I am currently configuring a number of cisco 2811 routers that require the BGP exterior routing protocol, however the IOS version (12.4) currently installed does not support the bgp protocol.After entering the commands into the cisco CLI 'protocol not in this image' is returned.
View 2 RepliesI want to configurate Vpdn protocol PPOE but i can not write protocol ppoe under vpdn group name on cisco 2811. cisco 2811 iso is 12.4 T adventurer and i upgrade it 15.1 advansecure but problem is still.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'm having an issue with my Cisco 2811. The Internal FastEthernet0/1 interface is showing Link up but Protocol down. I have tried various combinations with the speed and duplex on the port and having no luck.The port connects to our Fortigate 110c router.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a collapsed core design with routed ports between all components. Access layer switches, data center switches, core/aggregation. All routed (no spanning-tree at all).Now...I have to add an IBM BladeCenter with a BNT layer 3 switch to my topology. However, those nasties don't seem to support routed ports.How can I have a routed port on my cisco switch and a standard access port on the BNT and still establish an adjacency with an SVI? I am running OSPF, but I am labbing this in my home lab with 2 x 3550s and EIGRP.
On SW2:
*Mar 1 00:57:00.711: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1
*Mar 1 00:57:00.711: AS 999, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
*Mar 1 00:57:02.303: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1, retry 9, RTO 5000 tid 0
*Mar 1 00:57:02.303: AS 999, Flags 0x1, Seq 17/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
[code].....
I have an environment where i have two nexus 7010 switches, along with 2 nexus 5510's. I need to run OSPF as a layer 3 routing protocol between the vpc peer links. I have 1 link being used as a keep alive link, and 3 other links being used as a VpC link.
1) Is it best to configure a separate Vpc VLAN i.e 1010
2) Is it best to configure a vrf context keep-alive
3) just have the management address as the peer ip's.
What is inter vlan routing protocol? What are its three modes?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI just bought 2 Nexus 7000 to upgrade my primary/Production Data Center from 6509/MSFC. I'll keep the 6509E/SUP720 for the DR Data Center. I have ordered two 10Gig Wan Pipes between the Production and DR. In other words between the Nexus 7000 and the 6509E.
My problem is that i do not know the best way to do the routing between the 2 Data Centers. Currently I have MPLS with a provider connecting the 2 Data Centers using BGP on the CEs and I'm running eigrp in locally in the Cores. After the 10Gig comes to life, the MPLS will go away.
My QUESTION: Should i run ibgp between the 2 Nexus and ibgp between the 2 6509E/sup 720 AND THEN run ebgp between the Nexus and the 6509/sup 720 over the 10Gig WAN? OR should i collapse everything into one eigrp domain/AS and just run Eigrp between the Nexus and 6509E/Sup 720 over the 10Gig Wan?
I have bought Cisco ISR 881 C880DATA-UNIVERSALK9-M with c880data-universalk9-mz.150-1.M7.bin ios.
command "show ver" tell me:
License Information for 'c880-data'
License Level: advsecurity Type: Permanent
Next reboot license Level: advsecurity
So I have advsecurity. On cisco site there was a thing URL
"Table 5. Cisco IOS Software Features on Cisco 880 Series: Advanced Security Feature Set (Default)"
that tell me I have RIP protocol to use. But when I type "router rip" command and sub router sommands like: network, passive-interface, redistribution. There are no in runnning-config such things after all I've done. It have not been saved.
then the command "show licence":
#show license
Index 1 Feature: advipservices
Period left: Not Activated
Period Used: 0 minute 0 second
License Type: EvalRightToUse
License State: Not in Use, EULA not accepted
License Count: Non-Counted
License Priority: None
I need even RIPv2 to have simple routing information to exchange.
And I don't know. Cisco 880 series is G2 or G1. Cisco ISR beginning from 890 series is G2. About 880 I don't know. There no informanion about it or at least I have not found it yet. On one 891 is the same problem. When I type "router eigrp 1" everything is great. But when "router rip" - do no work.
Does ASA 5540 support BGP routing protocol to be configured on it?iam talking about the latest versions.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have encounterd a broplem on my Cisco 805 model.
When i use the command "show ip interface brief" the status shows "up" but the protocol is "down" on my serial interface.
The link between my to sites is down after this happend.
When I config BGP on my 3750X Switch, it show error as below:
protocol not in this image
should I need to upgrade the IOS or Where I can found a supported image (support BGP)
I am trying to enter this command in Cisco 2960 but the device is not accepting it. Is this because of IOS or this command is not available for 2960?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to review the port-channel configuration on a 6500 series. I am issuing the "show etherchannel summary" command and the out put shows the Group, Port-Channel, and Ports. It does not show me the protocol that is in use such as PAgP or LACP. Does this have to do with the Etherchannel in the "On" mode rather than "active", or "Auto"?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have configured SPAN in cisco 3750 switch as below mentioned. but the destination port protocol is down.switch(config)#monitor session 1 source interface gigabitethernet1/0/1switch(config)#monitor session 1 destination interface gigabitethernet1/0/11 ingress vlan 1
View 8 Replies View Relatedif the sge2010 switch support Routing Information Protocol (RIP) and if so how do I enable it. I have a small wireless router that support it and would like client connected on it te bo visible from the wan side and that worked when I had another device doing the routing with RIP support the wireless router was picking up that information and the routing for the wireless client was working.
View 2 Replies View RelatedOn our backbone (Cisco 6509) we have the following config.
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
spanning-tree vlan 1-200 priority 24576
1. is rapid-pvst the best spanning tree protocol to use? on some switches we have pvst (not rapid)
2. do all switches in the LAN need to use the same protocol?
3. does line 3 :priority 24576 mean that someone set tis switch as root manually? how can one further enforce the backbone as root (so noone adds a old switch with lower root id)
I'm trying to implement the UDLD protocol (Cisco-compatible), but face some problems. There is no enough information for implementing this protocol neither in RFC 5171 [URL] nor on [URL] How can I get a more detailed information regarding protocol state machines and timers?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are using CISCO LMS 4.2.3 in our network in India, we are facing a issue regarding alarm generation for a protocol flap/down, especially when BGP / OSPF neighbourship got flapped.These flapping will result in the data service degradation , by which we came to know that some protocol flap may occurred at router end & then we go for the manual check by login into the router.after escalating the same to cisco we came to know that it is a bug of Cisco LMS. using any other method/technique to view the protocol down alarms automatically for cisco routers.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWill Resilient Ethernet Protocol (REP) run on all Cisco switches (2960S and 3010) or is it only available on Service Provider switches like the ME3400E?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI work for a Wireless ISP and the device impacted is the back haul radio into the site. I have swapped from a 2950T to a 3550. Replaced the radio, PoE, patch lead. We have re ran the cable up the tower using shielded outdoor cable with a drain wire which has been earthed to an earthing block in the cabinet. We have other devices on the tower not experiencing the issue. We suspect cable interference however am now at a loss to diagnose further.
[Code]....
Currently our Cisco 3750 have one interface (port 1) that connected to our provider (Internap) with the IP 66.150.7.68 assigned. Now we want to upgrade to dual handoff L3 protocol. Below is the network configuration from Internap.
>>>> We have assigned the below /30s for each of the interfaces and will statically route the 66.150.7.0/25 down both interfaces.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 63.251.162.20/30
>>>> 63.251.162.21 - border1.sef003 - Internap side
>>>> 63.251.162.22 - your side
>>>>
>>>> 63.251.162.184/30
>>>> 63.251.162.185 - border2.sef003 - Internap side
>>>> 63.251.162.186 - your side
tell what command lines do I need to input on my Cisco switch for port 1 and 2 in order for the dual handoff to work correctly?
I'm trying to upgrade NBAR protocol pack on my Cisco 1941 router, so i downloaded new NABR protocol pack (version 4.0.0) and transferred it into router flash via tftp. When i try to apply new protocol pack with command : ip nbar protocol-pack flash:[protocol-pack-name]
i got this error :
% NBAR Error : Advanced Protocol Pack can not be loaded on top of Standard Protocol Pack
The router is running IPBASE IOS with Security License, IOS image is c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.153-1.T.bin. Does NBAR2 packages works on IO BASE images?
I have been having following situation on my WAN facing interface on Cisco2911 where the same number of broadcast, multicast and unknown protocol drops is happening. Not sure but some applications are struggling to run over on the WAN.
[code]....
I want to know could we change or remove the Gateway (highlight) within of Routing Information Sources in OSPF routing protocol? [code]
View 9 Replies View RelatedMy Company use Core Sw 4507R-Sup 7L-E with Enterprise Services License. I has upgraded to use iOS cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.03.01.SG.151-1.SG1.bin
When I use match protocol in class-map, there are only about 10 protocols, and not have those ones I need. I intend to expand the list of protocols to do some Policy-map by loading PDLM. But 4507 is no longer support NBAR. So do we have another way to set Catalyst 4507R with Sup 7L-E recongnize more protocols in match protocol command?
Is there a possibility to transfer files between two N5k's via mgmt0 using TFTP protocol?
Source: One N5k's mgmt0 interface
Destination: Another Nk5' mgmt0 interface
I know when issuing "copy bootflash tftp" or vice versa, I need to specify management VRF. But how do I specify to be TFTP itself sourced from mgmt0 interface in NX-OS? From IOS I was used to use "ip tftp source-interface <interface>", but in NX-OS I have only Ethernet or Loopback as an option.
According to NX-OS Unicast Routing Configuration Guide (Configuring Layer 3 Virtualization) the answer should be in N7k configuration guide, but I didnt find it there either...
We are using 3825 Cisco router with IOS version 12.4(24)T2. The unknown protocol drops on our GigabitEthernet0/1 interface is increasing. This interface is connected to our modem. What could be causing this unknown protocol drops?
cnshaccent-gw-2#sh int GigabitEthernet0/1
GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is BCM1125 Internal MAC, address is ffff.ffff.ffff (bia ffff.ffff.ffff)
[Code]....
At a college I'm trying to setup a Cisco 2960 to be used on a VLAN 248 tagged on the uplink port that uses Spanning Tree/. Here is the following from the Cisco:
show interfaces trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native v lan
Gi0/1 on 802.1q trunking 1
Port V lans allowed on trunk
Gi0/1 248
[code]...
On the Alcatel OS6850-48L the following is setup: bridge 1x1 248 priority 3287 Vlan 248 802.1q 5/8 "cisco"
I cannot make a change on the Alcatel, I can only administer the Cisco. I was able to get things working fine (as a test) using a Net gear or HP switch instead of the Cisco. However we have a Cisco switches and would not like to have to buy HPs. Is there a compatible spanning tree protocol to use on the Cisco with the way things are configured on the Alcatel. I need to stick to standard RSTP (802.1w) ieee standards and not something Cisco proprietary.
I have a 3845 router. Setup SSH Version 2generated rsa keys (1024)set login localtransport input ssh and telnet is enabled since I can't get ssh connection working When I connect using SSH, I get the following error. server refused authentication protocol.
View 21 Replies View RelatedWe have one core switch and we are planning to add a 6509. Both are none VSS.All the access switches are Catalyst 3560 series.
We plan to have all 3560s to have a link to each of the core. Without VSS, it is not possible to etherchannel to both core switches correct?What protocol should I configure to prevent in case one core fails? HSRP, VRRP, GLBP?
Do I need to run spanning tree protocol? if so which one?What is the best way to connect from each Catalyst 3560 for load balancing and redundancy? One to each core?
I have a 2811 router with a 9 port switch module and a four port ISDN module. The ISDN Module is our connection to the outside world. FE 0/0 and FE 0/1 are connected to separate networks and both route our the ISDN connections.We are getting a new satcom system that consists of a modem, antenna control unit (ACU), and an antenna. The ACU and the modem communicate accross Ethernet and are generally hooked to a switch. Anything computer hooked to the switch can simply use the modem IP as it's gateway and be surfing the Internet without much hassle (just need the correct DNS addresses).I'd like the networks behind FE 0/0 and FE 0/1 to be able to route out the satellite modem for their Internet connection -- when the satellite is available. Is it possible to put two switch ports in a VLAN (one for the modem and one for the ACU), give the VLAN an IP in the same subnet as the modem and ACU, and then tell the router to route traffic out the modem IP address ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have four 2811 routers with IOS 12.4(15)T installed. Embedded Event Manager was introduced in IOS 12.3(4)T, why do I not have it?! I've been at this for over a month, when I try to see the command 'event manager' I get Unrecognized command? According to all EEM documentation I can find, this should work on our machines!
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a known working configuration with many sites and one operative center that receives all communications.The connection OF THE OLD SITE is here detailed:Now I need to integrate another site. The difference between the old site and the new site is the following:
-old site communicates with the operative center by means of the FE0/1 or by means of an HWIC4T serial interface.
old site automatically switches between the tunnel on the ethernet interface (FE0/1) and the serial channel giving priority to the ethernet tunnel.
-new site will communicate with the operative center by means of the FE0/1 or by means of a transceiver device connected on the FE0/0.
-both new site and old site have a LAN on the FE0/0 where data is generated and sent to the router to be dispached to the best available channel.
The connection of THE NEW SITE is here detailed: the old site was configured this way: [code]
the first line means that everything starting from the client directed to 192.169.0.2 it will be sent on the tunnel1.the second line tries to route the same packets on serial0/0/0 with low priority.On the New site i did the same:
i created the tunnel form my cisco 2811 to the operative center using the FE0/1, then i added the following:ip route 192.169.0.2 255.255.255.255 Tunnel1
This works as expected routing the packets to the operative center on the FE0/1.Now I miss the second part: route packets on the FE0/0 to the ip address 192.168.1.31 WITH LOW PRIORITY like i did on the old site.
I did some tries but no one solves. Which is, in your opinion, the right command to add on the cisco2811 in order to get the equivalent of what i did on the old site ( ip route 192.169.0.2 255.255.255.255 Serial0/0/0 10 ) ?