Cisco Switching/Routing :: IP Address DHCP Command Not Available On C3550
Nov 19, 2011
I'm trying to configure my C3550 with fast ethernet port 0/48 assigned to vlan 2 in static access mode and SVI vlan 2 configured as dhcp client.
But I see command ip address dhcp is not available on interface vlan 2:
Cat3550(config-if)#ip ad
Cat3550(config-if)#ip address ?
A.B.C.D IP address
Cat3550(config-if)#ip address
Could it be a problem related to the version running on the equipment (see below the output of sh version command not sure of what EA1 stands for)? I read here [URL] that this command was introduced in version 12.1(2)T
If it is a version problem is there any possibility to download upgraded version for free?
Cat3550>sh ve
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C3550 Software (C3550-I5Q3L2-M), Version 12.1(20)EA1, RELEASE
[Code].....
View 7 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 2, 2013
I believe that I should have started with this issue because I cannot run tclsh on a multilayer switch. When I try to execute "tclsh" command I receive this message: SWITCH#tclsh
Translating "tclsh"...domain server (X.X.X.X)
% Unknown command or computer name, or unable to find computer address
The equipment is a MLS C3550 - Version 12.2(35)SE3
Is there any wrong with the IOS version?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2012
i have a strange problem in my campus network.im trying to run port security on my access switches which they are 3550 with ios c3550-ipservicesk9-mz.122-52.SE when i run the port security with Sticky option, even i put 1000 mac address for just learning on the port but when i issue the switchport port-security command every pc connected to that port loses its connection with network UNTIL i enable dhcp snooping!!! all my client are getting they ip address from DHCP server but strange thing is that how on earth i have to enable DHCP snooping to port security work properly? also when i check the configuration under the interface when dhcp snooping is not yet enabled switch doesnt add any mac address under the interface so no one can work until i enable snooping and then switch adds mac addresses under the interface configuration.is this Bug on this version of IOS?[code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2012
I am trying to find a command for dhcp snooping rate-limiting on a CatOS. The PFC card is PFC. PFC3B is said to support that command. But there seems no this command.
-6k> (enable) sh ver
WS-C6509-E Software, Version NmpSW: 8.4(5)
Copyright (c) 1995-2005 by Cisco Systems
NMP S/W compiled on Aug 3 2005, 13:26:46
[Code] ......
Up time is 1183 days, 1 hour, 41 minutes
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2012
I am wondering if it has its own DHCP router and if theres a command to enable it?Also Random side question. it hands out ip addresses to other devices (the 2950 im using infront of a router) but when I hook up another switch to this switch it doesnt initialize the port or try to connect? why.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2013
I have a Cisco 2951 Router and I am trying to set it up to use DHCP and for security purposes I need to use the "IP Access-Group in" command. The DHCP will not work when I have this command on the interface that I need to run it through, DHCP works fine when I do not have the "IP Access-Group in" command in the configuration. When I check the log after the failed DHCP attempt it shows up as denied, as if it's being blocked. The IOS I have is c2951-UNIVERSALK9-m 15.0 (1) M3. Conf Reg 0x2102.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2011
we have cisco WS-C6509-V-E with IOS version 12.2(33)SXI4; s3223_rp_IPSERVICESK9_WAN_M) running on a switch. I am trying to configure the command "mac-address-table synchronize" under global config mode. But when I enter the command Cisco(config)#mac-address-table ?It doesn't show the synchronize option?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2010
We want to configure the "mac-address-table synchronize" command on our 6500 series switches to ensure that the CAM tables on our DFCs are in synch with the PFC on the supervisor modules. url...it is recommended that we disable the routed MAC purging with the mac-address-table aging-time 0 routed-mac global configuration command. What is a routed mac entry? Are there any issues with running that mac aging-time command?
We also plan to run this command "mac-address-table aging-time 14400" to keep our ARP and CAM tables on the same aging time to reduce unicast flooding on our network. Can we run this command with the "routed-mac" command above?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2012
process of upgrading IOS image in this particular switch to c3550-ipservicesk9-mz.122-44.SE6.bin.
SW1#sh version
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C3550 Software (C3550-I5Q3L2-M), Version 12.1(11)EA1, RELEASE
[Code]......
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2012
I am using cisco 1841 LAN router, I need to block MAC address i have applied the command access-list 1102 deny 0000.0000.0000.0000 mac address..... but it does not work.
View 24 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2012
I have purchased these two switches from ebay as a test lab, I plan to connect them up via a gigastack modulecable and enable ip routing on the c3550 and vlans to talk to each other.
I'm very much a procurve person and really need to get into the cisco switching.I will want to trunklacp between the switches - whats the process is setting that up on cisco switches?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2011
i have a Ws-C3550-24-Emi switch and i need to upgrade its flash memory to 32Mb. I couldn't find any documents in cisco website about the memory upgrade guideline. Possible to upgrade this switch to 32Mb? If so, what's the max of memory i can upgrade? and the part number for this type of memory?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2013
Here iis a diagram of my current lab where I am using IP SLA to automatically switch from ISP 1 to ISP 2 should the connection go down (and vice versa)
My switches are C3550 Layer 3 switches. Both ISP's do work so connectivity is not the problem.
If I shutdown the fa0/19 port on SW1 the SLA kicks in and changes my defualt route out 10.0.1.0 without a problem. And when I do a no shut it comes back to tge 192.168.10.0 netowrk just as we would expect. No problem there.
When I disconnect the ISP 1 cell phone the SLA does switch the defualt route to the 10.0.1.0 netowrk. Okay, just fine so far. Here isthe problem, when i reconnect the cell phone the SLA does not come back to the 192.168.10.0 netowrk without first having to delete the SLA and then recresting it (both switches).
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2011
I disconnected and reconnected the powercable while holding on to the setup button until system, alert, setup go amber. The system led light began blinking green. I waited until one of the leds lights on the ports starts blinking green I then connected the ethernet cable connected to my pc. I made sure my lan connection on my computer was set to dhcp.In the docs claim it should take about 1 minute to grab a new ip address. After a few minutes i check the ipconfig on my pc and I get the apipa address.The setup light on the switch remains green while system is amber. The led for port 1 stopped blinking and remains green.My pc is not grabbing an ip address I don't know what else to do.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2013
We have two switches; a WS-C3550-48 and a WS-C3548-XL connected via fiber uplink ports. Both switches are on the same subnet 192.168.1.0 /24. I would like to change the subnet of the second switch, WS-C3548-XL, to be on 192.168.2.0 /24. Would it be possible to assign 192.168.2.x IP addresses to both uplink ports to achive this?
Or would I need to create a separate VLAN and assign both GigabitEthernet0/1 uplink ports to this VLAN?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2012
Not sure if this is a problem with the switch or the wireless AP connected to the switch, but I have a couple of 3560's, one is a 3560G and the other is a 3560, both have phones and wireless ap's connected to them. The ap's on both of these switches continue to loose there ip address and thus disconnect from the controller. This happens about once a week, but the odd thing is that the phones never loose there ip address. All of my other 3560s and 3560g's that have AP's and phones connected are working fine.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2012
I am trying to setup VLANs and most of configurations are working ok now except IP address assignment from DHCP. If any computer in VLAN 120 or 130 configured with manual IP address, then all works fine. It can reach internal servers and the internet without problem.If the IP address is assigned automatically then any computer in VLAN 120 or 130 are obtaining IP address (strangely!) from VLAN 100. Because switch ports that connected to the computer belongs to VLAN 120 or 130, the computer cannot reach internal servers and the internet with ip address from VLAN 100 . All SVI interfaces for VLAN 100, 120 and 130 have ip helper-address option defined pointing to the DHCP server. No DHCP snooping enabled on all switches at this point. DHCP server have three scopes for the three different VLANs.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2011
The DHCP/DNS server is on ip address 10.1.100.103 with an alt on .102 I'm attempting to integrate a 4510R+E into an existing network and use existing DHCP/DNS windows 2008 server to push out IP addresses to connected computers.
I want to assign a VLAN to every port for management purposes and then I put an IP helper address on every VLAN.
I've attached a the 4500E partial config. I'm attempting to get Gi1/44 to a state where I can plug a computer into it an resolve an ip address and gain internet access like all the devices on the existing network can do.
I've created a new scope in DHCP with the ip subnet of 10.60.211.0 255.255.255.0 It leases addresses from .1 to .253
The computer will not resolve ip addresses with this config.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2012
we have a 3560 switch configured with EIGRP with dhcp. We have a user that we cannot ping, however the interface show up / up and no errors on interface. the ip address is 10.2.0.199 - however we have dhcp configured to exclude the range from dhcp ip dhcp excluded-address 10.22.0.1 10.22.0.200 how can this work station get a dhcp address if we have that ip range excluded from the dhcp pool?
The user is off a different switch that is a uplink to this distribution switch. Traceroutes shows that the problem is with the distribution switch.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2011
I notice that my Cisco switches have 2 fiber GBIC ports on them each and while i have been around networking for quite some time i have never dug that much into fiber. So after some quick googlefu i learned that there is lots of different types and compatibility problems.
The 2 switches i would like to connect are a WS-C3550-12T and a WS-C3550-48-EM.From what i have read these are 1000-base-fx?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2012
a new LAN installation, two VSS pair 6509 core, 15 closets, with 3750 stacks. Floor 15 only, devices/hosts can ping teh DHCP server but cannot aquire IP addresses. no such problem on other floors?
portfast an dother parameters are intact.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2011
I have a 3911 router with a 1242 AP. The problem that I have is that when the user is trying to connect, the user get the OS Ip address 169.254.168.154 and I see that when I do the "show dot11 association" command, but when I do sh ip dhcp binding on the router I see
172.19.9.141 0100.18de.74db.14 Jan 31 2011 11:14 AM Automatic
The router is seeing as if the router gave the ip address to the user, but the reality the user was assigne the OS ip address 169. I did "debug ip dhcp server events" and I got the following:
Jan 31 11:09:06.752 EST: DHCPD: Seeing if there is an internally specified pool class:Jan 31 11:09:06.756 EST: DHCPD: htype 1 chaddr 0100.18de.74db.14
Jan 31 11:09:06.756 EST: DHCPD: remote id 020a00000a58218400000000Jan 31
[Code].....
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2013
We have 2 nexus 7010 switches configured with HSRP in the network. For all the vlans core1 is Master and Core2 is standby. In the current setup we have external dhcp server and dhcp relay is configured for all the vlans on Master and standby switch. The setup is running the IOS 5.2
Activity Done: During the Maintainacne activity, we isolated core1 switch in the network by disabling the vpc/keepalive and all the uplinks from access switch. The core2 switch was master for all the vlans.
Issue observed: It has been observed that new users were not getting ip address from the dhcp server. The ethereal capture showed that dhcp server was not getting the dhcp requests from the core2 switch. We disabled the dhcp feature in core2 and enabled again with dhcp relay again configured on vlan interfaces .even after doing this no change was observed in behaviour. Finally we got core1 back in network by enabling all the links.
Observation: The moment VPC link came up between the core switches, users started getting ip's from dhcp. Then we started enabling all the uplinks on core1.Core1 again become master for all the vlans and users continued getting ip’s. Network running fine.
Further Testing
1. For one of the vlan, core 2 switch has been made primary and for new users checked the dhcp functionality and it was working fine. The aim was to identify if anything wrong on core 2 related to dhcp relay
2.Again we changed the priority for this vlan and made core1 master for the same. This time we disabled this vlan on core1 and tried new user with core 2 became master and dhcp functionality worked fine for new user. Actually in this case we have simulated the same behaviour when we observed the issue with only difference of VPC was not available during the issue time as core 1 was isolated form network
Inputs needed.
Is there any known behaviour for dhcp functionality when VPC is unavailable? If we see the test scenario2 (wherein core1 was master for the vlan and we disable this vlan on core 1 and core 2 was able to relay dhcp requests for new users in this vlan.) it was actually same as scenario we observed during issue time..
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2013
Version 12.2(33)SXI
int vlan 1
description client vlan
ip vrf forwarding A
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
standby 129 ip 10.1.1.2
standby 129 timers 1 4
standby 129 priority 105
standby 129 preempt
ip helper-address 10.1.2.20
[code]....
dhcp requests are not making it to the dhcp server SAME VRF (ip helper-addres is not doing anything.....)extended vrf traceroutes on udp 67 sourced from vlan2 are fine
I am expecting udp unicast packets on port 67 "giaddr" relay packets on the DHCP server generated and sourced by the relay on Vlan1
eg. Mar 1 01:59:06.731: DHCPD: setting giaddr to 10.1.1.1
This exact setup works in our preprod environment with the same code.Only difference is we run Distributed etherchannel on the 6500's where this doesnt work.
Wireshark on the client I can see the requests being sent Going to check it with debug ip dhcp server to check the relay logs out of production hours.
I have seen so many people say it IS and ISN'T supported on this version of the code.e.g. [URL]
I am aware the helper-adddress should inherit the vrf of the interface ip helper-address vrf command is not supported.The fact it works in the PP environment.... could this be due to the Distributed EtherChanel difference? or just some bug....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 14, 2012
I am trying to configure a loop back interface like so: [URL], on the following device:
C3550 Software (C3550-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(50)SE, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1on port gig0/1 which is using a 1000Base-SX adapter. This is for troubleshooting purposes and it does not appear to be a feasible option. Is there another way to accomplish in the IOS?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2012
I am administering a Catalyst 2960S switch and I would like to connect several computers to it. Some of those each have a static IP address. For a few of them, I would like the switch to dynamically assign an IP address to them via DHCP. Is the switch capable of doing this? If so, how can I do it? I tried looking through Cisco Network Assistant and I couldn't find it. Some web pages have suggested I telnet into the switch and issue commands like "ip dhcp ?" to see what commands are possible. I can telnet in and if I type but I get an "Unrecognized command" for both "ip ?" and "ip dhcp ?". This makes me think I'm reading the wrong web pages. I did come across the term "DHCP snooping". It seems relevant, but very difficult for me to grasp.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2009
Can a layer 2 cisco 2950 switch be used as a dhcp server with it's own address pool.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2012
Does the 2960 switches with LAN-Lite support DHCP Server Port-Based Address Allocation?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2012
My actual Scenario
1 x 4500 and 1 x 3560?They are gateways of 8 Vlans?They are doing HSRP in each of those Vlans?The 4500 is the Active?There is a DHCP Pool for each of those Vlans on both gateways using "ip dhcp excluded-address" I ensured that the range of provided ips by each DHCP server will not be overlapped Obs.: Reducing the lease time, I ended with the calls bringing related problems.
OK, every thing is blue, every thing is fine.But the network diagram is realy complex(41 switchs, 89 uplinks), and depending of how is the network flow, one or other server answer first or latter.
For many reasons I would like that the secondary DHCP server would answer only if the primary DHCP server goes down.To me, the bigger reason is that DHCP database would be only in one DHCP server.But there is other reasons.
I passed by many frustrated solutions:Try to force a delay on the answer on one of the servers. - Impossible.Try to disable DHCP server, and, using EEM, enable it only if router became active in HSRP. - I couldn't do It.
What I'm thinking now is use the HSRP resource to resolve it.On both routers I would put a "ip helper-address" pointing to an Virtual_HSRP_IP.And depending on which router is the active, him will answer the request.
My first doubt is:Would it work?The second doubt is:Could I use the same Virtual_HSRP_IP that exists on that Vlan(see example 1),or I would need to point it to a Virtual_HSRP_IP in a different Vlan(see example 2)?
Example 1
-----------------------------------
| 4500 |
-----------------------------------
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.10.0.2 255.255.0.0
ip helper-address 10.10.0.1
standby 1 ip 10.10.0.1
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2012
I have a Cisco Catalyst 4506-E Swtich,I configure it as a DHCP and gw for the Wireless Cisco AP through the WLC 5508,the DHCP pool reached the maximum limit I run the Show ip dhcp pool (pool name) it's show the below result
GIR906.PCIRQ.DC.CR.1#show ip dhcp pool 406
Pool 406 :
Utilization mark (high/low) : 100 / 0
Subnet size (first/next) : 0 / 0
Total addresses : 126
Leased addresses : 76
[Code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
I have some DHCP trouble since I subnetted my network with a 2921. My clinets are in 172.16.2.0/23 and DHCP servers are in 172.16.5.0/24.Sometimes, randomly I guess, I get NACK from my DHCP server, and if I look into DHCP logs I got something like this:
15,11/09/12,09:52:27,NACK,172.16.3.172,switchE51D12.host.com,A0CF5BE51D12,,0,6,,,,,,,,
15,11/09/12,09:52:28,NACK,172.16.3.172,switchE51D12.host.com,A0CF5BE51D12,,0,6,,,,,,,,
15,11/09/12,09:52:29,NACK,172.16.3.172,switchE51D12.host.com,A0CF5BE51D12,,0,6,,,,,,,,
[code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2012
Have a client wanting to hand out public ip addresses to all clients from a PFSense Firewall terminating the internet connection.
How do I allow the Cisco Switches currently in place, configured with private ip addresses in the 10.10.x.x ranges and Vlans, where the main 3550 layer 3 has defined dhcp scopes for each vlan, to relay dhcp requests from all vlans to the PFSense firewall?
I assume I would take off the currently defined dhcp scopes for the vlans and configure each vlan/switch with the ip helper address and specify the PFSense firewall and that Nat would have to be disabled onthe firewall?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2011
The last few days I've been exploring options in getting rid of some old routers accross a wan connections. I have a cat 3560 to play with and I thought I would try and use the no switchport command test out routing with switch. I've got some type of route issue and I tried a few things which I thought would fix the issue but had no effect. I'll post the config and a few commands so you can see what the basic setup is.
Here we can see in the arp that it knows about both 10.7.1.2 (PC unable to ping 10.3.3.254) as well as 10.3.3.254 (ASA).I tried adding in a ip route of 10.7.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.3.3.110 as well as 10.3.3.254. Neither produced the results I wanted allowing 10.7.1.2 (PC) to ping the ASA (10.3.3.254). [code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
