Cisco VPN :: 2621 VPN Tunnel Drops Routes Out Of Routing Table

Dec 11, 2011

My main issue was trying to connect virtuelly via GNS3 and my router setup on it. I have three Cisco 2621 XM routers set up. They all came with 2 Fast Ethernet ports. However, only one of them has a Serial port. So, what I'm doing is connecting the routers together with the fast ethernet ports using crossover cables. So, I baselined two routers to start with. Very simple AAA, set up IP HTTP server, IP HTTP Secure Server, etc. Privledge lvl 15 access, etc.
 
I then set my Router A's inside Fa0/1 port with a 192.168.1.0/24 network. The outside port Fa0/0 is 10.0.0.0/30 network.Router B is set up similar, 192. 168. 2. 0/24 insice Fa0/1, Fa0/0 is 10.0.0.0/30 network outside. So, three networks 192.168.1.0, 192.168.2.0, 10.0.0.0 network. [code] I then repeated the same on Router B, just transposing 2.0 network for interesting traffic, and Peer 10.0.0.2 for the Fa0/0 interface on Router A.When I "test" the tunnel, I get an error message. So, since I'm connected to Router B (which was working, had routing, and had Router A's network 1.0 in it's routing table), the error msg says that I need to add a route into the routing table (192.168.1.0). It was there up until I attempted to put the VPN in place. It's like it stopped the routing.
 
At face value, it looks like this should be working! But when I debug the ospf process, it looks like hello packets aren't tranversing across to the other side. Is it because I just have the 192.xxx.xxx.xxx networks as "interesting" traffic? Can I have multiple networks marked as "interesting"? I thought that's what the peer statements were doing to allow the tunnel to be established.

View 6 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco :: BGP Routes Not In Routing Table?

Feb 4, 2013

We have a BGP / OSPF configuration as shown in the topology picture. When the connection towards Internet is taken down, we expect the traffic to be forwarded toward WAN 2 (preferred) or WAN 1. The problem is that the BGP learned routes disappears when the Internet connection is taken down. The IP routing table on R2 only shows internal networks and the networks between R2 and WAN 1 and 2. No routes to internet is shown. We run "show ip bgp neighbors <ip-to-wan-1-router> received-routes" it contain internet routes. And when we run "show ip bgp neighbors <ip-to-wan-1-router> routes" it contains no routes at all.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco :: How To Remove These L Routes In Routing Table

Apr 2, 2013

viewtopic.php?f=33&t=24000

How can you remove these "L" routes in routing table?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV180 - Subnet Calculation In Static Routes And Routing Table

Jan 3, 2013

I've been playing around with the Cisco RV180s for a while now and have come across a problem with the subnet calculation in the static routes and routing table. Essentially, if I configure up a static route for a /16 it's entered in the routing table as a /13. If I add a /24 it's entered in the routing table as a /16. I haven't tested every subnet size and combinations but this looks like a fairly fundamental maths bug.
 
As a side note, I notice that the 1.0.1.9 release notes state the removal of SSH Server, however, I can not find any reference to it's existance prior to 1.0.1.9, did/does it exist in 1.0.0.30 and if so where? .
 
Screenshots are below and an extract from the configuration file for reference.

From the config file:
 
route = {}
route[1] = {}
route[1]["active"] = "1"
route[1]["dstIpAddr"] = "8.8.0.0"
route[1]["gwIpAddr"] = "192.168.1.250(code)

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5520 Activating Failover Config Drops Routing Table

May 21, 2012

I'm attempting to configure two ASA 5520 for active/standby failover.When I enter the “failover” command to enable the config on the primary ASA, the entire routing table disappears.There is no routing process running, only static routes are configured.
 
Is this an expected behavior of the failover process and if so, how long should I wait for the routes to come back?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3825 Will Not Add Routes To Topology Table From Eigrp Neighbor

Mar 13, 2013

I have a 3825 running c3825-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T8. It is configured as an eigrp stub advertising only its connected and static routes. There are three WAN connections using a metro ethernet service. Two are data, one for voice traffic. The primary data connections run to two WAN edge ASR1002 routers.
 
The primary data connection (Gi0/1.943) is 20 Megs, the secondary data connection (Gi0/1.944) is only 15 Megs. Before the secondary connection was in place I only had routes to our backbone via Gi0/1.943 and everything was working great. Some time after the secondary data connection was turned up the routes to the backbone through Gi0/1.943 disappeared from the eigrp topology table causing all data traffic to flow through the less desirable secondary Gi0/1.944 interface to our backbone.
 
There is a good eigrp neighbor relationship between the 3825 and the ASR connected to Gi0/1.943, but if I show ip protocols it does not list the ASR as a data source. I know that the ASR is advertising its routes because I can see the updates coming from it if I debug ip eigrp. For some reason they are just not being added to the topology table by the 3825, not even as a feasible successor.
 
I have shut/no shut the interface multiple times at both ends during troubleshooting and I also reloaded and upgraded the code on the 3825 from 12.4(24)T to 12.4(24)T8. We also contacted the metro ethernet carrier to see if they had a policy that could potentially be blocking the traffic (no). My colleagues and I are just not seeing any feasible reason why these routes are not being added.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1514 Gre Tunnel Output Drops Errors

Nov 17, 2012

I have seen an error in GRE configured between two routers over WAN.  i am monitoring the WAN link and GRe tunnel via WhatsupGold NMS and it reported that Gre tunnel having packet loss sometimes and this time it affects the services and traffic passing over tunnel.sh int t101 shows output drops . is that the problem ? i have read that i have to adjust MTC size but i tried to change the tunnel MTU to 1400 but still sh int t101 shows MTU as 1514 ? What could be the problem of output drops in my tunnel link. [code]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: WS-SUP720-3B - 2 Full BGP Table - Maximum Routing Table?

Jan 16, 2013

In datasheet of  WS-SUP720-3B - link- was said that are only supported around 256K routes (fib?rib?).With this value I can't get 2 full bgp - that is around 850K ..
 
The supervisor is that control this or just memory ? I said this because I have a 7204-npe-g1 whith 2 fullrouting and 1G of and he are ok..

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5505 / Static Routes Through Site-to-site Tunnel

Dec 17, 2012

I am using a Cisco ASA 5505 Here is a description of my topology.
 
Headquarters = 192.168.201.0
Client X = 172.16.0.0
Datacenter = 10.12.0.0
 Site to Site Tunnels:
Headquarters ---> Datacenter
Datacenter ---> Client X
 
I want to ability for computers in the Headquarters subnet to access the Client X subnet.I have tried setting up a static route to push all traffic destin for 172.16.0.0 to the datacenter, but was unsuccessful. how I can route all 172.16.0.0 through the tunnel.I have tried ading a static route on my ASA but without success.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: EIGRP 101 - Prefer External Routes Versus Internal Routes?

Apr 8, 2011

Is there a way in EIGRP to prefer external routes versus internal routes. EIGRP always picks up internal routes as long as they are available, no matter if external routes have better metric. Our Scenario is that we have DMVPN hub and spoke topology running EIGRP 101. The Core routers also on EIGRP 101 prefer EIGRP 101 routes. We have the new MPLS network running BGP and redistributing these BGP routes into EIGRP 101. The core routers prefer EIGRP 101 routes (internal) to redistributed BGP (external) routes.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: 2621 - Routing With Two LANs

Mar 9, 2006

I have a spare 2621 sitting on my desk and i would like to run a little experiment. i had two LAN segments that are seperated right now, but would like to stick this router between them and route traffic between them?

Current configuration : 1221 bytes
!
version 12.2
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption(code)

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5510 / VPN Tunnel Drops Due To Inactivity?

Dec 12, 2011

I am using a Cisco ASA 5510. Our tunnels always drop due to inactivity, which is a security issue I understand, and it only takes some "interesting traffic" to bring it back up. My problem is that it looks like the interesting traffic has to originate from my side of the tunnel, when our clients send traffic and the tunnel is down due to inactivity it does not come back up. Is there a setting that I am overlooking that will make it come back up no matter who sends traffic? Or, is there a way to make it stay up through inactivity?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2621 / Public IPs / How To Use Less On An Interface

Jul 24, 2012

I have a 2621 that I am configuring on the internet. My ISP gives me a static DHCP assigned address and then two more static addresses that are not part of the same block. (e.g. 1.2.3.4 is static via dhcp and then they give me 5.6.7.8/30).
 
I have fa0/0 getting 1.2.3.4 ia dhcp. I have 5.6.7.8 on a loopback interface for PAT/NAT as I have the main one on fa0/0 doing vpn to a remote ASA. The problem is that I have yet another device that needs a public IP, mainly 5.6.7.9... I want to hook that device up to fa0/2 (this box has three fa interfaces). How do I setup fa0/2 if I want to give the device on it a real live public IP address? I have done this before, but it must have been 10 years back on an even older CISCO and I can not remember how I did it.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2621 - Sample Configurations / Routing Network

Apr 9, 2011

I'm moving into a new data center. I don't consider myself a network engineer or anything but I do understand the basics. The new data center I am moving into routes my network to me a bit differently than my old data center. The IOS on the Cisco 2621 is: c2600-i-mz.123-26.bin
 
I am assigned a /29 block which they configure as the routing network, it looks like this: Routing Network: A.A.A.0Routing Network Sub net Mask: 255.255.255.248Routing Network Def Gateway: A.A.A.1Customer Usable Address: A.A.A.4
 
I've been assigned a /28 block which is B.B.B.240/28. They stated that in order for me to use my allocated blocks, I had to act as my own gateway, routing the traffic through the routing network. This goes just a bit beyond my networking knowledge, though I still understand it, I just don't know exactly how to execute. I'm assuming my 2621 with 2 Fast Ethernet interfaces should be able to handle this routing scenario.
 
Any sample configs, or possible a link to a how to to get this setup? I was going to use FreeBSD to do the routing, but a appliance based Cisco router is much more attractive of an option to me.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5520 8.3 VPN Tunnel Drops Traffic

Aug 23, 2011

We have a 100 Mbps WAN circuit, we have configured an IPsec tunnel between ASA 5520 and Cisco 3845 Router for our DR site replication via Veeam Backup and Replication, it was working fine before, when we established the 3DES tunnel the traffic for certain subnets is dropped after an hour and it stops the replication, although tunnel remains up and we can access the other subnets, as soon as we clear the crypto SA and ISAKMP sessions on the firewall the traffic starts flowing again and then after an hour the traffic is dropped again.So far the testing and differnet configurations we tried are as under.
 
Tried with a different MTU size both on firewall and ESXi servers but nothing happened.Their is no QOS configuration.Checked the utilization on both ends its Noram although their are subsequent 100% spikes on Cisco 3845 but on average it remians at 30-40%.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 2921 - IPSec Tunnel Random Packet Drops

Mar 15, 2013

I'm trying to troubleshoot a random packet drop issue for an IPSec tunnel between two VTIs. For over a month, we didn't see any issue, and starting today, we have up to 30% packet loss across an IPSec tunnel.
 
After some analysis, I concluded that the packet loss happens somewhere on the path from the uc520 to the 2921. Packet counts show up correctly on the uc520 physical egress interface, but the packet count is low on the ingress interface on the 2921.

Pings outside the tunnel along the same path are fine.
 
I also cleared the tunnels on both ends and after they reestablished, the issue was still present.
 
Any pointers on finding where the packets get lost?
  
rr-hq-2921#ping 10.1.13.1 source g0/1 rep 100         
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 100, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.13.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

[Code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Setup VLan Between 6509 And 2621 Router?

Oct 25, 2011

I need to setup a vlan between the 6509 and 2621 router. This needs to be a VLAN (200) the runs between the devices that uses DOT1Q trunking. The end result is all the networks (vlans)  on the 6509 can talk to the LAN on the 2600 (10.133.22.0 / 23) and visa versa.
 
Device 1
6509 with CatOS / IOS
Config I did on the MSFC:
Interface Vlan 200
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.248

[code]....

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 / 2621 - IP From Wrong VLAN Being Handed Out

Dec 29, 2011

Setup is like this:  Poly com IP phones -> Cisco 2960 switches -> Cisco 2621XM router running 12.28(r).  A Windows 2003 server running on HP Proliant DL380 G4 with the correct DHCP scope is configured for the IP phones, also sitting on a Cisco 2960 switch.

A typical port config on the 2960 is:
interface FastEthernet0/1
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 60
mls qos trust cos
auto qos voip trust
spanning-tree portfast
spanning-tree bpduguard enable

Relevant section of the config on the 2621XM router:
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
[Code] .......

This used to work on a Windows 2000 server which sat on different piece of hardware, but stopped immediately after the migration to Windows 2003 server was done.  There was no change on the router or switches prior to or after the server migration.  I see DHCP server log on the 2003 server giving DHCP NACK because the phones are apparently asking for IP's in the data VLAN.

View 14 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2621 - Unable To Ping Internal Interface

Dec 3, 2011

I've got a 2621 configured as my main gateway to the internet - right now it's obtaining a DHCP ip from a the ISP's proprietary router set to bridged mode.
 
As of now, I'm unable to ping the internal interface of the router.  I can ping external IP's only, even though I have DNS servers listed, i am unable to resolve host names.  I'm running a few servers to which people are able to connect to my web server, among other services.  I even have a crypto map setup to another 2621 across the country and can ping all internal ips on the other end... I JUST CANNOT PING THE INTERNAL INTERFACE of the router!!

I've noticed that when I ping the router during it's boot process (using linux un-interupted) I get a response in a very short window, then dies again.  I'll post my config below:
 
[code]....

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2950 / 2620 / 2621 - How To Get WAN Connectivity Back To Switch At End Of Network

Jan 27, 2013

I have a lab setup to take my CCNA and CCNP and I'm having issues trying to get WAN connectivity back to a switch at the end of my network.  My lab environment consists of 1 - 2950 switch, 1 - 2620 and 1 - 2621XM.  I have 1 Ethernet connection from each router to the switch and 1 serial connection from the 2620 to the 2621XM.  I have the serial interfaces in a shutdown state right now so there is no loop since I do not have Spanning tree setup on the ports on the switch yet. 

Right now using the fast ethernet ports on the routers and I have no issues its when I shut down those Ethernet ports and try using the serial interfaces when I start having issues.  So my network layout is Ethernet from switch port f0/4 to port f0/0 on 2620 and serial from s0/1 on the 2620 to s0/2 on the 2621XM. My 2621XM f0/1 is whats connected to the WAN and I have no issues getting to the WAN from my 2621Xm or my 2620 but when I try pinging any website or even my WAN default gateway from my switch I get nothing! 

Ive also noticed that when I do a IP NAT translation (after accessing the WAN from my 2620) on my 2621XM the source IP is of my serial connection not the ip of my 2620  router?  I have my default gateway on the 2620 as the the IP of my serial interface on the 2621XM and vice versa because my LAN network is 172.16.1.0 and my WAN is 172.16.9.0.  I have a /31 setup between my serial connections 172.16.11.0 (s0/1) is on the 2620 and 172.16.11.1(s0/2) is on the 2621XM.  I used the SDM (ver 2.5) to setup NAT to have f0/1 with Nat outside and s0/2 as Nat inside.  Encapsulation is HDLC between the serial links. Ive attached the running configs of the switch and routers.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 / Policy Based Routing With Two Default Routes

Jun 24, 2012

I have a 1941 router configured for Policy based routing with two ISPs.Two static default routes configured to point the gateways of respoective ISPs with same metric.But the problem is, packets are going throug the one ISP only while doing traceroute.
 
N/W connectivity:
 
ISP1----->                <----------------------> LAN1   
               |  Router |
ISP------->                <----------------------> LAN 2
 
Below is my configuration :
 
Current configuration : 5958 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 05:18:56 UTC Mon Jun 25 2012
!
version 15.0
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption

[code]....

View 26 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560E - HSRP Gateway Failover And Routing Table

Nov 12, 2012

We have two Cisco 3560E layer 3 switches at the core of our network. The switches are configured as an HSRP pair and the clients on our network point to the HSRP address as their default gateway. So if CORE-A dies, then CORE-B will pick up the address and the default route for the clients will continue to be available.We also need to specify a few static routes on the core switch to allow us to get to specific networks. Is there a way to do this so that the routes failover in the same way that the default gateway does?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV 042 V3 Advance Routing Feature Causes Static Routing Table Not To Appear

Jan 31, 2012

I tried the "Advanced Routing" Feature over the RV-042 V3 Dual WAN VPN Router , And the New IP Subnet i added ( 10.0.7.0 ) in the Static Routing Table does NOT Appear in the Routing Table of the Router. Please review the attached Print Screen for both the Static Routing Entry Configuration & the Routing Table of the RV-042 Router.

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: RIPv2 Routers Setting Routing Table For R3

Dec 5, 2012

I started using RIPv2 on Packet Tracer. I got two subnets to connect with two routers. After I completed that, I decided to add a third router. How to setup the Routing Table for atleast R3 ?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2911 With IOS Version Is 15.1 - Routing Table Not Updating

Oct 2, 2012

I am using Cisco 2911 & IOS version is 15.1. My problem is that after some days (e.g. 15-20 days), the routing table suddenly stops updating & then I have to enter the default route again to make it up. I am using Track 1 to track default route here. After primary link goes down, the Track is also going down but after coming the primary link up, the track is not coming up. So, I have to add the default route again to make it up.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: GNS3 - Stub Router Not Updating Routing Table - EIGRP

Nov 14, 2012

We have small which I'm looking to implement and have built this on GNS3.
 
We have:
 
Router A in site 1
Router B in site 2
Router C in site 3
 
Router A and B are connection via a point to point 100M link and from Router C we have a 2 point to point one of which is 5Mpbs and going to Router A and Router B.
 
For Router C to reach Router A network it will go via Router B and these are 100M connection. When the link between Router A and B goes down. Router C should update and start using the 5m route.
 
For some reson, the routes are not updating. I have to do 'clea ip eigrp ne' for the routes to update and if I reload the routers all works well, it seems the problem is intermittent.

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Filter A Specific Host(s) From OSPF Routing Table On A ASA 5550 (ABR)?

May 22, 2013

I am attempting to filter a specific host(s) from my OSPF routiing table on a ASA 5550 (ABR) using LSA prefix lists.  However, when I look at the other routers in that area, I notice that ALL LSA type-3's are being removed (10 hosts are now missing from the routing table). I have verified the filter is working on the ABR, but I can't figure why ALL hosts/routes that were coming into the area are now being filtered instead of the specific one that I want to filter out.
 
Here is the config on the ABR:
 
prefix-list pdm_pl_000 seq 10 permit 206.253.180.137/32
!
!            
router ospf 1
network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
network 10.150.10.0 255.255.255.0 area 10
network 10.150.252.0 255.255.255.224 area 10

[code]....
 
The 206.253.180.137 host is actually coming from Area '3'.  Am I doing something that is removing all type-3 LSA's?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 2901 / 2951 - Site-to-Site VPN - Constant DPD - Tunnel Drops

Dec 12, 2012

We have approx 40 branch offices - all of which are connected to a single core site over VPN Tunnels using various gear. At one particular site, we are having issues with the tunnel dropping sporadically throughout the day - some days it happens 10 times, some days it happens none. This just randomly started happening two weeks ago, without any changes taking place. Since it started happening, I have upgraded the code to latest versions, but still the issue persists. This particular site has a 2901 and connects back to a 2951.
 
Below is the output from:

debug crypto ipsec
debug crypto isakmp

[code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Understanding NAT Table And Its Chains (pre-routing / Post-routing And Output)?

May 28, 2011

I'm learning about iptables, but I don't fully understand the chains of NAT table (prerouting, postrouting and output).I'm specially in doubt about prerouting and postrouting. As far as I know, DNAT can be made with prerouting and SNAT can be made with postrouting, so I think prerouting is for input and postrouting is for output, but the material I'm reading (and another sources) are not clear.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Default Routes In Nexus 5k

Apr 29, 2013

I have a pair of N5K's, down stream from them are from Fabric Interconnects and a UCS chassis.  Upstream is a stack of 3750's then ASA5510's. 
 
I am trying to backup the config to our TFTP server and I am getting 'no route to host'.. I tried to add a route, and found that N5K uses VRF's for routing?? .. After some looking I see there are two base VRF's 'management' and 'default'.. the management VRF has a default gateway entry and a single interface member (mgmt0).. when I look at the default VRF .. there are no interface members or routing entries.. Ok, I can handle that just add some interfaces and add a default gateway.  Then I get lost:
 
I'm able to access the UCS manager..... so how the heck is that even possible if there's no gateway defined anywhere (or maybe I'm missing something?).  My theory was: add all other ports but mgmt0 to the default VRF, and have the default gateway point out of the uplinks (a vPC).. but wasn't sure how that would affect anything and mainly just wanted to know how I was able to access the UCS manager in light of the fact that there is no default gateway anywhere that I could see...

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Track IP Routes On 6509?

Jul 2, 2012

We have a need to track specifc subnets on our two 6509s, running IOS version 12.2(18)SXF16. Basically, we want to do this:
 
track 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.252 reachability
track 2 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.252 reachability
 
However, the 6509 IOS only provides the option to track an interface. Is this a feature that's available in later IOS versions?
 
Is there another way to track these routes? The subnets are used for WAN links at a HQ and DR site and we are doing a specific PBR (sending all http/https traffic) using these subnets. If that WAN link goes down, we want to be able to utilize a backup WAN link to support that traffic.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 871 IP Routes Based On Domains

Apr 9, 2012

I would like to configure few routings on my Cisco router 871 in order to allow my employees to have access only to specific websites.However, since some websites have dynamic IPs propably the route that I will create will not work.
 
My question is, can I configure a route or is there any other way to configure this permission based on the hostname/domain? For example, if I want to permit access to this website www.surveymonkey.com (75.98.93.51) instead of configuring:
 
ip route 75.98.93.51 255.255.255.255 192.168.10.250
 
is there any way to configure based on the url.. in order to be able to recognise this host correctly??

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Dynamic Routes With 1711

Jan 23, 2012

Im new to cisco routes, Im traing to configure a 1711 routes with a dsl 2wire routes, my problem is that Im able to ping anywhere in the routes, but when Im on my computer I can only ping the interfaces on the router but no the 2wire route that gives me access to the internet.
 
                                                              Cisco 1711                                                                       2wire                                                        
                          f0 192.168.200.1(Inside NAT)          e0 192.168.1.76( 2wire Nat)              192.168.1.254      (Internet)
 
My computer is getting ip addres 192.168.200.100 when I ping th 192.168.1.76 is fine, but when I try to ping the 192.168.1.254 does not work, Im assuming the cisco has activated a dinamic route from .76 to .254, but it is not working, why?

Here is the router configuration
 
Router#show runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 1183 bytes!version 12.3service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname Router!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!no aaa new-model!resource policy!memory-size iomem 25ip subnet-zero!!no ip dhcp [Code]....

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved