Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - VSS Implementation

Jun 5, 2011

I have a network with four 6509s in a ring with 10Gb links. Two adjacent switches are at the home office, the other two at the DR site. The switches at each location are physically similar to each other with respect to what blades are in them. We went through an upgrade from SUP-720's to VS-SUP-720's recently, only at the DR site - basically a practice, with the home office conversion hopefully taking place next weekend.
 
We initially just brought up the two chassis separately, in non-VSS formation (stand-alone). So far, so good - everything was connected, all traffic was passiing, all links were up, everything was reachable: EVERYTHING worked. Then we made the conversion: step-by-step from the cisco.com page; create a virtual domain, make one switch switch 1, the other switch 2, create differently numbered port-channels on each 6509, add the SUP 10Gb links to the port-channel, do the conversion.
 
Here's where the trouble started. First of all, the two 10Gb links back to home office created a spanning-tree loop and we had to shut down one of the links. (Is there something that needs to be configured on those links to turn spanning tree on? Does VSS conversion turn stp off?) Secondly, though it worked while in stand-alone mode, the copper blade in the standby 6509 stopped passing traffic - it would take config, the links would come up, but you could not ping across those links. Interestingly enough, there was an access switch with links to each of the copper blades, and having them both up also caused a spanning-tree loop. adding a new port-channel and putting both links in it did nothing to alleviate the loop. This leads me to believe that stp is not working properly. I reiterate, that even though the loop occurred, nothing else plugged into that blade was pingable.

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 VSS Implementation / Migration?

Jan 5, 2012

I am planning an implementation of VSS on our two 6509 switches, and would like some feedback on things to look out for, and any issues encountered by others that have done this already.
 
We have the 10Gig port installed on the Management blades, but not configured yet.
 
Main questions would be:
 
1: What kind of "down time" am I looking at for the migration? (Reboots, configuration reloads, etc.)

2: I will be saving the configurations on both devices before-hand, but how does the VSS migration "merge" the configurations of both devices?

3: L2 VLANS - we have some on one switch, others on the second switch. Will these be combined, or would this be a manual process?
 
Any other things of note that I should know about before planning this migration?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 VSS Implementation As A Service Module Core

Jun 8, 2011

I m planning to implement VSS in core but want some inputs on IOS as i have FWSM as a service module Core :- Ii am running 12.2(33)SXH2a on my Core 6509  and i checkd cisco sites and Fwsm release notes but it states only  I-Train of IOS while mine is H-Train so can I directly upgrade to  I-Train or I was thinking of SXH8b IOS.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IPv6 HSRP Implementation On IOS-XR 4.2.1

Nov 11, 2012

I'm looking to try and implement ipv6 HSRP on a series of IOS-XR Routers running 4.2.1 following on from successfully setting up IPv6 HSRP on a few cat6509s on VLAN Interfaces in other parts of the network. I have entered the "router hsrp" configuration menu and gone into the interface in question that I'm looking to setup with IPv6 HSRP. Unfortunately, there version 2 or address-family ipv6 commands are not available.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: QoS On 3750x For VOIP Implementation?

May 23, 2013

We are going to be expanding our Shoretel phone system in our HQ and I need to get QoS configured correctly.  All of our offices are connected via MPLS and I need to make sure that we are sending QoS tagged traffic to our provider.  The phones are tagged by the director, but there is other traffic for call control that needs to be tagged.  I don't have access to our CPE router as it is managed by Sprint.  The Sprint router is connected to our internal network.  We have our data network running on (4) 3750x switches running 12.2(55) with IP feature set.  

The problem is that many of these commands don't work on the 3750 (priority, bandwidth, match protocol, etc...) and the configuration assumes you are applying this to an outbound queue which is not supported on the 3750.  I think I have to do this with policing, but I'm not sure what interfaces need to have this applied.  

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4948E / EIGRP Implementation With GLBP

Sep 4, 2012

I'm in the process to install two 4948E switches.  I will be configuring GLBP and wanted to get some guidelines on configuring GLBP and EIGRP:
 
- First question is like HSRP I'm configuring it on both swithches like this:
 
Switch 1:
interface vlan 5
ip address 10.1.5.249 255.255.255.0
glbp 5 ip 10.1.5.1
glbp 5 priority 110
glbp 5 preempt
glbp 5 authentication md5 key-string xxxxxx

[code]....
 
- Second question is about EIGRP, when I configure EIGRP on the main switch that is AVG with the following commands, will I also have to run the same commands on the second 4948 E too?
 
router eigrp 10
network 10.1.5.0 255.255.255.0

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 5596 LACP Implementation With HP Servers

Apr 17, 2012

I need to implement LACP HP servers mostly DL 380 g7 with Intel based dual port with two types of Cisco equipment first scenario server connected to 3750x stack of 4 switch's .second scenario same server type connected to two Cisco Nexsus 5596 . My question regarding two type of connection.Is it possible to do active active ?Would it give fault tolerance ?With HP LACP implementation is there known issue or should i expect latency with such configuration?What is the maximal lag- channel group that is possible per type?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 To 6509-E Chassis Upgrade?

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

     x3     48 ports
     x1     NAM
     x2     Sup720
     Running 12.2(18)SXF3
 
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade Of 6509 To 6509-E Chassis

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

x3     48 ports
x1     NAM
x2     Sup720

Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / 4900 - Network Down Cause Switching Supervisor With Redundancy

Jan 11, 2012

we've had an issue with our network, we have 2 6509 connected with redundancy, which are connected with 2 x 4900 Switches, from which are connected to a ESX Chassis for visualization, the thing is that the ESX stopped working, and the 4900 switches, and the main core were suffering from overload, they hang on it very well, in order to stop the overload, one of the links to the ESX Chassis were disconnected from one of the 4900 switches. The CPU usage from the 4900 and the core(6509) went down below 40%, and then they started to migrate the virtual servers from the chassis to another 2 chassis that were added right after. They were actually working well, but suddenly the 6509 changed to the other supervisor after everything was OK. We were wondering what could have been the cause of this, maybe the virtual servers migrations, maybe the overload from the ESX ? We also had a few question, is there any need to reload the cores every few months as a planned task ? Because the cores have been up for more than 1 year. And also is there any kind of of tool to monitor the CPU status, or the status overall from the cores or the switches ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Upgrading Switching Infrastructure

Apr 11, 2012

The have around 80 staff and I think the current infrastructure is overkill for the size of the company. The current kit is old and they have no GB ethernet ports. They currently have:-

Core Switch:
1x Cisco c6509with a 48 port fast ethernet module (WS-X6248-RJ-45)
and an 8 port fibre module (WS-X6408A-GBIC)

I'm looking to replace this with something with 72 ethernet ports and 8 fibre ports

Access Switches:
2x 3500Replacement needs at least 48 ports and 2 fibre modules each

and 2x 5500Replacement needs at least 72 ports and 2 fibre modules each.

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Routing Based On Client Gateway (6509-E)

Feb 26, 2012

If client gateway = 192.168.64.9 then next-hop = 192.168.64.8 else use default-route 0.0.0.0
 
I know it's possible to do a route-map match ip-address ACL list. But is it possible to match on gateway?
 
Some info about hardware and config:

6509-E in VSS (IOS 12.2(17r)SX5) withVS-S720-10G supervisor.

All routes are static, IP for 192.168.64.9 is on SVI vlan.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 MSFC - LAN Default Gateway Routing

Mar 6, 2012

I have two ISPs. Each is on it's own subnet connected to the 6509 MSFC/Switch. FW1 is on 100.1.100.0/30 and FW2 is on 200.1.200.0/30 subnet. My goal is route all traffice going to the Internet from subnet 10.133.3.0/24 to FW1 and all other subnets across the organization to FW2. I am not sure if I need to use ACL / Static route combo, or just a static routes or ACLS?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Use Policy Based Routing To Redirect Http Traffic

May 29, 2012

We have a Catalyst 6509 switch, and we hope to use policy based routing to redirect http traffic to my proxy server, where I can find the configuration example?

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Inhibit Vlan Routing

Nov 8, 2012

I would like to ask you if it's possibile to block routing between some Vlan for just once of them.
 
Maybe I can explain better:
 
I've got a Cisco 6509 with 4 configured vlan interfaces
Int Vlan 10  10.10.1.0/24
Int Vlan 20  10.10.2.0/24
Int Vlan 30  10.10.3.0/24
Int Vlan 40  10.10.4.0/24
 
Vlan "10" is the phone voip Vlan and it must not talk with the others Vlan. The others Vlan can comunicate normally except with Vlan "10".
 
Pratically Vlan "10" needs to be isolated from the others.
 
This equirement comes becouse Vlan 10 is wireless and has the WEP key encryption (very weak protocol). Some Phone couldn't support the WPA2 key and I need to avoid an unauthorized external client, cracking the WEP key and connecting to this WiFi, could have free access to the others Vlan.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Multicast Routing Preference

Nov 14, 2012

I have a problem on my catalyst 6509 on which I would like to do the following things :
 
I have some Vlans in which multicast is enabled.
In tose Vlan theres is a router which is default router for equipements.
 
I had enabled multicast routing because some Vlan needs to exchange multicast informations, but I wolud like to make difference between Multicast traffic. For example I have 5 vlans:
 
Vlan 1 and 2 need to exchange Multicast informations but the don't need multicast information from Vlan 3 and 4
Vlan 3 and 5 need to exchange Multicast informations but the don't need multicast information from Vlan 1 and 2
Vlan 5 is independant Vlan but doesn't need to have multicast information from all others vlan.
 
Last problem, equipement on differents vlan can use the same Mulkticast group address. In this case, Multicast routing is not working between Vlan 1 to Vlan 2 and Vlan 3 to Vlan 4.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Based Routing On 6509

Mar 6, 2012

I need to setup my 6509 with PBR going to two different Firewalls. The 6509 has vlans and multiple serial interfaces. What/where do I install the policy-maps? I want to direct one of the vlans to one firewall and the other vlans and wan subnets to the other firewall.

View 26 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Migrating From IOS To NX-OS

Aug 7, 2011

I am migrating from Cisco 6509 IOS (12.2) to Nexus 7000 NX-OS (5.1(1)).I am looking for a equivalente NX-OS command for permit ipinip on IOS.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Getting Very High CPU In 6509?

Mar 3, 2012

I have 2 6509-E chassis with SUP-720-VSS and classic line cards :-(. on October 2011 the switch reached 100% CPU on both devices and the entire network went down. Customer restarted the core so we lost all the log files and couldnt find out any root cause on the same. TAC engineer suggested to have some script configured on the system in case of CPU shooting up above 70%, it will create a file in flash and keep appending the logs to the same. Last week i got call from customer saying that the CPU again went high for around a minute on both the cores. Last time i added CoPP also on the switch in order to prevent the CPU reaching 100%. Still it went high and from the captured logs i saw that the process created the high CPU was Port Manager Per and SSH process. Attached the file created by the netdr capture command.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - VSS Using Just Three (3) Supervisors

Aug 3, 2012

I have a customer that has a Catalyst 6509 with two Supervisor VSS capable and my Sales team sell another 6509 with just one Supervisor VSS capable. Simple question: Will VSS configuration will recognize that I have three Supervisors? It will work as QUAD-SUP solution or as a normal VSS solution?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: SFP+ Supported On 6509-E?

Nov 16, 2011

We are trying to migrate from 1g to 10G, couldn't find any module on 6509-E which supports 10G on SFP+ ...I can see X2 and Xenpacks .. but not SFP + .what exactly this Xenpack means ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: CAT 6509 STP Compatibility With F5 LTM

Sep 1, 2012

We have connected a single F5 box with dual links to 2 different Cisco Catalyst switches using 802.1Q trunks. F5 is configured with RSTP mode and on Cisco Switch RPVST+ is configured.STP root bridge is hardcoded on the Cisco side. Loop Guard is globally enabled.On F5 STP link type is Auto, STP Edge port is disabled since that port is connected to the cisco switch.When we are failing over the F5 primary link to the secondary link we see 'Loop Inconsistent' on the cisco switch and things dont work after the failover.We have tried configuring the F5 as STP passthrough but that doesn't fix out the issue.I have checked out the forums and found out following recommendations

1. Configuring MSTP bw F5 and Cisco for better compatibility (Not possible from Cisco side because of a major change in large production setup)

2. Configuring VSS in Cisco switches (not possible due to hardware limitation)

3. Connecting F5 using single links to each switch (redundancy compromised)
 
I am wondering that on which default vlan does the F5 STP instance0 sends the STP BPDUs ? the term used on Cisco side is native vlan and others use PVIDs; that F5 default vlan should match the native vlan on cisco trunk side.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Getting 6509 VSS IOS Upgrade?

May 15, 2012

Tonight we were performing an IOS upgrade on our 6509 VSS to 122-33.SXI6.  Both 6509's have dual Supervisor cards installed.  Initially we had problems with switch 2 slot 5 supervisor returning to rommon however switch 2 slot 6 supervisor loaded correctly.  After manually setting the boot var in rommon, switch 2 slot 5 supervisor reloaded correctly.
 
After all supervisor's were online we noticed when looking at " show switch virtual redundancy" that sw 1 & 2 slot 6 supervisors were running the correct IOS version but sw 1 & 2 slot 5 were running different IOS versions, however when looking at the show version we are running on the upgraded IOS???  See output below...
 
Why the active supervisor has loaded the incorrect IOS the VSS is running on the upgraded IOS?  I have verified the IOS was copied correctly to each supervisor bootdisk, I see no issues. 
 
My Switch Id = 1                Peer Switch Id = 2        Last switchover reason = none    Configured Redundancy Mode = sso     Operating Redundancy Mode = sso
Switch 1 Slot 5 Processor Information :-----------------------------------------------        Current Software state = ACTIVE       Uptime in current state = 3 hours, 38 minutes                 Image Version = Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(33)SXI9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)Technical Support:

[code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - NAT / DHCP

Nov 30, 2011

We are looking to avoid the need to install an additional device in our network as our core 6509s are not being pushed by any stretch.  However, we are having an issue getting the 6509 to assign DHCP addresses and perform NAT.
 
Most interfaces and V LAN's on the 6509 are using public IPs and have BGP routing at the edge.  We have a trunk up link coming into the 6509 on a ws-6816 card via a SMF GBIC in slot 9, port 2 that feeds a wifi link where we are looking to provide guest access to our network.
 
We created 2 V LAN s on the switch 20 and 21.  We assigned a private IP and network to the VLAN20 interface and assigned a new public /30 sub net ip to the V LAN 21 interface.  The following configuration was applied which I thought was the required configuration based on how we would typically configure ISR routers for the same services...
 
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.200.200.1
!
ip dhcp pool WiFi_Pool
network 10.200.200.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.200.200.1
dns-server 4.2.2.1 4.2.2.2
[ code]...
  
What am I missing in this configuration? Note that if I create an access switch port for v LAN 20 on the switch and plug a laptop in directly to the 6509, the laptop is unable to receive a DHCP address.  If I assign the laptop an address in the 10.200.200.0 /24 range manually, I can ping 10.200.200.1 from the laptop, however, the laptop will not get to the internet as it appears to be failing to perform nat.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - VSS Between Sites?

Nov 9, 2011

I have been asked to research running VSS between 2 6509's between 2 sites?
 
I am just going through the whitepapers and need to establish the link requirements for such a setup.
 
Is it a valid setup?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 VSS IOS Upgrade

Jan 15, 2012

Will I be OK doing a eFSU Upgrade from s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI2a to s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXJ1?
 
I only have a single supervisor in each chassis.
 
Should I be ok with just following the eFSU upgrade instructions in the below?
 
[URL]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: GBIC On 6509

Nov 7, 2011

I have an interesting problem. I have a 6509 that I'm trying to swap the GBIC on. The switch is already using a GLC-SX-MM GBIC and it is up/up and passing traffic, but we are getting some errors and suspect it may be faulty. 

I want to replace the GBIC with one of the identical model - a GLC-SX-MM. It was brand new, never been opened. When the new GBIC is plugged in the link light on the switch goes completely off (not amber) and the port goes into a down/down (not connect) state. There are no messages in the logs at all. It's like it doesn't even see it. If you plug the old GBIC back in then the link comes back up. I tried a different port with the same results.Thinking that the new GBIC may be faulty (even though it was brand new) I tried a second GLX-SX-MM, also new. That one does the same thing. 

At that point I thought there might be a problem with that switch, so I tried the GBICs on the other 6509 in that pair. The other 6509 is running the same hardware and software. The GBICs will not work there either. If you move the old, suspected faulty GBIC from 6509-2 to 6509-1 then that it works. 

The solution would seem to be that I have two faulty GBICs, but I'm having trouble persuading myself that I have two new ones, straight out of the package, that are both bad. Are there any other things to check on the switch? Here's the pertinent information: 

switch#show ver
Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(33)SXI3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
<snip>
cisco WS-C6509-E (R7000) processor (revision 1.3) with 458720K/65536K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID SMG1109N3BK
SR71000 CPU at 600Mhz, Implementation 0x504, Rev 1.2, 512KB L2 Cache
[code]...

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Show Version On VSS 6509?

Apr 7, 2013

Is there a way I can check the version of each device on two Cisco 6509 if they are Virtually connected (VSS)? When I enter the command show version, it only shows one result, unlike show module, you have an option to choose which switch by entering 1 or 2.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IOS For Support Of OSPF And BGP In 6509-E

Sep 13, 2012

If i look at the Feature Navigator , it says that IP Base Supports OSPF and EIGRP. But if i look at the Cisco Link it contradicts the Cisco Feature Navigator.
  
[URL]
 
if I have 6509-E with VSS-SUP720-10G and want to run OSPF and BGP on the Switch. What is the IOS i require? WIll IP Base Suffice or i need to take Advance or Enterprise Image.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E 99 Percent CPU Usage

Mar 20, 2013

We are running Cisco 6509-e and we are running load test and when traffic reach 80 mbps switch start reponding very slow. I checked CPU usage and it was using 100% and connection to the switch from outside to inside are 80K. once connection dropp Cisco release CUP and it start responding normal. [code]

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Migrate VSS To New Set Of Chassis?

Dec 19, 2012

Currently have a pair of 6509 chassis setup with VSS. Only have the Sup and two line cards in each chassis. Would like to replace with a new pair of 6504E chassis. Is it possible to fail one chassis at a time and migrate to the new 6504E?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Inbound Qos On 6509 Not Working

Jul 22, 2012

6509 - Not working
 
1    6  Firewall Module                     
2    8  Intrusion Detection System          
3    1  Application Control Engine Module 

[Code].....
 
The Policy applied to the interface is just completely ignoring the configuration.
 
I am sure it is related to the 6500 architecture in some way. Same config is fine on the switch with the higher version on the sup card.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Getting Mismatched VSS Configurations

Sep 25, 2011

I built a VSS pair with a couple of 6509's.  This was our first pair so we took the opportunity to do some testing.  One of the features we tested was the priority/preemption feature, which we decided not to use.  After some time we shutdown switch 1 and relocated it to another building.  Unfortunately, because of a lack of fiber, it was not connected to switch 2 for several months.  Also, unfortunately, I failed to remove the priority commands.  Now while switch 1 was "unconnected", we made changes to the config on switch 2.  Months later, when the fiber was complete and I connected switch 1, preemption caused it to take over.  I'm guessing switch 1 thought it's config file was the better one, and proceeded to overwrite switch 2's production config.  I quickly disconnected the fiber but not before losing my production config on switch 2.  We of course recovered from that with a backup, but now I need to connect switch 1 again.  I have removed the priority command from switch 1 and rebooted it.

View 7 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved