Cisco WAN :: 3845 / GigabitEthernet Port Status Up And Protocol Is Down?

Oct 25, 2011

Is the subject line status correct? I have a gigabitethernet port (3845) that went from admin down, to reset and then status Down, protocol Down. Then I had another gigabitethernt port on a different 3845 router. To show port in status of UP and protocol Down, I didn't see a reset occur on this port. Which status is correct and does the reset step affect the final status being different?

View 8 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco WAN :: 3845 - Router Port / Protocol Up Even When Cable Is Removed

Mar 12, 2013

I faced a strage issue as one of our router port cable was removed  from the router port but the Port status is showing as  up /up    which made our HSRP state  to active active causing an outage , The router we are usign is cisco 3845 and IOS is c3845-adventerprisek9-mz.124-8b.bin

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3845 - SSH Connection Fails - Server Refused Authentication Protocol

Nov 16, 2011

I have a 3845 router.  Setup SSH Version 2generated rsa keys (1024)set login localtransport input ssh and telnet is enabled since I can't get ssh connection working When I connect using SSH, I get the following error. server refused authentication protocol.

View 21 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Does 3750 IP SLA Can Monitor Port Status

Jul 14, 2011

Does Cisco 3750 ip sla can monitor, let's say, monitor 3750 G1/0/1 port status, once it is down, then 3750 also make G1/0/2 also down. If yes, what is the command to do it?

View 3 Replies View Related

HP 1810G-24 Showing Port 26 Status In Logs?

May 16, 2011

OK, so just mooching around in the pages of my switch, a 24 port switch and it has in the logs:

268InfoMay 15 22:43:51NIMInterface 26 is Link Down
269InfoMay 15 22:43:51NIMInterface 26 is Link Down
270InfoMay 15 22:43:51NIMevent(39),intf(26),component(2), on non-existent interface

Now, correct me if I`m wrong but my switch only has 24 ports and two of those (23 and 24) are dual personality jobbies!?Where the hell is port 26? Where did it come from? and why did it need to show up only for the switch to realise that it doesn`t really exist?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Destination Port Protocol Is Down In 3750

Jun 18, 2012

I have configured SPAN in cisco 3750 switch as below mentioned. but the destination port protocol is down.switch(config)#monitor session 1 source interface gigabitethernet1/0/1switch(config)#monitor session 1 destination interface gigabitethernet1/0/11 ingress vlan 1

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Configure 861 Router To Use L2TP Protocol To Communicate FE Port To ISP

Apr 21, 2011

The router 861 Fast ethernet  have support for wan protocol L2TP ?
 
Can I configure the router to use L2TP wan protocol to communicate the wan FE port to my ISP ?
 
If yes  wath is the way ( CLI or Cisco E[press Professional Configurator ?)

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 7600 Router - Port Status Down When Using Transport Mode?

Dec 29, 2010

We have cisco 7600 Router with 76-ES+XT-4TG3C Module connected. The Module is getting detected after upgrading the Router with SRD5 IOS.Below are the testing which we have done on the Router but we are facing the issue while configuring the Transport mode LAN and Transport Mode WAN:Brief about this is:- 2 Cisco 7606-s Router with Module 76-ES+XT-4TG3C each.- two ports on 7606-s Ten2/1 & Ten2/2 are configured as a Transport mode WAN while Ten2/3 & Ten2/4 are configured as Transport mode LAN.- We connect Fiber Cable from LAN Port to MUX and from MUX to 2nd LAN Port of the same Router. Same thing we tested by using the WAN Port-MUX-WAN Port connection.- Now on MUX end LAN port, connected Single and Multi mode fiber and on 7606 end 2/4 port which is configured as transport mode LAN, using Multimode SFP module -> XFP-10G-MM-SR, port did not came up   then replaced 2/4 port with single mode SFP ->XFP-10GLR-OC192SR port came up. this is testing for LAN.-  For WAN testing on MUX end used WAN port and on 7606 end checked  with single mode and multimode fiber and with single XFP-10GLR-OC192SR / mulimode XFP-10G-MM-SR SFP, port did not come up.Wanted to know 1) If we have to go for Transport Mode LAN then which SFP/XSFP Module should go with along with the Single/Multimode Fiber.2) If we have to go for Transport Mode WAN then which SFP/XSFP Module should go with along with the Single/Multimode Fiber.Anything else is required while configuring the Transport Mode WAN as this is for Packet-Over_SONET/SDH? 3) MUX Side change is required while connecting both of this Modes on Cisco 7600 Router.4) Is hardware of the Router is giving any issue? Though we tested by connecting Back to Back LAN Port as well as Back to Back WAN Port. In both the situation the Ports are coming UP.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3845 Port-channel Sub-interface QoS

Sep 13, 2012

I have Cisco 3845 with two Gigabit interfaces configured as port-channel with subinterface and with QoS.However shape does not work, why? [code]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3845 - Configuring Serial Port In IOS 15.1(3)T?

Mar 16, 2011

I just installed a HWIC-2T in a Cis co 3845 running IOS 15.1(3) T  New build.The IOS self installed the port configuration including the command line "clock rate 2000000."  I can edit everything but that entry using the CLI.  When I enter the "no clock rate"  it will not take in the running conf.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Bundling 2 Gigabitethernet In 1941 Router

Apr 7, 2011

I am using cisco 1941 router in my DC for Internet service. I am going to terminate 2 WAN links each 4 mbps to my Gigabiethernet ports. Is bundling is possible to enjoy full 8 mbps internet to my organisation?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / WS-X6704-10GE Module And Port Status?

Dec 7, 2011

We have two 6509 switches with one WS-X6704-10GE module in each of them. There is an optical cable between the two switches plugged in  WS-X6704-10GE module on both sides. When you shut down the port on one side the other port still stays as up and you need phisycally to unplug the cable to have it down. The same behaviour is seen no matter on which of the two switches you shut down the port, the opposite one always stays as up and only removal of the cable makes it go down.
 
The ports are configured quite simply:
 
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-10
no ip address
udld port
 
The IOS version is 12.2(18)SXF8

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Apply MQC On 4 Port HWIC-4ESW - 3845 Router?

Mar 24, 2011

I have 3845 Router with HWIC-4ESW & I am trying to apply MQC on SVI interface but I keep getting configuration Error!-RTR(config-if)#service-policy output XYZ_WAN_QOS Configuration failed I believe that HWIC-4ESW is Layer 2 port & you can not apply Module Qos on SVI interface. I am exploring other option.
 
I have following link for 1 OR 2 Port Fast Ethernet port but not sure whether this will support what I am looking for.[URL] Aslo I have HWIC-1GE-SFP card on Same router where MQC works fine .interface GigabitEthernet0/1 description METRO-E  duplex auto speed auto media-type rj45 service-policy output Metro-E?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2950 / ASA 5510 - Configure GigabitEthernet 0 / 1

May 20, 2012

I have a Cisco catalyst 2950 and would like it's basic setup. It is connected to a Cisco ASA5510 on GigabitEthernet0/1. The ASA has two v lans configured. 101 and 102. I would like to configure my switch to be managed on the following IP which is on the 102 sub net:

172.16.102.253/24

Also, i would like to configure GigabitEthernet0/1 as a runk port to allow both v lans.

View 14 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-C2960-24TC-L / Configuring Of GigabitEthernet Interface?

Sep 15, 2008

I'm trying to configure the GigabitEthernet interface of the WS-C2960 switch to have a full duplex.  Unfortunately, there is no option to configure this neither is the speed of that interface.  But these options are present in FastEthernet ports.  Is there a bug in SW version 12.2(35)SE5 that explains this abnormality?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960G-24TC-L All GigabitEthernet Is Missing

Jul 24, 2012

My Cisco Catalyst 2960G-24TC-L is broken.Yes,I think it's broken.
  
1.Always dispaly : “ !!! WARNING: The switch is not usable !!! ”  “Unable to create l2trace server process, socket_open() failed”.
    
2.All GigabitEthernet is missing .
  
Switch(config)#interface ?
Async                   Async interface
Auto-Template     Auto-Template interface

[Code].....

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 3845 - Open Port Range On Secondary IPs On Router Interface

Feb 12, 2013

I have 4 public IPs on Router 3845 interface FastEthernet 0/0/1. IP as below.
 
50.200.2.2
50.200.2.3 secondary
50.200.2.4 secondary
50.200.2.5 secondary
 
I wan to allow ports 80 to 90 on 50.200.2.3 for my webserver (192.168.10.50)

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: Physical Or Technical Differences Between PWR-3845 AC/2 And PWR-3845 AC?

Dec 10, 2012

Is there any physical or technical diferrences between PWR-3845 AC/2 and PWR-3845 AC?  We are trying to order replacement parts and wondering if PWR-3845 AC is for one power supply and AC/2 means you get two with one order?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Physical / Technical Differences Between PWR-3845 AC/2 And PWR-3845 AC?

Dec 7, 2012

Is there any physical or technical diferrences between PWR-3845 AC/2 and PWR-3845 AC?  We are trying to order replacement parts and if PWR-3845 AC is for one power supply and AC/2 means you get two with one order.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3550 / Routing Protocol Neighbor Between SVI And Routed Port?

Apr 18, 2012

I have a collapsed core design with routed ports between all components. Access layer switches, data center switches, core/aggregation. All routed (no spanning-tree at all).Now...I have to add an IBM BladeCenter with a BNT layer 3 switch to my topology. However, those nasties don't seem to support routed ports.How can I have a routed port on my cisco switch and a standard access port on the BNT and still establish an adjacency with an SVI? I am running OSPF, but I am labbing this in my home lab with 2 x 3550s and EIGRP.
 
On SW2:
*Mar  1 00:57:00.711: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1
*Mar  1 00:57:00.711:   AS 999, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
*Mar  1 00:57:02.303: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1, retry 9, RTO 5000 tid 0
*Mar  1 00:57:02.303:   AS 999, Flags 0x1, Seq 17/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1

[code].....

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Can Implement BGP Without IGP Protocol

Feb 9, 2013

Can we implement BGP without IGP Protocol ? If yes, then how can we do it ? If no, why ?

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco :: How To Know The CAPWAP Protocol

Sep 3, 2012

I want to know the CAPWAP protocol.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2801 Can't Seem To Get Protocol Up

Nov 9, 2011

I have a 2801 router.  The Fa0/0 int shows up/down.  I have plugged it into diffrent cisco and non cisco switches and even a cross over cable to my laptop.  I cant seem to get the protocol up.  I have changed the speed to 100 and duplex to full to try to get it up that way and nothing. [code]

View 7 Replies View Related

How To Use ICMP Protocol

May 29, 2011

I want to know how to use ICMP protocol in sending a packet in a network ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: FastEthernet0/0 Is Up / Line Protocol Is Down

Jan 26, 2013

I was working on a problem the other day and came across something that I had seen before but never given much thought. I had a router with a switch connected to it and the interface was showing as Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is down. The problem in the end turned out to be a cable that had fell out because it was not connected correctly, but I was able to replicate this interface status on a router (FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is down), and NO cable was attached to the interface.I've had a look on the internet but cant seem to find a good answer, so does anybody else know why this status is shown on the router? Remember, NO cable is connected to the interface so it isn't a speed or duplex problem

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Run An OSPF Protocol Over An ATM Connection?

Apr 25, 2013

I'm trying to run an OSPF protocol over an ATM connection:

192.168.80.0 |----10.0.0.1-----------10.0.0.2----| 192.168.50.0

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: QOS By Protocol On ASA 5512-X

Apr 18, 2013

I'm looking to make a possible configuration for a customer. They need a device to provide :- firewalling- bandwidth limiting based on protocols, IP, users- web content filtering- good reporting to see which device/users are consuming most of the bandwidth.I used to use cisco ASA as firewall but it's a while I last installed on and I'm nt uptodate which current state.So I thought of using an ASA 5512-X but I'd like to know if it comply with all the requirements .Most important being the reporting and bandwidth limiting capability. It would be great to have some configuration example regarding bandwidth management.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: BVI1 / Line Protocol Is Down?

Sep 7, 2009

how to bring this interface back up? It's a 1252 with 80211.n.I started configuring it with CLI and then was using the web interface. I made a change on the web interface and it caused the AP to hang. I rebooted it and can access via Hyperterminal, but I cannot ping the IP address nor bring it up in the web interface any longer.I tried the "No shut" command in the BVI1 interface.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2811 IOS For BGP Routing Protocol

Jul 6, 2011

I am currently configuring a  number of cisco 2811 routers that require the BGP exterior routing  protocol, however the IOS version (12.4) currently installed does not  support the bgp protocol.After entering the commands into the cisco CLI 'protocol not in this image' is returned.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: NFS Protocol Across Pix 515E

Dec 30, 2011

I have a Pix 515E running PixOS version 8.0.4 with two interfaces, inside and outside.On the inside interface, I have a Redhat Enterprise Linux 5.4 64 bits machine as an NFS server version 4 (NFSv4).On the outside interface, I have three (3) Redhat Enterprise Linux 5.4 64 bits as NFS clients.I am looking for the exact UDP and TCP ports to be added to the ACL in order to accomplish

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: How To Allow Protocol 97 In PIX 515E

Oct 22, 2012

What would be the access-list entry to allow protocol 97? I am setting up foreign-anchor controller and need to allow protocol 97.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Is 1941 Supportable For BGP Protocol

Dec 28, 2011

My ISP is going to provide internet with dual path , for auto changover he (isp it admin) is planing for bgp implimentation.
 
is 1941 is supportable for bgp protocol ? Is it possible to create bandwitdh rate limit based on ip address on access list (be cause we are getting some 10 Ip address from isp  , out of 10 ip address , 3 ip addres has to go 3 diffrent departments) , i want restrict theese 3 ip address with 1 mb traffic as 1:1.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: ACS SE 4.2 RADIUS Protocol

Mar 28, 2013

I am using the Self RADIUS server in my Cisco ACS SE 4.2 appliance S. I have an AAA client C that interacts with S by means of the RADIUS protocol. This works fine, in that S correctly carries out authentication chores on username/password (PAP and CHAP) pairs received from C, sending back to C the corresponding Access-Accept packet when the authentication succeeds, or Access-Reject when it doesn't.
 
I have been able to import a set of three VSAs into S. Each of those attributes is of string type. I then configured in S a single user U with password P so that, whenever a U/P pair received in S from C is authenticated by S, S should send back to C, in the Access-Accept packet, the three attributes with the following values: [code]

With this setup, when an authentication is successfully completed by S, C receives 53 bytes worth of data from S every time. I am attaching a typical example, already disassembled. I have disguised the actual vendor ID, for legal reasons, but the rest is exactly as it was when received in C.
 
According to the disassembly, what we got is an Access-Accept packet, as expected. Its length is 53 bytes - again as expected, for this is the only packet that C has received from S here. However, the packet is incomplete, for attribute #3 is missing its value field.
 
Looking into the whole packet in more detail, it can be seen that while the wire format for the first attribute, namely, Frame-IP-Address, is correctly constructed, the remaining are not. For example, the sequence of bytes corresponding to the attribute #1 reads 1a 09 00 00 xx xx 2c 61 62 63. I believe that this is incorrect; it should be 1a 0a 00 00 xx xx 2c 61 62 63, for the wire format for this attribute consists of 10, not 9, bytes. I tried a few variations on the values for the attributes, and the results are always substantially the same, in that the wire formats for these attributes are always incorrect.
 
This all probably implies I have done something wrong when importing the VSAs into S, and/or when configuring things on S. I am therefore attaching the csv files I used to import my VSAs into S; as before, names and vendor ID are disguised, but their lengths are exactly the same as in the undisguised file. I used two csv files: One to import the vendor ID, and the other to import the VSAs under that vendor ID. As for user U, in S's administration GUI I clicked on User Setup and selected user U, moved to the bottom of the screen, where the attributes for this particular vendor were present,introduced the values for each attribute mentioned above, and made sure that button in front of each attribute was ticked.

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved