Cisco :: How To Know The CAPWAP Protocol
Sep 3, 2012I want to know the CAPWAP protocol.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Wireless :: WLC Cannot Detect CAPWAP 3602E
Mar 3, 2013We setup some new CAPWAP AP 3602E in the network and configure the DHCP server option 43 , but the WLCs still cannot detect the APs , Do you know if there any new way to troubleshooting?
WLC: 5508 version: 7.2.103.0
SW:3750E
AP: AIR-CAP3602E-C-K9
Cisco Wireless :: 1040 IOS To CAPWAP Possibility
Feb 1, 2011I´m looking to a project where we want to start using Autonomous AP with possibility to change to controller based on near future.
Will Cisco Aironet 1040 Series Access Points allow us to change from IOS to CAPWAP when needed? I read some posts about the oposite process (CAPWAP to IOS) so I think it´s possible on both way. Can some one confirm this to me?
Cisco Wireless :: 3500 - CAPWAP QoS Configuration
Feb 9, 2012We have had several APs disassociating from our controllers. The alerts say, Message: Access Point 'AP-xxxxx' associated to controller '10.x.x.x' on port number '0'. Reason for association 'Dot11g Mode Change. I have read several posts that point out that you should have QoS implemented to prioritize the CAPWAP traffic. I'd like to know if someone has implemented QoS and whether it has been successful in stopping the APs from disassociating. And if it has been successful do you have any configuration examples for the ports attached to the AP and controller as well as the QoS configuration?
We have several sites with AP1142's and 3500's. We have 2 5508 controllers. We are broadcasting 2 SSIDs of which one is in HREAP mode and the other is in local mode. Each of our sites have MPLS circuits.
Here is an example I found on Cisco which I believe can be used for CAPWAP as long as you change the ports to 5246 & 5247 instead of 12222 & 12223.
Example Router Configurations #
This section contains router configuration examples to be used as guides when addressing CS6 remarking or LWAPP control traffic load.
#
This example uses LWAPP APs on the 192.168.101.0/24 subnet, and two WLCs with ap-managers at 192.168.60.11, and 192.168.62.11. (code)
Cisco Wireless :: Convert Capwap 1142 To Autonomous
Mar 28, 2012I have an 1142 running capwap c1140-k9w8-tar.124-23c.JA4 that I am wanting to convert to an Autonomous AP.However, the AP does not seem to have an archive exec command to tftp downoad an new IOS.Is there another procedure that should be used ?
View 7 Replies View RelatedCisco Wireless :: 2504 Bandwidth Of Capwap Tunnel
Dec 15, 2012I'm looking at the spec sheet comparing Cisco WLCs and I see that the 2504 has a bandwidth max of 500mbps. Just to be clear, not all of the traffic from the APs goes through the WLC does it? In this setup, the APs would be plugged into a PoE switch as well as the WLC. The only traffic to WLC would be the CAPWAP tunnel, CleanAir info, etc right? All other traffic should just be handeld at the switch right?Also, does the 2504 licencing include CleanAir in the price?
View 17 Replies View RelatedCisco Wireless :: Downgrade 3600 Capwap AP To Autonomous
Nov 12, 2012I have to prepare an 3600 Capwap AP for autonomous functionality!
The following image was downloaded: ap3g2-k9w7-tar.152-2.JA
The release notes say: Site-Survey Only Mode for 3600, 3500, and 1550 Access Points You can install Cisco IOS Release 15.2(2)JA on Cisco Aironet 3600 and 3500 Series access points and on 1550 series outdoor access points to perform site surveys. This release runs on these access points with limited functionality. You can manually adjust these settings on the site-survey access points:
• Channel on each radio
• Transmit power on each radio
• Enable and disable the radios
• Manually set basic and supported transmit rates
• Enable advertised cell power in beacons to client to enable DTPC for doing active surveys
• Enable and disable SSID broadcast in beacons
• Enable open authentication
My Question is: Where can i find a instruction for downgrading an AIR-CAP3602i to Autonomous 3600 AP? Is it complicate to get the AP running, or what do i need for "downgrading"?
Cisco Wireless :: 5508 - Opening CAPWAP On Different Interfaces
May 9, 2012I am trying to configure two AP-management interfaces to accept CAPWAP on different ports using the option "Enable Dynamic AP Management". One of them uses public ip address. However, I getting the message "Ignoring discovery request received on non-management interface ..." on this.
The controller is 5508.
Cisco Wireless :: WISM2 / Looking Individual Log Of CAPWAP Access Point?
Apr 10, 2013I have a wireless network running with Controller WISM2 and I also have a NCS.I want to know if there is any way to look of individual log of CAPWAP and LAPWAP Access Points. It is better if I can see it through NCS.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco :: CAPWAP 1252 - Wireless Coverage In Compact Area With Many APs
Jul 10, 2011I am facing this particular issue while providing Cisco unified Wireless solution to the customer. We are having CAPWAP 1252 APs controlled by WLC.
Scenario: 50 persons sitting in a hall with closely packed chairs using wireless simultaneously. Wireless access provided by patch antenna at a height of 11m from the user. As one AP can server 25 users, 2 APs are placed with antenna directions facing the compact users. Each users gets very good signal from these two APs.
Whether there will be serious interference and client association issues in this scenario? once one AP associates 25 clients, whether other 25 clients associate completely to other AP?
Cisco Wireless :: Catalyst 3850 - CAPWAP Transit In MA / MC Mode?
Mar 10, 2013I understand that Cisco *wants* the APs to be directly connected to the new 3850.I have a few questions. Unfortunately, I think I know the answers. I just want to confirm.
a. When MA/MC is enabled on the 3850, does the 3850 start intercepting *all* CAPWAP packets it sees (much like CDP)? Even non-Cisco CAPWAP packets?
b. If I have a WLC 5500 upstream from the 3850, would APs hanging off a downstream 2960 be able to register to the 5500 through the 3850 when the 3850 is NOT in MA/MC mode?
c. If I have a WLC 5500 upstream from the 3850, would APs hanging off a downstream 2960 be able to register to the 5500 through the 3850 when the 3850 IS in MA/MC mode?
What I'm afraid of is:
a. yes, yes
b. yes
c. no
From the Q&A page:Q. Does the Cisco Catalyst 3850 support indirectly connected access points?A. No. The Cisco Catalyst 3850 switch will always terminate the CAPWAP tunnel locally. Pass-through mode or indirectly connected access point is not supported at this time.
Cisco Wireless :: Capability To Downgrade AP 1042 From CAPWAP To Autonomous?
Jan 6, 2011I would like to confirm if it is possible to downgrade AP 1042 from CAPWAP to autonomous? I want to buy the AP model AIR-LAP1042N-A-K9. But i don't sure if in the future it could support this feature.
View 9 Replies View RelatedCisco Wireless :: 5508 - Lwapp Capwap Technology Clarifications
Jul 10, 2012Clarify some points with capwap implementation, does all data and control traffic tunneled back to the controller and switching packets to the specific vlan will be done by the controller? so if i have 5508 controller, its maximum throughput will be 8 gbps (local mode AP), provided i have done LAG on all its ports to the LAN switch?
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Wireless :: 1524 - Unable To Store Capwap Fragment From (mac Address)
Nov 8, 2011The following messages are filling up my syslog.
*spamApTask0: Nov 09 15:59:29.071: %LOG-3-Q_IND: capwap_ac_reassembly.c:652 Unable to store capwap fragment from 88:f0:77:b6:fd:00.
*spamApTask3: Nov 09 15:59:27.616: %CAPWAP-3-REASSEM_SPACE: capwap_ac_reassembly.c:652 Unable to store capwap fragment from 88:f0:77:b6:fd:00.
What could be causing it? I am using 1524 APs in a Mesh environment with a WLC 5508 (7.0.116.0) which is connected to a H3C switched network.
The MAC addresses above are from my MAPs and I don't think I am getting it from the RAPs.
Cisco Wireless :: Convert Standalone 1600 Access Point To CAPWAP Based AP
Mar 20, 2013Can I convert a standalone 1600 access point to a CAPWAP based AP when I choose to deploy a WLC later?Cant see any literature on cisco.com that is specific to the 1600 APs
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Wireless :: Is Aironet 1260 Good For Indoor LWAP Or CAPWAP Environment
Jul 12, 2012Is Aironet 1260 good for indoor LWAP or CAPWAP environment? Do we need external antenna for the Aironet 1260 access point when using it indoor?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco :: Can Implement BGP Without IGP Protocol
Feb 9, 2013Can we implement BGP without IGP Protocol ? If yes, then how can we do it ? If no, why ?
View 11 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 2801 Can't Seem To Get Protocol Up
Nov 9, 2011I have a 2801 router. The Fa0/0 int shows up/down. I have plugged it into diffrent cisco and non cisco switches and even a cross over cable to my laptop. I cant seem to get the protocol up. I have changed the speed to 100 and duplex to full to try to get it up that way and nothing. [code]
View 7 Replies View RelatedHow To Use ICMP Protocol
May 29, 2011I want to know how to use ICMP protocol in sending a packet in a network ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco :: FastEthernet0/0 Is Up / Line Protocol Is Down
Jan 26, 2013I was working on a problem the other day and came across something that I had seen before but never given much thought. I had a router with a switch connected to it and the interface was showing as Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is down. The problem in the end turned out to be a cable that had fell out because it was not connected correctly, but I was able to replicate this interface status on a router (FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is down), and NO cable was attached to the interface.I've had a look on the internet but cant seem to find a good answer, so does anybody else know why this status is shown on the router? Remember, NO cable is connected to the interface so it isn't a speed or duplex problem
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco :: Run An OSPF Protocol Over An ATM Connection?
Apr 25, 2013I'm trying to run an OSPF protocol over an ATM connection:
192.168.80.0 |----10.0.0.1-----------10.0.0.2----| 192.168.50.0
Cisco Firewall :: QOS By Protocol On ASA 5512-X
Apr 18, 2013I'm looking to make a possible configuration for a customer. They need a device to provide :- firewalling- bandwidth limiting based on protocols, IP, users- web content filtering- good reporting to see which device/users are consuming most of the bandwidth.I used to use cisco ASA as firewall but it's a while I last installed on and I'm nt uptodate which current state.So I thought of using an ASA 5512-X but I'd like to know if it comply with all the requirements .Most important being the reporting and bandwidth limiting capability. It would be great to have some configuration example regarding bandwidth management.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco :: BVI1 / Line Protocol Is Down?
Sep 7, 2009how to bring this interface back up? It's a 1252 with 80211.n.I started configuring it with CLI and then was using the web interface. I made a change on the web interface and it caused the AP to hang. I rebooted it and can access via Hyperterminal, but I cannot ping the IP address nor bring it up in the web interface any longer.I tried the "No shut" command in the BVI1 interface.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 2811 IOS For BGP Routing Protocol
Jul 6, 2011I am currently configuring a number of cisco 2811 routers that require the BGP exterior routing protocol, however the IOS version (12.4) currently installed does not support the bgp protocol.After entering the commands into the cisco CLI 'protocol not in this image' is returned.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: NFS Protocol Across Pix 515E
Dec 30, 2011I have a Pix 515E running PixOS version 8.0.4 with two interfaces, inside and outside.On the inside interface, I have a Redhat Enterprise Linux 5.4 64 bits machine as an NFS server version 4 (NFSv4).On the outside interface, I have three (3) Redhat Enterprise Linux 5.4 64 bits as NFS clients.I am looking for the exact UDP and TCP ports to be added to the ACL in order to accomplish
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: How To Allow Protocol 97 In PIX 515E
Oct 22, 2012What would be the access-list entry to allow protocol 97? I am setting up foreign-anchor controller and need to allow protocol 97.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: Is 1941 Supportable For BGP Protocol
Dec 28, 2011My ISP is going to provide internet with dual path , for auto changover he (isp it admin) is planing for bgp implimentation.
is 1941 is supportable for bgp protocol ? Is it possible to create bandwitdh rate limit based on ip address on access list (be cause we are getting some 10 Ip address from isp , out of 10 ip address , 3 ip addres has to go 3 diffrent departments) , i want restrict theese 3 ip address with 1 mb traffic as 1:1.
Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: ACS SE 4.2 RADIUS Protocol
Mar 28, 2013I am using the Self RADIUS server in my Cisco ACS SE 4.2 appliance S. I have an AAA client C that interacts with S by means of the RADIUS protocol. This works fine, in that S correctly carries out authentication chores on username/password (PAP and CHAP) pairs received from C, sending back to C the corresponding Access-Accept packet when the authentication succeeds, or Access-Reject when it doesn't.
I have been able to import a set of three VSAs into S. Each of those attributes is of string type. I then configured in S a single user U with password P so that, whenever a U/P pair received in S from C is authenticated by S, S should send back to C, in the Access-Accept packet, the three attributes with the following values: [code]
With this setup, when an authentication is successfully completed by S, C receives 53 bytes worth of data from S every time. I am attaching a typical example, already disassembled. I have disguised the actual vendor ID, for legal reasons, but the rest is exactly as it was when received in C.
According to the disassembly, what we got is an Access-Accept packet, as expected. Its length is 53 bytes - again as expected, for this is the only packet that C has received from S here. However, the packet is incomplete, for attribute #3 is missing its value field.
Looking into the whole packet in more detail, it can be seen that while the wire format for the first attribute, namely, Frame-IP-Address, is correctly constructed, the remaining are not. For example, the sequence of bytes corresponding to the attribute #1 reads 1a 09 00 00 xx xx 2c 61 62 63. I believe that this is incorrect; it should be 1a 0a 00 00 xx xx 2c 61 62 63, for the wire format for this attribute consists of 10, not 9, bytes. I tried a few variations on the values for the attributes, and the results are always substantially the same, in that the wire formats for these attributes are always incorrect.
This all probably implies I have done something wrong when importing the VSAs into S, and/or when configuring things on S. I am therefore attaching the csv files I used to import my VSAs into S; as before, names and vendor ID are disguised, but their lengths are exactly the same as in the undisguised file. I used two csv files: One to import the vendor ID, and the other to import the VSAs under that vendor ID. As for user U, in S's administration GUI I clicked on User Setup and selected user U, moved to the bottom of the screen, where the attributes for this particular vendor were present,introduced the values for each attribute mentioned above, and made sure that button in front of each attribute was ticked.
Internet Protocol Not Working
Jan 26, 2013I am encountering a problem with location of website i.p address and its port
[code]...
What's The Standard Protocol To Transfer R2 To SIP
Apr 19, 2011what's the standard protocol to transfer R2 to SIP?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco :: Inter Vlan Routing Protocol
Jan 31, 2013What is inter vlan routing protocol? What are its three modes?
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 2811 Showing Link Up But Protocol Down
Mar 9, 2012I'm having an issue with my Cisco 2811. The Internal FastEthernet0/1 interface is showing Link up but Protocol down. I have tried various combinations with the speed and duplex on the port and having no luck.The port connects to our Fortigate 110c router.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco :: RFC 791 Widely-used Version Of Internet Protocol
Mar 22, 2011The IP defined in RFC 791 was the first widely-used version of the Internet Protocol. Interestingly, however, it is not version 1 of IP but version 4! This would of course imply that there were earlier versions of the protocol at one point. Interestingly, however, there really weren't. As I mentioned above, IP was created when its functions were split out from an early version of TCP that combined both TCP and IP functions. TCP evolved through three earlier versions, and was split into TCP and IP for version 4. That version number was applied to both TCP and IP for consistency.url... what i wanna know s in tat underlined line its given 3 versions of TCP what r they?
View 2 Replies View Related