Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750X - Unable To Access VLAN IP Pool
Mar 19, 2013
I have one issue on Vlan in Cisco 3750X switches , I have 2 Offices , I am sitting at corp OFfice and i have one 3750 ( 10.10.1.36)Switch at my location , in my remote office i have one more switch 3750 ( 10.10.33.1) and i am able to access the both vlan IPS with out any issue , now i have some network components in Vlan33 ( 10.10.33.1) at my remote office . i am able to ping 10.10.33.1 IP from my corp office , but i am not able to ping any network devices in 10.10.33.5 example : 10.10.33.5 is my Cyberoam IP at remote location and i am not able to ping , i have taken a trace route and not able to find the issue as i am not much femilar , ping 10.10.33.5 at remote location devicec
I am giving the Configuration for both locaitons below :
10.10.1.36 - Corp Office 3750 Switch:
sh run
L3-#sh running-config
Building configuration...
I have a LIII Switch Cisco 3750x ,with diffrent Vlans , Some users are in Vlan 102 (10.10.2.0) and Some Users are in Vlan1 (10.10.1.0) , now i want to restrict the Vlan102 users to access Vlan1 , i am pasting my configuration below , how to create a access list .
interface Vlan1 ip address 10.10.1.36 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.1.36
I've got a 3750x stack set up as my core switch (only a small-ish environment) - I'm shortly going to be deploying an enterprise wireless network with Corporate and Guest SSID's. I'm going to be putting all traffic from the Guest SSID in VLAN 244, and don't want it to have access to any of the other VLANs (1 (Legacy Eqpt), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 248 & 252).
IP ranges for all the main VLANs are:
1: 10.0.0.x/22 4: 10.0.4.x/22 8: 10.0.8.x/22 12: 10.0.12.x/22 16: 10.0.16.x/22 etc etc (you get the pattern)
I'll probably give Guest traffic (VLAN 248) the IP range 192.168.10.x/22 (not because I NEED that many addresses, but it's easier for everyone to remember/understand if I keep the subnet masks the same all round). However I also have a CCTV VLAN (252) which already has the range 192.168.0.x/24, which some people in other VLANs WILL need access to.
So my question is: What is the syntax for the ACL on my 3750x (IP base - 15.0.2) to prevent traffic from VLAN 244 gaining access to any of my other VLANs. I'm making a broad assumption here that a layer 3 switch is perfectly capable of supporting that function? I need ALL the syntax for setting up ACL's - I've never done it before
My gateway device by the way is 10.0.4.1, and I do have inter-VLAN routing set up on the core switch (obviously).
In a stand alone 3750x switch configuration, can the secondary power supply only act as a redundant power supply (active/standby), or can it become a "pool" of power similar to power sharing mode for StackPower (somewhat active/active)? I understand there is no stack involved here but I'm curious if this functionality is possible.
I am using a Cisco SG-300 28 port switch in layer 3 mode as my default gateway for all my devices. I have two vlans on the switch, vlan 1 and vlan 4. Both are pulling valid IP addresses in their scope from the DHCP server, and both have valid DNS settings. I set a static route to the Internet on the switch to our firewall (192.168.5.254). All devices connected to vlan 1 are able to access the Internet, however all devices connected to vlan 4 cannot get past the switch. A tracert from one of these devices shows it hits the switch as the gateway, but gets no further. [code]
I recently upgraded my network to have two 3750x core, one interface on the cisco is connecting to a Netgear switch via a fiber converter. I am keep getting the vlan flapping error message in my log as below.
I am migrating an existing LAN from 3550 to 3750X-12S. In the existing configuation, I´ve got some trunks with native VLAN <> 1. The native VLAN is also used for user data transport. With IOS 15.0(1)SE3 on 3750X I recognized, that per default behavior PVST is not active for a VLAN defined as native, even if the corresponding trunk is up and trunking. My current workaround is to add a "switchport access vlan" command on the trunk even this one never should become an access port. With this statement only the switch is activating the PVST for the native VLAN. For all other vlans PVST works as exspected. [code]
I'm building a new colo presence with a full class C of public IP's. The idea is to connect to our ISP with a 3750x switchstack and they will be providing two ethernet drops that conect directly into two seperate switches on their side with HSRP and BGP at the routing level, so we will just point to their virtual IP (gateway address).I'm not sure how to either segment the public ip block or statically route each ip address and the interaction of vlans/svi with HSRP groups. Just use the switch at layer 2 or handle the internal routing with eigrp or ospf at layer3?
Has anything changed in the way of defaults for creating a trunk port and spanning-tree between a 3750x and the newer 2960s? I have one of each I just took out of the box and applied my standard switch configuration template but I cannot get my VLANs that are configured on my 3750X to appear on the 2960S. I find nothing that is blocking and everything seems to be forwarding and I am running out of things to check.
My management has tasked me to give them a high level overview of the different switching we can choose for our new building.
This is what I know so far.4 Closets, each closet has 450 ports,One MDF room that is will contain one UCS Chassis and a Nimble iSCSI SAN.
I am working on the spreadsheet and it looks like this (Not totally filled):
2960s3560x3750x45064510Approx cost (Each, 48PORT, POE+, 10G uplink, Dual PS, IP BASE) 6K7K8K45K75KMax Capacity192432432192384Backplane speed206464520520ProLeast ExpensiveStackable to 9Stackable to 9ProDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSProLayer 3 opt Layer 3 optDual SupsDual SupsConExpensiveExpensiveConNo Dual PSConLayer 2 OnlyCannot stack more than 4 For the MDF I would like to use 2 Nexus 5548's with FEX's, and the layer 3 daughter board. For the IDF's I was thinking of two 4010's.
This is my scenario. I have my IP as 172.16.1.1 (aaaa.bbbb.cccc.dddd) which has full internet access. Now when i am not available in the office, i noticed some one assigning my IP in to his workstation and gaining full internet access. How do i restrict such things? i.e. even if some one assigning my IP on the network, they shouldnt access LAN or WAN.I tried 'arp 172.16.1.1 aaaa.bbbb.cccc.dddd arpa' configuring on my L3 Cisco 3750X switch assuming i can acheive, but that did not work.
We recently purchased Cisco 3560X Layer3 Switch. We need to perform simple Inter VLAN routing. We have configured VLAN1 (name-server_vlan) and VLAN2 (name- user_vlan). We have also assigned the Ports and IP address to both the VLANs. After assiging this if we plug Laptop A into VLAN1 then it doesnt communicates with Laptop B (btw, Laptop A is able to Ping VLAN2 Gateway ) in VLAN2 but on the other hand Laptop B is able to communicate with Laptop A and ping everything i.e. Gateway of VLAN1.
I have started to use ip extended access-lists on several 3750X-switches to filter inbound and outbond traffic on the VLANs. But it seems that the use of object-groups is not supported, is this correct? Is it really no way to group different ip-addresses into groups and then use these groups in the access-lists?
We have a 3750 and a 3560 defined as a layer 2 switches. One gig port on each switch is trunked to layer 3 switches, which containall the VLAN definitions etc. The other gig port on the 3650 and 3750 switches are trunked together to provide an alternative path in the event of a failure.
We have added a new device to the 3750 and given it a VLAN 9, and the VLAN added to allowable VLANS on both trunk ports between the layer 3 and layer 2 devices ie:
switch port trunk allowed vlan 9,10,20,30,40,50,60,90,200,202,206,211,212,700. From either of the 3750 or the 3560 we can ping any device on any VLAN on any switch in this group with exception ofVLAN 9. We can however ping the ip address of VLAN 9 on the layer three switches.
I want to configure accesslists on my Catalyst 3750X-switches to protect different VLANs/networks. Any best-practices about inbound versus outbound accesslists? In my head it is more readable and easier to understand the config when accesslists are assigned outbound on the VLAN to protect instead of assigning them inbound on all possible source-VLANs. But of course, from a performance point-of-view it is better to use inbound access-lists to avoid un-necessary routing etc.
i configured the VLAN810, with DHCP services, while i try to ping the host which is connected to gi 1/0/2 from my gi 1/0/1 , i can't ping the same vlan host , while i try to debug ip icmp its showing ,
C3750XB11#sh running-config Building configuration... Current configuration : 12053 bytes ! version 12.2 no service pad service timestamps debug datetime msec
I have a Nexus 5548 installed (layer 2 device only) with several 10G ports supporting IBM P770 systems and a TSM (Tivoli Storage Manager) system on a single VLAN. All of the Nexus 5548 ports are configured for jumbo frames. I was ask to install a new server on the same VLAN as the others but as 1G port without jumbo frames to allow communications with the TSM server. I'm assuming that the 1G port for this new server without jumbo frames configured on the Nexus 5548 will not be unable to communicate with the TSM server that is on the same VLAN with it's Nexus 5548 10G port configure using jumbo frames.
I am not able to create more than 256 VLAN in Cisco Nexus 5010 switch. While creating I am getting "No VLAN resources available for VLAN creation" Details below -
Switch model - 5010 Software : NX OS 4.0 (1a)
Error Message: Nexus_5010(config)# vlan 417 ERROR: No VLAN resource available for VLAN creation.
Yesterday I configured the 7010 Nexus switch. I created a VDC and allocated few ports and configured VLAN for testing. After enabling feature interface-vlan i was allowed to configured L3 interface for the vlan. I assigned ip address and connected few server to check the reachability but it says Destination Host Unreachable.
I am unable to connect a Wifi Modem wiith 2960 Switch having VLAN 1,Attached is the network diagram,what configurations i have to modified it,I need to Connect A Wifi Modem on VLAN 1 ,Connectivity is working fine between VLAN 10 and VLAN 1.What should be the next step to Connect Wifi Modem to VLAN 1 so that Users on VLAN 10 should connect to Internet.
Here is my configuration below , i have upgraded my C-3750 switch IOS from IPbase to IPservices , after upgrading i have tried to apply PBR on my Vlan 4 and failed , when i am tying to apply route-map to Vlan4 the command was taking but i am unable to see the route-map when sh run , i am giving the command as "ip policy route-map TTSL" in my Vlan4 , below is the configuration.
In Vlan2 i have connected one ISP and Vlan4 I have connected one ISP , my local subnets are 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x , now i want to route the 192.168.1.x traffic from Vlan2 and 192.168.2.x Traffic from Vlan4 .
sh boot coreswitch#sh boot BOOT path-list : flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5.bin
I have a multiple Offices in my location , all my external users are connecting my site using Cisco Client to site VPN and accessing my 2 sites , All users are able to access my 2nd office servers which are in 10.10.0.x pool , I have a different vlan in that same location with 10.10.35.x series and users are not able to access this pool servers , I am not much familiar with Routing . i am using ASA 5520 firewall .
Aug 24 11:32:16.275 AEST: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Vlan21, changed state to down Aug 24 11:32:36.827 AEST: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Vlan21, changed state to up Aug 24 11:35:23.854 AEST: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/1/2, changed state to down Aug 24 11:35:24.854 AEST: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/1/2, changed state to downesw_mrvl_vlan_port_remove : Unable to find entry for VLAN(1) dbnum(1) esw_mrvl_vlan_port_remove : Unable to find entry for VLAN(1) dbnum(1)(code)
When the above problem happens, as work-around, we delete VLAN.DAT file on the Compact Flash of this 2811 router and recopy the VLAN>DAT file back to teh Compact Flash.
Then it runs for a few weeks and the same problem happened.
Then we put a new Compact Flash and recopied VLAN.DAT to new CF and it ran for 3 weeks and same problem started again.
Could be 2811 router motherboard? This customer has thousands of these 2811 routers in identical setups and this is the only router that is having this problem.
Cisco IOS 12.4 Basic check to see if the command "ip nat pool" is available?We have 12.2 basic and I know it is in the 12.4 Advanced and 15.1 Basic versions (too large of a jump in version for management). Our budget is very limited so I am hoping that 12.4 Basic has this command.
Can you confirm that if I want to disable temporarily a dhcp pool on a 4500, I need just to shutdown the interface VLAN corresponding to a specific dhcp pool?
ip dhcp pool test network 10.X.27.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 10.15.27.250
I've got a Catalyst 3560G, and I want to reset the current index for a DHCP pool. I could remove the leases given for that pool, but I couldn't find this option.
We are having Cisco router 1002 ASR and 2841 switch. Some times perticular VLAN user will not be able to access the network but from the same switch others VLAN users can able to access. We were getting ARP entries in router but we cannot ping the IP's. Even we clear the ARP entries. Once we restart the switch users can access the network. We have changed vlan ports, uplink too. but problem not solved. and we observed CPU utilization will be going 70-80% some times and at same time switch hangs.
We have 3 VLAN in our cisco 3750G switch. VLAN 1 10.1.0.0/24 for domain network, VLAN 2 10.2.0.0/24 for student and VLAN 3 10.3.0.0/24 for public. We have one printer 10.3.0.206 in the VLAN 3 and want to allow student server 10.2.0.253 in the VLAN 2 to access the printer. How can we configure access-list? Here is current configuration.
ip access-list extended publicaccess permit icmp any any permit ip any host 10.2.0.253 permit tcp any any established log deny ip 10.3.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 deny ip 10.3.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.255
Extended IP access list VLAN20 10 permit tcp any any established 11 permit icmp any any 20 permit tcp any 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 eq 80 30 permit tcp any 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 eq 443 40 deny ip any any log
[code].....
Above is the network diagram and access list for VLAN 20 and VLAN 30, applied on incoming direction of each valn.But still able to access other port which is not on access list, tried changing the direction with no luck.Inter vlan routing is enabled on CoreSwitch default router is 192.168.10.10
