Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Can't Remove Bgp Aggregate-address Statements

Jan 29, 2012

I have a 6509 running s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M version 12.2(33)SXH5.  Four incorrect bgp aggregate-address statements were entered in which overlap.  Attempted to remove the statements but they won't come out.
 
aggregate address 16.37.31.0 255.255.224.0 summary-only
aggregate address 16.37.30.0 255.255.224.0 summary-only
aggregate address 16.37.29.0 255.255.224.0 summary-only
aggregate address 16.37.26.0 255.255.224.0 summary only
 
I have entered in the correct statements and have no problem getting those in, removing them, and reentering them.

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Won't Remove ACL Entry

Dec 3, 2012

We have a pair of 6509's with duplicate ACL lists & entries.

1 = Version 12.2(33)SXI4a
2 = Version 12.2(18)SXF15a
 
I wanted to remove some logging that was on an entry on one of our extended ACL's. On 1 this worked fine with the no 400

400 <acl rule without log>
 
However on 2 it lets me carry out the no 400 command but when i go to add the 400 <acl rule without log> i get the error % Duplicate sequence number.sure enough when i perform the 'Show access-lists <Name>' it is still there!
  
I have tried the following:

Adding a duplicate ACL entry before it (399) without log and i still get hits on line 400Adding and removing the duplicate created line 399 (without logging) with no issues.Adding and removing a dupliacte ACL (without Logging) after (line 401) with no issues 

It looks like it is just this line it seems to think it has removed but hasn't?!
 
I understand an option is to duplicate the ACL in a text editor remove line, delete the ACL and put the edit back in .....however i wondered if this is something known (bug).

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3500 XL - Remove Default Gateway IP Address

Aug 9, 2012

I have a 3500 XL switch with the following default gate IP address that i need to clear from the switch but not quite shore how to remove it.
 
I've removed the customer original Ip for security reason as this is an open discussion forum and just replaced with 1.1.1.1
 
switch#show ru
Building configuration...
Current configuration:
!

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: Aggregate Policer Error In 6509

Mar 13, 2012

I am trying to find some background information regarding this error:
 
Cisco 6500 [SUP720-3B] %QM-4-AGG_POL_EXCEEDED QoS Hardware Resources Exceeded
Out of Aggregate policers.
 
What triggers this error? In this case, there are QoS policies configured at the interface level. The 'show platform hardware capacity' command shows that there are1024 policers supported. What counts as a policer? Is a policer each instance of a class using the police command? I see where there have been some suggestions to use VLAN based policies instead of interface policies and others suggesting to turn off 'qos marking statistics' but I would really like to understand the details of what causes policers to be used up and how to approach fixing this.
 
I am trying to understand how this works under the covers but can't seem to find any documentation anywhere defining the details.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - HSRP Standby Address Not Reachable

Jun 11, 2013

I have  my hsp setup where switch A and switch B share active/standby roles among several vlans. In the last few weeks, i have seen trouble tickets where connectivity is lost and upon investigation i discover that i can ping physical interface IP addresses for both standby and active devices but not the standby IP. I have also validated configurations and layer 2 paths and they haven't been broken.

What I end up doing is failover to the standby device and back and the problem clears, reachability is restored. My question is whether I am solving this the right way. If so, what is it that would cause the standby IP to not be reachable and how does my solution fix that? N/B the switches are catalyst 6509's.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Static MAC Address Entry And MS NLB / IPv6

May 23, 2012

I have seen other discussions regarding Static MAC address entries on IPv4, but what of IPv6?We have MS NLB solutions and they are working fine. We have Cisco 6509/6504, Version 12.2(33)SXI5
 
But then we have a new one for a new ActiveDirectory solution, and on those networks we have implemented IPv6.
 
How is Static MAC address entries and MS NLB solved in IPv6 (i.e arp ip.ip.ip.ip mac.mac.mac ARPA gi1/1). I can't seem to find much examples or documentation on this? Is it replaced with another function?The reason I ask is twofold.

1. I really want to know

2. The NLB cluster seem to drop IPv6 traffic at even intervals, witch seems to correspond with NLB transition.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Mac Address Error Message No Entries Present

Dec 6, 2012

I am receiving this error after connecting a copper adapter on a GBIC blade in a 6509. Here are the results from the show Interface.  I am waiting to confirm the device on the other side settings but as far as I see I get UP and Up for protocol and line respectively.
 
GigabitEthernet2/11 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is C6k 1000Mb 802.3, address is 0009.11e4.f3ce (bia 0009.11e4.f3ce)
Description: RCPBSDEV
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stack 3750X - How To Configure Port Channel To Aggregate Two Links

Feb 18, 2013

I have two stacks 3750X on two different sites with two links L_2_L, and I want to configure the port channel to aggregate the two links.
 
Site A                                                                                                  Site B
3750X -A1 --------------------------------------(          )--------------------------------------- 3750X -B1
                                                      (  L-2-L )
3750X -A2 --------------------------------------(          )--------------------------------------- 3750X -B2

Below the configuration that I have put the two stacks.
 
site A
interface Port-channel5
description Etherchannel group entre le stack 3750X-A et Switch Lan_2_Lan
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 11,12,999
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
speed 100
 
But the problem is only one link is Bundeled in channel group, see below

Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
5      Po5(SU)         LACP      Gi1/0/15(I) Gi2/0/15(P)

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco :: BGP Aggregate-address Versus Static Summary Route

Sep 16, 2012

I have a layer 3 switch with a bunch of SVIs all in the 192.168.x.0/24 range. I just want to advertise a 192.168.0.0/16 summary to the BGP neighbors. I can do this either by:

1) Redistributing connected into BGP and then using the 'aggregate-address' command to advertise the summary.

2) Specifying a network statement in the BGP config for every single SVI, then using the 'aggregate-address' command.

3) Create a static route to null0 (ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 null0) and put 'network 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0' command in the BGP config.All three fulfill the same purpose of summarizing all the SVIs, but creating the static route is much cleaner in this case. It seems like the aggregate-address command is mostly intended for routers that are aggregating connections coming from other routers and all of them share a common prefix.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 To 6509-E Chassis Upgrade?

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

     x3     48 ports
     x1     NAM
     x2     Sup720
     Running 12.2(18)SXF3
 
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade Of 6509 To 6509-E Chassis

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

x3     48 ports
x1     NAM
x2     Sup720

Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Remove IPSec VPN SPA Module From 6509 Chassis?

Feb 29, 2012

Need to remove the IPSec VPN SPA module from the 6509 chassis. Does the module is hot swappable or does the 6509 need to be turned off prior to removal.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Remove QOS From 3750 Switch

Jun 8, 2007

How do you properly remove the QOS queues and configs from the switch.A was using auto qos which created a whole mess of qos configs on my running-config. I did "no mls qos" in conf term but that did not remove the queues.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-C6509-E Doesn't Remove IPs From ARP

Mar 25, 2012

we have a WS-C6509-E WITH SUP VS-S720-10G, and IOS s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI5.bin. [code]

From, what we can see, whenever we try to clear arp-cache, it doesn't remove the IPs from the ARP. We've checked a bug in the IOS 12.2(33)SXH4 with the same issue, in version SXI4 is solved, but I have version SXI5, it is supposed to be fixed, from this caveat CSCtf16300, since it says it was fixed on 12.2(33)SXI4, it should be fixed on SXI5, right ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 To Remove Switch Number 3

Apr 30, 2013

We currently have a stack of 5 x 3750 switches and i want to remove switch number 3 (it has the least number of things plugged in). What will happen to switch 4 and 5 will they be renumbered 3 and 4, and will the config automatically update this if it does?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Remove Configurations From Ports (GigE Or Fa) In 6500?

Jul 17, 2012

what is the best way to remove configs from ports (GigE or Fa) in a 6500 that we aren't using anymore (i.e. best way to return a port to default).  Remove each line one at a time or is there a command to default a port?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2950 - Cannot Remove Banner And Login

Aug 12, 2012

I'm having trouble with a Cisco Catalyst 2950 Series Switch where by I'm following the procedure from Cisco's web site to remove the Banner and login information, url..

Each command is being accepted by the switch from following the information given within the help sheet above,the problem i have now is when i turn the power off then turn the switch back on I'm still getting the banner and login information even though i have follwed Cisco's help correctly.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-6748-GE How To Remove Old Configuration Of Previous Modules

Jan 23, 2011

We currently have two 6509's running in VSS, both switches have a  WS-6748-GE module in slot 3.  I'm in the processing of removing these modules.  I will then be replacing them with a different module type, but I need to know how to remove the old configuration of the previous modules.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - How To Remove Stack Info On 2 Switches

Feb 20, 2012

I have been given 2 x 3750 switches that were a stack, I need to keep the configs on both but how do I make them individual switches again and remove the stack info?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cannot Remove Embedded Service Engine Interface In 2951

Mar 5, 2012

I have removed an embbedded service engine modole from an 2951 router, after reboot the rouiter. the service engine interface still appears; any command can I use to completely remove it.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750x Remove Stacking Option On Sunday For Testing

May 2, 2013

is it easy to remove the 3750x stacking?  i'd like to test one of them on a sunday and keep the other one on production.  it's just two stack of 3750x, is it hard and do i really need to remove the cables on the back?
 
basically i need to put a different config for my testing, i gues i need to remove the cables right?  and put it back on the stack before monday.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Remove Internal Fan To Make Switch More Silent

Jan 21, 2013

Any example, tested on 3750-24/48TS and 3750G-24TS to remove the fan to make the switch more silent. I'm not interested in replies telling that is risky, I'm interested to know how is the switch acting. Has shutdown at overheating? I will use the switches only for my CCIE studies, a couple of hours per day, no heavy load.
 
I tested with 2950 switches are there were absolutely no problems, the devices were even in production.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5596 - Remove Switch-Profile Without Interruption

Jun 11, 2013

i want to remove the sync-profile on each of two synchronized Nexus 5596UP without loosing the config stored in Switch-Profile. That means without connectivity interruption and re-configuration of interfaces in "conf t mode", for example. Since NX-OS Release 5.2(1)N1(1) there is a new command
 
switch(config-sync)# no switch-profile abc profile-onlyprofile-only—Deletes the switch profile without the local configuration. 
   
[URL]

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 How To Remove Ports From Config For Non-existent Line Card

Aug 6, 2012

On a number of 6500 chassis it appears that linecard 3 did exist at somepoint, but was removed.Problem is that when issuing the 'show int desc'  or  'show ip int brie'  the ports for the still appear, and indeed same with 'show run'  and  'show conf'.

View 1 Replies View Related

Broadband :: Remove An Ip Address From The Computer

Feb 24, 2011

Tech Support Guy System Info Utility version 1.0.0.1
OS Version: Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium , 64 bit
Processor: AMD Sempron(tm) M120, AMD64 Family 16 Model 6 Stepping 2
Processor Count: 1
RAM: 1788 Mb
Graphics Card: AMD M880G with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 , 336 Mb
Hard Drives: C: Total - 224515 MB, Free - 125199 MB; D: Total - 13654 MB, Free - 2267 MB; F: Total - 101 MB, Free - 95 MB;
Motherboard: Hewlett-Packard, 363F, 42.15, Base Board Serial Number
Antivirus: Microsoft Security Essentials, Updated and Enabled

View 1 Replies View Related

Remove FQDN / MAC Address From WRT310N Router

Jul 23, 2011

trying to remove a MAC address or FQDN from my router. Lexmark printer was installed and died. Lexmark replaced, but old MAC is still embedded in router and my laptop only sees the old, no matter how many times I reinstall.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: C3750ME / Add Or Remove IPv4 Address From Tunnel Interface Getting This Log?

Jan 3, 2007

I have a Catalyst 3750 Metro running 12.2(25)EY4.Every time I add or remove an ipv4 address from a tunnel interface I have the following log:
 
Jan  4 10:42:19.088: %PLATFORM_HCEF-3-ADJ:  Insane handle in add LT7
-Traceback= 25222C A81C70 A7B28C B08958 B28940 B2A2E0 B2A684 B9EFA4 B9F004 B9F684 B9F814 B9F99C B8E3BC BA1BD8 3DFA94 39BA3C

View 3 Replies View Related

Remove Access To Mail Address / Password On A Computer Others Use

Nov 27, 2011

When signing in on my e-mail I accidently clicked on "yes" when asked if I wanted the computer to remember details. Now I can't find out how to reverse it. new to computers as you can see.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / 4900 - Network Down Cause Switching Supervisor With Redundancy

Jan 11, 2012

we've had an issue with our network, we have 2 6509 connected with redundancy, which are connected with 2 x 4900 Switches, from which are connected to a ESX Chassis for visualization, the thing is that the ESX stopped working, and the 4900 switches, and the main core were suffering from overload, they hang on it very well, in order to stop the overload, one of the links to the ESX Chassis were disconnected from one of the 4900 switches. The CPU usage from the 4900 and the core(6509) went down below 40%, and then they started to migrate the virtual servers from the chassis to another 2 chassis that were added right after. They were actually working well, but suddenly the 6509 changed to the other supervisor after everything was OK. We were wondering what could have been the cause of this, maybe the virtual servers migrations, maybe the overload from the ESX ? We also had a few question, is there any need to reload the cores every few months as a planned task ? Because the cores have been up for more than 1 year. And also is there any kind of of tool to monitor the CPU status, or the status overall from the cores or the switches ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Upgrading Switching Infrastructure

Apr 11, 2012

The have around 80 staff and I think the current infrastructure is overkill for the size of the company. The current kit is old and they have no GB ethernet ports. They currently have:-

Core Switch:
1x Cisco c6509with a 48 port fast ethernet module (WS-X6248-RJ-45)
and an 8 port fibre module (WS-X6408A-GBIC)

I'm looking to replace this with something with 72 ethernet ports and 8 fibre ports

Access Switches:
2x 3500Replacement needs at least 48 ports and 2 fibre modules each

and 2x 5500Replacement needs at least 72 ports and 2 fibre modules each.

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Routing Based On Client Gateway (6509-E)

Feb 26, 2012

If client gateway = 192.168.64.9 then next-hop = 192.168.64.8 else use default-route 0.0.0.0
 
I know it's possible to do a route-map match ip-address ACL list. But is it possible to match on gateway?
 
Some info about hardware and config:

6509-E in VSS (IOS 12.2(17r)SX5) withVS-S720-10G supervisor.

All routes are static, IP for 192.168.64.9 is on SVI vlan.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 MSFC - LAN Default Gateway Routing

Mar 6, 2012

I have two ISPs. Each is on it's own subnet connected to the 6509 MSFC/Switch. FW1 is on 100.1.100.0/30 and FW2 is on 200.1.200.0/30 subnet. My goal is route all traffice going to the Internet from subnet 10.133.3.0/24 to FW1 and all other subnets across the organization to FW2. I am not sure if I need to use ACL / Static route combo, or just a static routes or ACLS?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Use Policy Based Routing To Redirect Http Traffic

May 29, 2012

We have a Catalyst 6509 switch, and we hope to use policy based routing to redirect http traffic to my proxy server, where I can find the configuration example?

View 11 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved