Cisco VPN :: 2621xm Split Tunnel VPN Not Resolving Internal Host-names
May 20, 2012
I'm having with my VPN Server on my Cisco 2621xm.
I started by creating a VPN - everything worked great. I assigned the DNS Servers, Domain name, WINS Server so when I connect I'm able to resolve local hostnames on the network with no problem, however, I had no internet access... I then set up a split tunnel access list. Since I've set that up, I'm now able to ping internet based addresses url... but no longer able to resolve internal host names. I can ping the ip addresses, just name resolution no longer works. [code]
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 21, 2011
I was thrown into trying to fix a friends pc being told that the internet wasn't working.What I've found through some messing around is that I am able to pull up websites with the ip address but trying to use the domain name give a "Host Not Found". Similar error when trying to do a ping. However doing an nslookup will pull the ip's for a domain. I've done the dns flush, the netsh commands that are floating around to no avail.
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2012
Is it possible to configure remote access (IPSEC client) to force all traffic through the tunnel (no split tunnel) yet still limit the internal hosts that can be accessed?
I have been asked to provide remote access (via ASA5510) with the following requirements:
- the client should have unrestricted internet access via the ASA (the source address will appear to be the outside interface of the ASA)
- the client should have access to only two internal hosts (192.168.10.10 and 192.168.44.10)
Is there a way to limit access to those two internal hosts, while still providing secured internet access? The only way I can see is to use an access list on another device (for example our core switch).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2013
Region : UnitedKingdom
Model : TL-WDR4300
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 3.13.23 Build 120820
ISP :
Region : UnitedKingdom
Model : TL-WDR3600
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 3.13.23 Build 120820
ISP : BT Infinity
I am running a Windows Home Server machine called "mserver" that has an IP address supplied via DHCP.There is also a local webserver running on port 8089 that I use to access media from several devices (Android Phone, Blackberry Playbook & HP Touchpad...i.e. not Microsoft).When I had the BT Homehub3 in use I could access the webserver via http://mserver:8089 and it would be loaded on all devices. With the WDR3600 used in place of the Homehub3 it cannot resolve mserver into a local IP address on a non windows device. I can access it via http://192.168.0.xxx:8089 so the route is there.Does the WDR3600 have any local DNS resolution? I repeat the BT HomeHub3 CAN do this, so why can't the TP-LINK?
P.S. I have tried :-
Disabling hardware NAT
Turning off UPNP & Port Forwarding
Restoring to factory default
Disabling all ALG's in security
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2012
I have a e4200 sitting behind a BT home hub 2. The home hub provides internet connection to the e4200, and the e4200 allows all devices to connect. I am able to ping internal IP addresses, but when I try to ping by device name it returns the external IP address. How can I view / amend the DNS table on the router?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2012
We have ASA 5520 acting as the VPN Server and Cisco 1941 router as EZVPN client. Since last few days client is not able to establish vpn connection. 1941 router is continuously generating the below log messages
001569: Jul 22 12:19:05.883 ABC: %CRYPTO-4-EZVPN_SA_LIMIT: EZVPN(VPNGROUP) Split tunnel attributes(51) greater than max allowed split attributes(50)
001574: Jul 22 12:19:07.835 ABC: %CRYPTO-6-EZVPN_CONNECTION_DOWN: (Client) User=vpn_user Group=VPNGROUP Client_public_addr=<client public ip> Server_public_addr=<server public ip>
004943: Jul 22 11:32:42.247 ABC: %IP_VFR-4-FRAG_TABLE_OVERFLOW: Dialer1: the fragment table has reached its maximum threshold 16
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2011
Is it possible to give me NAS and Xbox 360 Host names so that they show up in my DHCP Client list? Currently there are 13 devices connected, 11 of which have a host name but these two do not. It also shows the IP and MAC addresses of each connected device.I just want to make sure that all of the devices that are connected are what I would expect.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2011
I have been asked to do is locate some computers on the network and run a security scan on them. Well i pinged the host name and got an IP address. Then the network admin me look up the switch port that the computer is located on and so on. So i find 3 of the computers im looking for and when i get on the computer and look up the name but it does not match the name given to me. So i do an ipconfig /all and see that the computer has the right IP address and MAC address but not the same name. So my main question is, are these computers one in the same or is something messed up?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2011
where the host names do not properly resolve with the right ip address.Example, I ping a host name, it gives me an IP, but when I VNC into the workstation, it is a totally different host.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 25, 2012
I have issues with the same host name duplication in different VLAN's in the same domain.Scenario:I have 2 VLAN's named VLAN A and VLAN B.If i assign in VLAN A for one of the computer name as Comp1 it's not in the network so its accepting.in dns will be replaced with VLAN B and if i ping i can see the ip also from VLAN B.
View 18 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2011
Anyway, I am looking for a way to discover host names of Apple devices (namely iPods and iPhones) that are on our network. I've tried a number of programs like Nmap, Advanced IP Scanner, and LanSpy to name a few. All of them will report back the MAC address with no problem but no dice on resolving the host name.
My goal is to use the host name to identify the device, and ultimately the person with the device. Any thoughts on how I can go about this? Is there a setting in Nmap I'm missing or perhaps a better program to use?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2013
I ran into a very interesting problem that occurred today and I'm trying to figure out why it happened. If it was one ASA 5505 that just required the reboot, then I'd have just chalked it up to a glitch, but when we built a new AD/ DNS server on the main network at the main site and changed the 3 Remote site ASAs to point to the new DNS server in the DHCPD options, none of them could ping any local host names to the DNS server at the main site they were now pointing too, but external host names { URL} all translated and pinged fine.
From a laptop on one of the remote sites, we could ping the new AD/DNS server(192.168.0.3) and the old AD/DNS server(192.168.0.2) and everything else at the main site, and telnet to port 53 showed successful across the Easy VPN from the Remote site to the new server at the main site. When wire shark was added to the new DNS server at the main site, the DNS request and replies for {URL}, for example, came and worked fine, but any requests for local resources never made it to the server from the remote sites.
A reboot of one of the Remote Site ASA's corrected the issue. Then I rebooted the other two remote site ASAs, and now DNS was working fine for everybody. I had also tried clearing the ARP cache on the ASAs before resorting to rebooting them. I also tried rebooting the laptop thinking the local DNS cache needed cleared before resorting to rebooting the ASAs. I'm struggling to understand why external, public host names made it through and resolved from the remote sites to the new server at the main site, but anything local failed before even reaching the new server(The new DNS server could resolve requests made by computers at the main site, but the remote sites that traverse the Easy VPN from the ASAs failed). The new AD/DNS server is the only server configured for DNS for all remote site computers.
Is any of this making sense? I'm wondering if clearing the x late or local host tables would have corrected it without having to reboot. I'm just trying to grasp the understanding here and figure out what happened.
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2012
I am able to connect to corporate VPN with no issues when connecting directly to ISP modem. When I try to complete the same VPN connection via a Wireless Router (Linksys WRT160Nv3) i get the following message: "Network error. Unable to look up host names"I have tried connecting and it will initially connect, but 15-30 seconds it will drop and connection can't be re-established.Is there a setting on the Linksys WRT160Nv3 that needs to be changed?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 17, 2012
I have several PIX 501's and one of them is extremely slow accessing network resources and does not have Internet access. I would like to use split tunnel and have them access the Internet throught their DSL connection and any traffic for network resources sent over the VPN. How can I improve the speed and set up split tunnel via the command line? I dont have the PDM software so I guess I will need to do all the configuration via the command line. Below is the configuration:
PIX Version 6.3(1)interface ethernet0 autointerface ethernet1 100fullnameif ethernet0 outside security0nameif ethernet1 inside security100enable password k4HlcGX2lC1ypFOm encryptedpasswd y5Nu/Nt1/5dK8Iuf encryptedhostname
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2012
I'm having with my VPN Server on my Cisco 2621xm.
I started by creating a VPN - everything worked great. I assigned the DNS Servers, Domain name, WINS Server so when I connect I'm able to resolve local hostnames on the network with no problem, however I couldn't connect to the internet. I then set up a split tunnel access list. Since I've set that up, I'm now able to ping internet based addresses (www.google.ca), but no longer able to resolve internal host names. I can ping the ip addresses, just name resolution no longer works.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 27, 2013
I'm configurig a VPN profile with NO split tunneling. The tunnel is working to the inside, but I'm not able to get internet access. Below are the NAT statements that I created.
nat (outside) 2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
global (outside) 2 (ip address)
I'm familiar with 8.6 nat statements, but with 8.2 it's not letting me put in the same commands.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2011
I've created an IPSEC VPN site-to-site from a SR520 (remote office) to a Nortel Contivity(home office)...all works really well on the VPN front as I can communicate effectively over the tunnel. However, this setup will be deployed at a few smaller sites and I'd like to setup a split tunnel so that Internet bound traffic goes straight to the Internet while traffic bound for our home office goes over the IPSEC Tunnel.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2007
I've configured SSL VPN on an 1811 router running 12.4(9) IOS. I'm using the full SSL VPN client and do not want to split tunnel the traffic. I can reach my inside resources just fine, but I can not reach sites on the Internet. I want to tunnel my Internet traffic to the router and then have it hairpin out the same interface.
I've successfully configured this type of hairpinning on an ASA for SSL VPN, but have yet to find a way to do it in IOS.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2012
I have a RV082 v2 with Firmware 2.0.2.01-tm with a Site-to-Site VPN to a Cisco ASA5510.
The PCs behind the RV082 can not see two webservers behind the ASA5510. Both servers have full DNS registration and are accessable from other sites with RV042 routers.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2013
I read a rumor that the RV016 does not support split VPN tunnels.
[URL]
My understanding is that VPN tunnels on my RV042 routers will send internet traffic out the local gateway, and only send traffic thru the VPN tunnel if it is destined for the remote subnet. That is my understanding of "split tunnel".
Is that not true with the RV016?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2012
I followed:[URL]And my VPN connection is established on 2921.However when I successfully connected to the router via VPN, ipfoncfig shows default gateway being 255.0.0.0,My CISCO2921 GI0/0 has default 10.10.10.1 IP assigned, I want to access this interface with CISCO CP.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2013
i have cisco asa 5540, users access vpn through anyconnect, i have applied split tunnel so that all users accessing internal network (10.0.0.0) grows through tunnel and other traffic through internet.. working fine.i want to fully tunnel one user so that all his traffic goes through the tunnel, what is the best way to do it, "is there any guide (step by step)"
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2011
I can connect to the router over VPN just fine, problem is that once I connect I can not access the 192.168.1.0 network... can't ping a workstation on the network 192.168.1.25, I can however Ping the Router which is 192.168.1.254.
FastEthernet 4 is my WAN
used this for setup: [URL]
Here is the config:
! Last configuration change at 13:50:29 UTC Tue Mar 16 1993 by cjcatucci!version 15.0no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecservice password-encryption!hostname c861w!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!no logging monitorenable secret
[Code].....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2011
getting internet access via a easy vpn tunnel on a cisco 877 router. Basically we would like roaming users to be able to use the internet via the vpn rather than using a split tunnel. The reason for this is we have multiple sites that are tied down via external IP access lists for some services. We would like roaming users to be able to interact with these sites through the central router and use the routers external IP address to acess the secured sites. I know we can use a proxy but we also use some other non proxy bases services at these sites so would rather direct routed access.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2013
Is it possible with ASAVPNSERVER 5520 and an EasyVPN 5505 Client to have the client do split tunnel to a single public IP address? Both devices are on 8.2(5) 33. Could you possible provide sample config for split tunnel?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2013
We have 2 Hubs (Cisco 7200 - 2 for redudancy). Every customer have a Spoke (Cisco 881). The Spokes are 24/24 connected to the 2 hubs (2 dmvpn tunnels) to give us the access to our equipments of monitoring and for support. Every Spoke have a NAT table with a specific NAT range for every Spoke. Like this we can reach every devices with a unique IP inside the VPN.For example:
- Spoke_001 have a NAT IP range of 10.80.0.0 255.255.254.0
- Spoke_002 have a NAT IP range of 10.80.2.0 255.255.254.0
...
To connect to the hubs with our laptops, we are using the Cisco VPN client. We have different profiles created in the hubs:
- Admin profile with an ACL that allow the connectivity to every Spoke
- Integrator profiles: that allow the connectivity of one integrator to some defined Spokes.
So the integrator profile looks like this in the hub
crypto isakmp client configuration group [NAME]
key [PASSWORD]
domain [DOMAIN]
pool [NAME]
acl [NAME_VPN_Split]
[code]....
The problem is that if we can't summarize an ACL in less than 50 lines, we will have to create a second profile and to know wich one to use for wich network...
Version:
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.3(4r)T3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
BOOTLDR: 7200 Software (C7200-KBOOT-M), Version 12.3(15), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
System image file is "disk2:c7200-advsecurityk9-mz.151-4.M2.bin"
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2011
I am tryingto replace a VPN3000 with an ASA (8.4) for remote access. We use Cisco ACS for authorization and accounting, and RSA for authorization.
On the VPN3000 we were able to pass the Split-Tunnel list to restrict users access to only specified IP's.I am trying to replicate the same on the ASA. I understand that I can create access-lists that will limit user access, and I am trying to understand how to assign an access list to the user based on the Radius attribute - [307627] IPSec-Split-Tunnel-List.
Is this done using the Dynamic Acccess Policy?How do I assign the Radius Attribute of the IPSec-Split-Tunnel-List to the dynamic policy?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2013
i've configured Cisco VPN CLient on a router 2821, and it is working fine.I could access inside resourses normally>the problem is that when i connect with VPN i lost connectivity to internet? What is wrong with my configuration? Below the running config of the router.
CISCO2821#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5834 bytes
!
version 12.4
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2010
I have successfully setup the AnyConnect VPN (connecting to our ASA5510) and have split tunneling configured. My remote users can access inside LAN servers as well as the Internet from their remote location. What I would like to know is is it possible to change the split tunnel and not allow access to the Internet from the remote location but force the remote client to go through the VPN and out our internal edge firewall to the Internet? Basically I need my remote clients to access the Internet but I would like for their Internet traffic to go through the VPN and out our edge firewall. This will allow the same security as if they were sitting in the office.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2013
(Setup routing and iptables for new VPN connection to redirect **only** ports 80 and 443) Only my goal is a bit different. I am running a headless gui-less install of Ubuntu Server 12.04 that is being used for a variety of different purposes... I would like all traffic to travel un-prohibited through my ISP except for my transmission traffic. I have a VPN i subscribe to that allows me access for which I only want to direct a single port's traffic to. I am currently using a modified version of the code from the above link. My current code is below:
#!/bin/sh
sleep 200
DEV1=eth0
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2012
Currently, we allow /24 into our DMZ as follow: [code] Now, if we need to extended the /24 to a bigger scope ( range of 15 class C networks ) : can I just re-used the static route or should I use a ACL to allow traffic? This is on a ASA5585
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2012
We just changed ISPs and now have a /29 routed subnet to be used on our ASA 5510 (8.4) instead of the one public ip we had before.There are a couple of PAT translations that were previously setup on the "interface" address which i now want to assign to a different ip address further in my subnet.
So i just changed this:
object network BMMM
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp smtp smtp
to:
object network BMMM
nat (inside,outside) static other.external.ip.in.subnet service tcp smtp smtp
And assumed that this would work,y it does not, and this leaves me unable to contact that machine from the outside.And shoud i also change my access-list?The relevant access-list rule is:access-list outside_in extended permit tcp any object BMMM eq smtp
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2012
I am not very familiar with ASA 5520 yet.I have been able to allow the OUTSIDE world to connect via SSH to the intermal host 172.17.2.50 on my DMZ network. I've created a NAT rule and an ACL as written on the configuration below.
Now I need the INTERNAL network to ssh 172.17.2.50 but ASA stops me with the following error: [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
