am absolutely sure that I setup the switch in L3 mode since it allows me to create mutiple interfaces. I am hoping that this GUI issue is related to interVLAN routing.
Below is the blog I started for InterVlan issue [URL]
This is the link for online simulator and what I see in its IP tab. I know this switch is not SG300. [URL]
This is what I see on our switch.
Our switch version
switchd64684#show version
SW version 1.1.0.73 ( date 19-Jun-2011 time 18:10:49 )
Boot version 1.0.0.4 ( date 08-Apr-2010 time 16:37:57 )
HW version V01
1) I have a Cisco SG300-28P. I plan to add a SG300-52. Would it be possible to manage the new switch through the SG300-28P web browser ?
2) There are 2 fans in the POE model SG300-28P. How many fans are they in the non POE switch SG300-52 ?
Can I connect a single Cat5e cable between two SG300-28 and link them? If so what must I configure?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have SG300-28P that I am using as layer-3 switch. Recently I ran in to SG300-52 switch and even though loading same firmware doesn't give me option to do layer-3 switching. For SG-300 I see options in GUI to create vlan interfaces under IP information section, while SG300-52 has IP information option only under the management section.let me know if these are 2 different hardware types and L3 is not possible on SG300-52. If its possible to enable L3 switching on SG300-52?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to assign public IP address as Router's local IP address (RVL200, RVS4000)?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to setup VLAN's in the company I work for and I am almost there but missing the part when the internet works.I have an SG300 as a L3 Router IP 192.168.0.93.I have created VLAN20 and VLAN40 Assigned VLAN20 192.168.2.1 and VLAN40 192.168.4.1
The static routes have been created and a default router going to the Sonicwall firewall at 192.168.0.1.Port 24 is configured as Untagged VLAN1, Untagged VLAN20 and VLAN40 in trunk mode and going to the Sonicwall NSA 2400. [code]
Working to move all 192.168.0.x network off of VLAN1 and move it a management switch.I have DHCP helper on pointing to the DHCP server.Both VLAN's once the DHCP server is configured to Gateway 192.168.0.93 can get an IP from the correct subnet either 192.168.2.x or 192.168.4.x
All PC's are getting a GW IP of 192.168.2.1 pr 192.168.4.1.All test PC's on both VLAN's can ping each other and any server with the correct GW.When I try to ping google.com or open a web page and try google.com it times out.
I was assigned a task to configure an SG300-28P to have 3 different vlans.Now on VLAN1 their will be only one device configured with static IP 192.168.0.230,On the other 2 VLANS there will be a separate router connected on each one of them and will also act as a DHCP server.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have spent several days tearing my hair out trying to properly configure our small business switch (SG300-10p) for voice. The phones are a relatively new addition and will replace old POTS phones.Our network consists of a 1941 ISR router, the SG300-10P switch, a mac server (handing DHCP, DNS, AFP), 4 client desktops and 4 SGA525G2 IP phones. The router, server, desktops and phones all have their own connection to the switch and the second data ports on the back of the IP phones are not used. We do not have any unified comms devices for voice. Our VOIP solution is hosted by a local SIP provider, and each phone independently registers with the provider's SIP proxy over the internet.
Left almost to it’s own devices (or presumably flat, default settings on VLAN 1), this whole setup works just great. We can TFTP files, make and receive calls, and do all the usual XML stuff. Calls are crystal clear. Even the localisation and directory works. However, I’ve been told several times that to ensure good quality on VOIP calls during periods of busy traffic, I should set up some form of QoS. A Voice VLAN on the switch, I was told, is the best way to do this as it automagically gives priority to the whole voice VLAN over the normal data VLAN.
I have followed instructions in numerous manuals, articles and guides, and have managed to create the Voice VLAN, both manually and automatically (I can watch Smartport detect the phones and see the Auto Voice VLAN add the ports to the VLAN as I connect them). The trouble is, as soon as this happens, the phones lose connectivity with the rest of the network, including the DNS server and the router, and therefore the internet, causing them to lose registration with the SIP service.
I tried adding the server and router ports to the Voice VLAN and tweaking every possible combination of tagged, untagged, excluded, trunk, access, general and PVID settings I can think of (by the way, I have no idea what any of those mean). The switch is in Layer 2 mode, but adding the port connected to the router to all the VLANs does not result in internet connectivity to the phones. I have told the phones to tag frames with the VLAN ID and told them not to. I have tried upgrading firmware and I have rebooted the switch so many times I'm tired of those wretched little flashing lights.
Nothing seems to work. And so I am stuck with everything on VLAN 1. My most recent thought is that the 1941 needs to know about the Voice VLAN (I checked CDP and it knows about the switch), but I’m reluctant to start messing with the router config when this is our production network, at least without knowing what I'm doing. I don’t even know if QoS applies when a Voice VLAN is not set up and we're on VLAN 1, some articles say yes, others say no. And when it is set up right, how does that priority transfer to the router? I’ve looked in the router manual and config options and found something called 802.1Q, but I have no idea what it is, how it works or even if it applies to our situation. Can I forgo VLANs altogether and use QoS some other way, perhaps?I have googled enough to cobble together our setup in IOS up until now. Ideally, I would still like to be able to ssh or https into each device (as I do now) for management, and I’ve read about setting up a another VLAN for config, monitoring etc, but I guess that would mean routing between VLANs in Layer 3.
Is it possible to configure both Catalyst WS-C2960-24PC-L and Switch Cisco SG300-28 to work together for VLANs for voice and data ? If yes, can you give me the resources which I can refer to ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've been looking at picking up a 16-24 port gigabit switch that supports trunking, vlans etc. for home use.
I've looked at the Cisco SG2/300's, HP 1810g-24 and the Dell 2816 and 2824 switches, and it seems like the Cisco's are the best buy (layer 3'ish features, same price as the HP) but there isn't much about them.
I'm replacing 2 3COM 4500 Swithes with the SG300-52 Cisco switch. We have 3 VLANs, 10, 20, 100. The switch is set for Layer 3 and I have setup DHCP relay. what settings i should set on the Cisco for the following setups:
3COM Setup
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
[Code].....
We have several of the SG300 Serices switches. We use them to route VLAN traffic to Remote Offices, Internet Connections, and WiFi Access Points.In one remote office we have a SG300-10 setup to route the HQ Network and the remote Office Subnet. The SG300 is Connected to HQ via Fiber and has multiple Tagged VLANs on it. If I do speed tests over the Fiber Link on the Incoming Tagged Netwotk I get Decent performance, 80Mbs. If I switch to a networtk that is not priginating from HQ, and have the SG300-10 route packet, I get dismal performance. 15-20Mbs.
I Fireded up a New SG300-28P FW v1.2.7.76. Added a the HQ VLAN 101 and new VLAN 1025 . Mapped some Tagged and untagged ports for each. Switch was connected to HQ Network as untagged VLAN 101. I put a laptop on an Untagged VLAN 101 port. Ran some tests, cam back with 750-850Mbs. Great. Put the same laptop on a Tagged 101 Port, Configured the NIC for Tagged VLAN 101, Same test, same Speeds, 750-850Mbs.I then Configured laptop for Tagged VLAN 1025. Connected to tagged VLAN 1025 port. Ran speed tests, resuts were 15-20Mbs!
I then Configured laptop for Untagged VLAN 1025. Connected to unagged VLAN 1025 port. Ran speed tests, resuts were 15-20Mbs!It was only the Laptop and the Connection to the HQ net on the SG300-28P. Why is the performance of this unit soooooo poor when it needs to route?Other Switches have FW v1.0.0.27 or FW v1.1.2.0. They have Similar speed issues. All Configured for Layer 3.
does the SG300 switches can be used with Microsoft NLB in Multicast mode?I know on traditional Catalyst switches you can statically "map" IP's to mac's and then to multiple ports but this doesn't seem to work correctly on the SG switches - it gives an error about the mac not being not Unicast?
View 2 Replies View RelatedAny snmpset commands to add, modify and delete vlan table entries on SG300-10 switches? I checked url... however this information is apparently only valid for catalysts. The latest firmware is installed and the provided MIB files are used.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI know that a default gateway is used to log in remotely, but what is the purpose of the IP address on a VLAN?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm using CCP to configure my Cisco 881, I need to assign my IP address range to the WAN interface (176.35.224.112/29), however everytime i enter the IP Address with a /29 subnet mask or indeed one of the usable addresses with a /32 I'm told I need to "Enter a valid IP address".I have also attempted to set the interfaces IP address via IOS directly and was also told the address was incorrect.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 2003 server that is doing something wrong. When I show the mac address table I can see that the server is assigning a bad mac address to several IPS. The server assign a non-existent mac address to some IPS for this reason the server stobut I would like to solve the problem
- I ran my antivirus an no virus was found.
- I updated the network driver.
I have a Compaq Presario 6000. The DHCP server is not getting a valid IP address. How do I troubleshoot?
View 2 Replies View Related