Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1921 Limiting Upload To 1.5mbit?
Nov 28, 2012
We recently got a 1921 for our main office and we have a dedicated 15/15 connection. We're running on an 1871 right now that is not under my control so I can't even see it's running config. OK! So when I set my gateway to be the 1871, we can get our upload to over 6mbit (we have 8 branches, so won't ever get full 15 since they're using it too). With the gateway set as the 1921, it seems like we're stuck at 1.5. I haven't seen it go higher than that. I've looked over the config but can't see anything that would imply some kind of bandwidth limit but I have copied the config here.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 6688 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 10:59:47 PCTime Thu Nov 29 2012 by admin
! NVRAM config last updated at 10:04:31 PCTime Thu Nov 29 2012 by admin
! NVRAM config last updated at 10:04:31 PCTime Thu Nov 29 2012 by admin
version 15.1
We want to puchase new Cisco ISR 1921/K9 . i want to know does it support the following sample IP-SLA commands
ip sla 2icmp-echo 172.16.1.2timeout 500frequency 1ip sla schedule 2 life forever start-time now
track 10 rtr 1 reachability delay down 1 up 1 ! track 20 rtr 2 reachability delay down 1 up 1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 track 10ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.2 track 20
Im asking above question because we will need to enable ip-sla on the mentioned router. as i read on the cisco webside, it says Cisco-ISR-1921/K9-IP Base support only IP-SLA RESPONDER feature nothing else. If Cisco-921/K9 does not support the above commands , should i go for ordering Cisco-1921-SEC/K9 ?
I have a 4500 and 6500 that I'd like to be able to limit the bandwidth of layer 2 switchports. So for instance I have all GB blades but certain servers I'd like only to have connections of about 5 Mb per second or 15 Mb per second etc.
We have a guest wireless setup but I need to rate limit the users so no one hogs all the bandwidth. The WLC is connected into a 3750 which is doing all the routing between the vlans. I know I cannot shape the traffic on the 3750.
I have a 2960 that I need to limit the uplink port to 50Mbps for 3 vlans and 350Mbps for another vlan. Would the following config achieve that or is this even possible for the 2960?
class-map match-any VLAN50-51-52 match vlan 50-52 class-map match-any VLAN53
I have a 3560 switch where I have 4 ports connected, one is to our WAN provider - 10Mbps and the other three are connected to different customers who I want to get an equal share of the 10Mbps bandwidth.I'm fairly clued up about configuring modular QoS but I'm being thrown by the fact that you can't apply a service-policy outbound on the ethernet ports.
I am trying to limit traffic inbound to 10Mbps on a gig interface 0/48 set to 100/full. So I downloaded some big files over this link and I'm able to see 30- 40Mbps or more. You can see from the show int - rate-limit command that parameters are never showing exceented so nothing has been dropped. [code]
I'm trying to limit the bandwidth on certain ports to 3Mbps and others 1Mbps for a project, however when I do a bandwidth test from a website the speed on the router doesn't seem to change it's as if the changes over telnet aren't actually affecting the swtich's qos settings. I have verified that the policy is attached to the interface and the settings are correct as well.
We have a number of 6509s which generally have dhcp relay agents configured on the SVIs. The dhcp servers are centralised. Recently we've had one or two faults with misconfigured or faulty devices (blade server chassis and also printers) generating high volumes of dhcp discover packets and causing high cpu on the relevant 6500. I would like to rate limit these discover packets, which are layer 2 broadcasts. Storm control can't discriminate between different types of broadcasts and on a gig link would need to be set down at about 1% to have much effect on the problem. I've looked at CoPP and also mls hardware rate-limiting but as I understand it, these two features don't control broadcast traffic. I also looked at dhcp snooping but if an interface receives a high level of dhcp discover broadcasts, e.g. over 100pps, I don't want it to go error-disabled (as this would knock down the whole edge switch), just to drop the excess packets.
I am trying to limit the incoming and outgoing traffic on a l2 port to 8mbps for a ip subnet within the nexus 7000. The port is connected to my ISP router which has a bandwidth of 20mbps.Policing won't work on a l2 Port and shaping cannot be applied on a port level. url...I have been reading thru the qos guide for nexus release v6 and have problems understanding the different queues.
I have the following config using a Cisco 1921. I am trying to get devices on the the native VLAN to get internet access via the gateway x.x.x.73.Any thing being routed from the other Vlans 15/20/30 can get access, but nothing from an internal IP address. Is there something I am missing.
The Xs replace the same 3 octets for each interface.I am trying to route from VLANs 15/20/30 to see VLAN 5. I have tried a few things, in terms of adding extra ip routes, but can't get anything to work. Each of those Vlans have another router on the other side of them, which I have also tried adding ip routes too, but nothing. One of the routers (Vlan15 is a Draytek 2830). [code]
I will be installing two Cisco 1921 Routers to connnect a T1 between two offices. We are changing out our current AdTran routers as we would like to bridge three VLAN's across the T1 link. I followed the instructions at (URL) shtml to the best of my ability and my two Gigabit Ethernet ports are tied into a bridged virtual interface (BVI1). I then assigned a IP to BVI1 and another to my Serial0/0/0 then made a route to get to the other side of the T1 and a defualt route out our proxy. What I want to do now is setup QoS to make sure my voice data gets priority.
I setup a QoS ACL called "Voice" with the TCP and UDP source and destination ports that our phone system uses. I then setup a QoS policy on the Serial0/0/0 outgoing interface called "VoiceTraffic" and under the "match" list I match DSCP 46 or my "Voice" access rule. For the action I turned on "Queuing" and set it up for LLQ at 50%. Does this sound about right? Is there anything els eI can setup? I tried ot setup something else on the ethernet side but because they have the BVI I can't. I read some article sin this forum that said I could still apply QoS to the GigabitEthernet ports even if they are in the bridge group but it doens't let me do that.
I am setting up a new 1921 for a public library and I am running into a problem and I bet I am missing something simple. All the internal stuff works and I can ping the outside IP on the 1921 but can't go any further to the internet. The 1921 has the 2 gig ethernet ports, 0/0 is connected to a DSL getting DHCP settings fine from the DSL modem. The other gig ethernet port 0/1 is running the inside network and its function fine, I have a server on it and other clients and they can ping and get dhcp settings etc.I've pasted the config output below and IP addresses of the main actors. [code]
I have already ordered a Cisco ISR 1921/K9. but as i read on Cisco website, it is written that Cisco 1921/K9 only support (IP SLA Responder) feature.
I don't know actually what is sla- responder. but our requirement is we will connect that Router 1921/K9 into 2-ISP links and i want to enable IP- SLA probes on that router so that it can track both the routes into those isp links. so my question is does CISCO 1921/K9 have the support for what i need ?How about Cisco 1921-SEC/K9 ?
I need to set up a L2 llink between my LAN and this 1921 router. I though IRB would do it but its not working yet. Here is the topology- I dont want to see another hop on this 1921 rtr so I hope I can just trunk it or something with IRB. Not working.
I have recently configured a cisco 1921 router for internal routing on my network. Here is what i am trying to accomplish:
Main network 10.65.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0- all office devies and computers. Second network 10.65.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 - All plant equipment machinery and production lines
i have configure gig 0/0 for my company network and gig 0/1 for my plant network. I can ping the router from both networks but am unable to route traffic betwenn them. what am i missing?
Im having some major issues with my new setup. I have a Cisco Router (1921ISR) that is connected to the internet through a t1. In addition to that is another cable modem. Each of these are connected to my firebox through an external interface.My router is on the 10.1.10.X network. My internal network is 192.168.1.X I have several NAT statements on my router pointing to 10.1.10.X addresses. These addresses are defined on my firebox as seconday external addresses and I am SNAT'ing them to 192.168.1.X addresses on my local LAN.This is mostly working well for everything. However, there is an FTP I am connecting to through the a VPN on the cisco that will not connect. The source is a 192.168.1.X address.
I was trying to upload image to sup x4516 V10G from Rommon using the management port but did not succeed. The steps which I did as mentioned below: [code]I got the tftp request on the tftp server but from the switch was showing access violation
We are migrating from Catalyst 6509 IOS platforms to Nexus 7009. There's the normal differences in commands which is well doucumented. We do have some quite large files containing ACLs varying from 10's of lines to several 1000's of lines. Our normal upload would be done using tftp and then issuing the command 'conf net' on the the 6509. This is no longer the way to do this on NX-OS. I've tried copy ftp: running-config which works fine for small files but for big ones it takes a long time, in some cases I've see it takes 20-30 minutes. The initilal tftp uplaod to the 7009 seems OK but the copy into the running-config is the bit that takes time and initially I thought I'd killed the 7009!! It did finally come back to the prompt. Are the 7009's simply not designed for large ACLs? I did try the configure session (Session Manager) but I couldn't see a way of uploading a file. I tried creating a new session and then exiting it, copying in a file of the same format and then commiting it but it didn't seem to acknowledge the file (checksum?).
I have working internet behind cisco 2811 on all vlans however upload speed is very slow and ftp server download is slow and times out, previously when directly connected to modem/router was fine? This is router config below:
Current configuration : 2229 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 02:21:18 UTC Tue Mar 12 2013 version 15.1 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec
I want upgrade my switches 2960-24PC-L RAM: 128MB and Flash: 28MB, but in the web page of cisco I see that the requirement of hardware is RAM: 128MB and Flash: 32MB.
I download the IOS file and this file is only 11.2MB so my question is if I can upgrade the IOS because my flash is enough for upload the IOS file.
We purchased a cisco 1921 router to replace a software firwall not long ago. The router was sold as a firewall with the suggestion that an ASA would be unnecessary.Unfortunately a router does not replace/do the jobs a firewall does, so I looked online and noticed that Cisco do offer firweall security features in one of their IOS.How do I tell if this is implemented on my router?If not, does my IOS support this, or do I need to buy an extension/another version of the IOS?,The version of the IOS I have is: c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin.
The Cisco 1921 router has two routed adapters. One is GE0/0 which I am using for my WAN interface. It is working properly. The 2nd interface is GE0/1 which is being used as my internal adapter. It is running NAT. When I attempt to reach the internet it fails while checking the exit interface. Here is the report.
AttributeValueRouter ModelCISCO1921/K9Image Namec1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-3.T.binIOS Version15.1(3)THostnameBulldog Interface Details AttributeValueInterfaceGigabitEthernet0/1IP address192.168.1.1DescriptionNOC Link Test Activity Summary
I am trying to decipher the differences between the two models of the 1921 router. One has an IP Base IOS and the other has a Security IOS. I have an ASA so I don't think I need all the Security IOS bells and whistles on an internal router. Although, does the IP Base IOS allow for trunking and sub interfaces? I definitely need that and on CDW's website it says that the 1921-Sec/K9 w/ Security IOS includes 802.1Q and that spec is not listed on the 1921/K9 IP Base IOS model.
I bought a cisco router last week. The reseller said it is a brand new one. However, when I try to set it with console cable connecting to PC, the default password does not work. I tried to use control+break to get access to rommon for password recovery. The tera term pro displayed nothing at all! In thin case, what should I do to setup the router? Dose the reset button in the back work to restore the router to factory setting(which means i can use default username and password)?
