Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 / IGMP Snooping - All Mcast Traffic Forwarded To Mrouter Ports?

Mar 22, 2012

I've been looking into IGMP snooping and have read that a L2 switch will forward multicast traffic to all ports connected to an interested receiver AND all mrouter ports. In a L2 'V' topology this results in all multicast traffic routed onto a VLAN being forwarded to the 2nd distribution switch. My question is how should a 6500 Sup720 deal with this unwanted multicast traffic? Both a Local SPAN of the RP and a Netdr capture suggest that this traffic is punted to the RP and ultimately dropped. Is this expected behavior or should the traffic be dropped in H/W?

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 861 Do Not Use IGMP Snooping?

Nov 21, 2011

I useing Cisco861  : C861-universalk9-mz.124-24.T3.bin on my Cisco861 the command "ip pim dense-mode","ip igmp static-group "command does not exist,
 
router(config)# ip p?
port-map    prefix-list
router(config)#

[Code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IGMP Snooping On 3560

Nov 28, 2012

how to configure igmp snooping on a 3560.
 
I have a pure L2 switching network and 2 hosts on the same vlan that want to communicate a protocol between each other using multicast packets.
 
I wanted to configure ip snooping only on this vlan and create a multicast group limited to only these 2 host ir order to make sure that the multicast traffic is only between both of them.
 
Since both are sender and receiver I´m not quite sure on how to configure this. In theory I also need to set an IP Multicast Address on the switch to where the hosts will send their multicast packets.
 
This is basically the network:
 
HOST_A---|SWITCH_A|==|SWITCH_B|---HOST_B

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IGMP Snooping On The Cat3560?

Oct 10, 2012

In the following topology
 
R1(f0/0)------------(f0/1)SW1(f0/2)------------R2
  
R1 is configured as host (no ip routing) with ip igmp join 239.10.10.10 on fa0/0 and R2 with ip pim sparse-mode on f0/0. SW1 is a Catalyst 3560 running IOS 12.2(25)SEE4 working at Layer 2 only in this topology (VLAN 1).
 
I configured SW1 for igmp snooping:
 
ip igmp snooping
ip igmp snooping vlan 1
  
Basically, I can see 'snooped' muticast group (via IGMP reports sent by R1)
 
SW1#sh ip igmp snooping group
Vlan      Group             Type        Version     Port List
----------------------------------------------------------------
1         224.0.1.40        igmp        v2          Fa0/2
1         239.10.10.10      igmp        v2          Fa0/1, Fa0/2
SW1#
SW1#
SW1#

[code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7010 - IP IGMP Snooping Querier

Sep 23, 2012

I've got a pair of Nexus 7010's running vPC. I am having a Multicast issue with a cluster of Linux servers that need to talk Multicast for cluster/high-availability operation. All the servers need to talk to a single multicast address and I am having trouble getting them to communicate. I believe I need to enable IP IGMP Snooping Querier on the N7K's and it needs to be enabled on the VLAN where the servers reside. How to enable IP IGMP Snooping Querier on a VLAN ?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Default IGMP Snooping Is Enabled On 3750 From Documents

Nov 14, 2012

We have a 3750 acting as the core. By default IGMP snooping is enabled on cisco 3750 from the documents.but, when we see the ip mroute table on the switch, it doesnt show any output.

View 40 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IGMP Snooping Configuration For Multicasting On Catalyst 3020

Nov 24, 2011

Our switch model is "Cisco Catalyst Blade Switch 3020 for HP" We are building HA (High Availability) Databases infrastructure.Currently, there are two nodes(hosts- servers) and two above switch for HA.
 
Oracle said we need to turn off the IGMP Snooping in order to use the multicasting for their interconnect communication.So my question is:
 
Q1> Is there any way to use Multicasting without turning off IGMP Snooping on Switch side?
 
Q2> If 'yes', how can we configure the switch for Multicasting ?
 
Oracle uses 230.0.1.0 & 224.0.0.251 IPs with 42000 range port for Multicasting communication.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IGMP On 6500 Versus 4500

Mar 11, 2012

I encountered a problem migrating configuration from Cisco 4500 with IOS 12.2(53)SG4 to Cisco 6500-VSS with IOS 12.2(33)SXI7.
 
With 4500, we had  2 servers with JBoss running multicast to build up the cluster. They used 239.X.X.X multicast IP. There was no need to configure "ip igmp snooping vlan XX static XXXX.XXXX.XXXX interface X" neither static arp entry.
 
When we migrated to 6500 in VSS, we had to do:
 
mac-address-table static XXXX.XXXX.XXXX vlan XX interface X disable-snooping
 
With this command, the JBoss cluster worked well. The question is, ¿Is there any difference regarding IGMP in 4500 versus 6500?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: DHCP Request Not Being Forwarded By Helper Address Same VRF 6500?

Feb 22, 2013

Version 12.2(33)SXI
 int vlan 1
description client vlan
ip vrf forwarding A
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
standby 129 ip 10.1.1.2
standby 129 timers 1 4
standby 129 priority 105
standby 129 preempt
ip helper-address 10.1.2.20

[code]....
 
dhcp requests are not making it to the dhcp server SAME VRF (ip helper-addres is not doing anything.....)extended vrf traceroutes on udp 67 sourced from vlan2 are fine
 
I am expecting udp unicast packets on port 67 "giaddr" relay packets on the DHCP server generated and sourced by the relay on Vlan1
 
eg. Mar  1 01:59:06.731: DHCPD: setting giaddr to 10.1.1.1
 
This exact setup works in our preprod environment with the same code.Only difference is we run Distributed etherchannel on the 6500's where this doesnt work.
 
Wireshark on the client I can see the requests being sent Going to check it with debug ip dhcp server to check the relay logs out of production hours.
 
I have seen so many people say it IS and ISN'T supported on this version of the code.e.g. [URL]
 
I am aware the helper-adddress should inherit the vrf of the interface ip helper-address vrf command is not supported.The fact it works in the PP environment.... could this be due to the Distributed EtherChanel difference? or just some bug....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 IP DHCP Snooping Over L3 Links

Apr 9, 2012

I am working in a environment that is classed as collapssed Layer 3 environment.  We have a core 6500 with routed links to 3560's which are access switches.
 
We have layer 3 vlans on the access switches, one for data one for voice.On the layer 3 vlans we have ip helper addresses that are used for DHCP.  The DHCP servers are located on the 6500.
 
I recently had a incident where someone plugged a netgear router into a desk point because they thought they could use it for a switch.  This router then started to dish out IP addresses to people in the morning for those who came in and docked their laptops.  99% of people weren't affected because they have desktop PC's are their leases hadn't expired.
 
Now we have bpduguard, bpdufilter to prevent people from plugging in switches that send out BPDU's.  However this doesn't prevent the above senario where someone plugs a router or a 'dumb' switch that doesn't send BPDU's.Because of the above senario I started looking at DHCP Snooping, but I am unsure on a couple of things.
 
With the topology of our network I understand that I don't need to configure IP DHCP Snooping Trust on the L3 uplinks to our core switch.  From what I understand I just need to enable IP DHCP Snooping globaly and then on the VLAN's on the access switch (because of the L3 topology VLAN's are local to the access switches).  Only if I had L2 uplinks to the core would I need to configure IP DHCP Snooping Trust on the trunk links.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Multicast Traffic Not Forwarded On Catalyst 6506 VSS Supervisor

Nov 30, 2009

I have two Catalyst 6506 in VSS mode with VS-S720-10G running 12.2(33)SXI1 IP SERVICES.I have two firewalls that communicate on to the other through a dedicated VLAN created on Catalyst 6506.
 
One firewall is able to ping the other one on this dedicated VLAN but if I send multicast traffic from firewall-1 I didn't receive it on firewall-2.I found a bug related to multicast issues on Cisco WS-C6509-E with VS-S720-10G. The bug ID is CSCtc59038.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: ESW 520 IGMP Snooping?

Sep 25, 2011

I have to deploy a full IP-TV solution and the IGMP snooping must be supported on the switch.

I know the the ESW 520 support this protocol but the full IP-TV solution will manage uo to 200 set up boxes, does this switch support all this traffic?

I also have another question, what exactly mean "Combo SFP slots include one 10/100/1000BASE-T Ethernet port and 1 SFP-based Gigabit Ethernet slot for fiber, 1 port active at a time." ? Is when I use 1 port with LX sfp transcever the 3 other uplink ports will be inactive and I can't add another or trunk it with another switch?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: Setting Up IGMP Snooping On SG 300-10

Oct 3, 2011

i want to setup IGMP Snooping on the Managed Switch SG 300-10. I do it over the webinterface. Enable Bride Multicast Filtering, Forwarding Method IP Group Address and enable IGMP Snooping v3. In the local Network i stream up to 4 Multicast streams 239.1.1.1-239.1.1.4. The client vor the Multicast are IP setupboxes. If i connect PRTG Network Monitor over SNMP to see the Traffic on the ports i see that all Multicast streams are at every port. What is the false i do? I thought only the multicast stream that is shoosen at the client are forwarding and not all multicast streams. The IP STBs have only a 100Mbit network adapter and i have to muticast over 10 Streams (10Mbit per stream) over the local VLAN. So i think IGMP Snooping is the solution for me. Or need i also a Multicast router?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: SRP527W VPN For MAC To Run IGMP Snooping

Sep 12, 2012

I have a network which is based upon a 4507 Core/Dist switch, with 1G fibre to a bunch of radially connected 2960 Access switches. It all works fine and as expected for data and telephony.I have been tasked with setting up one of the VLANs to support multicast, so a bunch of video streams will be injected at the 4507, and will be delivered to client PCs connected to the 2960 switches.The 4507 is running with SVIs to some VLANs, but the VLAN that will have the Multicast on it is isolated, with no SVI.I could change this if required,I need to run IGMP snooping, and probably deploy CGMP to take advantage of the Cisco-proprietary functionaity.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: Setting Up IGMP Snooping On SG300

Apr 3, 2012

I have some problems with IGMP snooping feature on the SG300 switch. I want to filter multicast dinamycally with IGMP snooping. To configure our switch I use the web page: - In Multicast I first enable: Bridge Multicast  Filtering Status Thzn I enable IGMP snooping ,Then I enable IGMP Snooping on my VLAN During my tests I stream a video (UDP multicast). This stream is present on all the ports of my VLAN with IGMP snooping normally configured. Also, I can't see any entry in the IGMP/MLD IP Multicast Group  Table where I should normally see my multicast address.

View 4 Replies View Related

Linksys Wireless Router :: E4200 And IGMP Snooping?

Jul 20, 2011

Is the E4200 able to deal with IGMP snooping (v2/v3)?I would like to replace a motorola/netopia vdsl-router which handles internet tv-traffic.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: IGMP Snooping Configuration For Multicasting On Catalyst 3020

Nov 24, 2011

Our switch model is "Cisco Catalyst Blade Switch 3020 for HP"We are building HA (High Availability) Databases infrastructure.Currently, there are two nodes(hosts- servers) and two above switch for HA.Oracle said we need to turn off the IGMP Snooping in order to use the multicasting for their interconnect communication.So my question is: Is there any way to use Multicasting without turning off IGMP Snooping on Switch side?If 'yes', how can we configure the switch for Multicasting ?Oracle uses 230.0.1.0 & 224.0.0.251 IPs with 42000 range port for Multicasting communication.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Application :: IGMP Snooping Configuration For Multicasting On Catalyst 3020

Nov 24, 2011

IGMP Snooping configuration for Multicasting on Cisco Catalyst 3020 Our switch model is "Cisco Catalyst Blade Switch 3020 for HP" We are building HA (High Availability) Databases infrastructure.Currently, there are two nodes(hosts- servers) and two above switch for HA.Oracle said we need to turn off the IGMP Snooping in order to use the multicasting for their interconnect communication. Is there any way to use Multicasting without turning off IGMP Snooping on Switch side?, If 'yes', how can we configure the switch for Multicasting ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: IGMP Snooping Configuration For Multicasting On Catalyst 3020

Nov 24, 2011

IGMP Snooping configuration for Multicasting on Cisco Catalyst 3020 
 
Our switch model is "Cisco Catalyst Blade Switch 3020 for HP" We are building HA (High Availability) Databases infrastructure. Currently, there are two nodes(hosts- servers) and two above switch for HA.
 
Oracle said we need to turn off the IGMP Snooping in order to use the multicasting for their interconnect communication. So my question is:
 
Q1> Is there any way to use Multicasting without turning off IGMP Snooping on Switch side?
 
Q2> If 'yes', how can we configure the switch for Multicasting ?
 
Oracle uses 230.0.1.0 & 224.0.0.251 IPs with 42000 range port for Multicasting communication.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Spanned Ports On 6500?

Oct 8, 2012

I had a question on spanned ports - if i was to add another additional port with the command:
 
monitor session 10 destination interface Fa2/22
 
will this take out the existing monitoring configuration below? Will I have to add the whole line in including the interface - will this cause any disruption to existing traffic being spanned to those ports?
 
monitor session 10 source interface Fa2/3 - 5 , Fa2/8
monitor session 10 destination interface Fa2/2 , Fa2/33
 #show mon
Session 10

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Shutdown Ports Not In Use For A While With EEM Scripts

Jun 14, 2012

I have used the two sl and tm scripts that was on the previous discussion but with no luck. I'm currently using IOS version 15.how I can get this work on my c3750 and 6500.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - Shutdown Ports Not In Use For A While With Scripts

Jun 14, 2012

I have used the two sl and tm scripts that was on the previous discussion but with no luck. I'm currently using IOS version 15. how I can get this work on my c3750 and 6500.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Remove Configurations From Ports (GigE Or Fa) In 6500?

Jul 17, 2012

what is the best way to remove configs from ports (GigE or Fa) in a 6500 that we aren't using anymore (i.e. best way to return a port to default).  Remove each line one at a time or is there a command to default a port?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 / How To Filter IPX Traffic

Feb 23, 2013

We have a lot of IPX traffic flowing through a switched network and we are being asked to filter it from a network standpoint. At one point they were using IPX in their network, but no longer need to, so they still have a lot of machines spewing out IPX traffic. We have removed the IPX routing commands from our distribution switches, (Cisco 6500), but after running a short 10 minute Wireshark capture I'm still getting a good bit of IPX traffic from a lot of different devices.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Does 6500 With SUP-720 Support Nat On Multicast Traffic

Jan 16, 2012

does 6500 with SUP-720 support nat on multicast traffic?
 
i know it support Multicast service reflection based on SXI4 which can facilitate me on destination address nat.
 
but if i need only source nat, does the defualt NAT feature supported on multicast traffic ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - Route-map Not Used / ACL Not Matching Traffic

Jan 12, 2012

I'm performing tests with following desired scenario: We have several remote offices, connected to our HQ via MPLS. In these remote offices, we have several vlan's. Each vlan has it's own ip-range. The MPLS cloud is routed, so we cannot switch our HQ vlan's to the remote offices. In this case, the client pc is in a guest vlan which allows him internet access. The uplink for this internet access is hosted in our HQ datacenter.
 
basic scheme:
client pc --> MPLS cloud (managed by ISP) --> 6500 switch LAN --> Checkpoint Firewall --> 6500 switch DMZ --> ASA Firewall
 
My test scheme:
Client pc is in a subnet A (guest vlan range office).
We receive this traffic on our first LAN 6500.

[Code].....

View 29 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 How To Remove Ports From Config For Non-existent Line Card

Aug 6, 2012

On a number of 6500 chassis it appears that linecard 3 did exist at somepoint, but was removed.Problem is that when issuing the 'show int desc'  or  'show ip int brie'  the ports for the still appear, and indeed same with 'show run'  and  'show conf'.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Location Of FIB And Adjacency Table In Both 6500 Series And Fixed Ports Switches

Apr 28, 2012

I am little confused about the location of FIB table and adjacency table in both cisco 6500 series and fixed ports switches .In case of 6500 series switches
 
"Central CEF mode:The CEF FIB and adjacency tables reside on the route processor,and the route processor performs the express forwarding. Use this CEF mode when line cards are not available for CEF switching, or when features are not compatible with distributed CEF."
 
If line cards do no support CEF, then FIB and adjacency tables are built and are located on route processor( control plane ). Data plane operations are implemented in software and route processor performs those operations.

Some Cisco switches actually use different hardware to control the different planes. For example, the Cisco Catalyst 6500 is a modular switch that uses the Multilayer Switch.Feature Card (MSFC) for control-plane operations, and the supervisor Policy Feature Card (PFC) for the data-plane operations.
 
Supervisor module has  has MSFC and PFC. MSFC implements control plane operation where as PFC implements data plane operation.But the first paragraph says in Central cef mode, both data plane and control plane operations are implemented by route processor. [code]
 
Do these switches implement the Central mode cef in same way as mentioned above. i.e
 
"Central CEF mode:The CEF FIB and adjacency tables reside on the route processor and the route processor performs the express forwarding. Use this CEF mode whenline cards are not available for CEF switching, or when features are not compatible with distributed CEF."Or  fixed ports switches such as 3750 implement data plane operation in hardware where FIB tabe and adjacency table are maintained on Data plane.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 6500 - Cannot See Return Traffic On SPAN Session?

Jan 31, 2012

On a Catalyst 6500, we configured a SPAN session with VLAN 300 as a source. We configured the session bi-directional ("both" keyword). We connect a sniffer on the SPAN destination port.
 
Strangely enough, we only see the traffic from the VRF to the firewall, but not the reverse traffic ! What can be the problem ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Sup VS-S720-10G Traffic Forwarding In Active And Hot State

Jan 24, 2012

I have catalyst 6500s with two VS-S720-10Gs, one is in Active and one is in Hot state. Both Sup cards have two 10G uplink ports. How does the traffic forwarding works in this case on the uplink ports? Do these uplink ports actively forward traffic or it is only the uplinks ports on Active that forward traffic? I see CDP neighbors on both Active and Hot SUPs uplinks ports - it  indicates that packets are flowing on both cards.
 
I want all uplink ports on both SUPs to actively forward traffic. Does it work? What is the config for this?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 / 3560 - Get L2 Traffic Amount (bit / Byte) Passing Through Switch

May 30, 2012

We want to get L2 traffic amount (bit/byte) passing through a cisco switch (6500/3560 ...) for a specific VLAN. it can be via SNMP or CLI ...How can we do that?
 
note: there is no L3 interface on swtiches.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Get Traffic From 192.168.1.33 On UDP Ports 10000-20000 And 5222?

Jul 29, 2012

So I am trying to get traffic from 192.168.1.33 on UDP ports 10000-20000 and port 5222 (udp) to have DSCP set to EF and  Forwarded accordingly.  

Building configuration...

Current configuration : 32481 bytes!! Last configuration change at 22:52:11 UTC Mon Jul 30 2012!version 12.2no mls acl tcam share-globalmls netflow interfacemls qosmls cef error action freezevty-async!!spanning-tree mode pvstdiagnostic bootup level completeaccess-list 99 permit 192.168.1.51access-list 99 permit 192.168.1.9access-list 99 permit 192.168.1.8access-list 99 permit 192.168.1.12access-list 111 permit udp any any range 10000 20000access-list 111 permit udp any any range 1 9999access-list 111 permit tcp any anyaccess-list 111 permit udp any any range 20001 49151access-list 111 permit udp any any range 50000 65535access-list 150 permit udp any any eq 5060!redundancymain-cpu  auto-sync running-configmode sso!ip access-list extended Modesto_Officeremark Wireless Linkpermit tcp any any establishedpermit icmp any anypermit udp host 65.214.162.12 host 99.24.26.84 eq tftppermit ip host 65.214.162.24 host

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4900 Capturing VLAN Traffic And Set Destination To GE Ports

Jan 24, 2012

At present we are having a 4900 series switch where we are running one monitor session.Additionaly we are in need of capturing VLAN traffic and set the destination to 2 * GE ports , both are in the same switch.Due to the limitation of two monitor sessions per switch , we thought of putting the destination ports as port channel but it looks like it is not supported.

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved