I have a 3750 switch (c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-46.SE.bin) were i want to add bandwitdh limit pr. interface, doing the following:
ip access-list extended customer_A
permit ip any any
class-map match-all BW_10Mbps
[Code]....
When i trie to apply the "service-policy output 10 Mbps" to the interface, it says the service-policy output is not supported on the switch. Is this a software related isue ?
I am facing issue while configuring service-policy output command in Cisco 7609-S router with c7600s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SRE2.bin IOS. However, in the same series router having IOS c7600s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SRC6.bin is supported service-policy output.Both the switch have WS-SUP720-3BXL SUP.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are planning to implement the following policy map for egress traffic on an Nexus 7000:
policy-map type queuing dd-1p3q1t-8e-out-10G class type queuing 1p3q1t-8e-out-pq1 priority level 1 shape percent 10 class type queuing 1p3q1t-8e-out-q2 bandwidth remaining percent 5 class type queuing 1p3q1t-8e-out-q3 bandwidth remaining percent 5 class type queuing 1p3q1t-8e-out-q-default bandwidth remaining percent 90
We are using two N7K's to which is one N5K connected through a vPC. From the N5k we use a port-channel with 4 * 10G. Two of this four ports are connected to on N7K and the other two are connected to the other N7K. On the n/K's we are using vPC.
My question now are:
1. Where i have to connect the policy map? To the port-channel or on each physical interface?
2. When i have to connect this policy to the port-channel, how does i have to set the shape percent, when i would like to reserve 10% from the 40G? Does i have to set the shape value to 5% on each N7K because vPC?
i would like to know the possibility to use mls qos trust dscp with service-policy in the IOS ver.12.2(25)SEE2.The specific version is not possible to configure like below.
Cat3750(config-if)#do sh run int f1/0/1
Building configuration...
[code]....
I encountered this problem with cisco 870 atm interface. I applied service-policy output, its being accepted but when you do a show run interface, it's not there.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI run 2801 with 124-24.T3 and I have following problem: router is connected to internet over pppoe and ISP once per day breaks this link. so I get:
Jun 7 19:31:56.639 MSK: %DIALER-6-UNBIND: Interface Vi2 unbound from profile Di1
Jun 7 19:31:56.663 MSK: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access2, changed state to down
and I also have tunnel interface which endpoint is accessible over internet.
so I get:
Jun 7 19:31:56.679 MSK: %ADJ-5-PARENT: Midchain parent maintenance for IP midchain out of Tunnel1 68844500 - looped chain attempting to stack
Jun 7 19:31:57.635 MSK: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Virtual-Access2, changed state to down
Jun 7 19:31:59.199 MSK: %TUN-5-RECURDOWN: Tunnel1 temporarily disabled due to recursive routing
this is not a problem, problem is that router when interface goes down removes service-policy output from it, so I receive such message every day from runcid:
ip ospf cost 1
ip ospf mtu-ignore
tunnel source Loopback1
tunnel destination 192.168.200.199
- service-policy output tunnel_mpr_gre
and have to restore policy manually.
I am not able to configure Service policy output command in Cisco 2921 router.While configuring I am getting below error.Same config is working fine in Cisco 3845 router.I am suspectting the problem with license in IOS.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 1x Cisco 6509 with Sup2 and MSFC2 and it is running on IOS (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11). I have following policy map :
Policy Map VOIP
Class IP PHONE
priority percent 75
and the following command on each interface: service-policy output VOIP those configuration are working fine on SUP2 with MSFC2 but last week I tried to upgrade the SUP2 to SUP32 on the switch and upgrade the IOS to the latest version (s3223-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SXJ4) but when I try to put service-policy output VOIP on each physical interface I am getting the following error:
"Priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface" and when I try to add service-policy output VOIP on a V LAN interface I am getting following error:
MQC features are not supported in output direction for this interface. Will I need to change something after upgrading to SUP32..
I got this 3640, trying to apply a service-policy (output and input), but seems like I do it something wrong...because he only apply the output policy... here the config, I already try to config the service police inside the fa0/0, but is not showed at all, he only show the output, its like I never apply that
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have some trouble with that policy-map on my 2960 or 3560 switches with LAN base 12.2(53)SE2. I want to use that feature to catch video traffic from webcams in laptops which can't send dscp values out of the box. This is my test config to check if the function is working: catch every traffic from my workstation for testing, access-list 101 permit ip any any, class-map match-all CL_TEST
1. I can't see any counters with the command "sh policy-map interface FastEthernet 0/1". Cisco tells that this command is not possible. But how I can see if the policy is working correct?
2. When I did the configuration I can't see any packets with dscp af41 on the out going interface on the switch with "sh mls qos int gi0/1 statistic" as I expected. After reloading the switch I see the pakets with af41. Okay for that moment. But.After that I changed something in the policy-map. Only "set ip dscp ef" for a second test.
Generating some traffic I see only packets with af41 as before I changed the policy-map. No traffic with ef on the outgoing interface.
i just configured a C6K VSS with Sup2T, 15.1SY IOS software and a WS6724-SFP module with the follwing cos config:
auto qos default
table-map cos-discard-class-map
map from 0 to 0
map from 1 to 8
map from 2 to 16
[code]....
After applying the service policy to one interfac of the WS6724-SFP module the policy is deployed to all interfaces of the module. So far it should be ok but after a short time all interface of the module begin to go down an up and down and up ... flapping.
interface Vlan24
description Internal Wireless Internet
ip address 10.x.0.1 255.255.254.0
[Code]....
So, I am trying to limit the bandwidth used by this vlan. The service-policy output statement works, the service-policy input statement does not. My test is to get on that vlan and go to speedtest.net. My download speeds are about 3.5Mb/s, my upload speeds are about 20Mb/s.
it has something to do with this:
sh mls qos ip
QoS Summary [IPv4]: (* - shared aggregates, Mod - switch module Sid - Switch Id)
Int Sid Mod Dir Class-map DSCP Agg Trust Fl AgForward-By AgPoliced-By
[Code].....
is there a way to assigen a QoS service policy via Radius to an Caltalyst 4500/3750 Switchport?
in detail, we would like to assign this policy
policy-map SET_EF class class-default set dscp ef
to an interface. All traffic should be marked with a defined DSCP value.
This works find when doing it statically with
interface FastEthernet2/1 service-policy input SET_EF
but we would need to assign such a policy via Radius during the 802.1x Authentication. different users should get differnt policies. We use Cisco ACS 5.2 as Radius Server and there actually is a field for that in the Authorization Profile Common Tasks Configuration. in detail, this uses the cisco-av-pair "sub-policy-In=<policy name>" attribute to assign a service policy to an NAS.
we found also two other attributes "sub-qos-policy-in" and "ip:sub-qos-polcy-in" for that. CCO says that "ip:sub-qos-polcy-in" works with Catalyst 65k [URL]
unfortunately this seems to not work on Catalyst 45k and 37k.
In the ACS Logs we can see that these attributes are attached to the Radius Reply, but unfortunately they are ignored by the switch.
it is interesing that when entering "show aaa attributes" on the Catalyst 45k, these attributes are displayd - so for my understanding the switch should understand these attibutes (?)
4503-E#sh aaa attributes AAA ATTRIBUTE LIST: Type=1 Name=disc-cause-ext Format=Enum Type=2 Name=Acct-Status-Type Format=Enum
[Code]......
I've been working on breaking down and understanding the default auto qos configuration on a Cisco 3750 in the hopes of putting together a QoS strategy that will fit our environment. I'm having some difficulty understanding how the "mls qos queue-set output" syntax works.
From another post, at [URL], the author offers the following example and explanation;
mls qos queue-set output <1/2> threshold 2 400 400 100 400thresshold 1: 400%
thresshold 2: 400%
thresshold 3: 100% (implicit, not configurable)
reserved: 100%
max: 400%
However, I'm having trouble understanding what is meant. Here, it looks like it's saying, for example;
mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 2 400 400 100 400
How come there is syntax stating "threshold 2" when in the succeeding part the 400 refers to thresshold 1 and threshold 2 again? The syntax 400 400 is, apparently, already referring to thresshold 1 and 2, no?
Example config
int g2/24
service-policy output test
#and/OR
int g2/24.10
encap dot1q 10
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
service-policy output test
I am seeing Interface output drops that appera to be incorrect. When I do "Show Interface gi1/0/20", I will get interface output drops of "4294961382". But, when I do the same command again it shows "0" drops. Is this a reporting error? I am ruinning c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-58.SE.bin on a 3750 stack with 2 switches in the stack. [code]
View 10 Replies View RelatedOne of my Catalyst 3750 switch have many out drops, I execute "sh mls qos int g2/0/3 statist" command, there are many output drops in queue3 threshold3. [code]
View 8 Replies View RelatedWhen configuring QoS on 3750s/3560s, we're mapping packets to particular interface output queues with commands such as: [code] The command to see what's actually being enqueued, dropped, etc. is: [code]
Note that these queues are numbered 0 - 3, and not 1 - 4. We've been assuming that the first queue number in the "mls qos" (i.e., 1) command maps to the first queue (i.e., 0) in the "show mls qos" command.
I am working in an environment where i have to use more etherchannels, any way that how many etherchannels could we create on Cisco Switch 3750 e. do they can utilize high process resources of CPU.
View 4 Replies View RelatedSFP-10G-ER are not supported on Catalyst 3750-X and on other switches ....
%PHY-4-SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED: The SFP in Gi1/1/1 is not supported
Why ?When will ER be supported ?
I try to enter the command "ip policy route-map" on 3750's interface. But the command doesn't appear. Why? Whereas I see several times that this command is possible on this switch. What I have to do to enter this command?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a simple design with 3750. I configured a route-map which define a next hop. I defined this route-map on a policy on a vlan interface.When I test some ping and a debug ip policy and it seems that my policy never match.Is there any mechanism that prevent the switch from using PBR? I think of CEF .
View 5 Replies View RelatedIn our datacenter we have a 3750 stack with IP base image. I have enabled PBR and reloaded the switch. Show sdm prefer says i am using default template. The reason i want to use PBR is that we have 2 firewalls on the same work and want to be able to have granular control over which gateway out of the network they use but still be able to access all internal resouces accross wan and locally.
Created access list to identify traffic:
access-list 10 permit 10.2.3.59 (test workstation on vlan 3)
Created policy:
route-map TestASA permit 10
match ip address 10
set ip next-hop 10.2.0.3
Assigned policy to the user vlan3:
ip policy route-map TestASA
Results:It changed the default gateway to the above gateway but i could not access any resources on any other vlan, could not access resouces accross wan.
I have a simple design with 3750.I configured a route-map which define a next hop.I defined this route-map on a policy on a vlan interface.When I test some ping and a debug ip policy and it seems that my policy never match.Is there any mechanism that prevent the switch from using PBR?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have 2 ISP connected to Router A and Router B.Both the routers are connected to the core 3750 switch.. I want to send the traffic from the switch that goes to router A to router B..[code]
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have a client with a 3750x stack. We've upgraded it to IP Services. We have a simple PBR setup. One access-list to forward traffic from a specific LAN ip to another gateway on the network.
I go to vlan1 (default vlan) to apply the PBR and the command takes with no errors, but do a "show run" and it doesn't show up under the interface.
I go to vlan1 and apply a PBR that doesn't exist and the command takes with no errors, and is listed under the interface in the config
I can apply the PBR globally and appears to work, but we can't have it there based on other issues it creates.
config: (all tracks are up)
C3750_stack#show sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop routing" template.
[Code]....
Unable to limit traffic on catalyst 3750 gigabit ports it has fiber modules,
I want to limit traffic 2mb per port
I have tried srr-queue and policier but it is not working and there is no ratelimit command under any interface, Applying policy to output is not supported of the interface
policy-map rate-limit
class class-default
police 2000000 8000 exceed-action drop
int gi1/0/3
service-policy input rate-limit
still when I start download it goes to 10 mbps
We are using Cisco 3750 switches in our environment as distribution switches.We currently use to police inbound traffic, but we need to find a solution to limit inbound traffic per IP.Something like this “Inbound traffic for each IP can be maximum 1 Mbps” This can be done having, one ACL and one class-map for each IP, but in my situation is not a practical solution, because we have more than 500 IP’s on that site.
Is any way to accomplish this without writing 500 ACLs and 500 class-map?
I am trying to configure policy based routing however when i try to apply to an interface vlan. The configuration does not show in the interface.
route-map OTHER_ROUTE permit 10
match ip address OTHER_ROUTE
set ip next-hop x.x.x.x
[Code]....
I've been fighting what seems to be an increased number of outqueue drops on our core stack and edge switches for the last 3 or 4 weeks.(The core consists of a stack of 5 3750s in 32-gig stack mode. The wkgrp switches are 3560s. all are at 12.2.52) The wkgrp switches are directly connected to users. We use Nortel IP phones with the phone inline with the user PC. auto-neg to 100/full. [code] However I have tried turning off QOS on a couple of workgroup switches (no mls qos, but left individual port configurations the same) but am still seeing drops.Since I have disabled qos on the switches in question (no mls qos) (not the core tho) I am presuming these commands have no affect on the switch operation and therefore cannot be related to the problem. With QOS turned off one would presume that it is general congestion - especially at the user edge where busy PC issues might contribute. So I wanted to see if I could see any instances of packets in the output queues building up.
I wrote some scripts and macros that essentially did a snapshot of 'show int' every 20 seconds or so, and looked for instances of 'Queue: x/' where x was greater than zero.What I found after several days of watching the core stack, and a few of the workgroup switches that are most often displaying the behavior, was that I NEVER saw ANY packets in output queues. I often saw packets in Input queues for VLAN1, once in a great while I would see packets on input queues for fa or Gi interfaces, but NEVER on output queues. [ code] Additionally, when I look (via snmp) at interface utilization on interfaces showing queue drops (both core and wkgroup), they are occurring at ridiculously low utilization levels (as low as 4 to 8%). I've tried to look for microbursts between the core and a wkgroup switch where the core interface was experiencing drops, but haven't seen any (using observer suite). [code] While the queue-drop counts aren't critically high at this point, they are happening more frequently than in the past and I would like to understand what is going on... In most cases, no error counters are incrementing for these interfaces. Is there some mechanism besides congestion that could cause output queue drops?
I have catalyst 3750 I want to controle traffics on every port I have tried Frame-Relay Traffice shaping and Quality of service but there is no support for these commands in the switch.do we have any way to limit traffic on every port in catalyst 3750 and 2960 switches ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedHere is my configuration below , i have upgraded my C-3750 switch IOS from IPbase to IPservices , after upgrading i have tried to apply PBR on my Vlan 4 and failed , when i am tying to apply route-map to Vlan4 the command was taking but i am unable to see the route-map when sh run , i am giving the command as "ip policy route-map TTSL" in my Vlan4 , below is the configuration.
In Vlan2 i have connected one ISP and Vlan4 I have connected one ISP , my local subnets are 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x , now i want to route the 192.168.1.x traffic from Vlan2 and 192.168.2.x Traffic from Vlan4 .
sh boot
coreswitch#sh boot
BOOT path-list : flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5.bin
[Code].....
I was trying to apply route-map in Cisco 3560 Switch (C3560-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2 (55)SE5, I am able to create route-map but I am not able to apply it on any interface.
View 4 Replies View Related