Cisco Switches :: SG300 Unit In Stacking Mode?
Nov 7, 2011So it seems like the SG300 series (have here sg300-52) can be run as standalone unit and also in stacking mode. but i can not find any documentation or howto for this.
View 8 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Switches :: SG300 Stacking And Powered From POE By Upstream Switch?
Sep 11, 2012I discovered on a pair of SG300-28P.
On a second switch (ver 1.2.7.76) when I unplugged the power cord, to my amazement the switch turned right back on (about 1 second later), with the power cord removed. To verify that the power is indeed coming from POE, the upstream switch (ver 1.1.2.0) that is the same model (sg-300-28p), shows all 7 Ethernet ports connecting the two drawing from 2700mW, to 3000mW.
While the second switch is powered from the first over POE, the POE does not work on the second switch to power anything, and the system summary mentions something about "PoE Power Information on Master Unit".
Is this a stacking operation, and is POE on the second switch NOT supposed to work when powered over Ethernet from an upstream switch?
Cisco Switches :: SG500X-58 - Native Stacking Mode?
Mar 15, 2013The switch SG500X-48 has 4 SFP+ ( 10G ) ports - XG1, XG2, XG3/S1, XG4/S2 - and two configuration modes - standalone and "native stacking".
Can I use XG1 and XG2 SFP+ ports to connect servers when "Native stacking" mode is active ?
Cisco Switches :: SG300 Switches Can Be Used With Microsoft NLB In Multicast Mode
Dec 18, 2011does the SG300 switches can be used with Microsoft NLB in Multicast mode?I know on traditional Catalyst switches you can statically "map" IP's to mac's and then to multiple ports but this doesn't seem to work correctly on the SG switches - it gives an error about the mac not being not Unicast?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG300-10 ACL Entry In Layer3 Mode?
Jul 26, 2011I'm setting up two vlans and I would like all of vlan 2 to only have access to the WAN router on vlan1 at 192.168.30.1.
VLAN1 192.168.30.x
VLAN2 192.168.31.x
I've setup the VLANS and static routes and I'm able to access the WAN router at 192.168.30.1 from the 192.168.31.x network and everything is fine.
I'm getting an error setting up the IPv4 based ACL that is designed to allow the 192.168.31.x network access to only the 192.168.30.1 WAN router.
The first rule I setup is to permit source 192.168.31.0 / 0.0.0.255 dest 192.168.30.0/0.0.0.255 to allow all traffic to from the 192.168.31. net to access the 192.168.30.x net. Then I was going to deny the dest of 192.168.30.1-255 but I'm not sure of the wildcard to use for that.
I'm not clear on the wildcards but I'm also getting the following error when I setup the first ACE rule:
"MIB Index is out of range.Index must be bigger then 0 and Existing ifindex.."
I suspect the error is related to how I'm using the wildcards?
Cisco Switches :: Can SG300 Connect With Catalyst Switch On PVST+ Mode
Aug 30, 2011Our customer use catalyst switch that spanning tree be PVST+ mode.I take SG300 connect with this catalyst switch.Does it support ?If it support,how to config on SG 300 ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG300-28P (SRW2024-K9) In L3 Mode - Intermittent Loss Of Speed
Jan 24, 2011Every "once in a while" (about a week with my network load), the SG300 crawls to an almost standstill of all IPv4 activity (haven't got IPv6 enabled here yet, so I can't comment wether this applies to IPv6 as well). It seems pure L2 transmissions is not affected, but L3 definitely is (down to 20mbit as opposed to the 600+ rate I usually get).
Soft-rebooting the switch (via the webgui) useful, and the intervals of the crashes seem related to total bytes transmitted, not time. I have jumbo frames enabled, and disabled flow control on on the switch and all hosts.
Firmware Version is 1.0.0.27, md5 1987292110f5657e74308dde30c03dc4 Boot Version is 1.0.0.4 md5 4c9a0b6a9f1346736646d08ab94ae2ac
Cisco Switches :: SG300 - Setting Management Interface In Layer 3 Mode
Jun 13, 2012How to set the management interface on a SG300 Switch in Layer 3 mode? I've some vlans configured on the switch with interfaces in each of them:
Vlan 100 (10.0.1.254 /24)
Vlan 200 (10.0.2.254 /24)
Vlan 300 (10.0.3.254 /24)
...
Vlan 900 (10.0.9.254 /24)
Now, the management interface is listening on all interfaces (IPs). But I would like to configure the switch to only listen on 10.0.9.254. What I need to configure or whether it is possible?
CIsco Switches :: SGE-2010 How To Wire Switches For Stacking
Dec 13, 2011We had a SGE-2010, just purchased 2 (two) SGE-2010P. I want to stack the switches (all 3) (unless there is a better way). Not sure what is needed hardware wise, and how to physically wire the switches. Had switches years ago (diff brand) that used a special cable that connected the switches. It seems that is not the case here. I have not used fiber in networking before so I am new to that part, I’m willing to learn, just need pointed in the right direction.Can all three switches be stacked, (1) SGE-2010 & (2) SGE-2010P? I THINK I need to use the GBIC port 4 to stack, I understand 1 port is enough if two switches are used, but what about three or more switches.What are the other GBIC ports used for? Will I be better off (can I ) use the GBIC ports LAG (2 ports) to the other switches? Or would regular ports work just as well?
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG300-28 GUI Different Than Online SG300-48 Simulator
Aug 29, 2011These are our first switches and seems like GUI is lot different than the online. Out intervlan routing is o not working. I am absolutely sure that I setup the switch in L3 mode since it allows me to create mutiple interfaces. I am hoping that this GUI issue is related to interVLAN routing.
Below is the blog I started for InterVlan issue [URL]
This is the link for online simulator and what I see in its IP tab. I know this switch is not SG300. [URL]
This is what I see on our switch.
Our switch version
switchd64684#show version
SW version 1.1.0.73 ( date 19-Jun-2011 time 18:10:49 )
Boot version 1.0.0.4 ( date 08-Apr-2010 time 16:37:57 )
HW version V01
Cisco Switches :: SG300-28P And SG300-52 Web Managing - Fans
May 26, 20111) I have a Cisco SG300-28P. I plan to add a SG300-52. Would it be possible to manage the new switch through the SG300-28P web browser ?
2) There are 2 fans in the POE model SG300-28P. How many fans are they in the non POE switch SG300-52 ?
Cisco Switches :: SG300-28 Uplink To Another SG300-28?
Feb 8, 2012Can I connect a single Cat5e cable between two SG300-28 and link them? If so what must I configure?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: Difference Between SG300-28P And SG300-52
Jul 25, 2012I have SG300-28P that I am using as layer-3 switch. Recently I ran in to SG300-52 switch and even though loading same firmware doesn't give me option to do layer-3 switching. For SG-300 I see options in GUI to create vlan interfaces under IP information section, while SG300-52 has IP information option only under the management section.let me know if these are 2 different hardware types and L3 is not possible on SG300-52. If its possible to enable L3 switching on SG300-52?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: Lag Between Stack Unit On Sge2010?
Jun 28, 2012Can I create lag betwen stack unit to increase speed between units ?? stack connection is only 1Gbit on ports 24/48 if posible lag link must be in trunk mode ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: Stacking Switches 2960S
Apr 7, 2012Im trying to Connect a 2960-S Catalyst Switch to a 3560 Catalyst Switch. It worth pointing out im newish to switching although i know some commands and what they do This is my first time connecting 2 switches together.
They are connected via a crossover cable and have green lights flashing on the connected ports When i run "show CDP neighbours it sees the new switch Unable to ping new switch...just timesout Here is the the interface on the 3650
GigabitEthernet0/40 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 001b.532f.8428 (bia 001b.532f.8428)
Description: Uplink to Switch 2
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
[Code]....
Cisco Switches :: SGE2010 Lag Won't Work On Stacked Unit?
Jul 1, 2011We've have a 2 SGE2010-48 port, stacked. 4 LAGS are denifed, two on primary, whitch are working, two on slave unit are NOT working. Devices connected to LAGS are de the same and same configuration (Cisco ASA 5510).
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: Does The SF300 Support Stacking
Jul 20, 2012Does the SF300 support stacking? If it does, which port(s) are the ideal ones?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: Stacking Requirements For SG500-52P
Jun 4, 2013I have a Cisco SG500-52P along with an older SGE-2010P, am I correct that in order to stack they must be the same series?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SGE2010 Stacking Compatibility With SG500
May 29, 2013I am currently running two SGE2010 in stack and planning to purchase new Sg500 .I have two questions :
1. If these two different products can be managed as one stack.
2. Are the SFP (mini-GBIC) connections compatible and if so what accessories or parts do we need to enable them?
Cisco Switches :: SGE2010 Stacking Versus Link Aggregation?
Aug 14, 2011answer regarding stacking the SGE2010 switches versus link aggregation if greater than 1 Gb connectivity is required between individual switches? Currently have several switches in a stack configuration but would like to increase the bandwidth between some or all of the switches. Does stacking support a link aggregation configuration? If so what ports can be used and how should the link aggregation be configured in conjunction with the stacking?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Stacking 2960S Switches Options?
Oct 10, 2012I have 2 Catalyst 2960S (24 ports and 48 ports). Can I stack them using the Uplink connection instead of the stack modules. I know Stack module is the best option but it is kind of expensives (half price of the 24 ports switch) and I only need to stack no more then 2 switches.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: SG500X-24 Stacking - Keeping Connections Active
May 12, 2013I am installing a network that has two SG500X-24 switches as core and several SG300-52 switches as access switches. I've seen in the SG500X-24 datasheet that there is a True Stacking feature. But in the data sheet there are not a lot of details about it. My doubt is the following. If I configure the two SG500X-24 switches as a single switch through stacking them, can I connect one SG300-52 switch to these two SG500X-24 switches through two cables (both configured as a LAG in the SG300-52 and in the SG500X-24 stack, one cable per SG500X-24), the the first cable connected to the first SG500X-24 switch and the second cable connected to the second SG500X-24 switch and keep both connections active?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3750X Setting Up Power Stacking Switches
Dec 27, 2012I'm trying to get some clarity on power stacking 3750X switches. I have a new stack of 6 switches. I know I can only have 4 in a power stack and all 6 in the data stack with a max of 8. I'm trying to find the proper way to connect the power stack cables for the 4 switch power stack.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Stacking 24 And 48 Port 3750X Switches Not Working?
Dec 11, 2012We purchased a number of 3750X 48 and 24 port switches for the College Campus. Am finally getting around to getting them inserted on the network. Working with a WS-3750X-48PF-S and a WS-3750X-24P-L. Have them stacked with the 10Gb uplink on the 48 port switch. Have not been having fun.In the boot sequence, the switches recognize they are stacked, but as soon as they finish boot, I get the message on the 48 port switch: “Stack Port 1 Switch 1 has changed to state down.” Then “Stack Port 2 Switch1 has changed to state down.” Am noticing that I have a message preceding that: “Major version mismatch with stack neighbor.”The 48 port is running c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE3, HBOOT 12.2(53r)SE2.The 24 port is running c3750e-unversalk9-mz.122-55.SE3, HBOOT 12.2(53r)SE2Most of our 3750X and older switches are running 122-55 or 122.58 code. IP base or Universal. There is speculation that the problem is the 24 Port is Lan base, as the part number might indicate. (WS-C3750X-24-P-L.... I think that is the part number) and the 48 is IP base. Both switches are Universal, and my understanding is that they don't care about LAN or IP Base until you enable a function that falls in the IP Base domain. Then I have to call Cisco Licensing.For these switches, LAN Base is fine, based on the boot message, I feel the real problem is 122-55 versus 150-1 in the stack. So.. the question is: Do I downgrade the 48 port to match what we have in our environment, and what is on the 24 port switch. Or... Upgrade the 24 port switch to match the 48 port switch and have an installation that is not consistent with our environment? I do have two more edge closets to install with this purchase of 3750X 48 port switches.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3750X - 48PS Switches Power Stacking
Mar 28, 2012In my office we bought 7 cisco 3750X - 48PS switches. We configured Data Stacking between those switches. We also want to configure Power Stacking between those 7 devices.
I found in the Data Sheet that we can only configure 4 devices in power stacking at a time. If it is like that how to configure the rest of 3 devices. Need configuring power stacking between those devices in a better way..
power stack cable part no we have is
CAB-SPWR-30CM
Cisco Switches :: Replacing 3COM 4500 Switches With SG300-52?
Nov 21, 2011I'm replacing 2 3COM 4500 Swithes with the SG300-52 Cisco switch. We have 3 VLANs, 10, 20, 100. The switch is set for Layer 3 and I have setup DHCP relay. what settings i should set on the Cisco for the following setups:
3COM Setup
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
[Code].....
Cisco Switches :: SG300 Switches Have Poor Performance In Layer 3?
Jan 1, 2013We have several of the SG300 Serices switches. We use them to route VLAN traffic to Remote Offices, Internet Connections, and WiFi Access Points.In one remote office we have a SG300-10 setup to route the HQ Network and the remote Office Subnet. The SG300 is Connected to HQ via Fiber and has multiple Tagged VLANs on it. If I do speed tests over the Fiber Link on the Incoming Tagged Netwotk I get Decent performance, 80Mbs. If I switch to a networtk that is not priginating from HQ, and have the SG300-10 route packet, I get dismal performance. 15-20Mbs.
I Fireded up a New SG300-28P FW v1.2.7.76. Added a the HQ VLAN 101 and new VLAN 1025 . Mapped some Tagged and untagged ports for each. Switch was connected to HQ Network as untagged VLAN 101. I put a laptop on an Untagged VLAN 101 port. Ran some tests, cam back with 750-850Mbs. Great. Put the same laptop on a Tagged 101 Port, Configured the NIC for Tagged VLAN 101, Same test, same Speeds, 750-850Mbs.I then Configured laptop for Tagged VLAN 1025. Connected to tagged VLAN 1025 port. Ran speed tests, resuts were 15-20Mbs!
I then Configured laptop for Untagged VLAN 1025. Connected to unagged VLAN 1025 port. Ran speed tests, resuts were 15-20Mbs!It was only the Laptop and the Connection to the HQ net on the SG300-28P. Why is the performance of this unit soooooo poor when it needs to route?Other Switches have FW v1.0.0.27 or FW v1.1.2.0. They have Similar speed issues. All Configured for Layer 3.
Cisco Switches :: VLAN Management Via SNMP On SG300-10 Switches
Aug 7, 2011Any snmpset commands to add, modify and delete vlan table entries on SG300-10 switches? I checked url... however this information is apparently only valid for catalysts. The latest firmware is installed and the provided MIB files are used.
View 8 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: Multiple VLANS And SG300-28P Switches Setup?
Aug 20, 2012I'm going to have several SG300-28P switches to setup. I'll need to create multiple vlans for data, voice, and wireless traffic. I have the following questions in setting up this configuration:
VLAN 1 Management
VLAN 100 Data
VLAN 200 Wireless
VLAN 300 Voice
1) For managing the switches via IP, will LAN1 be the default management network? Should I create a seperate VLAN for managing the switches?
2) For uplinking the switches together, I plan to trunk a port to connect the switches together. What's the configuration on the trunk port to forward all vlans from one switch to another?
3) On some ports, I want to configure a trunk for two vlans (Data and Voice) where the phone has a pass through for PC. The phone supports tagging for the PC and the VoIP traffic. For example on port 10, would VLAN 100 and 300 be set to tagged?
Cisco Switches :: SG300-52 Multiple Lags Between Switches?
Jan 19, 2012I'm having alot of trouble trying to connect more that one LAG between two SG300-52 switches.Basically i have configured both switches with the same vlans. For 2 of the vlans i would like to connect them together between the two switches using LAG. Switch1 has Vlan 5 (ports 1-12) & Vlan 10 (Ports 25-36) with LAG configured on ports 1-2 and ports 25-26. I have setup the second switch identical to the first. But when i connect the LAG's there is no connectivty. If i disconnect one LAG the other starts working.Can you only have i interconnect LAG between switches?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switches :: How To Configure Two Links Between Switches SG300
Apr 22, 2012I have two SG300 serie switches and two Gigabit connection between them. How do I configured these two links to work toghether like a one 2 Gigabit channel?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Cannot Change SG300-28 To Layer 3 Mode
Jan 31, 2012it says that the cisco sg300-28 managed switch default system mode is Layer 2. but i want to change it to layer 3.
i can't get inside the "Console Interface Main Menu" where the switching from L2 to L3 will be done.
I have done the ff:
1. Upgraded firmware to 1.1.2.0 (latest)
2. Reset the switch to factory defaults.
3. The guide stated that in order to perform telnet to the switch, you need to enable it. So I logged in first in to the web GUI and enable telnet service.
4. I can now start telnet on the switch but I can't see the "Switch main menu".
All I can see are these lines from telnet:
User Name:cisco
Password:******
switchd5928c#
I just want to know how to get into the console interface main menu where these lines should appear so that i can change the system mode:
• System Configuration Menu
• Port Status
• Port Configuration
• System Mode
• Help
• Logout
Cisco Switches :: SG200-18 Switches With LC Single Mode Fiber SFP's
Dec 2, 2012We have a project in which we are using 34 Cisco SG200-18's each with a MGBLX1 (LC Single Mode Fiber) SFP mini-GBIC.All the fiber's come back to one building where we must "bridge" all 34 fiber connections. What hardware should be used to accomplish this? A L2 switch? For example, a 12 port SFP Switch with Fiber SFP's accepting the first 12 fiber connections, then other switch with SFP for the next 12 and so on, until there is a overall capacity of 36 and having patch cables between the 3 switches?
what cisco or non cisco hardware would work with these SF200-18's to accomplish this?