Why I cant correctly use ip sla command. I only have on my 2901 such commands: ip sla ?
key-chain Use MD5 Authentication for IP SLAs Control Messages
responder Enable IP SLAs Responder
server IPPM server configuration
There is my "sh ver"
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M15, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
And...What should i do. if i want to create a failover with to WANs
I am attempting to configure a Cisco 2901 router using IOS 15 to properly perform NAT/PAT translation between LAN and the internet connection.
My Configuration:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address dhcp
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
no ip route-cache
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
no mop enabled(code)
I am trying to implement an etherchannel on a cisco 2901 (IOS 15.1). i have already created the port-channel but i cannot assign the gig interface to the channel group.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently installed a cisco 2901 router. The router is connected to hosts using a SG 200-50 50-Port Gigabit Smart Switch
Problem is the router internal interface keeps shutting down without notice and randomly. At that time I cannot ping the interrface from a LAN PC even though I can ping other hosts on the LAN. The ISP link is okay since I can put a static IP on my computer and access the net.
I need to break into a 2901 router to recover the passwords. Cisco's methodology for password recovery on 2900 seriews routerssays to remove the compact flash card and reboot into RMON. There is no external compact flash card on a 2901. Is there acompact flash card inside the box? Or can you use the older method of rebooting and then hitting ctl+break to boot into RMON?
View 5 Replies View Relatedi'm interested if it's possible to set the NTP server via DHCP on an 2901 Router with 15.2(2) image.
i configured the interface gigabit 0/0 as dhcp client. The DHCP Server sends to me DNS, Default GW and NTP. All is working fine, but the NTP will not be configured. i tried to add an DHCP option request, but there is no NTP (42) value. [code]
is there any way to add the value NTP (42) for the DHCP request or isnt it possible?
Does the 2901 have etherchannel capabilities? If so, how to configure it? I mean, I can type "show etherchannel 1" in it, so I would assume if I can show it, I better be able to configure it, right?What about the 2911?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi want to use the cisco 2901 router with two adsl cards(EHWIC-VA-DSL-B) and would like to know if that possible without any restrictions with the ip base license.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 2901 with the 4port gigabit ethernet switch module that I'm trying to get configured to have a seperate subnet for each port. So far I have it set up so each subnet is a vlan, then on each port I use the switchport access vlan command to tell it which subnet I want that port to be on. However, there is one port that I need to have 2 subnets on. The way I found to do that was to use switchport trunking on that port, but it doesn't seem to be working properly. how they would configure this? Right now I have vlan 101 as x.x.x.17/28 and vlan 103 as x.x.x.53/30. I think where I'm getting hung up is the proper association between the physical port and the vlan subnets.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have always done my port monitoring (SPAN) on Cisco layer 3 switches with no issues. This time I am trying to do this on a Cisco 2901 router:
Cisco IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(4)M2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
System image file is "flash0:c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M2.bin
I need to have the source port gig0/0 and destination port gig0/1. There is something about the gig port enumeration (slot/port#) that makes the command rejected. It is self explanatory:
#sh ip int brie
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Embedded-Service-Engine0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx YES NVRAM up up
GigabitEthernet0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
Serial0/0/0:0 unassigned YES unset up up
[code]....
It doesn't matter what slot or port number I use, it is always rejected. The command is rejected for Both destination and source gig interfaces. I tried a wide variety of slot/port numbers. To my best understanding the complete port names are: GigabitEthernet0/0 and GigabitEthernet0/1, so why does it think there has to be another digit after 0/0 or 0/1? Does it have anything to do with the Embedded-Service-Engine0/0 being administratively down?
Everything in my network works as a charm. Every host in my vlans can access and ping the internet with no problems. But, my main router does not ping the internet (Pinging either ip "173.194.71.104" or domain "www.google.com" do not work). I don't know how is that possible since my hosts can ping the internet. Below is my main router confiurations
!
hostname Internet_Router
!
boot-start-marker
[Code].....
What ISO do I need to purchase to get Cisco IOS Firewall on a Cisco 2901 - is it just IP Base or do I need one of the Security IOSs?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 1-Port 3rd Gen Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN Int. Card - T1/E1 in a 2901 that I want to configure for data only (T1 connection to the Internet)I don't see any options in the IOS for using this thing as a serial interface (data), only options for configuring PRI/ISDN.
View 5 Replies View RelatedThe license has been installed onto the router. Here is the relevant out from the show license all:
License Store: Primary License StorageStoreIndex: 0 Feature: ipbasek9 Version: 1.0 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: MediumStoreIndex: 1 Feature: WAAS_Express Version: 1.0 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, Not in Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium
WAAS license as it says that this is not in use, WAAS under the interface is not possible.
I am trying to come up with a config for implementing QoS over a 512 kbps WAN link that will traverse voice and data traffic for now. I am using a Cisco 2901 router with 15.1(3)T IOS on it. my config is below
class-map match-any DATA-PRIORITY match protocol citrix match protocol sshclass-map match-any VOICE-CONTROL match protocol skinny match protocol mgcp match protocol h323class-map match-any VOICE match protocol rtp audio class-map match-any ANY match any [ code]...
THE ISSUE IS : when i add in the service-policy output WAN- QOS- POLICY command , i get the error " insufficient bandwidth 256kbps for bandwidth guarantee (180)". if i take out the " bandwidth 512 " command out then i get no issues adding the above command on interface g0/1
I have a Cisco ASA and a 2901 Cisco Router connected via site-to-site VPN. The ASA can ping over the VPN to computers behind the router, but the router can not always ping to computers in the ASA network. When i ping from a computer in the IOS router's 10.100.36.0 network the requests times out most the time; although every few minutes, i will get about 10 pings back, then stops working again.
I uploaded their two configurations.
The ASAs public IP is 20.20.20.5 and local (inside) network of 10.101.36.0/24
The IOS routers public IP is 20.20.20.10
There are many internal networks, but 10.100.36.0/24 is the one with issues.
I try to make a gre tunnel with 2 cisco routers 2901, ping responds between tunnel ip's ends, but I don't have pings from the pc's inside the networks. [code]
View 7 Replies View RelatedHow do I disable fragmentation on a 2901 router? I want it to simply drop packets oversized packets.In my lab, I am trying to test various MTU issues. I'm trying to use a 2901 router to simulate the WAN equipment that my WAN provider would deploy in production. In production i'm expecting the WAN to only support an MTU of 1320 with no fragmentation at all.
View 2 Replies View RelatedPhysical devices are a Cisco 2901 (CISCO2901/K9) with GE0/0 configured as 192.168.1.1
Connected through a D-Link DGS-1210-24 configured as 192.168.1.202
Running on a domain with an HP domain server as 192.168.1.2
The 2901 was an EHWIC (VA-DSL-A oPoTS) on EHWIC 0/0/0
GE 0/0 on the 2901 is physically connected to the DGS-1210 which is physically connected to the server.
VDSL 0/0/0 is physically connected to the DSL jack.
So far the configuration reports all is connected, and I can ping the gateway of our ISP (using CLI or Cisco CP); however the server reports no internet connection and no workstations can access the 'net.
Once connected; I'd also like to allow ports through for use on the network (25, 80, 110, 443, 987, 1723) - but not sure on how to do that just yet!
Our IP is 202.27.19x.19x
Our Gateway is 202.27.217.5
[Code] ......
I have recently bought cisco 2901 in order to replace it with our 1811W that we have at the moment.When I try to set a failover / backup with rtr; it seems like the function is not valid.Once I select rtr and set the object #, the reachability command is not available.Does that mean this function is not a part from the license package I have?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have inherited a setup for a custom application and would like to know if this is the only way this could be set up. How would you do it?The application uses dedicated T1 links to our vendors. There is a Cisco 2901 router in the middle providing the connections. Traffic to specific vendor's IP's are routed to their prospective connections. I have attached a network diagram and a config for the 2901. The way my predecessor(s) set this up, each different vendor uses a different private IP address for the internal links. This seems odd to me. Shouldn't there be a way to have only one subnet on the inside and have the links NAT depending on which route it takes? The servers have persistent routes built in them to send vendor traffic to the associated IP on the router. E.g., traffic to Vendor 1 is routed to 192.168.50.1, the 2901's IP address for the Vendor 1 network. That traffic is then NAT'd to an IP address associated with Vendor 1's link and the 2901 then routes the traffic to the Vendor's end of the link.
I would think that I should be able to revamp this so that internally we're only using one subnet and the traffic could NAT at the link associated with the Vendor. I recently had to add the 3rd vendor connection, and wound up having to duplicate what was done for the other two in order to get it working quickly. I didn't have the time to wrap my head around the best way to revamp the whole thing.
I recently obtained a 2901 router running 15.2(2)T to replace my old 877 which was running 15.1(4)M1. The 2901 is humming along quite nicely but I have had difficulty configuring one feature which was working fine on the 877. The router needs to be a PPTP client to a hosted VPN service. On the 877, I had it configured like this: [code] I then had a dialer interface to actually set up the connection, and some PBR to control what went over the VPN. All well and good, and it worked fine. But on the 2901, when I try to configure the same thing, there is no such command as "protocol pptp" -- the only option is protocol l2tp.Was PPTP support deprecated somwhere between 15.1 and 15.2, or does the 2901 itself not support it for some reason? Obviously I understand that l2tp is superior to pptp, but at the moment this is my only option.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have one router 1841 in which i configured PBR for internet traffic from LAN. I hv two ISPs few server are configured for ISP1 and few for ISP2.I planned to shift my existing setup at 2901 G2 router. when I am configuring the same config on this router so traffic is passing through only from one ISP not from other, if I troubleshoot so I see that the interface which is connected with ISP2 is not getting any input/output packet.
Config is here:
==========
interface FastEthernet0/0
description ****** ISP2 ******
ip address 203.xx.xx.110 255.255.255.248
[Code].......
I try to make a gre tunnel with 2 cisco routers 2901, ping responds between tunnel ip's ends, but I don't have pings from the pc's inside the networks.
[code]....
Where's the ideal place to put the KS? My current setup is 1 KS, 19 GM. The KS sits BEHIND a GM, so all other GMs have to come through one GM to get to KS.Now, I have purchased two dedicated KS routers. I configured one today, and placed it right on my WAN. My WAN is a L2 Ethernet domain, so i just provisioned a switch port in the WAN vlan, and away we go. I copied RSA keys over from the current KS, configured redundancy and the two hooked up, saw each other and it seems to be good to go. For the ACL, I put in an exclustion for my two KS to talk to each other:
deny ip host 192.168.250.40 host 192.168.250.41 (Old IP, New IP)
deny ip host 192.168.250.41 host 192.168.250.40.
I used a test router and pointed it to the new KS, it registered without a hitch... HOWEVER about two hours later (my 7200 second timeout) I lost ALL my branches. My 18 other GM were still pointed to the OLD IP only, they didnt have the second IP configured yet. In a hurry, I quickly disabled the redundancy configuration on the old KS and had to go to each GM and do a 'clear crypto gdoi' on each one to get them to re-register. There were no log messages about not being able to rekey, no log messages about dropped peerings, nothing. Once I did that, everything returned to normal.
The Question I have...
Would having configured the redundant KS caused this problem? Would having one KS behind a GM and the other Coop KS in the WAN make a difference?
Relevant config from existing KS, 2801:
crypto gdoi group GETVPN_GROUP
identity number 1234
server local
rekey retransmit 60 number 2
rekey authentication mypubkey rsa GETVPN_KEYS
[Code]...
I have a 2901 ISR G2 router, with IOS 15.0.1M3 , this router is not working with static NATing, I have tried to configure this router with one internet link and make few static translations with it. But this configuration is perfectly working with 1841 ISR router.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe've have a client who had a ordered 2 units of 2901 router to have site to site connectivity. User has bought a leased line of 256kbps from service provider in between two sites, but the issue is the service provider has layed a rj11 cable and there is no rj11 interface on 2901 router it only has two rj45.
View 5 Replies View RelatedNeed to know if I have 2 type of license on my 2901 router: ipbase and uc, will the 2 type of fuctions of this license work at the same time. Another words will i have route and nat functions work with voip having to type of license on my 2901?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI been working with PPTP server on cisco IOS since a log time ago. Up to release 15.0 seems is just stopped working. I mean external users can log in the pptp but after logged in there no traffic flow. A simple downgrade to 12.4 solves the problem.
But now i have all my infrastructure with ISR2 2901 and all IOS are 15.
I'm trying to run the ISM-VPN-29 in a 2901 router. Cisco says that the SECK9 and HSECK9 licenses are needed to operate this ISM. However, they also say that the HSECK9 license is not available on the 2901. I'm running the SECK9 license but it's still not working.
This link, table 5 states that the HSECK9 feature license is for 2921 and 2951 only:[URL]This link states that it is a requirement to run the card, and also that the card works on the 2901:[URL]
I am running 15.3(1)T IOS.
how to install VIC3-2E/M in cisco router 2901 & what precaution should have to be taken.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI wonder if I can build a NTP Stratum 0 device using a GPS and a Cisco router.Preferred would be a CISCO819 as it has a build in GPS, alternative a CISCO2901 + EHWIC-3G-HSPA+7.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have purchased a 2901 router with permenant licenses for ipbase, security and uc. The router came shipped with c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M3.bin but there are newer releases available. I understand that our licenses will cover us to upgrade to the latest version, c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M.bin, but when I attempt to download I am denied.
How do I go about downloading and upgrading?