Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4500 - How To Disable Dhcp Pool
May 21, 2012
Can you confirm that if I want to disable temporarily a dhcp pool on a 4500, I need just to shutdown the interface VLAN corresponding to a specific dhcp pool?
ip dhcp pool test
network 10.X.27.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.15.27.250
I have a Cisco 4500 as my core switch and there are two sup eng in this core. However, I noticed that the redundant sup is in diable mode rather than Hot Standby.
I have tired to enable the module but I am not able to do that.
I've got a Catalyst 3560G, and I want to reset the current index for a DHCP pool. I could remove the leases given for that pool, but I couldn't find this option.
3750 can not support multiple subnets in it's DHCP server pool config.
Is this an issue that can be fixed with a different iOS or is there a different Cisco switch that I can replace the 3750 with that will handle multiple subnets within an individual pool?
I have setup a 4500 series core/router.. the customer decided to run dhcp off the router for whatever reason... I have 20 different scopes handing out to their vlans. Does each vlan interface need an helper address?
vlan 1 on router is 10.85.0.1 i used the ip dhcp-server command pointed to 10.85.0.1 and then for ex. int vlan 20 ip add 10.85.20.1 255.255.248.0 ip helper-address 10.85.0.1
i am now getting a loopback error on the router, and i believe this is the cause...
I've two Cisco 4500 running as core switches for huge and complex network. The two 4500 are going to act as dhcp server for several subnets. The easiest solution would be to split each DHCP pool in two, and assign the first half of the pool to one of the core switch and the second half of the pool to the second core switch. This would be a partial solution since if one of the two fails, the second core switch would not have enough dhcp leases available for all the devices connected for each subnet.For such a reason, I'm wondering if it the 4500 switches support a stateful redundant DHCP servers, so that the two switches can synchronize their DHCP lease tables. If this feature is available, I could define the same pools for both the switches without the risk of having duplicate ip addresses within the network.
On a 4500 switch port , defined as access vlan 10, if the user connects his own dhcp server ( instead of the normal pc that should be connected ), will it cause issues with my existing network. the existing network is all static ip. In above case, will the dhcp server start looking out and assign dhcp ip's , if a user unknowingly removes his static ip and changes to obtain ip via dhcp option on the lan properties.
I got some problem with enabling dhcp snooping on 4500 (cat4500e-lanbasek9-mz.122-54.SG.bin) the topology is as below: dhcp snooping enabled only on CORE (with interface trusted to dhcp server)the problem is that I put these 2 commands
ip dhcp snooping ip dhcp snooping vlan 1
but it is not enabled on any vlan
SW-CORE#sh ip dhcp snooping Switch DHCP snooping is enabled DHCP snooping is configured on following VLANs: none DHCP snooping is operational on following VLANs:
[Code]...
On B1 if I turn it on there is a "1" in the section " DHCP snooping is configured on following VLANs:" but on core no.As you can see I did put the trusted on the interface in the direction to the dhcp.First I thought it can be a problem with option 82, I've read a lot about the issues with that, but the problem would be explicable if the client did receive IP address, but it does.
On a 4500 switch port , defined as access vlan 10, if the user connects his own dhcp server ( instead of the normal pc that should be connected ), will it cause issues with my existing network. the existing network is all static ip. In above case, will the dhcp server start looking out and assign dhcp ip's , if a user unknowingly removes his static ip and changes to obtain ip via dhcp option on the lan properties.
I need to apply DHCP snooping on 4500 series switches working as L2 in my Network. We have external DHCL Server in another location connected with 6500 series switch.
Running EIGRP Configured Voice & Data Vlan both DHCP Server -------- 6509 switch<----------------------------------->6509 Switch -------- 4500 switch ----------------------------------------------------------Ip Phones. (ving Redundant) (ving Redundant)
I need to know whether the configuration which I mentioned in scenario is enough for apply DHCP snooping in my network.
1 x 4500 and 1 x 3560?They are gateways of 8 Vlans?They are doing HSRP in each of those Vlans?The 4500 is the Active?There is a DHCP Pool for each of those Vlans on both gateways using "ip dhcp excluded-address" I ensured that the range of provided ips by each DHCP server will not be overlapped Obs.: Reducing the lease time, I ended with the calls bringing related problems.
OK, every thing is blue, every thing is fine.But the network diagram is realy complex(41 switchs, 89 uplinks), and depending of how is the network flow, one or other server answer first or latter.
For many reasons I would like that the secondary DHCP server would answer only if the primary DHCP server goes down.To me, the bigger reason is that DHCP database would be only in one DHCP server.But there is other reasons.
I passed by many frustrated solutions:Try to force a delay on the answer on one of the servers. - Impossible.Try to disable DHCP server, and, using EEM, enable it only if router became active in HSRP. - I couldn't do It.
What I'm thinking now is use the HSRP resource to resolve it.On both routers I would put a "ip helper-address" pointing to an Virtual_HSRP_IP.And depending on which router is the active, him will answer the request.
My first doubt is:Would it work?The second doubt is:Could I use the same Virtual_HSRP_IP that exists on that Vlan(see example 1),or I would need to point it to a Virtual_HSRP_IP in a different Vlan(see example 2)?
Example 1 ----------------------------------- | 4500 | ----------------------------------- interface Vlan1 ip address 10.10.0.2 255.255.0.0 ip helper-address 10.10.0.1 standby 1 ip 10.10.0.1
ON ASA, I understand that we can assign a static IP for a specific VPN client, or we can use a DHCP pool to assign IP. Now if I want to create DHCP pools, say pool_A and pool_B, for user A, B and C they use the IP from Pool_A, and user D, E, and F they get the IP from pool_B. Is there a way to do this in ASA?
We have the configuration below set up in a 3560 switch (addresses and names modified for privacy). We are running out of dynamic IP’s in the current pool (6.35.159.0 – 6.35.159.255). We have a new set of IP’s that we can use (6.44.56.0 – 6.44.57.255 – an additional 512 addresses). Although I can figure out the commands to add a new dhcp pool, secondary subnet, etc., I’ve never done this before so I’m not sure of everything I need to do. The end result I need is that the 3560 needs to be able to hand out IP addresses from the current and new pool to anything connecting to vlan 300 – our datanet where computers access the Internet. What I need to do as far as modifying the vlan, adding the secondary subnet, defining helper IP’s, gateways, whatever, so that computers connecting via vlan 300 have Internet access via either of the pools? I have been told that all I need to do is create the pool, but not sure if that is correct...
Cisco IOS 12.4 Basic check to see if the command "ip nat pool" is available?We have 12.2 basic and I know it is in the 12.4 Advanced and 15.1 Basic versions (too large of a jump in version for management). Our budget is very limited so I am hoping that 12.4 Basic has this command.
I am configuring IPSec Remote Access VPN on a ASA 5505. There are one external interface and one internal interface configured on the device. Internal interface connected to subnet 192.168.1.0/24.en VPN client get connected, I would like to assign the IP from some subnet(for example 192.168.2.0/24) other than the current internel subnet (192.168.1.0/24), but the VPN client can still access to 192.168.1.0/24. Is there a way to do this?
My AP get IP from 6509, but client cannot get dhcp from my dhcp pool for client, what is the reason?i have 3750g switch with integrated WLC, i connect it to 6509 I did all configs yesterday here is outputs
WLC Interface Name Port Vlan Id IP Address Type Ap Mgr Guest -------------------------------- ---- -------- --------------- ------- ------ ----- ap-manager LAG 10 172.16.10.100 Static Yes No globus LAG 20 172.16.20.254 Dynamic No No management LAG 10 172.16.10.99 Static No No service-port N/A N/A 0.0.0.0 Static No No
I have one issue on Vlan in Cisco 3750X switches , I have 2 Offices , I am sitting at corp OFfice and i have one 3750 ( 10.10.1.36)Switch at my location , in my remote office i have one more switch 3750 ( 10.10.33.1) and i am able to access the both vlan IPS with out any issue , now i have some network components in Vlan33 ( 10.10.33.1) at my remote office . i am able to ping 10.10.33.1 IP from my corp office , but i am not able to ping any network devices in 10.10.33.5 example : 10.10.33.5 is my Cyberoam IP at remote location and i am not able to ping , i have taken a trace route and not able to find the issue as i am not much femilar , ping 10.10.33.5 at remote location devicec
I am giving the Configuration for both locaitons below :
10.10.1.36 - Corp Office 3750 Switch: sh run L3-#sh running-config Building configuration...
I want to configure multiple DHCP configuration on ASA 5505. I tried to create sub interface for different IP Pool but it was not configure on ASA 5505. is it possible to create subinterface on ASA 5505?
ASA 5505 IOS version: 8.3(1) License: Security Plus
I'd like to create dhcp server pool on ASA 5510. I was wondering how big is the DHCP scope that Cisco ASA 5510 can support? Are there any ASA models which can support up to subnet mask 22 for DHCP scope?
I was trying to set a DHCP pool with 127.16.0.0/16 with RV220W, however, RV220W UI can't save it. It displays "IP Address Range -"Step to reproduce: (it is 100% reproducible)
1. login into RV220W admin web
2. Create a VLAN, id 201
3. Go to "Multiple VLAN subnets", select the VLAN, click edit
4. Enter following info: IP Address: 172.16.0.1 Subnet Mask: 255.255.0.0 DHCP Mode: DHCP Server Domain Name: Cisco Starting IP Address: 172.16.2.100 Ending IP Address: 172.16.10.254 Primary DNS Server: 172.16.0.1 Leave rest of settings with default value. DNS proxy is enabled
5. Press Save button. The UI shows text "IP Address Range -".
Expected result: RV220W shall save the setting and make use of 172.16.0.0 subnet in IP pool. By the way, the error message "IP Address Range -" seems incompleteI tried same setting on netgear FVS318N (very similar settings to RV220W), it accepts 172.16.0.0/16 as DHCP IP pool and works.RV220W has great feature set meets my needs. Its UI is slow and sometime dashboard freezes, which I can live with comparing to features. But DHCP server IP pool can't be class B is huge limitation to me.
I'm following a tutorial that 'dumbs down' the modem and lets me use the router for everything.
It asks me to set up a static LAN IP (10.x.x.x range) and edit the DHCP pool of the router. When I'm logged in to the routers admin, it doesn't seem I'm able to do any of this.
Earlier in the tutorial it also asked me to set up a static IP for the router, which I did I suppose.
I've added a screenshot of the admin panel, in case that's relevant.
I have some DHCP trouble since I subnetted my network with a 2921. My clinets are in 172.16.2.0/23 and DHCP servers are in 172.16.5.0/24.Sometimes, randomly I guess, I get NACK from my DHCP server, and if I look into DHCP logs I got something like this:
Have a client wanting to hand out public ip addresses to all clients from a PFSense Firewall terminating the internet connection.
How do I allow the Cisco Switches currently in place, configured with private ip addresses in the 10.10.x.x ranges and Vlans, where the main 3550 layer 3 has defined dhcp scopes for each vlan, to relay dhcp requests from all vlans to the PFSense firewall?
I assume I would take off the currently defined dhcp scopes for the vlans and configure each vlan/switch with the ip helper address and specify the PFSense firewall and that Nat would have to be disabled onthe firewall?
In a stand alone 3750x switch configuration, can the secondary power supply only act as a redundant power supply (active/standby), or can it become a "pool" of power similar to power sharing mode for StackPower (somewhat active/active)? I understand there is no stack involved here but I'm curious if this functionality is possible.
Does the 4500 support VSS (Virtual Switching System) ? On the official product overview page it says: 1.6 Terabits capacity with Virtual Switching System (hardware-ready)What means Hardware ready ? Does it mean that it supports VSS in the same manner as the 6500 ? The reason I'm asking this question is that I didn't find any info on the Internet about this. We would like to upgrade our network by interconnecting the 2 sites with Layer 2 redundant links (Layer 2 extension), but I'd like to use the both links in a load-balancing manner, which can be a real pain in the *** with STP. The choice is between 4500 and 3750 stackable core switches. The 6500s are very expensive.
How to know 4500 SUP7-E's MIB ?Our customer use MS SCOM 2012 SP1 get the OID are 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1286, but we use IOS MIB locator, we can not find this MIB id.
below are the IOS sh version information :
Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSAL-M), Version 03.02.00.SG RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4) Technical Support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Tue 26-Apr-11 18:09 by prod_rel_team
My question is if I can configure 3 ssid, for 3 different VLAN and add the DHCP address from a WAP4410N AP, when you upgrade to the latest version of IOS I can have this functionality?