Cisco WAN :: 3750 Switch - Configure Jumbo Frames Only On Certain Gigabit Interfaces?

Sep 28, 2008

On a 3750 switch, is it possible to configure jumbo frames only on certain interfaces and leave the other ones as they are?

View 9 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 / Jumbo Frames And Connecting Non-jumbo Switches

Jun 11, 2012

I currently have 4 3560 switches connected in a Mesh topology. These are all set to use Jumbo Frames and so are all the Servers that are connected to these.I now need to connect a 2950 switch to 2 of the 3560's which will have only desktop computers connected to it but i do not want to configure Jumbo Frames on this and any of the desktops.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Full Switch Outage After Enabling Jumbo Frames On Nexus 5010

Nov 22, 2011

I attempted to enable jumbo frames on a Nexus 5010 (NX-OS version 4.2(1)N1(1)).  I created the policy map below and lost access to the switch.
 
policy-map type network-qos jumbo
class type network-qos class-default
mtu 9216
 
After recovery I see from the logs that all vlans and interface were suspended.  I've attempted to look for reasons for a compatibility issue but I am unable to find what is checked and what could have been incompatible.  The other troubling thing is the adjacent switch suspended its interfaces too but no change was done there. What I need to look out for so that this does not happen again?
 
2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-3-IF_ERROR_VLANS_SUSPENDED: VLANs 1,10,601 on Interface port-channel1 are being suspen
ded. (Reason: QoSMgr Network QoS configuration incompatible)
2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-5-IF_TRUNK_DOWN: Interface port-channel1, vlan 1,10,601 down
2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-3-IF_ERROR_VLANS_SUSPENDED: VLANs 10 on Interface port-channel508 are being suspended.

[code]....

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 6509 CPU 100% With Jumbo Frames

Jan 8, 2013

I have two switches: Nexus 3064 (ver 5.0(3)U1(2)) and Cisco 6509.The 6509:

1 x WS-x6708-10GE 8 port Ten Gig module version 3.5, firmware 12.2(18r)S1.
2 x sup 720's, with PFC3A.
2 x WS-x6348-rj-45
4 x WS-x6748-ge-tx

The IOS is ipservicesk9-mz 12.2(33)SXH8b.Both switches have been running fine for quite a while(not connected to each other). I then ran a fiber connection between port Nexus:1/48 and 6509:Te9/1.When I ping (of any packet size) from the Nexus to the 6509 @172.19.4.254, the 6509's CPU goes to 100%. On occasion, we will get 1 out of 20 packets back in the reply.I reduced the MTU size on the three 6509 parameters until the CPU stopped going 100%.The magic number is 4175 bytes. 4176 and higher == 100% CPU.I am willing to put the fiber link to 1500, but how does one change that for just one port on the Nexus? I tried and it refuses to set the mtu. I also tried to setup a new service-policy but that didn't seem to work either.The Nexus users are all jumbo frame users. The users on the 6509 are all 1500 byte frame users, except for one user on a 1 gig port (ws-6748-ge-tx) line card. It is this user whom would like jumbos.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG 200-08 - Jumbo Frames Not Forwarded?

Aug 11, 2011

What am I missing - can't get my new SG 200-08 Switch to handle Jumbo Frames
 
I have set the MTU size to 9216, saved the conf. and rebooted the box - however when I try to "ping -f -l 8000 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" through it (or to the switch itself) I recieve only "Request timed out"!?
 
I have tried MTU=9000 as well.....
 
F/W: 1.0.1.0
 
Is there anything, apart from increasing the MTU size, that needs to be done?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Jumbo Frames On 3750s / Nexus 7K

Dec 8, 2012

I've to enable it on 3750 and nexus 7K switches. what are the steps involved? can we enable jumbo frame per port instead of enabling globally? i.e. we will only have few ports that will be using jumbo frames, rest of the ports will be using default 1500 MTU size.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5000 Jumbo Frames

Apr 16, 2013

We have a requirement to send span traffic to a destination port for monitoring purposes on two 5000s with some 2000 fex boxes attached.
Some of the servers are making use of frames larger than 1500. we have not changed any mtu configuration on the 5000 since installation, and I can see the policy maps is still on 1500.
 
My first assumption would be that frames larger than 1500 will not be dropped, but it seemingly not (see below). is there a reason why the switch would forward jumbo frames? Also, is there a limitation on MTU for span traffic? There is a MTU command under the span session, but the maximum is 1518. From what I can read the frame will be truncated if it exceeds this. Does that mean the fragments will be dropped?
 
RX
    7495685816 unicast packets  249 multicast packets  147899 broadcast packets
    7495833963 input packets  1426823388087 bytes
    1608134 jumbo packets  0 storm suppression bytes
[Code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Linksys Wireless Router :: Turn On Jumbo Frames On E3200?

Jul 3, 2011

How do I turn on jumbo frames on the e3200?  I am using 1.0.01 firmware.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Jumbo Frames Dropped On Nexus 7010?

Jul 5, 2012

I believe i've enable jumbo frames on our Nexus 7010, one in each data-centre.

system jumbomtu 9216. Also on the interfaces mtu 9216. And can see MTU 9216 bytes, BW 20000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec on the port-channel between them. Though when i ping between vlans at each site with large packets i get 30% drops and if i set the DF bit in IP header to yes -  100% loss.
 
8798 bytes from 10.200.12.2: icmp_seq=19 ttl=254 time=8.024 ms --- 10.200.12.2 ping statistics ---20 packets transmitted, 14 packets received, 30.00% packet loss

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Jumbo Frames Across Trunk And Sites

Oct 25, 2011

I understand that jumbo frames need to be enabled end-to-end. I have two ESX hosts connected at each site. I want to enable jumbo frames for those ports, but what if not all host on the ESX are using jumbo frames, will I have drops and connection failures? So if i have two sites, each with a 6509 connected via a trunk and need to enable jumbo frames for a vlan between the sites how do I accomplish this?If I enable jumbo frames on the trunk link how does that impact other traffic between the sites?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 3064 Jumbo Frames Configuration?

May 23, 2012

I have a Cisco Nexus 3064 that I am using as part of a flat network for the Lab. I have 30 Virtualization Servers(MS HyperV and VMware vSphere) connected to this switch and I want to enable jumbo frames. The Virtualization Servers are able to ping the local VM's using 8K bytes. However I am unable to ping from server to server using 8K bytes. I have configuration (in abbreviation). All the servers are in the same network which I configured as L2 ports with the "switchport" command. However, the interface "MTU" command is unavailable in L2 mode. I am only able to get the interface "MTU" command only in L3 mode with the "no switchport" command on the interface.
 
# int eth1/2-45
# no switchport
# mtu 9216
# no shut
 
I can ping the servers with less than 1500 bytes, but anything larger fails.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Jumbo Frames Not In Effect On Nexus 5548

Mar 24, 2012

According to this Cisco URL jumbo frames should be put into play by changing default ethernet system class. 
 
Recommended configuration:
!--- You can enable the Jumbo MTU
!--- for the whole switch by setting the MTU
!--- to its maximum size (9216 bytes) in

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Jumbo Frames Coming From Catalyst 3100?

Dec 2, 2012

I have a Cisco Catalyst 3100 blade in a Dell server chassis that is trunked to a 6509.
 
When doing a protocol capture, I see large frames being sent from one of the servers in the chassis.
 
Example:
 
TCP:[Continuation to #1701] [Bad CheckSum]Flags=...AP...,   SrcPort=HTTP(80), DstPort=2667, PayloadLen=2831, Seq=1489611217 - 1489614048,   Ack=1719592331, Win=65535 
I see lengths up to 6900+ bites coming from the server.
 
The switch has the global MTU set to 1500
 
system mtu routing 1500
 
and I can't seem to set this at the interface level. The server is configured to send 1500 length frames. Why am I seeing these jumbos? (the server is Windows 2003)

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Enabling Jumbo Frames On Existing 3560

Mar 1, 2011

I have a pair of Catalyst 3560 GB switches that are trunked with two of the standard ports, and that have trunk ports connecting to a failover pair of PIX 515e's. We're considering adding a pair of cluster database nodes and an iSCSI SAN, both of which would need a dedicated interconnect VLAN that I'd like to employ Jumbo frames on. I don't necessarily need the VLANs to traverse the firewall trunks since they're private interconnects, but I need each host to traverse the switch trunks.
 
Since it seems I can only enable Jumbo frames on the entire switch (current standard frame size is 1500 and jumbo is also 1500), when I enable it what kind of possible negative impact could this have on my trunked ports as well as my host connections? I've read mixed reviews of users with iSCSI SAN devices seeing terrible performance when enabling jumbo frames so I'm apprehensive about enabling them on an existing network.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Implementing Jumbo Frames On Nexus 5548

Apr 16, 2013

The server team has asked me to implement jumbo frames on a single VLAN, the one they use for v motion.  We have two pairs of 5548s, each pair running VPC for most connections. I am aware of many postings that describe how to enable jumbo frames globally, like this: 

policy-map type network-qos jumbo
class type network-qos class-default
[code].....
 
I am not clear how I can extend this principle to one VLAN only. 
 
Also, I am aware of a posting [URL], that shows some pitfalls of implementing jumbo frames in a VPC configuration.  Pretty well all my connections are VPC, including all the FEXes, which are all dual-homed.  In many cases, the VPC extends through to the servers so that the servers run port.channels across two FEXes.  I am unclear whether the pitfalls are still valid, or whether I have to wait until my next maintenance slot (6 months away) to implement jumbo frames.  Can jumbo frames be implement safely on the fly?  How does enabling jumbo frames fit in with "conf sync" mode?

View 2 Replies View Related

TP-Link 300Mbps Wireless :: TL-WR1043ND Does WR1043D Support Jumbo Frames

Dec 20, 2012

Region : Argentina
Model : TL-WR1043ND
Hardware Version : v1
Firmware Version :

Does WR1043D support jumbo frames?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV180 Running Base Firmware (1.0.0.30) Don't Support Jumbo Frames

May 28, 2012

I've enabled jumbo frames in Networking -> LAN (Local Network) -> Jumbo Frames on an RV180W running the base firmware (1.0.0.30).The switch seems to pass jumbo frames just fine (like ... almost every switch these days), but the router itself silently drops jumbo frames.ss this a known bug?This makes enabling jumbo frames on clients impossible, since it will break some external connectivity. (I.E. when two endpoints are on networks with jumbo frames, they will then negotiate a high MTU over the WAN, but the router will silently drop large frames and they won't get an ICMP Fragmentation Needed, etc. because the router simply drops large frames).

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 9000 Jumbo Frames On Routed Ports Between Sites?

Oct 14, 2012

We have a number of sites which have high-speed L2 links which terminate on our L3 switches at each site. The ports are between the sites are placed in routed mode.
 
I would like to use Jumbo frame between two of the network which will communicate across sites and 1500 mtu on the rest, is this something which is possible?
 
From my understanding is the mtu is set on the interface therefore if I set the mtu on the L2 link ports on both sites to 9000 then would this cause a problem for the 1500?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Enable Jumbo Frames On Single VLAN (Nexus 5548UP)

Sep 17, 2012

We are currently using two Nexus 5548UP's as our Datacenter Network Core.  I have a pretty simple objective:  I would like to enable Jumbo Frames on a single VLAN only(VLAN 65).  This VLAN is used strictly for backups.  I do not want to enable Jumbo Frames on the other VLANs(VLANs 1-10).  Im not sure what the best way to do this is.....or if it is even possible but I am hoping to get some configuration examples.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configure Ethernet Jumbo Frame Setting In A C6509E Switch With WS-X6548-GE-TX?

Jun 25, 2012

I would like to configure Ethernet jumbo frame setting in a C6509E switch with WS-X6548-GE-TX and WS-X6516A-GBIC port modules, and IOS 12.2(33)SXJ1. whether any of these modules can support jumbo ethernet frames up to 9000 per port bases.Also, if none of these modules support port-based jumbo frame MTU then would the switch allow jumbo frames on Ethernet trunks from an access switch (say a C3560)?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Support Of Jumbo Frames On ASA 5500 Firewall Appliance?

Feb 28, 2010

Can any ASA 5500 in particular the ASA5510 firewall support jumbo frames (i.e. greater than the default standard 1500 Bytes frames)?. I plan to use the ASAs to setup a point-to-point IPSec tunnel and need an Application frame of 4Kbytes intact and not segment it.I have done little checking on the Cisco Website and see it mention of Jumbo frames on the 5580 on 10Gig interface but didn't see mention 5510. 5580s are way over-kill and expensive for what I need is to run a mission critical one IPSec point-to-point with maximum of no more than 100Kbps so 5510 is perfect for me but not sure if it can carry the jumbo frame?
 
On the routers and switches it's the MTU settings and they are configurable per interface and I am OK and the circuit is T1 which the Telcos said it's OK since it's physical layer so the only unkown is the firewall.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Ping From Vlan Interfaces On 3750 Switch

May 27, 2013

 I'm having some trouble getting my head round the following but I think it's routing related?
 
I have a Cisco 3750 switch with the following configured:

interface Vlan1
ip address 192.168.0.223 255.255.254.0
no ip route-cache

[Code].....
 
The 3750 is connected to a firewall which handles the routing.  From the 3750 I can only ping remote networks from the vlan1 interface not from vlan6,8 or 10 i.e ping 10.34.37.101 (remote network) source 192.168.0.223 (vlan1) works but ping 10.34.37.101 source 10.74.10.1 (vlan10) does not?  I can ping 10.34.37.101 from computers on the various vlans but not from the 3750 it self.
 
I looked at setting a default gateway for the various vlan interfaces

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4948E - Configure Switch Gigabit Port

Sep 11, 2012

Trying to configure the Cisco 4948e switch gigabit ethernet port with "switch port trunk encapsulation dot1q", but didn't get the option. Please find below the options got after "swith port trunk"............
 
SW(config-if)#switch port trunk ?
  allowed       Set allowed V LAN characteristics when interface is in trunking mode
  native         Set trunking native characteristics when interface is in trunking mode
  pruning       Set pruning V LAN characteristics when interface is in trunking mode
 
SW(config-if)#switch port trunk. Please find below the version of the SW............ 
 
SW#sh ver
Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-LANBASE-M), Versi
on 12.2(54)SG1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: {URL} 
ROM: 12.2(44r)SG11
Hobgoblin Revision 21, Fortooine Revision 1.22
[code]...
 
So, whether the command is not supporting on this Cisco switch ? But we have Cisco 4948 Cisco sw where that command is working fine.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Use Both Interfaces On 2921 To Connect To 3750 Stack Switch 1 And 2

Nov 9, 2012

I have a Cisco 2921 and a 3750 stack. I want to use both interfaces on the 2921 to connect to the 3750 stack switch 1 and 2. Is this possible using same ip subnet?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / 3800 - Configure Trunk Between Switch And Extreme Switch

Nov 2, 2011

i have an issue to connect a trunk between cisco switch and extreme switch i have many vlans that i want to cross via a link between cisco 3750 switch and a Extreme Alpine 3800 switch

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750-X SVI Jumbo Frame Support?

Nov 24, 2012

I've had a read through the docs for the 3750 series switches, but nothing that definately says that jumbo frame routing will work on a SVI.One part specifically I'd like clarification on is:The default maximum transmission unit (MTU) size  for frames received and sent on all interfaces on the switch or switch  stack is 1500 bytes. You can change the MTU size to support switched  jumbo frames on all Gigabit Ethernet and 10-Gigabit Ethernet interfaces  and to support routed frames on all routed ports. It says supported routed frames on all routed ports, but this in the past has meant physical ports, and not Virtual ones.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configure QOS In 3750 Switch?

Nov 7, 2011

configure qos in Cisco 3750 switch.I have configured below template and applied on the vlan interface.But i am getting the hit on the access list but I am not able to get hit on the class map.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Gigabit Interfaces In ASA5510-SEC-BUN-K9?

Jul 14, 2011

I know with a ASA5510-SEC-BUN-K9, you can increase eth0/0 and eth0/1 to gigabit with the right IOS.  Is the same possible with the CSC version of the ASA?

Exact pn is ASA5510-CSC10-K9.  I believe I only have the base license for the ASA, but the security plus for the CSC.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3750 - How To Configure Backup Link Into Switch Interface

Jan 18, 2011

I have two 3750 switch.switch A(main) and switch B is connected by OFC but i have another wireless link for backup.Now if OFC goes down then i manually connect wireless link with switch B  for this reasons i am faceing a lot of problem. I want without any changing of cable if my primary link goes down then my backup link automaticaly goes up and vice versa .
 
Switch-A port gi1/0/9 and Switch-B port gi1/0/9 is connect by OFC Switch-A port gi1/0/8 and Switch-B port gi1/0/8 is connect by Wireless link (backup) i attach my network diagram kindly find the attachment file.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 7206 VXR - NPE-G2 / Add More Copper Gigabit Ethernet Interfaces?

Aug 17, 2011

We have a Cisco 7206 VXR Router with NPE-G2. As everybody aware that, It has got 3 x Gigabit Ethernet Ports on this. We would like to add Two more Copper Gigabit Ethernet Interfaces. The Configurator does not show any options to add that...
 
Now we have a doubt that, Does this 7206 VXR support how many Copper Gigabit Ethernet Interface ?. There is no clear answer available in the Data Sheets.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Configure GLBP On 3750 Stack Switch

Nov 30, 2011

I have WS-C3750-48PS-S, i wanted to implement GLBP on this switch, Is it possible to configure GLBP on this switch?
 
IOS :                    c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE4.bin
Part number:     WS-C3750-48PS-S

[Code].....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Manage And Configure An External Switch And Router

Apr 3, 2013

1. How I can manage those devices, the Switch and the router? What is the BEST SOLUTION to manage this devices?
 
2. I want to monitor the traffic on this environment, how I can do it? How I can monitor the traffic from customer A, Customer B, and my own LAN traffic, in terms of bandwidth that has passed throught my devices? Is it possible to monitor on MY LAN, or I have to monitor from the EXTERNAL switch?
 
3. How I can limit the bandwidth? I was trying to configure it using access list, with policy-map, etc....and limit this on each interface. [code]

The interface does not support the specified policy configuration and/or parameter values.Assigning a policy map to the output side of an interface not supported.With I few reading, I could see that the SWITCH 3750 doesnt support this configs.My INTERNET LINK is 30 Mbps, the ports on the Switch (WS-C3750X-48P-L) are Gigabit Ethernet.How I can limit the bandwidth here? For example, How I can limit a interface to 3Mbps..I was thinking about this:

- Limit the interface to 10Mbps: speed 10

- and limit the interface with 30% of this speed:  srr-queue bandwidth limit 30
 
Does this work for both UPLOAD and DOWNLOAD?When the packets passes that 3Mbps limitation, will they be droped?

View 28 Replies View Related

Management VLAN Frames Blocked By Switch?

Sep 10, 2012

I'm having some problems with a D-Link switch. I believe it's filtering the management VLAN frames, which is really strange. If you look at the graph, you can see that the D-Link is connected to three switches by trunk links. I'll just use the numbers set in red on the graph to explain what's going on, it's simpler to see.So when I'm connected either to switch 4 or switch 5 (or the others on 5's level) I can use the management VLAN (ID = 1) to connect to all switches above number 3 (including number 3) but I can't get to switches numbers 1 and 2.The only way to connect to those switches is to either connect directly to one of their ports attributed to VLAN 1 or by connecting directly to switch 3. So that's why I concluded that switch 3 filters VLAN 1 frames. It's not switch 4 cause I can get from 5 to 3. But at 3, the frames stop.Also, this only happens for VLAN 1. We have some VoIP phones connected to switches 1 and 2 and their frames can communicate anywhere in the network.

View 12 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved