Cisco Switching/Routing :: Getting 6509 VSS IOS Upgrade?

May 15, 2012

Tonight we were performing an IOS upgrade on our 6509 VSS to 122-33.SXI6.  Both 6509's have dual Supervisor cards installed.  Initially we had problems with switch 2 slot 5 supervisor returning to rommon however switch 2 slot 6 supervisor loaded correctly.  After manually setting the boot var in rommon, switch 2 slot 5 supervisor reloaded correctly.
 
After all supervisor's were online we noticed when looking at " show switch virtual redundancy" that sw 1 & 2 slot 6 supervisors were running the correct IOS version but sw 1 & 2 slot 5 were running different IOS versions, however when looking at the show version we are running on the upgraded IOS???  See output below...
 
Why the active supervisor has loaded the incorrect IOS the VSS is running on the upgraded IOS?  I have verified the IOS was copied correctly to each supervisor bootdisk, I see no issues. 
 
My Switch Id = 1                Peer Switch Id = 2        Last switchover reason = none    Configured Redundancy Mode = sso     Operating Redundancy Mode = sso
Switch 1 Slot 5 Processor Information :-----------------------------------------------        Current Software state = ACTIVE       Uptime in current state = 3 hours, 38 minutes                 Image Version = Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(33)SXI9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)Technical Support:

[code].....

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 To 6509-E Chassis Upgrade?

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

     x3     48 ports
     x1     NAM
     x2     Sup720
     Running 12.2(18)SXF3
 
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade Of 6509 To 6509-E Chassis

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

x3     48 ports
x1     NAM
x2     Sup720

Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 VSS IOS Upgrade

Jan 15, 2012

Will I be OK doing a eFSU Upgrade from s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI2a to s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXJ1?
 
I only have a single supervisor in each chassis.
 
Should I be ok with just following the eFSU upgrade instructions in the below?
 
[URL]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade 6509-E Ios Image?

Jan 9, 2013

I am going to upgrade the IOS image on 6509-E SUP 2T  from 15.1 to s2t54-adventerprisek9-mz.SPA.150-1.SY3.bin switch and i would like to know whether i would need to upgrade the boot loader image as well.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 SSO Redundancy IOS Upgrade

Sep 9, 2012

I have a 6509 switch with SSO Redundancy (STANDBY HOT) with IOS ver 12.2(17d)SXB11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11.bin). I need to upgrade the IOS on this switch.I have 512MB Memory on the switch and 40144896 bytes free on Disk0.which IOS is the latest version to upgrade and also give me some hints for IOS upgrade on this switch?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Sup Engine 32 IOS Upgrade Via USB

May 14, 2013

I would like to find out how to upgrade SUP engine 32 via USB port as I've never did IOS upgrade on a SUP engine via USB before

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IOS Upgrade For VSS 6509 Switches

Nov 19, 2012

I have 2 6509 switches configured with VSS.As per advised my managment I have to enable SSH but it is not available existing IOS which is "s72033-ipbase-z.122-33.SXI3.bin". SSH available in "s72033-ipbasek9-mz.122-33.SXI10".
 
upgrade the IOS with VSS configured switches.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Supervisor IOS Upgrade

Oct 16, 2012

We are trying to upgrade the IOS on one of our 6509 switches. We have two 720 10GE supervisors running in SSO. Our procedure is reload the standby supervisor with the new IOS. We understand that you can only use one console connection when in RPR mode so we rely on the active supervisor giving us information that the standby unit is up and running.
 
The problem we have is that when we do a "show Module" on the switch the online diagnostics for the standby supervisor comes back us unknown. [code] We believe the active supervisor can see the standby supervisor because when we save the configuration we get a message saying that the config is sync'd with the standby router. We have a TAC case raised to investigate. We are upgrading from 12.2(33) SXI1 to 12.2(33) SXJ3

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E VSS Will Upgrade Rewrite The Configuration

Jan 22, 2013

I am planning on upgrading my 6509s to use VSS within the next few weeks.  I have checked all of the hardware and software prerequisites, and we are good to go from that perspective.I do have more of a procedural question- my switches are already configured and in production, VLANs, HSRP (3 IP addresses per VLAN- 1 per switch plus virtual IP), etc.  Does the VSS upgrade take all of this into account and rewrite the configuration correctly, or should I plan on redoing the entire config for the switches after the upgrade?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Supervisor Upgrade With FWSM?

Oct 8, 2012

We are planning to upgrade the IOS on our two 6509E supervisors in the next few weeks. We currently run IOS 12.2(33) SXI1 and are upgrading to 12.2(33) SXJ3. At the moment the two supervisors are in SSO mode and after reading many articles it says that when the images are different on the two supervisors they are in RPR mode. When you then reload the active supervisor it will reboot all the line cards.
 
1. Is above correct? Will my line card reload?

2. We also have a FWSM installed, When/If the line cards are rebooted does the FWSM also reboot?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade SUP2 To SUP32 On 6509?

Sep 18, 2012

I am going to upgarde SUP2 to SUP32 on my 6509 by next week. right now I have 2 SUPs on the 6509 in redundant mode.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade 6509-Chassis In VSS-Environment?

May 1, 2013

we have some pairs of 6509-VSS, which partially have old (no more officially supported) 6509-Chassis.All linecards in the VSS are the same (Sup 720-10GE-3C, 67XX).
 
We now bought some new 6509-E-Chassis and want to change the old chassis by the new ones in a ISSU manner, that means:
 
1. putting the partner, which chassis changes, in redundancy mode, switch it off, exchange chassis (old "Catalyst 6509", new "Catalyst 6509-E")

2. inserting the line-cards exactly in the same slots and connecting all cables

3. switch on the new chassis, witing to come up in VSS
 
I'm not sure of having to set the switch number for VSS (is that in the Sup?; configuration? or part of the chassis-memory?)
 
I've looked up cisco for some hints, but don't found anything.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Upgrade To 12.2(33)SXI10 And ROMmon?

Dec 12, 2012

I have ROM MON version 12.2(17r)S2 and I am trying to determine if I need to chnage this to 12.2(17r)SX7. It does not appear I need to  with the upgrade to 12.2(33)SXI10. Is this correct?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Sup2 To Sup32 Upgrade?

Oct 7, 2012

I need to upgrade 2xsup2 module to 2xsup32 on my cisco 6509. I just found out that I can not have the CISCO WS-X6500-SFM(Cisco Switch Fabric Module switch) with Sup32 and I have to remove 2 xCISCO WS-X6500-SFM2 modules from the switch.I am using this switch as a access switch and most of the ports are 100Mbps.
 
let me know if the upgrade would be safe or not as far as the bandwidth?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Upgrade Sup720 To Sup2T In VSS Cluster

Jun 21, 2012

I support an active VSS cluster using 2 x 6509E chassis with single Supervisor 3C modules in each chassis. I want to replace these with Supervisor 2T modules. All my service modules and line cards are supported with the Sup2Ts (I will also be implementing 6908 modules). Is there a document on the Cisco site for this? I haven't found one though I can find plenty that describe how to do a software upgrade.
 
(Note, I have a 3rd (non VSS) 6509E chassis that is also part of this core network and that will maintain VTP/V LAN's etc).

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 (HA) And FWSM (active / Standby) System Upgrade?

Sep 30, 2012

I have 2 6509 chasis with one SUP720-3B in each and current IOS is s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF4 and 2 FWSM with version is 3.3.1 I need to upgrade FWSM system software to 4.1, after checking FWSM 4.1 release notes, I thought of upgrading IOS to latest version  to 12.2(33)SXJ.I got new 2 CF of 512MB and downloaded the new IOS on them and need to upgrade 6509 IOS first to meet the requirement for FWSM upgrade.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / 6509 - Upgrade Core Switch Without Disrupting Network?

Feb 2, 2013

I am planning to upgrade the current core switch(3750) to 6509 series switch. Since we have a production network running we have to plan for an online core switch upgrade.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Sup32 Upgrade On 6509 - Priority Command Not Supported In Output Direction For This Interface

Nov 15, 2012

I have 1x Cisco 6509 with Sup2 and MSFC2 and it is running on IOS (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11). I have following policy map :
 
Policy Map VOIP
Class IP PHONE
priority percent 75
 
and the following command on each interface: service-policy output VOIP those configuration are working fine on SUP2 with MSFC2 but last week I tried to upgrade the SUP2 to SUP32 on the switch and upgrade the IOS to the latest version (s3223-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SXJ4) but when I try to put service-policy output VOIP on each physical interface I am getting the following error: 
 
"Priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface" and when I try to add service-policy output VOIP on a V LAN interface I am getting following error:
 
MQC features are not supported in output direction for this interface. Will I need to change something after upgrading to SUP32..

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / 4900 - Network Down Cause Switching Supervisor With Redundancy

Jan 11, 2012

we've had an issue with our network, we have 2 6509 connected with redundancy, which are connected with 2 x 4900 Switches, from which are connected to a ESX Chassis for visualization, the thing is that the ESX stopped working, and the 4900 switches, and the main core were suffering from overload, they hang on it very well, in order to stop the overload, one of the links to the ESX Chassis were disconnected from one of the 4900 switches. The CPU usage from the 4900 and the core(6509) went down below 40%, and then they started to migrate the virtual servers from the chassis to another 2 chassis that were added right after. They were actually working well, but suddenly the 6509 changed to the other supervisor after everything was OK. We were wondering what could have been the cause of this, maybe the virtual servers migrations, maybe the overload from the ESX ? We also had a few question, is there any need to reload the cores every few months as a planned task ? Because the cores have been up for more than 1 year. And also is there any kind of of tool to monitor the CPU status, or the status overall from the cores or the switches ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Upgrading Switching Infrastructure

Apr 11, 2012

The have around 80 staff and I think the current infrastructure is overkill for the size of the company. The current kit is old and they have no GB ethernet ports. They currently have:-

Core Switch:
1x Cisco c6509with a 48 port fast ethernet module (WS-X6248-RJ-45)
and an 8 port fibre module (WS-X6408A-GBIC)

I'm looking to replace this with something with 72 ethernet ports and 8 fibre ports

Access Switches:
2x 3500Replacement needs at least 48 ports and 2 fibre modules each

and 2x 5500Replacement needs at least 72 ports and 2 fibre modules each.

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Routing Based On Client Gateway (6509-E)

Feb 26, 2012

If client gateway = 192.168.64.9 then next-hop = 192.168.64.8 else use default-route 0.0.0.0
 
I know it's possible to do a route-map match ip-address ACL list. But is it possible to match on gateway?
 
Some info about hardware and config:

6509-E in VSS (IOS 12.2(17r)SX5) withVS-S720-10G supervisor.

All routes are static, IP for 192.168.64.9 is on SVI vlan.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 MSFC - LAN Default Gateway Routing

Mar 6, 2012

I have two ISPs. Each is on it's own subnet connected to the 6509 MSFC/Switch. FW1 is on 100.1.100.0/30 and FW2 is on 200.1.200.0/30 subnet. My goal is route all traffice going to the Internet from subnet 10.133.3.0/24 to FW1 and all other subnets across the organization to FW2. I am not sure if I need to use ACL / Static route combo, or just a static routes or ACLS?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Use Policy Based Routing To Redirect Http Traffic

May 29, 2012

We have a Catalyst 6509 switch, and we hope to use policy based routing to redirect http traffic to my proxy server, where I can find the configuration example?

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Inhibit Vlan Routing

Nov 8, 2012

I would like to ask you if it's possibile to block routing between some Vlan for just once of them.
 
Maybe I can explain better:
 
I've got a Cisco 6509 with 4 configured vlan interfaces
Int Vlan 10  10.10.1.0/24
Int Vlan 20  10.10.2.0/24
Int Vlan 30  10.10.3.0/24
Int Vlan 40  10.10.4.0/24
 
Vlan "10" is the phone voip Vlan and it must not talk with the others Vlan. The others Vlan can comunicate normally except with Vlan "10".
 
Pratically Vlan "10" needs to be isolated from the others.
 
This equirement comes becouse Vlan 10 is wireless and has the WEP key encryption (very weak protocol). Some Phone couldn't support the WPA2 key and I need to avoid an unauthorized external client, cracking the WEP key and connecting to this WiFi, could have free access to the others Vlan.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Multicast Routing Preference

Nov 14, 2012

I have a problem on my catalyst 6509 on which I would like to do the following things :
 
I have some Vlans in which multicast is enabled.
In tose Vlan theres is a router which is default router for equipements.
 
I had enabled multicast routing because some Vlan needs to exchange multicast informations, but I wolud like to make difference between Multicast traffic. For example I have 5 vlans:
 
Vlan 1 and 2 need to exchange Multicast informations but the don't need multicast information from Vlan 3 and 4
Vlan 3 and 5 need to exchange Multicast informations but the don't need multicast information from Vlan 1 and 2
Vlan 5 is independant Vlan but doesn't need to have multicast information from all others vlan.
 
Last problem, equipement on differents vlan can use the same Mulkticast group address. In this case, Multicast routing is not working between Vlan 1 to Vlan 2 and Vlan 3 to Vlan 4.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Based Routing On 6509

Mar 6, 2012

I need to setup my 6509 with PBR going to two different Firewalls. The 6509 has vlans and multiple serial interfaces. What/where do I install the policy-maps? I want to direct one of the vlans to one firewall and the other vlans and wan subnets to the other firewall.

View 26 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Migrating From IOS To NX-OS

Aug 7, 2011

I am migrating from Cisco 6509 IOS (12.2) to Nexus 7000 NX-OS (5.1(1)).I am looking for a equivalente NX-OS command for permit ipinip on IOS.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Getting Very High CPU In 6509?

Mar 3, 2012

I have 2 6509-E chassis with SUP-720-VSS and classic line cards :-(. on October 2011 the switch reached 100% CPU on both devices and the entire network went down. Customer restarted the core so we lost all the log files and couldnt find out any root cause on the same. TAC engineer suggested to have some script configured on the system in case of CPU shooting up above 70%, it will create a file in flash and keep appending the logs to the same. Last week i got call from customer saying that the CPU again went high for around a minute on both the cores. Last time i added CoPP also on the switch in order to prevent the CPU reaching 100%. Still it went high and from the captured logs i saw that the process created the high CPU was Port Manager Per and SSH process. Attached the file created by the netdr capture command.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - VSS Using Just Three (3) Supervisors

Aug 3, 2012

I have a customer that has a Catalyst 6509 with two Supervisor VSS capable and my Sales team sell another 6509 with just one Supervisor VSS capable. Simple question: Will VSS configuration will recognize that I have three Supervisors? It will work as QUAD-SUP solution or as a normal VSS solution?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: SFP+ Supported On 6509-E?

Nov 16, 2011

We are trying to migrate from 1g to 10G, couldn't find any module on 6509-E which supports 10G on SFP+ ...I can see X2 and Xenpacks .. but not SFP + .what exactly this Xenpack means ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: CAT 6509 STP Compatibility With F5 LTM

Sep 1, 2012

We have connected a single F5 box with dual links to 2 different Cisco Catalyst switches using 802.1Q trunks. F5 is configured with RSTP mode and on Cisco Switch RPVST+ is configured.STP root bridge is hardcoded on the Cisco side. Loop Guard is globally enabled.On F5 STP link type is Auto, STP Edge port is disabled since that port is connected to the cisco switch.When we are failing over the F5 primary link to the secondary link we see 'Loop Inconsistent' on the cisco switch and things dont work after the failover.We have tried configuring the F5 as STP passthrough but that doesn't fix out the issue.I have checked out the forums and found out following recommendations

1. Configuring MSTP bw F5 and Cisco for better compatibility (Not possible from Cisco side because of a major change in large production setup)

2. Configuring VSS in Cisco switches (not possible due to hardware limitation)

3. Connecting F5 using single links to each switch (redundancy compromised)
 
I am wondering that on which default vlan does the F5 STP instance0 sends the STP BPDUs ? the term used on Cisco side is native vlan and others use PVIDs; that F5 default vlan should match the native vlan on cisco trunk side.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - NAT / DHCP

Nov 30, 2011

We are looking to avoid the need to install an additional device in our network as our core 6509s are not being pushed by any stretch.  However, we are having an issue getting the 6509 to assign DHCP addresses and perform NAT.
 
Most interfaces and V LAN's on the 6509 are using public IPs and have BGP routing at the edge.  We have a trunk up link coming into the 6509 on a ws-6816 card via a SMF GBIC in slot 9, port 2 that feeds a wifi link where we are looking to provide guest access to our network.
 
We created 2 V LAN s on the switch 20 and 21.  We assigned a private IP and network to the VLAN20 interface and assigned a new public /30 sub net ip to the V LAN 21 interface.  The following configuration was applied which I thought was the required configuration based on how we would typically configure ISR routers for the same services...
 
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.200.200.1
!
ip dhcp pool WiFi_Pool
network 10.200.200.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.200.200.1
dns-server 4.2.2.1 4.2.2.2
[ code]...
  
What am I missing in this configuration? Note that if I create an access switch port for v LAN 20 on the switch and plug a laptop in directly to the 6509, the laptop is unable to receive a DHCP address.  If I assign the laptop an address in the 10.200.200.0 /24 range manually, I can ping 10.200.200.1 from the laptop, however, the laptop will not get to the internet as it appears to be failing to perform nat.

View 7 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved