Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G - IOS DHCP AP Loosing IP Address

Nov 13, 2012

Not sure if this is a problem with the switch or the wireless AP connected to the switch, but I have a couple of 3560's, one is a 3560G and the other is a 3560, both have phones and wireless ap's connected to them.  The ap's on both of these switches continue to loose there ip address and thus disconnect from the controller.  This happens about once a week, but the odd thing is that the phones never loose there ip address.  All of my other 3560s and 3560g's that have AP's and phones connected are working fine.

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G - Reset Current Index On DHCP Pool

Apr 2, 2013

I've got a Catalyst 3560G, and I want to reset the current index for a DHCP pool. I could remove the leases given for that pool, but I couldn't find this option.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS 3560G 48PS Invalid Dhcp Options And Unable To Parse

Jan 13, 2013

I have configured DHCP snooping on a WS-3560G-48PS running IOS 12.2(58)SE2 ipservicesk9 variant.When I enable DHCP snooping clients don't get IP addresses, when DHCP snooping is disabled, everything works fine.I have set up a SPAN port and run a capture (attached) on the traffic. Wireshark notes the Seconds elapsed field appeared to be encoded in little-endian but only on some packets. Apart from that, I can see nothing wrong with the DHCP Offer responses from my DHCP server.Attachment config.txt contains the interesting parts of the  configuration. Please note g0/32 has been set to ARP inspection trust as  without working DHCP snooping it would require a static bind.Is there any way of figuring out which option can't be parsed? Is there a way to force forwarding of unparsable DHCP packets while still running DHCP snooping?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Ce 500 Cannot Get Ip Address From Dhcp

Aug 10, 2011

I disconnected and reconnected the powercable while holding on to the setup button until system, alert, setup go amber. The system led light began blinking green. I waited until one of the leds lights on the ports starts blinking green I then connected the ethernet cable connected to my pc.  I made sure my lan connection on my computer was set to dhcp.In the docs claim it should take about 1 minute to grab a new ip address.  After a few minutes i check the ipconfig on my pc and I get the apipa address.The setup light on the switch remains green while system is amber.  The led for port 1 stopped blinking and remains green.My pc is not grabbing an ip address I don't know what else to do.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IP Address DHCP Command Not Available On C3550

Nov 19, 2011

I'm trying to configure my C3550 with fast ethernet port 0/48 assigned to vlan 2 in static access mode and SVI vlan 2 configured as dhcp client.
 
But I see command ip address dhcp is not available on interface vlan 2:
 
Cat3550(config-if)#ip ad
Cat3550(config-if)#ip address ?
A.B.C.D  IP address 
Cat3550(config-if)#ip address  
 
Could it be a problem related to the version running on the equipment (see below the output of sh version command not sure of what EA1 stands for)? I read here [URL] that this command was introduced in version 12.1(2)T
 
If it is a version problem is there any possibility to download upgraded version for free? 
 
Cat3550>sh ve
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C3550 Software (C3550-I5Q3L2-M), Version 12.1(20)EA1, RELEASE

[Code].....

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 120 IP Address From Incorrect Scope Is Assigned From DHCP

Jul 8, 2012

I am trying to setup VLANs and most of configurations are working ok now except IP address assignment from DHCP. If any computer in VLAN 120 or 130 configured with manual IP address, then all works fine. It can reach internal servers and the internet without problem.If the IP address is assigned automatically then any computer in VLAN 120 or 130 are obtaining  IP address (strangely!) from VLAN 100. Because switch ports that connected to the computer belongs to VLAN 120 or 130, the computer cannot reach internal servers and the internet with ip address from VLAN 100 . All SVI interfaces for VLAN 100, 120 and 130 have ip helper-address option defined pointing to the DHCP server. No DHCP snooping enabled on all switches at this point. DHCP server have three scopes for the three different VLANs.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Assigning IP Address Through DHCP On New 4500E Install?

Nov 20, 2011

The DHCP/DNS server is on ip address 10.1.100.103 with an alt on .102 I'm attempting to integrate a 4510R+E into an existing network and use existing DHCP/DNS windows 2008 server to push out IP addresses to connected computers.
 
I want to assign a VLAN to every port for management purposes and then I put an IP helper address on every VLAN.
 
I've attached a the 4500E partial config.  I'm attempting to get Gi1/44 to a state where I can plug a computer into it an resolve an ip address and gain internet access like all the devices on the existing network can do.
 
I've created a new scope in DHCP with the ip subnet of 10.60.211.0 255.255.255.0 It leases addresses from .1 to .253
 
The computer will not resolve ip addresses with this config.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - Dhcp - Excluded Address Range

Apr 29, 2012

we have a 3560 switch configured with EIGRP with dhcp.  We have a user that we cannot ping, however the interface show up / up and no errors on interface. the ip address is 10.2.0.199 - however we have dhcp configured to exclude the range from dhcp ip dhcp excluded-address 10.22.0.1 10.22.0.200 how can this work station get a dhcp address if we have that ip range excluded from the dhcp pool?
 
The user is off a different switch that is a uplink to this distribution switch. Traceroutes shows that the problem is with the distribution switch.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - DHCP Server Doesn't Provide IP Address

Dec 11, 2012

a new LAN installation, two VSS pair 6509 core, 15 closets, with 3750 stacks. Floor 15 only, devices/hosts can ping teh DHCP server but cannot aquire IP addresses. no such problem on other floors?
 
portfast an dother parameters are intact.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3911 Router DHCP Server Not Giving IP Address

Jan 30, 2011

I have a 3911 router with a 1242 AP. The problem that I have is that when the user is trying to connect, the user get the OS Ip address 169.254.168.154 and I see that when I do the "show dot11 association" command, but when I do sh ip dhcp binding on the  router I see
 
172.19.9.141        0100.18de.74db.14       Jan 31 2011 11:14 AM    Automatic
 
The router is seeing as if the router gave the ip address to the user, but the reality the user was assigne the OS ip address 169. I did "debug ip dhcp server events" and I got the following:
 
Jan 31 11:09:06.752 EST: DHCPD: Seeing if there is an internally specified pool class:Jan 31 11:09:06.756 EST:   DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 0100.18de.74db.14
Jan 31 11:09:06.756 EST:   DHCPD: remote id 020a00000a58218400000000Jan 31

[Code].....

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7010 New Users Were Not Getting Ip Address From Dhcp Server

Jun 8, 2013

We  have 2 nexus 7010 switches configured with HSRP in the network. For all  the vlans core1 is Master and Core2 is standby. In the current setup we  have external dhcp server and dhcp relay is configured for all the  vlans on Master and standby switch. The setup is running the IOS 5.2
 
Activity Done: During  the Maintainacne activity, we isolated core1 switch in the network by  disabling the vpc/keepalive and all the uplinks from access switch. The  core2 switch was master for all the vlans.
 
Issue observed: It  has been observed that new users were not getting ip address from the  dhcp server. The ethereal capture showed that dhcp server was not  getting the dhcp requests from the core2 switch. We disabled the dhcp  feature in core2 and enabled again with dhcp relay again configured on  vlan interfaces .even after doing this no change was observed in  behaviour. Finally we got core1 back in network by enabling all the  links.
 
Observation: The  moment VPC link came up between the core switches, users started  getting ip's from dhcp. Then we started enabling all the uplinks on  core1.Core1 again become master for all the vlans and users continued  getting ip’s. Network running fine.
 
Further Testing

1. For  one of the vlan, core 2 switch has been made primary and for new users  checked the dhcp functionality and it was working fine. The aim was to  identify if anything wrong on core 2 related to dhcp relay

2.Again  we changed the priority for this vlan and made core1 master for the  same. This time we disabled this vlan on core1 and tried new user with  core 2 became master and dhcp functionality worked fine for new user.  Actually in this case we have simulated the same behaviour when we  observed the issue with only difference of VPC was not available during  the issue time as core 1 was isolated form network 
Inputs needed.

Is  there any known behaviour for dhcp functionality when VPC is  unavailable? If we see the test scenario2 (wherein core1 was master for  the vlan and we disable this vlan on core 1 and core 2 was able to relay  dhcp requests for new users in this vlan.) it was actually same as  scenario we observed during issue time..

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: DHCP Request Not Being Forwarded By Helper Address Same VRF 6500?

Feb 22, 2013

Version 12.2(33)SXI
 int vlan 1
description client vlan
ip vrf forwarding A
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
standby 129 ip 10.1.1.2
standby 129 timers 1 4
standby 129 priority 105
standby 129 preempt
ip helper-address 10.1.2.20

[code]....
 
dhcp requests are not making it to the dhcp server SAME VRF (ip helper-addres is not doing anything.....)extended vrf traceroutes on udp 67 sourced from vlan2 are fine
 
I am expecting udp unicast packets on port 67 "giaddr" relay packets on the DHCP server generated and sourced by the relay on Vlan1
 
eg. Mar  1 01:59:06.731: DHCPD: setting giaddr to 10.1.1.1
 
This exact setup works in our preprod environment with the same code.Only difference is we run Distributed etherchannel on the 6500's where this doesnt work.
 
Wireshark on the client I can see the requests being sent Going to check it with debug ip dhcp server to check the relay logs out of production hours.
 
I have seen so many people say it IS and ISN'T supported on this version of the code.e.g. [URL]
 
I am aware the helper-adddress should inherit the vrf of the interface ip helper-address vrf command is not supported.The fact it works in the PP environment.... could this be due to the Distributed EtherChanel difference? or just some bug....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960S - Dynamically Assign IP Address To Computers Via DHCP

Aug 30, 2012

I am administering a Catalyst 2960S switch and I would like to connect several computers to it.  Some of those each have a static IP address.  For a few of them, I would like the switch to dynamically assign an IP address to them via DHCP.  Is the switch capable of doing this?  If so, how can I do it? I tried looking through Cisco Network Assistant and I couldn't find it.  Some web pages have suggested I telnet into the switch and issue commands like "ip dhcp ?" to see what commands are possible.  I can telnet in and if I type  but I get an "Unrecognized command" for both "ip ?" and "ip dhcp ?".  This makes me think I'm reading the wrong web pages. I did come across the term "DHCP snooping".  It seems relevant, but very difficult for me to grasp. 

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Can Layer 2 2950 Switch Be Used As DHCP Server With Its Own Address Pool

Mar 18, 2009

Can a layer 2 cisco 2950 switch be used as a dhcp server with it's own address pool.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - DHCP Server Port-Based Address Allocation

Nov 15, 2012

Does the 2960 switches with LAN-Lite support DHCP Server Port-Based Address Allocation?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4500 / 3560 - DHCP Redundancy - IP Helper Address Point To HSRP?

Jan 5, 2012

My actual Scenario
 
1 x 4500 and 1 x 3560?They are gateways of 8 Vlans?They are doing HSRP in each of those Vlans?The 4500 is the Active?There is a DHCP Pool for each of those Vlans on both gateways using "ip dhcp excluded-address" I ensured that the range of provided ips by each DHCP server will not be overlapped Obs.: Reducing the lease time, I ended with the calls bringing related problems.
 
OK, every thing is blue, every thing is fine.But the network diagram is realy complex(41 switchs, 89 uplinks), and depending of how is the network flow, one or other server answer first or latter.
 
For many reasons I would like that the secondary DHCP server would answer only if the primary DHCP server goes down.To me, the bigger reason is that DHCP database would be only in one DHCP server.But there is other reasons.
 
I passed by many frustrated solutions:Try to force a delay on the answer on one of the servers. - Impossible.Try to disable DHCP server, and, using EEM, enable it only if router became active in HSRP. - I couldn't do It.
 
What I'm thinking now is use the HSRP resource to resolve it.On both routers I would put a "ip helper-address" pointing to an Virtual_HSRP_IP.And depending on which router is the active, him will answer the request.
 
My first doubt is:Would it work?The second doubt is:Could I use the same Virtual_HSRP_IP that exists on that Vlan(see example 1),or I would need to point it to a Virtual_HSRP_IP in a different Vlan(see example 2)?

Example 1
        -----------------------------------
        |              4500               |
        -----------------------------------
        interface Vlan1
         ip address 10.10.0.2 255.255.0.0
         ip helper-address 10.10.0.1
         standby 1 ip 10.10.0.1

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: PIM Joins Not Switching Through Catalyst 3560G

Aug 2, 2012

I have the network described below, on which I am running PIM.
 
(network) ---- Embedded Linux Router --(vlan 5)-- CAT 3560G --(vlan 5)-- Cisco 1811 Router ---- Multicast Listener
 
The Linux Router and the 1811 have formed a PIM neighbor relationship.  The multicast listener sends an IGMP Join and I can see the PIM join leave the 1811 router (via "debug ip pim"). Using tcpdump on my linux router I never see the Join come in, but I can see the PIM Hellos (which is why the neighbor relationship formed).

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-2960S / Loosing Connection After STP Topology Change?

Nov 27, 2012

since a couple of days I've a strange behavior in my Spanning-Tree Topology.Every time I plug in a new Switch ( e.g. WS-2960S ) a topology change on my root bridge occurs and all client losing connection to the default gateway.The root bridge is also the default gateway.
 
Nov 28 11:14:12.865: STP: VLAN0001 Topology Change rcvd on Gi4/48
VLAN0001 is executing the ieee compatible Spanning Tree protocol
  Bridge Identifier has priority 0, sysid 1, address 0019.aa37.e040
  Configured hello time 2, max age 20, forward delay 15
  We are the root of the spanning tree

[code]....

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: VLAN Routing To Internet Through Firewall 3560G

Jul 24, 2012

Since two weeks I have a problem with the VLANs who I started to configure. I hope together we find the way.I have 5 VLANS configured in a CISCO 3560G switch. In my windows server 2003 I configured DHCP scope for each VLAN.One of the requirement to connect vlans each other is to put the IP of each vlan as gateway in the clients.So, how can I do to access to internet?. The ip of my Firewall are in one of the VLAN´s.When the configuration of the LAN only had one DHCP scope the gateway was the ip of my firewall. But now i don´t know how to configure the DHCP server, or the firewall, or the switch, or all of them To get access to internet.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: WAP321 - Loosing Connection To DHCP Server

Jan 1, 2013

I have two WAP321s in my office.  The network they are on is a single VLAN (172.16.10.x).  Both WAPs are setup with the same SSID, and I have setup Single Point Setup.
 
I am having a problem that was happening before I setup Single Point Setup, and it is still happening.  Basically wireless will be up and running fine for part of the day.  Then people throughout the office will begin to lose their connections to the DHCP server.  They still retain the connection to the WAP, but can no longer access the network. 
 
The only way I have been able to fix this issue is to reboot the WAP.  As soon as it reboots the connections come back.  At first I thought it was due to the number of connections (which is why we now have 2 WAPs), however we only have about 20-25 conncurrent connections. 
 
I put in the second WAP to try to balance out the load but this does not seem to be working.  Is there a setting I need to change on the WAPs to balance out the load?

View 13 Replies View Related

Routers / Switches :: Loosing Connection From A DHCP Router?

Jan 16, 2012

We are in a hotel that allows us to use their router with a Hawking 300N expander. We seem to lose connection each time their router gets a new IP address. The router seems to lose connection frequently. Is there a setting in the expander that will allow the expander to "follow" the DHCP address of the router without having to take it down and go thru the setup each time.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G - How To Setup Per Vlan Routing

May 14, 2013

I'm trying to set up per vlan routing on a 3560G switch but it's not performing as I would expect. I've got a server on the 109 vlan with a 10.1.9.100 address and a default gateway of 10.1.9.1 this address is an HSRP gateway and currently resides on 10.1.9.7. When I traceroute through to my user PC on the internal network it receives a response from 10.1.9.7 However, it is then denied by an ACL on the internal firewall which has been applied to interface Eth0/0. It should arrive at the firewall on Eth0/2.109 as it has the 10.1.9.4 address.
 
My goal here is to route traffic on the 101 vlan to a seperate interface on the internal firewall from 109 vlan traffic. I'm either doing something wrong or these routing commands aren't designed to work in the way I'm expecting (I couldn't find any documentation on the ip route command where it is followed by different gateways for different vlans)
 
interface GigabitEthernet0/12
description Internal-FW Eth0/2
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 109
switchport mode trunk(Code )

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G - PBR Support

Feb 2, 2012

I have a 3560G switch with c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-46.SE and 2 routers. The switch has vlans defined. I want to route all traffic on vlan 25 out of one of the routers exclusively. Here is what I have attempted: 

-Set the SDM template to routing & reload
-Define an access-list for the v lan traffic
-Define the route-map
-Apply the route-map to the vlan interface
 
When I attempt the last step I receive the following syslog error:

%PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTED_RMAP: Route-map RM_IMDGuest not supported for Policy-Based Routing
 
Also, the  route-map is removed from the vlan interface after this error is thrown. Im 99% confident that PBR is supported on this switch (am I wrong?). Here is the relevant show output:...

access-list 125 permit ip 192.168.25.0 0.0.0.255 any
route-map RM_IMDGuest permit 10
match ip address 125
set ip next-hop 192.168.5.3
[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: DHCP Server On 3560G

May 23, 2011

I am facing an issue with setting up dhcp server on a 3750G-24PS-S,IOS : c3560-ipbasek9-mz.122-58.SE.bin,the switch configuration is below,interface Vlan100 description ***Data Segment*** ip address 192.168.102.1 255.255.255.0 no shut!ip dhcp excluded-address 198.168.102.1 198.168.102.10! ,ip dhcp pool datalan   network 198.168.102.0 255.255.255.0   default-router 198.168.102.1    dns-server 192.168.40.11,!,interface GigabitEthernet0/1 switchport access vlan 100 switchport mode access spanning-tree portfast.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G - Routing Between 2 Locations

Jan 24, 2013

I was assigned a task to connect two locations through a L2 VPN, The infrastructure which i have are...

Fortigate 80 C firewall at Location A
CISCO 3560G at Location A
CISCO 3750G at Location B
2 MBPS Leased Line connecting two locations.
T1 line at Location A.

The requirements are as follows..

Both locations should be in the same ip range (ex 10.80.71.1/24) Internet for Location B should be from Location A, both locations should talk to each other.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Minimum UPS For Catalyst 3560G-48-Poe?

Oct 2, 2012

We have 2 catalyst 3560g-48-PoE protected by a 1000Va 800Watt tripp-lite and I was cheking to see if that is really sufficient. Looking at the charts from Cisco suppport  I would think I should have more, but have not had any issues with a few power outages

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Switch 3560G PoE-24 Not Booting?

Aug 13, 2012

i facing problem with my switch cisco 3560G, when it power on only System light is green and noting happen.  i check with serial cable ( Console) but noting happen  no booting.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560g And Set Ip Default Next-hop Command?

Apr 18, 2013

I have 3560g with 15.0(2)SE2 version. I try to give different default gateways for different interfaces.I've already changed the sdm, run "ip routing" and made interest interfaces in "no switchport" with ip addresses.

my route-map is "
route-map ABC permit 10
set ip next-hop 192.168.77.3"

and it is applied on the interface with "ip policy route-map ABC" but  when I try to apply it says "%PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTED_RMAP: Route-map ABC not supported for Policy-Based Routing" everything is fine if I change from "set ip default next-hop" to "set ip next-hop" but it is not I need in the guide of the version it is said this statement is not in unsupported list of route-map commands.[URL]

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G Upgrade Required

Feb 20, 2013

I have a  WS-C3560G-24TS-S running  12.2(50)SE5 with IPBASE. I have been told that the functionality i seek (multicasting) is only available in the IPSERVICES version of the software. I was reading up on upgrading and saw that i needed to do a show license and get the UID and Serial number and get a license that is tied to my box. But the show license command doesnt work wtih my box. i then found something that said that the 3560's were special in that way. Im not sure how to get this box upgraded. I have a different 3560 running the IPSERVICES elsewhere in my organization. Can i take the IOS Version and  update my switch to that?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G Does VTP Depends On BPDU

Aug 13, 2012

We currently have two 5548UP and  two 2232PP switches running on  5.1(3)N2(1a)  and the plan is to connect our old 3560G switches to 2232 PP using enhanced Vpc.
 
I enabled spanning tree bpdufilter on the 2232 PP ports so that we can connect switches to them but VTP is not working on those ports. Is there anything that needs to be done on the HIFs for VTP to work.Does VTP depends on BPDUs? Does enabling Bpdufilter affects VTP?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Throughput Of Etherchannel On 3560G

Nov 27, 2012

We have a problem with the throughput over etherchannel in LACP with 2 or 4 ports. It is iSCSI traffic (vmware esxi 4.1 U3) is going from 2 separate NICs (ports) to the etherchannel (with 2 or 4 ports) that has a SAN connected (Nexenta).

The SAN is configured in passive LACP and the switch is in active LACP.  Actually it does not matter if we do LACP or just MODE ON, still same result: ~1GBit/s throughtput in either direction.  Like already mentioned, 2 or 4 ports in the etherchannel make no difference, or the configuration of the etherchannel.

I will post some config data below, but here is the question: Why can't we see traffic beyond 1GBit/s?  Source and destination are capable of doing much more than that (vmware esxi RAID 5 of 1TB SATA; SAN 16 x 1TB NL-SAS). If we look with CNA, we can see that the traffic is balanced equally over the etherchannel ports. With or without QOS or flowcontrol, no difference. This whole traffic happenes on this switch. 
 
!
port-channel load-balance src-dst-ip
!
interface Port-channel5

[Code]....

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506-E Excluded Dhcp Address Are Showing More Than Excluded

Nov 8, 2012

I have a Cisco Catalyst 4506-E Swtich,I configure it as a DHCP and gw for the Wireless Cisco AP through the WLC 5508,the DHCP pool reached the maximum limit I run the Show ip dhcp pool (pool name) it's show the below result
 
GIR906.PCIRQ.DC.CR.1#show ip dhcp pool 406

Pool 406 :
Utilization mark (high/low)    : 100 / 0
Subnet size (first/next)       : 0 / 0
Total addresses                : 126
Leased addresses               : 76
[Code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 3560G - Using ASA 5505 As DHCP

Dec 4, 2011

I am opening a small branch office in another state and the equipment we purchased is as follows:
 
ASA5505
3560G.
 
We'll use a site to site vpn but just in case there's connectivity issues I'd like to use the ASA as DHCP. So far I have a scope defined in the ASA and if I plug a laptop directly in I get an applicable IP address. I trunked the port on the switch that goes to the ASA but not the one on the ASA itself (license restriction) The VLAN that I'm using for my PC's has an ip helper address that is assigned to the inside IP of the ASA.

View 5 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved