Cisco Switches :: Setting Up IGMP Snooping On SG300
Apr 3, 2012
I have some problems with IGMP snooping feature on the SG300 switch. I want to filter multicast dinamycally with IGMP snooping. To configure our switch I use the web page: - In Multicast I first enable: Bridge Multicast Filtering Status Thzn I enable IGMP snooping ,Then I enable IGMP Snooping on my VLAN During my tests I stream a video (UDP multicast). This stream is present on all the ports of my VLAN with IGMP snooping normally configured. Also, I can't see any entry in the IGMP/MLD IP Multicast Group Table where I should normally see my multicast address.
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 3, 2011
i want to setup IGMP Snooping on the Managed Switch SG 300-10. I do it over the webinterface. Enable Bride Multicast Filtering, Forwarding Method IP Group Address and enable IGMP Snooping v3. In the local Network i stream up to 4 Multicast streams 239.1.1.1-239.1.1.4. The client vor the Multicast are IP setupboxes. If i connect PRTG Network Monitor over SNMP to see the Traffic on the ports i see that all Multicast streams are at every port. What is the false i do? I thought only the multicast stream that is shoosen at the client are forwarding and not all multicast streams. The IP STBs have only a 100Mbit network adapter and i have to muticast over 10 Streams (10Mbit per stream) over the local VLAN. So i think IGMP Snooping is the solution for me. Or need i also a Multicast router?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2011
I have to deploy a full IP-TV solution and the IGMP snooping must be supported on the switch.
I know the the ESW 520 support this protocol but the full IP-TV solution will manage uo to 200 set up boxes, does this switch support all this traffic?
I also have another question, what exactly mean "Combo SFP slots include one 10/100/1000BASE-T Ethernet port and 1 SFP-based Gigabit Ethernet slot for fiber, 1 port active at a time." ? Is when I use 1 port with LX sfp transcever the 3 other uplink ports will be inactive and I can't add another or trunk it with another switch?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2012
A brief background on the setup: I recently switched out my switch. It was a Cisco 3750 10/100 switch and I wanted to upgrade to Gig. The cost of a Gig+POE 3750 is too much to bite so I opted for the SG300. My router is a Cisco 891. Here is the setup:
Cisco 891:
two SVI's: vlan1 and vlan 100
Vlan1 = 10.0.1.1/24
[Code].....
With the 891+3750, I was able to add "ip pim sparse-dense-mode" on all the SVI's and hosts could join any multicast group, irregardless of which vlan the host was a member of.
Now I've changed switches, and I dont get the same love. I have the PIM statement on both SVI's on the 891, but Im unsure of what I need to configure on the SG300. I have enabled "Bridge multicast filtering" + "IGMP snooping". What can I do to get similar functionality using the SG300 + 891? I assume this is my lack of understanding IGMP in general, but was able to get away with it using the PIM statements on the 891+3750 stack.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2011
I useing Cisco861 : C861-universalk9-mz.124-24.T3.bin on my Cisco861 the command "ip pim dense-mode","ip igmp static-group "command does not exist,
router(config)# ip p?
port-map prefix-list
router(config)#
[Code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2012
I have a network which is based upon a 4507 Core/Dist switch, with 1G fibre to a bunch of radially connected 2960 Access switches. It all works fine and as expected for data and telephony.I have been tasked with setting up one of the VLANs to support multicast, so a bunch of video streams will be injected at the 4507, and will be delivered to client PCs connected to the 2960 switches.The 4507 is running with SVIs to some VLANs, but the VLAN that will have the Multicast on it is isolated, with no SVI.I could change this if required,I need to run IGMP snooping, and probably deploy CGMP to take advantage of the Cisco-proprietary functionaity.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2012
how to configure igmp snooping on a 3560.
I have a pure L2 switching network and 2 hosts on the same vlan that want to communicate a protocol between each other using multicast packets.
I wanted to configure ip snooping only on this vlan and create a multicast group limited to only these 2 host ir order to make sure that the multicast traffic is only between both of them.
Since both are sender and receiver I´m not quite sure on how to configure this. In theory I also need to set an IP Multicast Address on the switch to where the hosts will send their multicast packets.
This is basically the network:
HOST_A---|SWITCH_A|==|SWITCH_B|---HOST_B
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2012
In the following topology
R1(f0/0)------------(f0/1)SW1(f0/2)------------R2
R1 is configured as host (no ip routing) with ip igmp join 239.10.10.10 on fa0/0 and R2 with ip pim sparse-mode on f0/0. SW1 is a Catalyst 3560 running IOS 12.2(25)SEE4 working at Layer 2 only in this topology (VLAN 1).
I configured SW1 for igmp snooping:
ip igmp snooping
ip igmp snooping vlan 1
Basically, I can see 'snooped' muticast group (via IGMP reports sent by R1)
SW1#sh ip igmp snooping group
Vlan Group Type Version Port List
----------------------------------------------------------------
1 224.0.1.40 igmp v2 Fa0/2
1 239.10.10.10 igmp v2 Fa0/1, Fa0/2
SW1#
SW1#
SW1#
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2011
Is the E4200 able to deal with IGMP snooping (v2/v3)?I would like to replace a motorola/netopia vdsl-router which handles internet tv-traffic.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2011
Our switch model is "Cisco Catalyst Blade Switch 3020 for HP"We are building HA (High Availability) Databases infrastructure.Currently, there are two nodes(hosts- servers) and two above switch for HA.Oracle said we need to turn off the IGMP Snooping in order to use the multicasting for their interconnect communication.So my question is: Is there any way to use Multicasting without turning off IGMP Snooping on Switch side?If 'yes', how can we configure the switch for Multicasting ?Oracle uses 230.0.1.0 & 224.0.0.251 IPs with 42000 range port for Multicasting communication.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2011
IGMP Snooping configuration for Multicasting on Cisco Catalyst 3020 Our switch model is "Cisco Catalyst Blade Switch 3020 for HP" We are building HA (High Availability) Databases infrastructure.Currently, there are two nodes(hosts- servers) and two above switch for HA.Oracle said we need to turn off the IGMP Snooping in order to use the multicasting for their interconnect communication. Is there any way to use Multicasting without turning off IGMP Snooping on Switch side?, If 'yes', how can we configure the switch for Multicasting ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2011
IGMP Snooping configuration for Multicasting on Cisco Catalyst 3020
Our switch model is "Cisco Catalyst Blade Switch 3020 for HP" We are building HA (High Availability) Databases infrastructure. Currently, there are two nodes(hosts- servers) and two above switch for HA.
Oracle said we need to turn off the IGMP Snooping in order to use the multicasting for their interconnect communication. So my question is:
Q1> Is there any way to use Multicasting without turning off IGMP Snooping on Switch side?
Q2> If 'yes', how can we configure the switch for Multicasting ?
Oracle uses 230.0.1.0 & 224.0.0.251 IPs with 42000 range port for Multicasting communication.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2012
I've got a pair of Nexus 7010's running vPC. I am having a Multicast issue with a cluster of Linux servers that need to talk Multicast for cluster/high-availability operation. All the servers need to talk to a single multicast address and I am having trouble getting them to communicate. I believe I need to enable IP IGMP Snooping Querier on the N7K's and it needs to be enabled on the VLAN where the servers reside. How to enable IP IGMP Snooping Querier on a VLAN ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2012
We have a 3750 acting as the core. By default IGMP snooping is enabled on cisco 3750 from the documents.but, when we see the ip mroute table on the switch, it doesnt show any output.
View 40 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2011
Our switch model is "Cisco Catalyst Blade Switch 3020 for HP" We are building HA (High Availability) Databases infrastructure.Currently, there are two nodes(hosts- servers) and two above switch for HA.
Oracle said we need to turn off the IGMP Snooping in order to use the multicasting for their interconnect communication.So my question is:
Q1> Is there any way to use Multicasting without turning off IGMP Snooping on Switch side?
Q2> If 'yes', how can we configure the switch for Multicasting ?
Oracle uses 230.0.1.0 & 224.0.0.251 IPs with 42000 range port for Multicasting communication.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2012
I've been looking into IGMP snooping and have read that a L2 switch will forward multicast traffic to all ports connected to an interested receiver AND all mrouter ports. In a L2 'V' topology this results in all multicast traffic routed onto a VLAN being forwarded to the 2nd distribution switch. My question is how should a 6500 Sup720 deal with this unwanted multicast traffic? Both a Local SPAN of the RP and a Netdr capture suggest that this traffic is punted to the RP and ultimately dropped. Is this expected behavior or should the traffic be dropped in H/W?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2013
How can I set the SSL certificate for the management interface of an SG300? I don't seem to find the configuration option in the web gui?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2013
How to setup 3 SG300-52 (in L2 mode) as per this diagram:Port 1 on all switches should be able to talk to each other and access the blob at the right.The ports 25 on the other hand should only be able to talk among themselves in their own private vlan. They are to carry sensitive traffic. So I created 3 vlans, vlan 78 for ports gi1, gi51 and vlan 10 for port25,49,50 and a dummy vlan: 666 with the intent of segratating vlan 10 from vlan 78. My attempts so far have failed. ports gi49-50 are configured as trunk ports and gi1,gi51 as access ports as the following cli output (excerpts of the startup config):
vlan database
vlan 10,78,666
exit
interface vlan 1
ip address 172.16.10.11 255.255.255.0
[code]....
Ports gi1 can talk to each other and access the blob but ports 25 refuse to talk to each other. But as soon as I remove the access links to the blob they can! Obviously, at that point port gi1 lose access.Is such a topology feasable or even advisable?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2012
We're setting up a Citrix Cloudstack/XenServer environment and having a heck of a time getting VLAN communication to work with the Cisco SG300-28 switches we've got. We have 4 hosts that are running physically connected to 2 SG300-28 switches.The Guest Network NICS are running on XenServer with a VLAN configuration. As you'll see below our problem lies in that the vm on Host1 (10.1.1.254) cannot communicate to the vm on Host2 (10.1.1.5).Our SG300-28 is currently in L2 mode with Trunked ports for the NICS. It's allowed the VLAN 133 as tagged. Here's the guest networking:here's how our SG300-28 are configured for VLAN traffic GE1,2,13,14 are the connected ports with VLAN133 being one of the tagged VLANS
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2012
How to set the management interface on a SG300 Switch in Layer 3 mode? I've some vlans configured on the switch with interfaces in each of them:
Vlan 100 (10.0.1.254 /24)
Vlan 200 (10.0.2.254 /24)
Vlan 300 (10.0.3.254 /24)
...
Vlan 900 (10.0.9.254 /24)
Now, the management interface is listening on all interfaces (IPs). But I would like to configure the switch to only listen on 10.0.9.254. What I need to configure or whether it is possible?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2011
These are our first switches and seems like GUI is lot different than the online. Out intervlan routing is o not working. I am absolutely sure that I setup the switch in L3 mode since it allows me to create mutiple interfaces. I am hoping that this GUI issue is related to interVLAN routing.
Below is the blog I started for InterVlan issue [URL]
This is the link for online simulator and what I see in its IP tab. I know this switch is not SG300. [URL]
This is what I see on our switch.
Our switch version
switchd64684#show version
SW version 1.1.0.73 ( date 19-Jun-2011 time 18:10:49 )
Boot version 1.0.0.4 ( date 08-Apr-2010 time 16:37:57 )
HW version V01
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2011
1) I have a Cisco SG300-28P. I plan to add a SG300-52. Would it be possible to manage the new switch through the SG300-28P web browser ?
2) There are 2 fans in the POE model SG300-28P. How many fans are they in the non POE switch SG300-52 ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2012
Can I connect a single Cat5e cable between two SG300-28 and link them? If so what must I configure?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2012
I have SG300-28P that I am using as layer-3 switch. Recently I ran in to SG300-52 switch and even though loading same firmware doesn't give me option to do layer-3 switching. For SG-300 I see options in GUI to create vlan interfaces under IP information section, while SG300-52 has IP information option only under the management section.let me know if these are 2 different hardware types and L3 is not possible on SG300-52. If its possible to enable L3 switching on SG300-52?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
I have an issue with SRW2024P-K9-BR (SG300). Datasheet and configuration guide show me that is possible configure DHCP snooping in this switches, but web interface and console don't appear related menus/commands.
I'm using firmware version 1.1.2.0 and didn't found anything about this here.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2011
I have a 2x Cisco 3750G switches (Stacked) that are part of an IP Video Surveillance System .All network is set to 1 VLAN (VLAN 1 default).The Cisco SWs ( Core ) are configured with IGMP Querier + Snooping .Connected to the Cisco SWs are 4 Fiber Rings(Loops) for redundancy . RSTP and IGMP Snooping are enabled on all the network SWs .Network Architecture Figure :
When all Fiber Rings (Loops ) are connected , the Cisco and Ring SWs spanning-tree tables show the blocked and forwarding ports properly .I am able to connect all my IP Cams + Encoders to the Ring SWs and connect my Servers + WorkStations to the Cisco SWs to record and view the multicast ip streams .All streams from Rings 1 ,3 and 4 are getting normally to the Servers + WorkStations through multicast ( IGMP Snooping are filled correctly on the Cisco and non-Cisco SWs ) . All multicast streams are joined normally except for Ring 2 .The Multicast streams passing through Ring 2 will operate normally for around 2 hours then after that the Fiber SWs begin to flood their multicast traffic causing the cams on the same switch to drop off the network .
I checked the Configuration of all the SWs on Ring 2 but all are are the same .
What is weird is that I have to set all the streams to unicast to stop the flooding just on Ring 2 (All other rings are not affected ) then after some time if I enabled a video multicast stream on one of the SWs of the Ring it will be streamed properly to the Servers + WorkStations ( All IGMP tables along the way will be filled properly ) then again after 2 hours or so , the flooding will start again suddenly and all IGMP table entries for the SW on Ring2 will be empty . No problem occurs on the other Rings which have more multicast streams .
View 0 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2013
I have a problem with DHCP. I have two 2960 connected with a port channel on ports 47 and 48 as trunk with native vlan 10. I only have this one vlan. In port 1 of sw 1, I have a C800 as DHCP server.
I have an AP autonomous with single ssid on vlan 10. When I connect the AP to sw1, I receive dhcp with no problems.When I connect the AP to sw 2, I’m not getting IP by DHCP.I have DHCP snooping working on vlan 10 on both devices.
The ports where I connect the AP are access ports on vlan 10 config as trusted.The trunk ports are also configured as trusted.The port 1 of ws 1 that goes to the C800 is also configured as trusted.
figure out why I’m not getting IP by DHCP when I connect the AP to the SW 2.The only I notice is that when I connect the AP to sw 2, I get on SW 1 the message of packet drop by option 82, but even after configuring ip dhcp snooping information option allow-untrusted on both switches, the problem persists.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2012
I need to apply DHCP snooping on 4500 series switches working as L2 in my Network. We have external DHCL Server in another location connected with 6500 series switch.
Running EIGRP Configured Voice & Data Vlan both
DHCP Server -------- 6509 switch<----------------------------------->6509 Switch -------- 4500 switch ----------------------------------------------------------Ip Phones.
(ving Redundant) (ving Redundant)
I need to know whether the configuration which I mentioned in scenario is enough for apply DHCP snooping in my network.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2011
I'm replacing 2 3COM 4500 Swithes with the SG300-52 Cisco switch. We have 3 VLANs, 10, 20, 100. The switch is set for Layer 3 and I have setup DHCP relay. what settings i should set on the Cisco for the following setups:
3COM Setup
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 1, 2013
We have several of the SG300 Serices switches. We use them to route VLAN traffic to Remote Offices, Internet Connections, and WiFi Access Points.In one remote office we have a SG300-10 setup to route the HQ Network and the remote Office Subnet. The SG300 is Connected to HQ via Fiber and has multiple Tagged VLANs on it. If I do speed tests over the Fiber Link on the Incoming Tagged Netwotk I get Decent performance, 80Mbs. If I switch to a networtk that is not priginating from HQ, and have the SG300-10 route packet, I get dismal performance. 15-20Mbs.
I Fireded up a New SG300-28P FW v1.2.7.76. Added a the HQ VLAN 101 and new VLAN 1025 . Mapped some Tagged and untagged ports for each. Switch was connected to HQ Network as untagged VLAN 101. I put a laptop on an Untagged VLAN 101 port. Ran some tests, cam back with 750-850Mbs. Great. Put the same laptop on a Tagged 101 Port, Configured the NIC for Tagged VLAN 101, Same test, same Speeds, 750-850Mbs.I then Configured laptop for Tagged VLAN 1025. Connected to tagged VLAN 1025 port. Ran speed tests, resuts were 15-20Mbs!
I then Configured laptop for Untagged VLAN 1025. Connected to unagged VLAN 1025 port. Ran speed tests, resuts were 15-20Mbs!It was only the Laptop and the Connection to the HQ net on the SG300-28P. Why is the performance of this unit soooooo poor when it needs to route?Other Switches have FW v1.0.0.27 or FW v1.1.2.0. They have Similar speed issues. All Configured for Layer 3.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2011
does the SG300 switches can be used with Microsoft NLB in Multicast mode?I know on traditional Catalyst switches you can statically "map" IP's to mac's and then to multiple ports but this doesn't seem to work correctly on the SG switches - it gives an error about the mac not being not Unicast?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2011
Any snmpset commands to add, modify and delete vlan table entries on SG300-10 switches? I checked url... however this information is apparently only valid for catalysts. The latest firmware is installed and the provided MIB files are used.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2012
I'm going to have several SG300-28P switches to setup. I'll need to create multiple vlans for data, voice, and wireless traffic. I have the following questions in setting up this configuration:
VLAN 1 Management
VLAN 100 Data
VLAN 200 Wireless
VLAN 300 Voice
1) For managing the switches via IP, will LAN1 be the default management network? Should I create a seperate VLAN for managing the switches?
2) For uplinking the switches together, I plan to trunk a port to connect the switches together. What's the configuration on the trunk port to forward all vlans from one switch to another?
3) On some ports, I want to configure a trunk for two vlans (Data and Voice) where the phone has a pass through for PC. The phone supports tagging for the PC and the VoIP traffic. For example on port 10, would VLAN 100 and 300 be set to tagged?
View 3 Replies
View Related
